shared vision of infrastructure education.Mutual Engagement and Joint Enterprise: The CIT-E Community of PracticeWith funding from the National Science Foundation, civil and environmental engineering (CEE)faculty members at University of Wisconsin-Platteville and the United States Military Academyestablished the Center for Infrastructure Transformation and Education (CIT-E). CIT-E has thefollowing intended outcomes: 1. Establish and sustain the CIT as the source for infrastructure education materials that is continuously improved by a vibrant Community of Practice 2. Develop educational expertise in infrastructure topics and in pedagogy among faculty at collaborating institutions 3. Deliver, assess, and
worked closely with the facultyteaching Calculus and Physics in developing shared outcomes for all three courses. Previously,these courses were taught independent of each other and most students did not recognize theconnection between math and science and the design process. Even though group projects in thePrinciples of Design course promoted creativity and the use of systematic methods for solvingproblems, there remained a lack of understanding among the students of the linkages of calculusand introductory physics to engineering design. Working as a team, the engineering, physics,and math faculty incorporated the physics and calculus the students were learning that semesterinto the design projects. These projects were assigned in the freshman
horizontal axis steps used in the profileto carry out the curriculum development.1. Define the problem and what is needed. The faculty needed a three-year BSc curriculum which could be followed by any one of the several 2-year MSc specializations. (This 3-2 split was dictated by the Minstry of Education as a result of a European agreement, by the way.)2. Determine its design criteria. What specifically must graduates be able to do once they have their BSc or MSc diploma? The answer to this was conveyed in the above profile. An additional curriculum design requirement was that the Freshman year should convey a realistic impression of the profession being entered.3. Create conceptual solution alternatives. A completely general and
engineeringclassroom. The key components of LCs at A&M are: (1) clustering of students in commoncourses (math, engineering, science); (2) teaming; (3) active/cooperative learning; (4) industryinvolvement in the classroom; (5) technology-enhanced classrooms; (6) undergraduate peerteachers; (7) curriculum integration; (8) faculty team teaching; and (9) assessment andevaluation. Based on the experience with its pilot curricula and the experiences sinceinstitutionalization in 1998-99, A&M believes that the LCs offer a superior educationalexperience for engineering students. Development of learning communities in both the first andsecond years of the engineering curricula at Texas A&M has been described in a paper byFournier-Bonilla et. al. 5 Based on
environmental monitoring and othertechnology areas. While many applications of networked sensor systems are yet to be eventhought of, the reality is that they are being deployed today and will continue to proliferate formany years to come until they eventually become as commonplace as a typical public utility likeelectricity.This paper describes aspects of an NSF funded CCLI project (DUE 0736888), titled, “TheSensor Networks Education Project” (SNEP) that seeks to develop materials and a modelteaching laboratory that will be useful for other faculty and organizations at the two- and eventhe four-year college level to emulate. This project looks at this evolving convergence on a morepractical level and speaks to the lack of engineering technology
design and construction curriculum integration, it is importantto note traditional educational approaches in these disciplines. Design disciplines, such asarchitecture and interior design, structure their curricula around studio-based teaching which areusually 4 to 6 semester credit hours and involve more contact. Such courses are typically project-based within which a student is presented with a defined design project brief and is expected,with intense faculty guidance, to develop a design proposal. This approach is supported with anumber of lecture-based technical and non-technical classes. On the other hand, construction Page
,education, and technology have collaborated in developing in developing, delivering, andrefining workshop experiences for engineering faculty. These workshops provide both contentand process knowledge needed to develop modules that incorporate current HPL learning theory(Bransford, et al.1), integrate technology , and guide the participants in developing modules fortheir own courses.Workshops generally were constructed along the following lines: • Participants assessed their personal goals for the workshop. • Workshop leaders briefly reviewed results from previous use of HPL Legacy Cycle class lessons to establish credentials for workshop. • Workshop leaders briefly reviewed HPL theory and Legacy
AC 2012-5261: DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF MULTI-LEVEL OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR A CONSTRUCTION DE-GREE PROGRAMDr. Yilmaz Hatipkarasulu, University of Texas, San Antonio Yilmaz Hatipkarasulu holds M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in civil engineering from Louisiana State University. He is currently the Coordinator of the Construction Science and Management program at the University of Texas, San Antonio.Dr. Suat Gunhan, University of Texas, San Antonio Suat Gunhan received both his bachelor’s of architecture and master’s of science in architecture degrees from Dokuz Eylul University and a Ph.D. degree in civil engineering from Illinois Institute of Technol- ogy. He is currently an Assistant Professor at the
engineering students,and they select a major at the end of the freshman year. The first year curriculum is essentiallyidentical for all students and the Division of Engineering Fundamentals serves as their home.The Division’s 13 faculty teach the two first-year engineering classes (EF1015 and EF1016) anda variety of sophomore level programming and graphics classes. EF1015 and EF1016 are both 2credit hour courses typically offered in the fall and spring, respectively. In addition to teaching,EF faculty are the advisors of the 1200+ first year students.BackgroundUntil the fall of 2001, EF1015 topics included ethics, the engineering profession, problemsolving, programming with MatLab, statics; material balance; electricity; and energy.Traditional EF1016
Paper ID #48460Best Practices for Industry Liaisons in Engineering Design Projects: Insightsfrom Students and LiaisonsDr. Edward Latorre, University of Florida Dr. Edward Latorre is an Associate Engineer with the Department of Engineering Education at the University of Florida and the Director of the Integrated Product and Process Design (IPPD) program. His current research areas are in support of his teaching in IPPD, a multidisciplinary senior and graduate level design course sequence where student teams develop solutions for industry sponsored projects. https://www.eng.ufl.edu/eed/faculty-staff/edward-latorre
community of practice that recognizes, fosters and supports professional growtharound diversity, social justice and inclusion in the classroom. The program is a space forprofessional growth where faculty can openly discuss questions around pedagogies of inclusion,and develop and refine practices for centering equity-minded and inclusive practices in coursesacross all disciplines. The program intends to better align faculty and their classrooms with thecurrent needs of students and the broader community with regard to diversity and inclusion.Ultimately, faculty in this community examine best practice literature and engage in workshopswith an aim to develop pedagogical philosophies and approaches to teaching that decenterdominant identities
Paper ID #13811Engineering the Future Workforce Required by a Global Engineering Indus-tryDr. Michael Richey, The Boeing Company Michael Richey is an Associate Technical Fellow currently assigned to support workforce development and engineering education research. Michael is responsible for leading learning science research, which focuses on learning ecologies, complex adaptive social systems and learning curves. Michael pursues this research agenda with the goal of understanding the interplay between innovation, knowledge trans- fer and economies of scale as they are manifested in questions of growth, evolvability
students around the U.S. are facing additional challenges. The only trend infavor of AE that is revealed from the small amount of literature present specific to AE, is that30 % of AE graduates started in a different major or institution [10]. This implies that AEmajor becomes attractive after the early years into college when students may have hadexposure to internships, research, mentor or faculty, and have had some credible experiencewith engineering to decide on a major. Lowest persistence rates among all engineeringdisciplines especially in the early years could also imply that students who start in AE arebeing pushed out by their early years into an AE program. The options available to studentsleaving AE are pursuing another engineering major
construction management has been strategically improved overthe last twelve years but the effective change to accommodate sustainable topics has resulted achange in prerequisites, adoption of limited elective courses, integration, and drive of the facultyfor the students to have access to material outside of required course work.PrerequisitesInternational Sustainable Development was established as prerequisite to the upper division. Thecourse satisfies the social/behavioral science requirement. The instructor is a buildingconstruction faculty member with a research interest in high performance and low-impactconstruction. The course focus is on providing resources for the understanding human impacts,limits of design, natural capacity, and social
is a certified flight instructor in gliders (CFI-G) with over 2,000 total flying hours. He is currently a research faculty member in the ME department of George Mason University doing research on a theory of systems engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference Is It Time for a New Pedagogy for Engineering Education? George A. Hazelrigg George Mason UniversityAbstractThe activity that most distinguishes engineering from mathematics and the physical sciences is thedesign of technologically challenging devices, products and systems. But
sufficientsupport to hire a controls lab developer that assists with research deployment19. This very uniqueand successful approach requires interdepartmental coordination at a level beyond the feasibleeffort level of an individual faculty member, especially one just starting at a new institution. Page 12.1051.2This article presents a methodology employed at Penn State University starting in 2004 andcontinuing to the present employed to integrate research, graduate education, and undergraduateeducation. The situation at the start of the project was that the author, as a new faculty hire, wasfaced with the simultaneous challenge of developing a research
series of assignments and examinations which require littlemore than rote memorization or repetition. This approach may be sufficient to excite scientists,some Nobel Laureates have mentioned that one aspect of a single lecture stimulated their career;but it is not engineering. The Chemistry faculty at Rensselaer had never taught the course in thismanner. Expanding on their teaching style we were able to adopt the philosophy "Involve meand I'll not only learn but understand and remember", as we developed our course. Bloom, anoted educational specialist, identified a hierarchy of six educational levels, each higher levelbeing more rewarding4. The typical course experience as described earlier focuses on the lowerlearning levels and is not
ProjectsAbstractStudents in computer science, software engineering, and related disciplines must master a broadrange of technical knowledge, skills, tools, and processes. They must also learn to navigate,understand, and contribute to real-world code, documentation, and diverse communities ofdevelopers, users, and other stakeholders. One effective way for students to develop suchknowledge, skills, and attitudes is to participate in Humanitarian Free & Open Source Software(HFOSS) projects. Research has shown that student participation in HFOSS projects has apositive impact on student motivation to study computing and a strong positive impact onperceived learning related to software engineering [1,2]. The OpenFE and OpenPath projectsseek to help faculty and
. The students spend four days learning physicalexamination procedure through lectures and clinical sessions. During the second eight-weekperiod of the internship, students attend morning rotations in internal medicine, pediatrics,obstetrics and gynecology, surgery, intensive care, and the emergency room. Students areassigned to a clinical mentor, and observe their mentor interacting with patients, performingclinical procedures, analyzing test results, and developing treatment plans. Students keep aweekly journal in which they describe their experiences in the clinical rotations. Afternoons inthe latter eight weeks of the internship are spent working on independent research supervised bya faculty mentor. Students write a short proposal at the
virtuallysynonymous in most contexts, so “bioengineering” will be used in this article for simplicity.)Neural engineers self-identify as engineers/scientists interested in engineering challengesrelated to the brain and nervous system. It has been referred to as a “merger of engineeringand neuroscience” [1]. Many neural engineers work on clinically oriented challenges,including for example developing sensory prostheses for the deaf and blind or designingsystems to stimulate walking motion in the legs of spinal chord injury patients. But otherneural engineers are interested primarily in understanding how the brain and nervous systemwork, or are affected by disease.Although engineers and scientists have been doing this kind of work for decades, it is onlywithin
Paper ID #10843Methods and Approaches for Developing the Future Leaders of the ElectricPower and Energy IndustriesMr. Brandon M. Grainger, University of Pittsburgh Brandon M. Grainger was born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Currently, he is pursuing his Ph.D. concen- trating in power electronics, microgrids, and medium voltage DC systems at the University of Pittsburgh. Mr. Grainger has a master’s degree in electrical engineering from the University of Pittsburgh with a concentration in electric power engineering and in 2007 graduated Magna Cum Laude with a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Pitt. From August
Paper ID #32994The AGEP Engineering Alliance: A Model to Advance Historically URMPostdoctoral Scholars and Early-Career Faculty in EngineeringDr. Tammy Michelle McCoy, Georgia Institute of Technology Tammy M. McCoy is the TA Development and Future Faculty Specialist for the Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL) at the Georgia Institute of Technology. In this capacity, she works closely with graduate students and postdoctoral scholars interested in pursuing careers in college teaching through teaching assistant (TA) training and support, academic career development programs, and training and certification in
. Richardson supports center operations and staff and oversees the operations of several preparing future faculty programs, such as Academy for Future Faculty and Graduate Teaching Consultant. She also leads the Teaching Assistant Institute, a professional development experience for new Teaching Assistants. Dr. Richardson also serves as a campus representative for the nationally recognized Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL). Dr. Richardson is devoted to the development of a national faculty committed to advancing effective teaching practices in science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics. Her diverse teaching and research experiences, which span over two decades, have helped her
theoretical background of I&M, while thepractical applications are part of a general technical education. The faculty and staff ofthe Center for Advanced Technologies (CAT) at FH are collaborating for this project.Planned major project activities include enhancing the I&M curriculum and setting up anindustrial-based I&M laboratory at FH and WSU-DET. The support will be from the twoinstitutions and possible educational grants.2. Project Aim, Motivating Rationale• Develop a new structure for the I&M courses at WSU-DET and FH utilizing a newlydeveloped and implemented distributed/cooperative laboratory, to perform real industrialmeasurements in an actual industrial environment. The course structure, incorporatingactual industrial
Copyright ©2003, American Society for Engineering EducationEngineering and Chemistry with a Director who is a member of the faculty in the Departmentof Chemical Engineering. The primary areas of involvement include (but not limited to):• Freshman Engineering Design modules adopted by faculty for use in secondary level student programs.• Engineering faculty providing professional development programs for secondary grade level teachers.• Pre-College programs designed specifically for engineering disciplines.• Engineering graduate students assigned as GA’s for professional development of teachers and providing lessons for school children (Science Outreach Program).• Competitions in engineering and science subjects hosted by NJIT, with the
component of construction managementeducation [5, 6]. The faculty believed that an industry-university partnership with the NAHBwould greatly enhance the RSCM course offerings. A long-term working relationship has beenmaintained with NAHB through their Student Chapter and its involvement with the annualNAHB Student Competitions. The advancement goal of this partnership was to facilitate facultyand student professional development as well as to incorporate a nationally recognized industryprofessional designation program into the RSCM area of concentration. It was also the goal ofthis BCM / NAHB collaboration to become a model for university residential constructioneducation programs. This program could be replicated at peer institutions, therefore
it? For Cloud skills, for example, one reason why mightbe the focused silo style instruction of Information Technology (IT) and OperationalTechnology (OT) in technician preparation programs. If the faculty in thesegroupings do not interact, then developing Standards on skill intersections will bedifficult to accomplish. However, a more fundamental reason might be that it isunclear what IT technician skills belong in an OT technician’s environment.Caucus interactions with manufacturing participants about what IT skills are needs intheir operational environment produced a broad range of responses. The skillexpectations for manufacturing technicians depended on their overall technicalknowledge and experience with the OT processes. This status
Problems and Solutions in Internationalizing Capstone Design Yuyi Lin, Donald Harby Dong Jang Zhonghe Ye University of Missouri Seoul National Fuzhou University Columbia, MO 65211 University of China LinY@missouri.edu Technology, KoreaAbstractABET is authoritative in US. However, engineers who graduate from an ABET accreditedcurriculum may not meet expectations in a global environment such as working in an Asiancountry. Through discussion with collaborating faculty members in 2-year and 4-year UScolleges, and in two Asian universities, this paper first attempts to recognize
Ralph R. Teetor Educational Award as well as the 1993 ASEE Dow Outstanding Young Faculty Award. His 1995 ASEE Annual Conference paper was selected as a best paper of session. Professor Renken is a member of ASEE, ASME, AARST, AIAA, ASHRAE, CRCPD, SAE, Sigma Xi, and Tau Beta Pi. He was also selected for inclusion in the 2001-2002 Millennium Edition of Lexington WHO'S WHO. Dr. Renken received his B.S. (1983), M.S., (1985) and Ph.D. (1987) in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Chicago. Page 11.475.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 DEVELOPMENT OF EXPERIMENTAL
Malaysia is a good location for this type of program is the abilityof much of the population to communicate in English. This is especially true in the KualaLumpur area where the students will be studying. The official language is Malay; however mostof the population is fluent in English.University of Kuala LumpurUniversity of Kuala Lumpur (UniKL), Malaysia’s first technical university is a private institutionof higher learning licensed by the Ministry of Education and managed by Universiti TeknikalMARA Sdn. Bhd. Based on its seven specialized campuses and five faculties at the Chancelleryin Kuala Lumpur, UNIKL has roots that go back well into the early years of the 1950’s with theestablishment of Rural Development Authority (RIDA). This was aimed