-Learning based Engineering Programs: A Cross- Cultural Exploratory and Comparative Case Study in India and the USAAbstractReflection is one of the pedagogical components which differentiates service-learning fromcommunity service and makes student learning authentic. Reflections have been studied widelywithin the U.S.; however, it is relatively new in India and less investigated. This paper is anexploratory case study between three institutions from two countries.The first program is a design-based engineering program that uses the service-learning pedagogyat a large midwestern university in the U.S.. Students reflect individually on a weekly basis andsubmit a final reflection at the end of the semester. The second program is part of a
fair, and a grading system that provides positive motivation for learning without lowering standards.• Deal effectively with a variety of common classroom management and other student-related problems.• Identify problems associated with the teaching profession having to do with time management, starting and maintaining research programs, and assessing and improving teaching, and formulate plans to overcome these problems.The above objectives were covered in the workshop with suitable examples and demonstrations,which had long lasting effect on all who attended the workshop. Demonstrations and interactiveexamples made learning enjoyable and time speed by.More details of that workshop may be found by other sources2, 7, 9
Paper ID #38277Assessment and Support of Advisor-Student Mentoring for GraduateEngineering Students at a Land-Grant InstitutionRachel Elisabeth Gehr, Purdue University Rachel is an NSF Graduate Research Fellow pursuing her PhD in Engineering Education at Purdue Uni- versity. She has earned a BS in Civil Engineering from LeTourneau University and MS in Environmental Engineering from Purdue. Rachel’s current research focuses on fair assessments and evaluation in engi- neering, but she also has experience in photochemistry, water quality, PFAS remediation, and disinfection. In her free time, Rachel enjoys kayaking, hiking
education.The NFDM is constructed in an adaptable manner such that it can be applied across variousdomains and organizational structures. The NFDM model is made up of an organizing committeeand a performance feedback loop of the key program elements.There are three key program elements of the NFDM to support new faculty mentoring: peermentoring groups, mentor-mentee relationships and workshops. Peer mentoring groups areformative communities of groups with like interest. These groups are typically made up of twoor more people of equal status and can vary from a small group to a large network. However, atAFIT, the groups may vary in military rank status and are composed of eight or less facultymembers. These groups may discuss strategies to include new
assistant at Arizona State University. She is a second year student in the Educational Policy and Evaluation program. Her research interests focus on higher education access, equity, and inclusion.Prof. Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause is professor in the Materials Science Program in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge
Paper ID #14704Graduate Summer Bridge Program: Building Community and Preparednessfor Success among Engineering Graduate StudentsDr. Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Tech Dr. Amelink is Director of Graduate Programs and Assessment in the College of Engineering, Virginia Tech. She is also an affiliate faculty member in the Departments of Engineering Education and Educa- tional Leadership and Policy Studies at Virginia Tech.Mr. Benjamin David Lutz, Virginia Tech Ben Lutz is a PhD student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His research interests include design teaching and learning, mentoring in
courses (such as foundational mathematics and/or science courses) [7],resulting in an undesirably large number of students that fail or drop out [8]. This is certainly trueat the University of Louisville’s J.B. Speed School of Engineering (SSoE) college, in whichengineering-based mathematics courses are taught “in-house” during the first two years ofundergraduate engineering programs. Several studies [e.g. 2] have shown that the challengesfaced within this math sequence are driving factors in SSoE attrition. While SSoE has madeconsiderable effort to improve these courses to enhance student success, the fact remains thatmany students find them quite difficult and, on occasion, overwhelmingly challenging. Apotential remedy for this issue is the
by the second cohort (N=9) in Fall 2022.Our methods included analyzing both qualitative and quantitative data from 2021 to 2024,using tools like the e-journal submissions, focus groups and survey tools that includedStudent Attitudes toward STEM survey (S-STEM), the Mindset Assessment Profile (MAP), andthe Grit scale in both fall and spring semesters. The MAP evaluates a student's growth orfixed mindset, while Grit assesses their passion and persistence in achieving long-termobjectives. We predict that students with higher grit and mindset scores will display morefavorable attitudes toward science and mathematics.Preliminary results show that students' mindset scores remained relatively unchangedthroughout the program. However, grit scores
a more effective quiz than thecontrol group. Since the overall number of independent reviews was small, a t-test was used.The t-test assumes a normal distribution and provides the probability of the null hypothesis thatthe means of data points are statistically equivalent. The two-sided t-test p-value in Table 2suggests there is greater than an 80% chance that the data measured could be significant. Proceedings of the 2010 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 12 Table 1. Independent reviewers’ assessment results for assessment form domain
learning from the labs, reinforce key engineering concepts, and synthesize their technicalknowledge through practical application [2]. At the same time, lab writing exercises supportstudents in becoming effective communicators by engaging them in purposeful documentationfor a technical audience [3]. For this reason, lab reports are often used to assess ABET’sengineering student learning outcomes 3 and 6 [4] in many engineering programs. Although labreports are one of the predominant tools for evaluating engineering students’ achievement inexperimentation and communication skills, assessing lab reports is challenging for engineeringeducators. Lab report graders must accurately and precisely assess the student’s achievement invarious aspects while
curiosity was added into this revised program, using Kashdan’s Five-DimensionalCuriosity Scale [10] in a pre- and post-course survey. Questions from the survey are given in theAppendix.Curriculum MappingA curriculum map was then created to ensure alignment between the three key pedagogicalstrategies and the curiosity assessment, shown in Table 1. Each key strategy maps to multiplecuriosity dimensions.Multidisciplinary Teams: Align to Deprivation Sensitivity, Stress Tolerance, and Thrill Seeking.For Deprivation Sensitivity, we give students an opportunity to practice dealing with ambiguity.The first six weeks of the semester we give students team-based entrepreneurial mindset mini-design challenges that intentionally force them to solve problems
the semester. A formative assessment was carried out long before the class began. The developers ofthe software used similar steps as described for media development in previous sections of thispaper. The goal of the software was to supplement the lecture with interactive problems. Thecontext was a media based software program that would be run on computers networked withinthe university. The learner variables were freshmen to sophomore engineering students withsome computer experience, but very little experience in statics. These factors were used toassess the usefulness of the software before bringing it into the classroom. The summative assessment is an example of the Applied Level 1. The software was usedin a classroom
in manufacturing and industrial resources toreduce the environmental impact of their produced products and services. Greenmanufacturing is an emerging field in recent years and is also the sustainabledevelopment model for modern manufacturing industries. Sustainable greenmanufacturing encompasses the concept of combining technical issues of design andmanufacturing, energy conservation, pollution prevention, health and safety ofcommunities and consumers. The goal of this paper is to assess the current graduateengineering technology online program curriculum at Drexel University (DU) withregard to sustainable and green manufacturing predominantly metal working basedmanufacturing curriculum. In this paper we will discuss key environmental
Management at Florida International University. During her master’s program, she has been working as a Graduate Research Assistant at Moss School of Construction Management, researching various topics related to sustainable infrastructures, pre-project planning, and aiding STEM majors to assess their pedagogical needs.Mr. Piyush Pradhananga, Florida International University Piyush grew up in Kathmandu, Nepal. Following college graduation in 2016 from Tribhuwan University (TU) in Kathmandu, he worked for a leading real estate corporation of Nepal on a project worth over ten million USD. He then joined a Research firm based in London where he worked as Engineering Graduate Researcher. Piyush now is a Ph.D. Candidate at
found that while developing and implementing an undergraduateengineering MEA that they went through similar developmental cycles that students go throughto create models for the problem.Paper Airplane MEAAn instructional and assessment tool in the form of a task model was developed for the PaperAirplane MEA. This MEA was initially designed to have students understand the concept of dragin Purdue University’s graduate program for aeronautical engineering.10 For the work of thispaper the MEA was adapted to be used for high school classes.The Paper Airplane MEA begins with an article for students to understand the context and theclient for whom they will work. The article describes several problems that occurred last year ata paper airplane
universities. He is a voice for collaboration and posts regularly at www.creightoncollaborative.com. Sean holds degrees from Marist College and New York University, and earned his PhD from Antioch University. He lives in the charming village of Yellow Springs with his wife, Leslee, and his five fun children, Liam, Maya, Quinn, Audrey, and Juliette.Ms. Maggie Varga, SOCHE Maggie Varga, Director, Southwestern Ohio Council for Higher Education (SOCHE) Maggie Varga is a Director for the Southwestern Ohio Council for Higher Education (SOCHE). In her capacity as Director, Maggie leads the SOCHEIntern Program, which employs nearly 300 students an- nually in cooperation with local government and small businesses, as well as the Air
in an Undergraduate Transfer ProgramIntroduction The Student Pathways in Engineering and Computing for Transfers (SPECTRA) programis an NSF-STEM that supports high-achieving low-income students who intend to transfer froma technical college to Clemson University, a large R1 institution, and pursue engineering orcomputing degrees. The three goals of the program are as follows: (1) provide scholarshipopportunities to low-income students pursuing engineering or computing at Clemson, (2) buildcohorts of transfer students to support their transition into Clemson University, (3) assess itsprogress internally and externally to assist the transfer students and improve the program Having support at a community college, such as through a
beendecreasing over the last few decades, a large gap persists in engineering; with women earningonly 19.8% of undergraduate degrees and women of color earning less than 3%. One successfulSTEM intervention is a program based out of a natural history museum in a large urban city.This program trains and mentors a select group of urban high school women (100% low-income:85% under-represented minorities) through a curated curriculum in the first year, followed bypersistent mentorship by a scientist for the last three years of high school. The alumnae of theprogram all graduate high school, with 97% attending college (as opposed to 51% of womenwho graduate from the local school district), and 89% earning a 4-year degree, of which 54% arein STEM (vs. 1% of
Paper ID #46492GIFTS: Integration of Real-World Case Studies into a First-Year EngineeringMathematics CourseDr. Joan Tisdale, University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Joany Tisdale is a Teaching Assistant Professor for the Integrated Design Engineering program. Joany earned a MS degree in Mechanical Engineering from MIT and a Bachelor’s degree in Aerospace Engineering from Auburn University. She has a PhD in Civil Engineering with a Civil Systems focus and a certificate in Global Engineering from CU Boulder. Her research primarily investigates sustainability integration into engineering curricula. Before going into academia, she
, qualified students from diverse backgrounds within the State of Michigan who would benefit from entering the engineering field. (OE)2 provides personal assistance with proposals, planning, and implementation; facilitates assessment and evaluation of research-based programs; coordinates with other groups across campus; and explores collaboration opportunities with other groups. This support is ongoing, grounded in the engineering research efforts of the College, to develop lasting relationships that increase public awareness regarding the importance and integrative nature of engineering. With partners in education, (OE)2 helps create original and unique programs or
professoriate, and impact on envisioning a successful career at the hosting university.This study will compare our future faculty development program with outcomes from otherfuture faculty programs with intention to develop a conceptual framework to evaluateprogrammatic strategies with the targeted audiences.IntroductionWith the increasing number of PhDs, the competitiveness of faculty positions increases, andavailability of faculty positions decreases. Furthermore, with the competitiveness and decreasein availability, we have yet to see significant increases in URM faculty within STEMdepartments. In general, we still have low matriculation into and retention of URM in STEMfields. In 2018, a review was published stating “despite large numerical
Education in the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering. His work contains a unique blend of engineering education and civil engineering projects. Dr. Perry’s current work centers on understanding how students transfer their knowledge between engi- neering school and work. This is supplemented by his role in developing assessment techniques for two NSF-funded projects focused on the incorporation of virtual and mixed reality technology into civil engi- neering education. In addition, his past civil engineering research investigated the behavior of wood shear wall structures under seismic loading conditions. Dr. Perry’s expertise in both the engineering education and civil engineering domains provide him with
industry [5], such as teamwork and communicationskills. Once the EC2000 criteria were instituted, US engineering institutions began to implementit, and large changes swept through the undergraduate curriculum [5].The impacts of EC2000 have been significant. In a study that assessed graduates from beforeEC2000 and after, graduates in 2004 were shown to be better prepared in all nine outcomes thatwere assessed compared to graduates in 1994, especially in understanding societal and globalissues, ability to apply engineering skills, teamwork skills, and understanding of ethics andprofessional issues [6]. This was attributed to the fact that “improvements in student learninghave indeed resulted from changes in engineering program curricula, teaching
content and application of STEMknowledge in these disciplines. While many challenges to recruitment and retention are shared,Roberts, Kassianidou and Irani (2002) suggest that there are “more specific problems that seemunique to or particularly pronounced” in computing disciplines, including huge variance in pre-college computing experience by gender and the ease in which social biases can be incorporatedinto the design of computing systems (p. 85).4However, transformative models for changing the face of engineering and of computingdisciplines, specifically, already exist. This paper describes and analyzes one such model – aninnovative “liberal studies in engineering” (LSE) program at a large state university inCalifornia, Comprehensive
Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director for the Engineering Plus program. She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where students learned about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in en- gineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and
engineering degree programs to Southern Polytechnic in 2007 and 2008. Crimm has been a professor at Southern Polytechnic since 1997, serving in a multitude of roles as he continually seeks to savor the joys of teaching and learning from faculty, staff, and students. Crimm earned his undergraduate and graduate degrees in Electrical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology and is also a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Georgia having been recognized by this GSPE organization in 2019 as the overall ”Engineer of the Year” among the several highly competitive categories such as Education, Private Practice, Industry, Government, etc.Charles Richard Kennedy, Kennesaw State University Charles (Richard
definition highlights the depth and complexity of successful mentoring. After a close review of theliterature, we opted for sticking to [31]’s identification of 4 latent variables that were validated by [32] in 2009 forthe College Student Mentoring Scale. The variables underlying the mentor-protégé relationship at the collegiatelevel involve (a) Psychological and Emotional support, (b) Degree and Career Support, (c) Academic SubjectKnowledge Support, and (d) the Existence of a Role Model. While more testing is needed to validate theseconstructs in a variety of settings, it provides an important starting point for a contextually sensitive mentoringstudy. A definition with this level of theoretical specificity can be helpful for assessing program
-test have been found to be robust to normality violations[14]. Based on the pre-post data as seen in Table III, undergraduates who participated in theNHERI REU program demonstrated a statistically significant increase in difference of researchself-efficacy from their pre- to post-assessment with a large effect size for all but Q4 and Q22which were medium effect size [15]. The effect size (Cohens d) can be interpreted on a range:small (d = 0.2), medium (d = 0.5), and large (d = 0.8) [15]. TABLE III RESEARCH SELF-EFFICACY QUESTIONS AND RESULTSQuestion Mean Standard t df Sig. Cohens Deviation
research at the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED), both at Virginia Tech. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023A Comparative Analysis of Support Perceptions between Transfer and First- Time-in-College Students in Engineering, Science, and Mathematics ProgramsIntroductionAn important mechanism for retaining engineering students is offering support programs at thecollege level, which includes, for example, formal structures such as living-learning communitiesas well as both formal or informal opportunities for mentoring by faculty and peers. However,traditional student retention theories concentrate primarily on the institutional level [1]–[5]. TheSTEM
quite useful only for the ME program with a large number of mixed ability studentsas the other two programs were too small and too uniform in performance level to produce much.With the overall correlation diagrams, lecturers of individual courses can use the data to directtheir lines of communication to appropriate upstream and downstream courses. Using the finalgrade as the main indicator, it was found that the courses in the 3rd to 5th semesters, particularlythe mechanics, mathematics and basic design courses, affected the overall performances morethan others.AcknowledgementsThis study would not have been possible without help from the Assc. Prof. Mana Sriyudthsak,Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Ms Duangta Bicokesoong, Registration