Chemical and Biological Engineering at the University of Colorado at Boulder. Matthew’s research in education focuses on methods that assess and increase innovation in product design, and his laboratory research seeks to understand and treat the airway dehydration present in patients with Cystic Fibrosis through mathematical modeling, rheological analysis, and systems engineering principles.Golnaz Arastoopour Irgens, University of Wisconsin, Madison Before becoming interested in education, Golnaz studied Mechanical Engineering at the University of Illi- nois at Urbana-Champaign with a minor in Spanish. While earning her Bachelor’s degree in engineering, she worked as a computer science instructor at Campus Middle School
as a Black faculty, student, or staff member in the college of engineering at thefocal institution. A total of 15 to 20 participants will be interviewed. We expect interviews to lastapproximately 60-minutes. Participants will be compensated for their time with a $50 gift cardcode. All interviews will be audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts will beanalyzed by thematic analysis [6]. IRB approval has been received and interview participants arebeing recruited. Interviews are expected to continue for the summer and fall semesters of 2022.Interview ProtocolThe interview protocol was designed to understand participants’ perceptions of engineeringculture and language. The interview protocol asks participants about their experiences
foundation in a STEM field can open the doors to a variety ofexciting career options.Laboratory ProceduresThe biodesign instruction is complemented by hands-on, laboratory activities, which are criticalin getting the students excited about STEM and biomedical engineering. The lab sessions givestudents opportunities to design, build, test and refine their project efforts. The students typicallybegin our program with very little experience building biomedical devices. To get the studentsstarted and to establish their confidence in the lab, the first set of sessions involve a series ofwell-defined laboratory activities to enhance the students’ understanding of their biomedicalproblems of interest. The lab sessions take place in the afternoons on
theopportunity to practice engineering design skills. Entrepreneurship programs, in the form ofcertificate programs and minors, as well as stand-alone courses, have been initiated in manyuniversities and colleges across the country.Both entrepreneurship and engineering design are being studied extensively by engineeringeducation researchers. As the study of these domains develops, researchers need to define thegoals and objectives of these disciplines and build pedagogical models to guide instructionalpractice, a point that Fiet and Mars made about the state of entrepreneurship education.4, 5 Part ofdeveloping pedagogical models of a domain includes understanding faculty beliefs andperceptions about that domain. Educational research has long supported a
associations among the key themes of themore complete underlying models used to represent the system being envisioned and developed.These benefits have led to the development of many new canvases with some expressly createdfor design courses in engineering education settings.A model-based approach for understanding and developing canvases has recently been presented(Tranquillo et al., 2016). This approach notes that canvases are high level representations ofunderlying complex systems. As alluded to above, these complex systems can be businessmodels, but they can also be products, devices, or manufacturing and supply systems. Briefly, acanvas is constructed by selecting interrelated elements of system models that represent theunderlying real systems
teams.References: 1. D. W. Knight, L. E. Carlson, and J. F. Sullivan. "Improving engineering student retention through hands-on, team-based, first-year design projects." in Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Engineering Education, Honolulu, HI, 2007. 2. B. N. Geisinger, and D. R. Raman, "Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors" Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Publications. 607, 2013. Available: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_pubs/607 [Accessed Oct. 4, 2018] 3. E. Seymour and N. Hewitt, Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997. 4. M. Besterfield-Sacre, C. J. Atman and L. J. Shuman, “Characteristics of
Learning How Engineering Design and Construction Differ Between CulturesThe students discovered and came to appreciate that engineering design and construction is notdone the same way in all cultures (Table 5). All three team members from RHIT indicated thatthe most frustrating part of the project was trying to get information needed to perform thedesign: site data, preferred construction methods, and social norms that might impact designchoices. One student pointed out “It was important for us to try and understand how the localresidents would use our design solutions and then pick the solutions that would be mostsustainable for them. In many cases, the design solutions varied greatly from the solutions wewould have chosen if we were designing
experience. Specifically, this paper utilizes Leximancer (natural language analytics software) to perform comparative analysis of student reflections and authoritative literature to identify themes within the student reflections that overlap with the entrepreneurship and design knowledge base. The outcomes of this research will inform educators as to the utility of designbased immersive learning experiences in blending engineering design and entrepreneurship. Methods There are several surveybased methods for tracking mindsets. There are instruments to measure attitudes toward, and interest in, entrepreneurship education (DuvalCouetil et al., 2012); a propensity for creativity and innovativeness (Ragusa, 2011); an understanding of innovation
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Teaching Fundamental Design Principles Through Integration of Knowledge and Curriculum DesignIntroductionCurriculum integration is “a way of thinking about what schools are for, about the sources ofcurriculum, and about the uses of knowledge” [1]. Curriculum integration requires, and should bebased on, deep thinking and understanding of the problem [2,3]. In the current system of education,the problem is not about the discipline of knowledge but with the approach and the representationof that knowledge in a way that satisfies a broad population of customers. Are students able toimplement and apply the knowledge they learn in school to solve real-life problems
lecturers could refer to and helpintegrate throughout the lectures and sessions to positively reinforce and provide relevantexamples of how these themes were/are used in real projects (Fig. 6). The human Arrogance is the Understand the Failure is not an mind – use it enemy of creativity mechanisms of option…it’s a failure requirement Pan out and zoom in Allow ideas time to Everyone is creative during the design incubate processFigure 6. – Innovative Engineering Design thematic icons.The
confrontclimate change and design climate resilient systems, as well as help in “restructure[ing] theenergy system and related infrastructure into a system that is sustainable, affordable, reliable, andjust” [2, p. 740].Tackling issues like climate change requires an interdisciplinary understanding. It is not just anenvironmental challenge; it intersects with issues of equity, justice, and global development.Recent studies indicate that engineering students may not fully grasp the significance of non-technical aspects related to climate change and how these aspects relate to their engineering work[3, 4]. Moreover, engineering students often fail to bridge the gap between the technical aspectsof engineering and its social dimensions [5, 6]. Recognizing
sustainabilityduring the planning and design phases of construction projects [16]. However, research on CMstudents' current understanding of infrastructure disparities is limited within the currentliterature. By utilizing the Envision sustainability rating system, instructors may teach studentshow to better understand these concerns and how to address them as engineers. As the nation'sfuture workforce is made up of diverse students, the resolution process should start with them inorder to build equitable, sustainable, and effective infrastructures.To this end, the Envision rating system is briefly described in the following section.The Envision™ Rating SystemThe Envision rating system provides a structured framework to evaluate sustainabilityrequirements for
. We seek to understand, and consequently improve,engineering design teaching and learning, through transformations of practice that are based onengineering education research.Design teaching and learningChallenges in teaching design exist due to difficulties in framing design problems, recognizingwhat expertise students possess, and assessing their expertise to help them reach their goals. Inproject-based learning (PBL), for example, Dym, et al (2005) proposed the questions related toissues of authenticity and assessment. In one of the questions about “proportions of problems”they shed light on the “problem solving” as one of the key characteristics in design thinking,teaching and learning. According to Jonassen (2000), “Instructional-design
Conceptual Framework failure experiences in elementaryA central part engineering problem-solving is experiencing The overarching theoretical framework that guides the engineering contexts?struggle, or uncomfortable moments where a designed proposed research work is a situative learning framework.solution is not working as it was intended. This study Johri and Olds summarize a situative framework as having,examines what these experiences look like for young “a central aim… to understand learning as situated in
mean std. dev. mean std. dev. Number Product/Industrial designers must understand mathematics and physics 1 3.76 0.72 3.33 0.91 and how to apply them to the design process. Mechanical engineers are creative in 2 the same way that product designers 3.44 0.84 2.67 1.28 are. Mechanical engineers must be skilled 3 4.16 0.85 3.9 0.89 at building models and prototyping. Product/Industrial designers must be
2004-1736 Studying the Engineering Student Experience: Design of a Longitudinal Study Sheri Sheppard, Cynthia Atman, Reed Stevens, Lorraine Fleming, Ruth Streveler, Robin Adams, Theresa Barker Stanford University/University of Washington/ University of Washington/ Howard University/Colorado School of Mines/University of Washington/ University of WashingtonAbstractThere is a need to study how students become engineers, and how they learn engineering anddesign concepts. The Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE) isconducting critical research in
Year.Dr. Jennifer Mueller Price, Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyDr. Michael Robinson P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Page 25.1504.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 “It’s Just Good Engineering” – One Case of Curricular Evolution of Sustainable DesignAbstractLike most all civil engineering programs, elements of sustainable design have been a part of thelearning in Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology’s (RHIT) Department of Civil Engineering forscores of years. However, modern sustainable design principles were first evident in
in their programrequirements. The study assessed the impact on student confidence in using these tools beforeand after the course, aiming to better understand their experiences and create course materialsthat more accurately reflect the challenges of aerospace engineering design. A backwards designapproach was employed in the development of the modules, and a thematic analysis wasconducted on student reflections. The analysis underscored the importance of challengingprojects supplemented with supporting modules in gaining insights into engineering design toolsfor aircraft design.IntroductionWith the fast and ever-changing growth in the aerospace industry, it is necessary to meet thedemands of the industry with individuals who are capable of
Bell Helicopter for seven years, earning airplane and helicopter private pilot ratings. She has a Professional Engineer license in Texas in Thermal/Fluid Systems. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Mapping Design Processes to Practicing Engineers’ Perceptions of Uncertainty in Aerospace Design Student PaperAbstractUncertainty is an unavoidable aspect of design. We discovered there are many different types ofuncertainty in complex systems, however these can be condensed into a few categories.Significant research exists on epistemic uncertainty, but proper understanding and managementof other forms of uncertainty are less
© American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Recognition of Design Failure by Fourth Grade Students During an Engineering Design Challenge (Fundamental)AbstractThe practice of persisting and learning from design failures is essential to engineering design andoffers unique ways of knowing and learning for K-12 students. To understand how studentsengage in the practice of persisting and learning from design failures, we must first understandhow, if at all, they recognize that a design failure has occurred. We studied a classroom of fourthgrade students engaged in an engineering design challenge and examined the ways in whichdesign failure occurred and
AC 2009-545: DESIGNING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL INITIATIVES FORGRANT PROPOSALSDonna Llewellyn, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Donna C. Llewellyn is the Director of the Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL)at Georgia Tech. Donna received her B.A. in Mathematics from Swarthmore College, her M.S. in Operations Research from Stanford University, and her Ph.D. in Operations Research from Cornell University. After working as a faculty member in the School of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Georgia Tech, she changed career paths to lead CETL where she works with faculty, instructors, and graduate students to help them teach effectively so that our students can
engineering solution to meet customer requirements.Lab 5 CMOS and BJT. The original lab was design to help students understand the performanceand characteristics of CMOS and BJT technology. The title of this lab is changed to “whichtechnology could be used in Artificial Intelligence, BJT or CMOS?”To build an entrepreneurial mindset, the following EML objectives are added: • Demonstrate constant curiosity about our changing world. • Integrate information from many sources to gain insight. • Identify unexpected opportunities to create extraordinary value. • Persist through and learn from failure.The authors added the following content in the project description:Artificial Intelligence (AI) will change the world. And it should continue
four distractors and generally out-performed the second-year andthird-year students. This result seems to support the hypothesis that students are generallylearning the taught engineering design process in their first year but begin to forget the specificsin later years without any formal coverage of the design process in any courses taken duringthose years.To better understand the students’ general ability to recollect the steps in the design process, asimilar dataset was created by providing students credit for identifying the correct step +/- 1 spot.Students were marked correct if they were able to accurately identify a step in the engineeringdesign process, and listed that step in either the appropriate order, or off by only one spot
teaching Introduction to Infrastructure and Infrastructure and Society, he teaches a variety of courses in structural analysis and design. He professional background is in reinforced concrete behavior and design, but he has a research interest in engineering education, student retention, and best advising practices.Dr. Philip J. Parker P.E., University of Wisconsin, PlattevilleProf. Barb A. Barnet, University of Wisconsin, Platteville Barb Barnet has a Ph.D. in statistics from Iowa State University. She is currently Chair of the Mathematics Department at UW, Platteville. Page 25.832.1
. Exhibit 5: Project stagesThe product innovation of the identified product would be based on any of the followingquestions (not limited to) • How can we reach our customers more effectively? • How do we make our service more affordable for a larger customer segment? o It could be based on material selection / structural change etc. • Is our product easy to use? If not, how can the product be modified to be ergonomic? What issues are clients facing with delivery?During the first stage, it is pretty much on understanding and finding the sources of Innovationand strategy as simple rules. Engineering design plays a role in creating a flawless design thatwould suit the customers. In these stages, the discussion is also done on how
AC 2010-1861: LINKING SENIOR DESIGN PROJECTS TO RESEARCHPROJECTSEvan Lemley, University of Central OklahomaBaha Jassemnejad, University of Central OklahomaMatthew Mounce, US NavyJamie Weber, ParsonsSudarshan Rai, UnknownWilly Duffle, University of Central OklahomaJesse Haubrich, University of Central OklahomaBahman Taheri, Alphamicron Page 15.845.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 LINKING SENIOR DESIGN PROJECTS TO RESEARCH PROJECTSAbstractSenior design projects form an important capstone for most engineering disciplines and mustconsist of the realistic application of the engineering design process. Some senior engineeringstudents
Paper ID #6408Assessing Student Design Work in Social Entrepreneurship ProjectsLindsey Anne Nelson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Lindsey Nelson is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her work centers upon helping engineering students connect meaningfully with global problems. She received her BS in Me- chanical Engineering from Boston University and her MA in Poverty and Development from the In- stitute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex. Her research interests include engineering design for poverty alleviation, sustainable design, the public’s understanding of engineering
’ Design Process Concept MapsIntroductionIn our ongoing exploration of this EAGER EEC NSF-funded project, we share results of thedesign concept maps part of our research project. This paper is intended to share formativedevelopment of a coding scheme to assess and evaluate drawings by undergraduate engineeringstudents of their engineering design process. There is a spectrum of student responses anddeveloping a taxonomy, or categorization, is helpful to better understand where students beginand end from a design project learning experience. This can then inform and illustrate the waysin which students balance breadth and depth and learn and apply their engineering know how.Design may appear throughout a curriculum or be substantiated as a capstone
. Thomason’s SketchUp rendering of the tiny home.Implementation in K-12 Classroom From the Summer 2022 cohort, Smalls had his Junior High School students participate ina tiny home building challenge focusing on the Engineering Design Process. The lesson beganby looking at the three pillars of sustainability and comparing them with environmentallyfriendly perspectives. This was a great start to help the students understand how they are similarbut also different. Afterward, they discussed the tiny home craze that is spreading in homeconstruction and then worked in groups to create an environmentally friendly tiny home designwhile staying on budget. This lesson allowed Smalls the opportunity to incorporate his learningabout sustainability into his
-design content knowledge and instructional skills ofteachers. Upon completion of professional development training through T2I2, teacherswill have been exposed to a representative portion of National Board Certification (NBC)requirements. NBC has many advantages such as expansion of teacher expertise andinfluence, and increased portability and salary potential. A focal emphasis is creatingdynamic learning environments for students to improve competency in engineering-design content through enhanced teacher practices and knowledge. In addition toadvancing student subject knowledge, creating dynamic learning environments includesusing validated assessment techniques to understand student needs, constructing mutualand supportive classroom