Session 3453 Assessing the Effectiveness of a Project-Based Laboratory Manual for a C Programming Course Kristine K. Craven Tennessee Technological UniversityAbstract Programming for Engineers, Basic Engineering (BE) 1120, is a first-year course atTennessee Technological University that is taught in a lecture/laboratory format. Traditionally thelaboratory manual has been comprised of unrelated randomly selected exercises chosen mainlyfrom the homework sections of the course textbook. A new project-based laboratory manual hasbeen
an opportunity in the first semester to explore allfour of the disciplines taught at Rowan (Electrical & Computer, Civil & Environmental,Mechanical, and Chemical) while learning about engineering measurement techniques. Thenthat same year in the second semester the principles of design are introduced through the use ofan experience in competitive assessment. Small groups of students work on the investigation ofa single product during the full semester. Along the way they are introduced to new analysistechniques and computer tools while learning in a “hands-on / minds-on” method themultidisciplinary nature of product design. By the sophomore year these students are ready forthe next stage – actual design assignments in a well
entrepreneurship courses to undertake work at a higher level.Business Basics for Engineers and Scientists is a new graduate course developed to address theproblem of differing knowledge levels and the problem of multiple background courses. It isnot an entrepreneurship course, so entrepreneurship texts were avoided, but it is a course thatengineering and science graduate students can learn from to help prepare them forentrepreneurship courses or for more general business understanding. Through a combination ofpractical books, articles, notes, cases, and guest speakers, the course introduces students toimportant theory and practice in three primary areas: organization and leadership, marketing, andaccounting and finance. The paper not only describes the
AC 2005-552: USING ELECTRONIC PORTFOLIOS IN A LARGE ENGINEERINGPROGRAMG.T. Adel,G.V. Loganathan,J. Muffo,Jr., O.Hayden Griffin,Kumar Mallikarjunan, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityM. L. Wolfe,Marie Paretti, Virginia TechT.M. Wildman,Tamara Knott, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityVinod Lohani, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Page 10.1407.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2005 Using Electronic Portfolios in a Large Engineering Program T. W. Knott, V. K. Lohani, G.V. Loganathan G. T. Adel, M.L. Wolfe, M. C. Paretti, K. Mallikarjunan
involved. The hope was to acquireadditional funding and equipment through the awarding of these grants. It is basically like thelottery. Without an application there is no way to be awarded a grant. But with an application,everything is possible.A number of professional societies were investigated to determine if they offered any grantopportunities that might be applicable. After considerable research a number of suitableprospects were discovered. Then the real work began. Writing the proposal is a very difficult andtime consuming process. The wording must express exactly what activities are planned and howthey will be accomplished. Details had to be included for everything, further complicating theprocess. Finally after considerable effort and
by periodical faculty meetings. Thesurvey results for the robotic lab showed an improvement in students‟ satisfaction of the overallexperience. The passing rate in the Introduction to Engineering course was used to assessstudents‟ performance. The positive effect of the learning community was confirmed through thehigher passing rates and the improved retention.References1. Smith, B. L., “The challenge of learning communities as a growing national movement,” Association of American Colleges and Universities Peer Review 4(1), 2001. Available at: http://www.aacu.org/peerreview/pr- fa01/pr-fa01feature1.cfm (accessed 01/18/11)2. Harms, P. C., Mickelson, S. K., and Brumm, T. J., “Using learning community course links to bring meaning
notebook was specifically developed as a tool forscaffolding the design processes for university-level engineering students enrolled in a studiodesign course. Whereas a blank notebook is just that, completely blank, the structuredengineering design notebook is comprised of prompts, tasks, and spaces for writing andsketching that help to illuminate the process of engineering design and provide design thinkingscaffolds. Interestingly, although these types of more structured design notebooks are a tool seenin K-12 science classrooms where there is a clear need to scaffold the design process for youngdesigners [5], [6], they are largely absent at the undergraduate level. The purpose of this qualitative case study is to understand students
) Engineering Education:Innovation Through Integration Journal of Engineering Education Volume 82, Issue 1.Bordogna, Joseph, Fromm, Eli, and Ernst, Edward W. (1995) An Integrative and HolisticEngineering Education Journal of Science Education and Technology Vol. 4, No. 3 (Sep.,1995), pp. 191-198Cohen, B. R., Rossmann, J.S., and Sanford Bernhardt, K.L. (2014) IntroducingEngineering as a Sociotechnical Enterprise. Proceedings of ASEE 2014: AnnualConference and Exposition. Indianapolis, Indiana: American Society for EngineeringEducation.Grasso, D., & Martinelli, D. (2010). Holistic engineering education. In D. Grasso, & M.B. Burkins (Eds.), Holistic engineering education: Beyond technology (pp. 81-92). NewYork: Springer.Klein J. T. (2005
home’s volume to surface area ratio, which reduces the total amount ofheat transfer through the walls. The homes in Figures 3(m), (n), and especially (q) and (r) werebuilt into the ground to make an Earthen home. This also increases the efficiency of the home byadding insulation to the home’s walls and reducing the rate of heat transfer through the walls.The home in Figure 3(m) and (n) also featured a large rainwater collection system. The homes inFigures 3(a), (b), (g), (h), (i), (j), (k), (l), (m), (n), (s), and (t) all incorporated a PV system.Considering that solar photovoltaics is a major portion of the course, and students gainsignificant lab experience working with PV system components, it is not surprising that moststudents incorporate
educational researchers) understandthe subject matter such that all collaborators can develop learning and assessment materials, andevaluate and interpret student responses. In our work the teachers (faculty) possess domainexpertise acquired through advanced graduate study, research, and years of practical experience.In this sense, the subject matter in higher education is taught at a level beyond the generalunderstanding typically possessed by a learning scientist. Page 10.379.1 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for
in Interactive Device Design!AbstractPress Play: Interactive Device Design is a four-year-old introductory course at Stanford that ex-plores the human-centered and technical workings behind interactive devices ranging from cellphones and video controllers to household appliances and smart cars. Students build a workingMP3 player prototype of their own design using embedded microcontrollers, digital audio de-coders, component sensors and other electronic hardware. Topics include electronics prototyping,interface prototyping, sensors and actuators, microcontroller development, multimodal displays,physical prototyping, user needs and usability testing.The course is intended as a deep-dive introduction to electrical engineering through the
SED Process Model facilitates awareness by naming aspectsof design that have been underemphasized in design broadly and recommends use of particularpractices throughout a design process. The goal of socially engaged design within engineering isto equitably address complex societal challenges through collaborative, reciprocal relationshipsthat build upon deep analyses of design context, positionalities, and technical knowledge.While this SED Process Model highlights these important aspects of design work, there islimited research on how engineering student designers interpret design process modelvisualizations as well as how they might perceive the value of a model that attends to people,context, and designer positionality in design work
. J. Avolio y F. J. Yammarino, Eds., “Transformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead 10th Anniversary Edition”, in Monographs in Leadership and Management, vol. 5, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2013, p. iii. doi: 10.1108/S1479-357120130000005037.[14] P. Hersey, K. H. Blanchard, and D. E. Johnson, Management of organizational behavior: utilizing human resources, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1996.[15] B. M. Bass, Leadership and performance beyond expectations, New York : London: Free Press ; Collier Macmillan, 1985.[16] B. M. Bass and B. J. Avolio, Eds., Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1994.[17
Paper ID #49261Enginovation: A Social Experiment in Innovating TogetherDr. Brooke Charae Coley, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus Dr. Brooke Coley, Assistant Professor of Engineering at Arizona State University, is a trailblazing scholar and disruptor, redefining engineering through equity-driven innovation. As the Founding Executive Director of RARE JUSTICE, she spearheads transformative efforts to dismantle systemic barriers, eradicate anti-Blackness in STEM, and amplify the voices of racially minoritized scholars. Her groundbreaking research critically examines graduate education while demanding
Paper ID #26300Negotiating Identity as a Response to Shame: A Study of Shame within anExperience as a Woman in EngineeringMs. Mackenzie Claire Beckmon, Harding University I am an undergraduate psychology major anticipating graduation in December of 2019. I am a member of the Beyond Professional Identity research group based in Harding University located in Searcy, Arkansas. I plan to further my studies in psychology through attending a graduate program for school or child psychology. It is my hope that these processes can lead to a career as both a researcher and practitioner.Dr. James L. Huff, Harding University Dr
barrier to podcasting for faculty at our university. (2) Disseminate engineering education innovations funded by the college to the campus community and beyond through a podcast hosted by the community of practice. (3) Experimenting with podcast course materials in engineering courses.(1) Results of the Podcasting ToolkitOur team met with experts and stakeholders to learn about logistics related to podcasting,communication strategies in academia, and podcast-based learning. From these experiences welearned about time requirements to prepare and edit podcast interviews (average estimates of ~10-15 hours), equipment needs, team roles.Interview PreparationProducing podcast episodes consists of several phases including development
: Exploring Common Ground, M. T. Huber and S. P. Morrealle Eds. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, 2002, pp. 217-245.[7] M. Ko, J. F. Mirabelli, A. J. Barlow, K. Jensen, and K. J. Cross, "Faculty Motivations and Barriers for Engineering Education Research," presented at the 2021 ASEE Annual Conference, Virtual Meeting, July 26-29, 2021.[8] M. Borrego and R. Streveler, "Preparing engineering educators for engineering education research," in Cambridge handbook of engineering education research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds Eds. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2014.[9] M. Borrego, R. Streveler, N. Chism, K. Smith, and R. Miller, "Developing an Engineering Education Research Community of Practice Through a
participatory approach[5] inwhich twenty semi-structured in depth interviews were conducted by two teenage researcherswith High School girls from two different schools in the West Midlands area of the UK. Inlooking at the issues through the eyes of 16 and 17 year old girls, the study provides a uniqueinsight into why girls are not attracted to engineering.Introduction: BackgroundLike most years, 2013 saw its fair share of global disasters and advances which varied innature from a nightclub fire in Brazil in January which killed 250 people[6], to an aircraftaccident at San Francisco airport in July[7], through to Typhoon Haiyan which devastated thePhilippines in November 2013[8]. Whilst on the positive side, advances in 3D printing[9], anew British
. AcknowledgmentsFunding for this project by the U. S. Dept. of Education’s Fund for the Improvement ofPostsecondary Education is gratefully acknowledged.1. Guskin, A. E., “Reducing student cost and enhancing student learning: The university challenge of the 1990’s. Part I: Restructuring the administration”, Change, (July/August), 23-29 (1994).2. Parrish, E. A., “A Work in Progress: WPI and the Future of Technological Higher Education”, WPI Journal, 3, Fall 1995.3. NSF Publication, “Report from the Presidential Young Investigator Colloquium on U.S. Engineering, Mathematics, and Science Education for the Year 2010 and Beyond”, (1991).4. Felder, R. M. and L. K. Silverman, “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education”, Eng. Ed. 78
associated with the interaction between living and nonliving systems.The curriculum developed to ensure that these goals are met is listed below. Learning objectivesa through o are shown for each course, the level at which each course addresses these objectivesis listed as 0,1,2,3 or 4. Four (4) indicates that the course very strongly addresses the goal, 0 thatit is not seriously addresses at all. Table I . Course Objectives MatrixCOURSES a b c d E F g h i j k l m n o ENGR 110 Introduction to Engineering 2 1 4 2 9 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 BMED 111 Biomedical Engineering 4 2 1 1 4
engineering and Zoltowski et.al’s research onempathic design [22] where student designers who connect with the end user in informal settingscan develop a broad understanding of stakeholders beyond scope of project. Moreover, thisfinding aligns with the conversation in the focus group: I’d say with the projects we implemented - you can see where it's going to go and what it's affecting. Usually in engineering projects you don't get to see that and that was huge to see that the end user was an orphanage. It adds a different component since you're in the midst of it all you're more eager to get it done. In the engineering world if you can see the effect that's important to the project.Finding 3 – Interpretation of the experience through
method. Amon, et al.2, implemented a two coursesequence in senior design using a specific research focus (wearable computers)that are sponsored by industrial partners and are “cross-disciplinary and inter-departmental.” Finally, Farr et al.3, claim that the capstone course is the mostimportant course due to the fact that it provides skills beyond design requiring thesynthesis of curricula concepts with the so called soft skills.The motivation for this type of course and the design of the course is dueprimarily to the unique requirements of industrial and manufacturing engineers todefine a problem and solve it. Many other engineering disciplines have theproblem defined for them. Although, Dutson, et al.4 states that the focus ofengineering
results and analysis provided later in this paper are based on student reflections duringPhases 1 and 3.The experiential activityTo enable scar tissue through the experience, surprise is a key aspect of the learning activity. Wewant students to experience ambiguity and its consequences, not just that someone tells themabout them. To maintain surprise, two actions are taken. First, students agree to an informal Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA), by which they commit to not discuss what happens in class withany students that have not taken the course yet. Of course, this cannot be enforced, but there isnot much more that can be done to control the flow of information. Second, all class material,such as the detailed topics that will be covered in the
industry partners, primarily but not exclusively in the automotiveindustry, and students may co-op with any of several hundred companies. Typically, a studentwill remain at the same co-op company throughout his or her education, allowing for a depth ofknowledge beyond what could be achieved in a single term.Drexel University (www.drexel.edu)At Drexel University, students typically experience up to three different companies throughouttheir co-op experiences, giving them a breadth of experience rather than depth with a singlecompany. There are over 1,600 employers that partner with Drexel, through 33 states and 48international locations. Drexel University does not require students to co-op; there are programsin which a student can choose to only
AC 2008-620: IS TRANSFER CREDIT A STRATEGY FOR SUCCESS OR APRESCRIPTION FOR FAILURE?Susan Walden, University of Oklahoma Founding Director of the Research Institute for STEM Education and a Research Scientist in the K20 Center for Educational and Community Renewal at the University of Oklahoma. She received her Ph.D. in Computational Organic Chemistry from the University of Oklahoma. She has taught organic and general chemistry, but her primary interests are in researching educational equity and applying democratic pedagogies to the sciences and engineering. She is also interested in educational outreach to K-12 and gifted education for K-16. She is an active member of the American Chemical
-orientated laboratorythat enhances student learning.Current Teaching StrategiesHistorically, soil mechanics has been taught through a lecture-laboratory approach since theintroduction of the laboratory component during the 1930s. One of the first soil mechanicslaboratory manuals published in 1939 by William S. Housel at the University of Michiganillustrated a systematic and discrete approach of teaching by introducing important test methodscommon to soil mechanics1.As the 1950s emerged authors developed manuals where there is little change to the overallstructure and content in comparison to the first texts. Authors seem to have written theselaboratory manuals to accommodate the teaching strategies desired at each institution or toinclude regional
NSF Advance-PLAN projectdesigned to address gender equity through policy change on a statewide level. The project isbased on the model of change that identifies effective change as a top-down policy drivenapproach through a central authority, in this case, a statewide board of regents that oversees allpublic universities. The model for top-down change is particularly suited to a small, rural statewhere a) n-values for gender related statistics at any institution may not be statisticallysignificant b) institutional relations allow for cross-state cooperation and c) size of theinstitutions allows for timely implementation and assessment of policies. In addition,intercollegiate cooperation allows for provosts of all six institutions to serve as
in our assessment results,where students’ confidence in their skills grows within and beyond the program.While predominately sponsored through the engineering college, Catalyze CU is truly cross-disciplinary, bringing together students and representatives from engineering, business, and arts& science. The program creates an opportunity for students to work in a real-world setting,which includes allowing students to take some chances and to fail forward in a relatively safeenvironment. They learn entrepreneurial and business skills which will serve students well inwhatever profession they choose to pursue. Catalyze CU gives engineering students a broaderview of the potential of their technical skills, that various career goals are
. Other instruments such as windand percussion instruments were not allowed since their behavior does not rely on conceptsrelated to solid mechanics. In addition to analyzing the structural behavior of the bridges,students calculated frequencies and explored the use of different materials thus extending theirunderstanding beyond basic solid mechanics principles.Requirements for the bridges were that they: Produce specific frequencies through mechanical means, Be interactive, Symbolize engineering, Be approximately 4ft x 2ft x 2ft in size, and Safely support a load of 150lb at least 1.5ft off the ground.Each group was given a budget of $100 for supplies for their bridges. Funding was provided bythe Thayer School of Engineering.Cooperative
not progress “up” the scale. Gilligan questioned the validity ofKohlberg’s criteria, asserting that girls spoke in different, not inferior, ways about morality. Girls,she found, asked for more information about the context of the situation and hesitated to makemoral judgments based on universal principles. These traits, Gilligan argued, were not signs ofan inferior moral sensibility, but of a different understanding of morality, one based onrelationships and specific situations in “a world comprised of relationships rather than of peoplestanding alone, a world that coheres through human connection rather than through systems ofrules” [1]. For men, she found, “the moral imperative appears rather as an injunction to respectthe rights of others