anumber of team projects into their curricula and there are some excellent guidelines onincorporating teamwork into existing courses [5]. A number of studies have been done onhow to improve effectiveness of corporative learning or teamwork in engineeringclassrooms. With no surprise, successful teamwork with proper team functionality Page 13.1221.2depends on strong, uniform interaction among the students [6]. Often, team formation isvery critical on team building and team member interactions [7].A team is “a small group of people who are committed to a common purpose,performance goals, and approach for which they hold themselves mutuallyaccountable.”[7
regarding directives. Front-line managers deliver the directives using specificationsand drawings with verbal instruction. The efficiency of communication sometimes depends onthe capability of interpreting materials. Augmented Reality (AR) is recognized as an effective user interface technology toenhance a user's perception by inserting the computer-generated information into the user's realworld experience1. An AR-based prototype of task directives focused on drawing andspecification review was created for improving communication with field labor. Only a little research has been done to evaluate the effectiveness and usability of ARtechnology and industrial application in the construction domain2. Thus, the purpose of theresearch is
needs, we have found that the design of the user interface plays a significantrole in determining effectiveness of a demo in improving understanding. The most successfulpresent a UI that encourages exploration, motivates learning, and facilitates intuitiveunderstanding. Careless design can easily result in something that does a better job of distractingor confusing a student than it does in teaching.The importance of UI design for improving software and Web sites that involve human-computer interaction is widely recognized in software engineering ideas and methodologyrelated to usability10-11. Researchers have considered the design and effectiveness of interactiveeducational simulations in the context of physics, chemistry and physical
feedback by participants who hold higher levels of authority, such as managers in industry or faculty members in academia. A healthy balance of ever-improving competence and justifiable confidence of the engineers can be developed by engineering educators as they engage students in the review of their design projects, and maintained by effective engineering leaders in industry as they run the design reviews of their companies. However, if engineering professors provide only severe criticism of students’ design projects, they risk destruction of the students’ self-confidence. If they only encourage without feedback on a concepts shortcomings, then a false sense of self- confidence without mastery may result. Conversely, if
improvement of student learning outcomes.Sarah Zappe, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Sarah Zappe is the Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Pennsylvania State University. Her background is in educational psychology with an emphasis on educational testing and assessment. Page 15.1000.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Projected Words per Minute: A Window into the Potential Effectiveness of Presentation SlidesAbstractThis paper proposes a metric for gauging the potential effectiveness of
AC 2007-1617: EFFECTS OF CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING, MATH ANDVISUALIZATION SKILLS ON PROBLEM-SOLVING IN STATICSKelli Higley, Pennsylvania State University Kelli Higley is a PhD student in Educational Psychology at Penn State. Before working on her PhD, she taught high school mathematics for 3 years. She has worked on diverse projects about learning, including research about discourse, reading, statistics, algebra, and now Statics. Her primary research focus remains improving the quality of mathematics teaching. She can be contacted at kjh262@psu.edu.Thomas Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University Tom Litzinger is Director of the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education
learning style Page 11.877.4information on freshmen and sophomores who participated in the courses that formed the nexusof the study6,7.The authors were awarded an NSF planning grant in 2004 through the Bridges for EngineeringEducation program. The grant enabled us to develop technology-enabled content and evaluateits effectiveness for engineering students and engineering technology students. The content wasdeveloped collaboratively among the College of Engineering, the College of Applied Science,and the College of Education, Criminal Justice and Human Services. During pilot-testing, wehave evaluated the effectiveness of the educational modules
Paper ID #26520Understanding How First-Year Engineering Students Create Effective, Col-laborative, and Inclusive TeamsMr. Nelson S Pearson, University of Nevada, Reno Nelson Pearson is a Ph.D. student at the University of Nevada, Reno. His research interest includes social networks and the integration of diverse populations, engineering culture, development of a sense of belonging, as well as engineering pedagogy. His education includes a B.S. and M.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of Nevada, Reno.Mr. Hector Enrique Rodriguez-Simmonds, Purdue Engineering Education Raised in South Florida, born in Mexico. Half
2017 ASEE International Forum:Columbus , Ohio Jun 28 Paper ID #20723Investigation of Effect of Curriculum Change on Students’ Performance inKnowledge-building and Knowledge-integration SubjectsDr. U. P. Kahangamage, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Udaya Kahangamage is a Teaching Fellow in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. He received his PhD from University of Bristol, UK. Currently, he teachers courses related to Engineering Design, Product Design and Manufacturing. His interest includes innova- tive teaching pedagogies for
AC 2007-3042: VISUAL DATA'S EFFECT ON QUALITY AND PRODUCTIVITYAT A TIER ONE AUTOMOTIVE COMPONENTS MANUFACTURERThomas Smith, Purdue University Thomas D. Smith is an industrial engineer with a large manufacturer of pneumatic automation products. He holds a master's degree in Technology and a bachelor's degree in Industrial Engineering from Purdue University; he has over 10 years of industrial engineering experience with emphasis on lean manufacturing, plant layout, and continuous improvement. Mr. Smith has provided engineering services to companies such as General Motors, Delco Electronics, Ingersoll-Rand, and ITT Aerospace.Niaz Latif, Purdue University Dr. Niaz Latif is Professor of
encapsulation of cells within chemically modified, biomimetic hydrogels. After graduating, she continued her research through working in a tissue engineering/ biomaterials laboratory until 2017. She then became an Instructor of Physics and Engineering at Marian University of Indianapolis, Indiana, where she currently teaches Physics I, Physics II, Biophysics, and will soon be developing courses related to biomaterials for the launch of the new ES Witchger School of Engineering at Marian University. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Benefits, Drawbacks, and Effects on Retention Rates to a 5 Year, Inclusive
ease the transition into the senior capstone design project and enableprofessors to easily achieve program educational objectives by fostering long-term retention ofmaterial through hands-on exposure.Through the incorporation of cost-effective robotics kits into theory-based courses, this paperintends to promote group learning to refine essential scientific and social skills through efficientand structured collaboration. Students who engage in a design-centered approach to engineeringeducation tend to correlate activities and project outcomes with core course knowledge tostrengthen concept retention. By facilitating continual exposure to design principles throughoutthe undergraduate curriculum, this paper is expected to familiarize students
Paper ID #26531Comparison of Virtual Reality Versus Reality: Effects on Student LearningUsing Virtual Technology on Nanotechnology EducationDr. Reza Kamali, Utah Valley University Dr. Reza Kamali-Sarvestani is an Associate Professor of Computer Engineering at Utah Valley University. He received his B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Shiraz University Iran, and M.S.E, Ph.D. degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from University of Alabama in Huntsville in 2009, and 2011 respectively. He joined Utah Valley University (UVU) in 2012. He is currently working to develop a Virtual Reality course on nano
Paper ID #25318Understanding the Effectiveness of Using VR to Support Teaching DrillingTrajectory ConceptsDr. Maryam Mirabolghasemi, Mississippi State UniversityDr. Michael Andre Hamilton, Dr. Michael A. Hamilton is an Associate Director at Mississippi State Institute for System Engineering Research (ISER) in Vicksburg, MS. He received his Doctorate, Master and Bachelor degrees in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Mississippi State University and has a graduate certificate in Modeling, Simulation, and Visualization Engineering from Old Dominion University. Currently, he is the technical lead for Big Data Analytic
, the students would not like for the entireclass to be administered via distance education. Some distance classes were considered acceptable, meaningthat a hybrid course was the most desirable for these students.B. Scenario III: This third scenario had the objective of collecting video access data, specifically the data foreducational videos. The results would allow for a qualitative evaluation of the data that were beingmonitored, which itself would allow us to gauge the effectiveness of the monitoring system. The videosused were donated by the MAST (Astronomic Museum, www.mast.br) and contained documentaries andresearch reports relating to astronomy. All the data presented was obtained through the monitoring service we developed
that one will be judged interms of a stereotype. In this project, we investigate the effect of skewed gender compositionson active participation in group projects in a required introductory engineering course. Usingvideo records of 175 final group design project presentations (4-6 students per group, 660students total), we performed a systematic investigation of student’s active participation, i.e., theroles and behaviors adopted by male and female students as a function of gender composition ofthe group. Independent judges viewing each videotaped presentation classified roles andbehaviors adopted by participants. Parameters that were collected include presentation contenttype (on a spectrum from technical to non-technical), student roles in
-solving. While these tools hold potential to enhance learning,they also pose significant challenges to academic integrity and the validity of traditional assessments.This study explores the redesign of assessments to address these challenges, focusing on scaffolded,multimodal, and real-time formats. Drawing from a graduate-level course in Machine Learning, theresearch examines student perceptions of traditional and redesigned assessments, their engagementlevels, and the role of GenAI. A mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative and qualitative data,was employed to analyze feedback from 12 students as a preliminary study. Results indicate thatredesigned assessments, particularly scaffolded projects, are more engaging and effective in
with active learning pedagogies on student learning, and effective strategies for increasing gender diversity in STEM disciplines.Prof. Margaret B. Bailey P.E., Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Professor Margaret Bailey, Ph.D., P.E. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering within the Kate Gleason College of Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology. Dr. Bailey teaches courses and conducts re- search related to Thermodynamics, engineering and public policy, engineering education, and gender in engineering and science. She is the co-author on an engineering textbook, Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, which is used worldwide in over 250 institutions. Dr. Bailey is the Principal Investi- gator (PI
organizational structure. Training objectives include improving group effectiveness, re-invigorating burned-out managers, ensuring maximum [optimal] use of [appropriate]* technology, and developing high potential managers. (Chmura, Henton, and Melville, 1987, p.17)*[emphasis added to clarify the research objective] It will be inaccurate to claim that functionalism and technical rationality, which have served as our guides for so long, have been superseded. Nonetheless the alternative approaches represented by reflective practice and critical theory have a logic and appeal that are attractive to the entrepreneurs as well as the social activists in CPE. (Novak, 1992, p.63) Leadership
. It provides avisual aid for students to solve problems and it is able to guide (tutor) them through the processof solving a truss design by providing immediate and intelligent feedback and guidance.The objective of this project is to evaluate and improve on the Mechanix program whilemeasuring its effectiveness for student learning. This will be done through both quantitative andqualitative means with freshmen students at Texas A&M University. An experiment will analyze Page 23.894.2the effects of Mechanix on both short-term impact and longer-term retention measured throughhomework assignments, exam questions and pre/post concept
support from A Scholarship Program to Increase Retention in Engineering (ASPIRE):Improving Work-Study-Life Balance. The goal of the program was to increase retention ofsophomore and junior engineering students who show academic promise but are at risk of notcompleting their studies due to financial concerns and/or life-work-study balance issues. Inaddition to financial support, ASPIRE provided scholarship recipients with opportunities toparticipate in activities that contribute to persistence such as tutoring, faculty mentoring,conferences, presentations and career planning workshops. Sixty-one students have beenawarded scholarships in this five-year period.This paper examines the effectiveness of ASPIRE to help students alleviate financial
education that emphasizesculminating skills in lieu of a list of courses would provide a better alignment between professionalpractice skills and undergraduate education [9, 10]. Research also discusses the role of internalreflective conversations in creating effective designers. Literature has shown that accomplisheddesigners reflect on their design experiences to improve their future work and practicedengineering designers thoroughly engage in problem setting and reflective conversations [11-13].Conversation during engineering design is not only important in internal reflective conversationsbut also in external communications with colleagues and stakeholders to successfully advocate fora solution. Researchers have examined how engineering design
technology for effective teaching and learning of STEM content and they donot have models or understanding of pedagogical approaches to implement technology-integratedcourses, in general, and robotics-integrated courses, in particular.15-18 Moreover, the rapid increasein the availability of innovative and budget friendly technologies makes it difficult for teachers tokeep up with the technological developments.19 A further complication arises due to continuouslyevolving hardware and software of the educational technologies. Hussain et al.20 and Lindh andHolgersson21 report that during the classroom robotic activities, students often ask their teachersintricate questions. The aforementioned challenges suggest that it is of paramount importance
research experience includes examination of implicit bias in the classroom and application of VR technologies to improve student engagement. Darby hopes to pursue a career in STEM education and educational research.Dr. Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University Kaitlin Mallouk is an Associate Professor of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Prior to beginning that role, she spent five years an Instructor in the Mechanical Engineering and Experiential Engineering Education Departments at Rowan. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Effect of Ego Network Structure on Self-efficacy in Engineering StudentsAbstractEngineering
, engaging the entire academic community in decision-making is essential.Participants stressed that operational leadership influences strategic planning. The operationallevel serves as an information source, guiding institutional improvements. However, weakleadership at this level can have severe consequences. One academic warned: “When we have a leader, for example, a career head, who does not know the profession, the effect on students is severe. A leader who easily gives in to pressure lowers the quality of professionals being trained.”Some interviewees advocated adaptive leadership, emphasizing collaboration and shareddecision-making. However, they also highlighted challenges in dealing with non-collaborativeteam members
Effective Implementation of Industry Sponsored Senior Design at Stevens Institute of Technology Leslie R. Brunell, PhD., P.E. Lecturer and Senior Design Coordinator Department of Civil, Environmental and Ocean Engineering Charles V. Schaefer Jr. School of Engineering Stevens Institute of Technology Hoboken, New Jersey 07030Abstract:The success of the industry-sponsored Civil Engineering senior design program at StevensInstitute of Technology and its impact on meeting the learning objectives established for the two-semester capstone design
AC 2011-1356: AN INVESTIGATION ON THE IMPACT OF THE DESIGNPROBLEM IN IDEATION EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCHGul E. Okudan Kremer, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Gul Kremer is an Associate Professor of Engineering Design and Industrial Engineering at the Pennsylva- nia State University. She received her Ph.D. from University of Missouri-Rolla in Engineering Manage- ment and Systems Engineering. Her research interests include multi-criteria decision analysis methods applied to improvement of products and systems and enhancing creativity in engineering design settings. Her published work appears in journals such as Journal of Mechanical Design, Journal of Engineering Design, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
Classroom Teaching Techniques – An Effectiveness Methodology for Aerospace Concepts?AbstractMost engineering courses require some level of work to be done by students using internet. Avast majority of material taught in classes is available online. Theoretically, a student could learnalmost everything they want from the online resources. In this research, a comparative study isdone between students learning and understanding when some basic aerospace concepts aretaught in a traditional lecture based classroom versus when students are told to look for the samematerial on the internet. The results indicate that, although all the material taught in theclassroom is available on the internet, students do not perform better when they
IEEE Fellow and PAESMEM awardee.Mr. James Samuel Carter III, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Mr. James Carter is a Ph.D. student in Education (Policy, Leadership, and School Improvement) at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. He holds undergraduate degrees in Aerospace Engineering and Sociology from North Carolina State University. He worked as an Aerospace Engineer for 9 years before returning to school. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020Assessment of the Effects of Participation in a Summer Bridge Experience for WomenThe ESCape program was started in 2008 as a bridge program for incoming
engineer with industrial experience would desire to return tograduate school is to be able to teach in an academic setting. While graduate schoolsoffer significant opportunities for research, the majority of graduate programs offer littleor no guidance for a student who desires to teach at a teaching oriented school. Aside Page 13.816.5from a few seminars on effective teaching, which are typically targeted at internationalstudents overcoming language barriers, few graduate programs require Doctoral studentsto enroll in a teaching methods course. And, because many such courses are outside ofthe engineering domain and may not be offered at the Doctoral