taught in one of the upper-level courses orlaboratories. One example of chemical engineers using 3D printing is additive manufacturingtechniques for scaffold fabrication using biomaterials [4,5,6]. The skill of 3D printing and thechemical engineering principles to solve problems in the biomaterial and material industry is oneonly example of why learning rapid prototyping is important.Methods/assessment – This research project was approved by Vanderbilt’s IRB # 191344. Thehands-on activities developed in the summer before the course. Rising junior students workedwith the instructor to develop and create the activities that can fit in a 50-minute class session.This step took numerous iterations and ideas that did not fit into the boundaries of the
video. Then, respondents answered a series of questions abouttheir interest and knowledge of several STEM topics, both before and after watching thevideo(s). This retrospective pre/post questionnaire technique helps to alleviate response-shift biaspresent in self-assessed changes in learning attitudes. Our findings show that collaborativepresentation videos increased self-reported audience interest in engineering, and perceptions ofdisciplinary relatedness more than the non-collaborative, individual presentations made by thesame researchers. These results suggest a beneficial role for collaborative communicationstrategies to foster interest in engineering among public audiences, even among people without abackground in STEM. Further
evidence-based teaching practices. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students.Dr. Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University Dr. Michael Prince is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University and co-director of the National Effective Teaching Institute. His research examines a range of engineering education topics, including how to assess and repair student miscoDr. Jenefer Husman, University of Oregon Jenefer Husman, Professor in the Education Studies department at the University of Oregon. Her research focuses on students’ motivation for learning in engineering contexts
Certificates from Virginia Tech in Engineering Education and Future Professoriate and from USFQ in Structures for Construction Professionals. MiguelAndres’s research includes Architectural and Civil Engineering Project Management, Sustainable and Resilient Urban Infrastructure, and the development of engineers who not only have strong technical and practical knowledge but the social awareness and agency to address global humanitarian, environmental, and social justice challenges. For him, social justice is a concept that should always be involved in discussions on infrastructure. Related to STEM education, Miguel Andres develops disruptive pedagogies for STEM courses as a tool for innovation, and assessing engineering
areas in which you need help to accomplish your research goals? • Describe your overall progress for this week? • How would you rate your progress on a scale from 0 to 10, where 10 is the highest amount of progress. • What is your plan for next week? • Paste pictures below of graphs or pictures or anything else you want to share from this week.The progress reports were reviewed by the co-Directors and the REU faculty advisors. The progress reportscombined with the weekly group meeting presentations allowed the students to self-assess and gauge theirprogress. The progress reports evolved over the course of the 10 weeks and indicated growth and learningfor all students: both those that participated virtually in year 1
-related pursuits in connected learning,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2017.[20] D. Brandt, “Sponsors of Literacy,” College Composition and Communication, vol. 49, no. 2, p. 165, May 1998, doi: 10.2307/358929.[21] D. L. DuBois, N. Portillo, J. E. Rhodes, N. Silverthorn, and J. C. Valentine, “How effective are mentoring programs for youth? A systematic assessment of the evidence,” Psychological Science in the Public Interest, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 57–91, 2011.[22] R. Spencer, T. Tugenberg, M. Ocean, S. E. O. Schwartz, and J. E. Rhodes, “‘Somebody Who Was on My Side’: A Qualitative Examination of Youth Initiated Mentoring,” Youth & Society, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 402–424, May 2016
the goals of the three-year project funded by NASA. This is thefirst year of the project and therefore, the assessment of the project would be completed by theend of summer 2023. The authors will produce a report describing the details of the assessmentand outcomes of the project and publish the findings in the proceedings of the American Societyfor Engineering Education (ASEE) 2024 conference.ConclusionOverall, the new modules introduced in each course along with mini projects would helpstudents develop essential skills to achieve useful and practical manufacturing competencies thatinclude understanding the design of products, selecting the equipment and tooling managementprocedures, validating the parts for their reliability and safety, and
held for students to learn about companies and graduate schoolprograms from leaders outside of the region.The spatial visualization curriculum was taught in a flipped format, as had been done theprevious year. Students were provided access to videos of the lessons, and students had access tofaculty assistance for questions about the content. Students were given multiple attempts tosubmit homework, and the spatial visualization assignments were assessed throughmastery-based grading. Most students performed well on their initial homework submissions, buta few students did occasionally take advantage of the resubmission opportunity. All otherprogram elements described above were implemented over the two credit hour professionaldevelopment course
success, allowing our design team tokeep focus on the end-user and their experience the moment they stepped foot into our buildingdesign. It also reminded us that every product needed a purpose, every building detail needed tomeet some industry standard or best practice, and we constantly were looking to answer thequestion WHY.Figure 4.0 Evidence Based Design DiagramThe Design Team was comprised of students from three different programs, some workingwithin the constraints of a course, others working independently, and some participating in bothlanes. All student work was shared via MS Teams and reviewed weekly, then each team metweekly with the faculty team lead to synthesize thoughts, task, and assess the success of theenergy efficient design
installations. The use of the term became more widespread followingadoption in the 1960s by NASA managers when used to refer to small teams of experts taskedwith solving difficult and pernicious issues; ‘tiger team’ in NASA was defined as: "a team ofundomesticated and uninhibited technical specialists, selected for their experience, energy, andimagination, and assigned to track down relentlessly every possible source of failure in aspacecraft subsystem or simulation" [1]. For example a tiger team was formed during the Apollo13 emergency to get the astronauts of the damaged module back to earth. As with the originalusage, tiger teams are still used for security assessments by testing an organization's defensesagainst spying, industrial espionage, or its
importanceof the capstone projects is reflected in Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) criteria and assessment protocols. [7]2. EMET Senior Projects at Penn State - FayetteAt Penn State – Fayette EMET program the senior project coursework is based on requiredEMET 403 and EMET 440 courses. The EMET 403 is a one-credit course on design projectpreparation that includes the selection of the topic and initial design work that involves planning,creation of design schematics or blueprints, and design specifications, and culminates in thePreliminary Design Report (PDR) with a budget and schedule of all activities includingimplementation stage. Since the EMET program does not provide a separate course on projectmanagement principles with
learningcommunity (FLC) with a local two-year institution to foster a collaborative community andsupport faculty in adopting APEX materials, which included helping them to consider, plan,apply, and reflect on effective practices for integrating computing into their courses. Buildingupon these pilot efforts, we are actively expanding adoption of the APEX program in severalways. First, we have begun holding summer and winter training workshops for faculty at severaladditional community colleges. Second, we are refining and improving the FLC experience aswe initiate new FLCs with these institutional partners. Finally, we will continue to assess theprogram’s efficacy through a research plan that evaluates student and faculty experiences,allowing us to optimize
pandemic.There is some research on the learning of geospatial technology and spatiotemporal computingskills which focused on high school [3], [4]. There are only a few papers on college students [7],[8], [9], and a few on the challenges of learning in developing countries [10]. Very few focus onthe virtual internship learning environment [11], [12], [13, [9]. There is no study at present onspatiotemporal computing skills for 2-year associate degree students. In addition, there is noresearch on the impact of remote or virtual internships on spatiotemporal GIS learning during thepandemic. Our study fills that gap and provides an urgent assessment for internships during thepandemic.During the pandemic, with the financial support of the NSF START grant, 2
risk of damaging physical equipment or injuring themselves. This allows students tofocus on the development and testing of their projects without the fear of costly mistakes.The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 introduces RRBot – a two-link robot armused for the project-based assignments – and details the set up of its necessary toolchain in ROSand Gazebo. Section 3 provides an overview of the objectives and technical content covered in thesix project-based assignments, along with the results and performance attained in each assignment.Section 4 offers a comprehensive analysis of the student learning outcomes through the presentationof performance metrics and evaluations, aimed at assessing the efficacy of the proposed
evaluationoutcomes. To date, much of our work has focused on formative feedback and the annual review process.Moving forward we plan to also develop processes for incorporating the teaching evaluation process intotenure and promotion reviews. We are also working on the development of a rubric, which is based on onecreated by Kansas University (Follmer et al., 2020), to make it easier for the Dean to assess the teachingeffectiveness of a large number of faculty members.ReferencesAAU (2022). “AAU to Establish Learning Communities on Effective Teaching Evaluation.” https://www.aau.edu/newsroom/press-releases/aau-establish-learning-community-effective-teaching-e valuation.Boring, A., Ottoboni, K., & Stark, P.B. (2016). “Student evaluations of teaching
, students begin with blinking a LED and the use of digitalports on the Arduino board, then integrate a potentiometer to control the blink rate, a photocell andthe Serial Monitor to learn how analogue ports work. From there they are introduced to RGBLEDs. The final assessment has the students complete a challenge project of making a holidaylights string that can blink at varying rates and colors and turn on and off when it is dark or lightout. In project 2, students are introduced to a piezoelectric speaker, button use, an LCD and atemperature sensor. In the final assessment students work to create a thermostat with feedbackmessages. In project 3, motor controllers, motors, servos and an ultrasonic distance sensor areintroduced. The final assessment
and quizzesa few days in advance as you would if they were in-person were of particular importance. Manystudents also appreciated now having recorded lectures due to the online learning environment,not just to provide flexibility if a synchronous class was missed, but to rewatch to getclarification on confusing topics and review prior to assessments. Recommendations related towell-being were also discussed by students such as spending time away from the computerscreen when not doing school work, having fun, connecting with other students, and keeping apositive attitude.It is interesting to note that the following Fall semester, students and faculty were given thechoice to attend classes in-person or via Zoom as the COVID-19 pandemic continued
data storage. The bottom entry in Table 1 doeshighlight an immediate outcome of the initial survey response Caucus skillsidentification discussion. The manufacturers involved in the Additive ManufacturingIndustry 4.0 Technology environment indicated that their activities went well beyondcommon tasks associated with 3D printing and they preferred to group additive andthe classical subtractive operations as part of advanced materials manipulations.This paper’s authors concur with that assessment and do not attempt to isolate aspecific subset of technician skills that would be considered unique to additivemanufacturing. The table does not priorities the skill groupings, but it does listidentified technologies, blue italics print, with their
, September). Soft skills for science and technology students: A pedagogical experience. In 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL) (pp. 1198-1202). IEEE.Craps, S., Pinxten, M., Saunders, G., Leandro Cruz, M., Gaughan, K., & Langie, G. (2017). Professional roles and employability of future engineers. In Proceedings of the 45th sefi annual conference 2017-education excellence for sustainability, sefi 2017 (pp. 499-507). European Society for Engineering Education SEFI.Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and teaching in higher education, (1), 3-31.Itani, M., & Srour, I. (2016). Engineering students
future research direction can be to follow up with conference attendees toevaluate and assess long-term impacts of the conference materials, resources, and communityconnections on their efforts to pursue, persist, and prevail in computing/EmTech education andcareer.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation, under GrantNo. 1932662 & 1953431. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.References[1] U.S. Department of Labor. Covid-19 Impact, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/OPA/newsreleases/ui-claims/20201453.pdf[2] A
Education ConclusionA computer simulation laboratory is an alternative approach to establishing a reallaboratory. Such a laboratory has a significant advantage over a real laboratory becausethe capability to upgrade and update software packages to emulate the real one is mucheasier and cheaper than replacing the equipment found in a real laboratory.We have designed different lab assignments. The lab assignments include analog anddigital modulation techniques, the design of fiber optic links along with studying thecorrelation between the physical characteristics of the link and the transmitted signal, andthe design of different network topologies.To provide an initial assessment, the communication lab
]. This study is important to assess he magnetoelastic Villari effect whichdeals with the change in the magnetization of a soft magnetic material due to mechanical stress.Osterloh and his associates at the University of California in Davis [13] discovered thatnanowires made of lithium, molybdenum and selenium atoms show changes in electricalresistance up to 200 % when exposed to vapors of organic solvents. By attaching chemicalgroups to the nanowires they could modify the sensor to measure the acidity of a solution. Ananomaterials research and development company [14] is involved in using nanostructure insensors made with conventional materials such as tin oxide, to enhance the performance of thesensors. It is also involved with federal
: Learning Factors Used in the Affect Survey 1. I gain factual knowledge (terminology, classifications, methods, trends). 2. I learn conceptual principles, generalizations, and/or theories. 3. I get a chance to talk to other students and explain my ideas to them. 4. I am encouraged to frequently evaluate and assess my own work. 5. I learn to apply course materials to improve my own thinking, problem solving, and decision making skills 6. I develop specific skills, competencies, and points of view needed by professionals in the field. 7. I acquire interpersonal skills in working with others in the class.The results of these pre-post affect surveys are given in Tables 8 to 11 for the Iron Cross (IC),Virtual Biomechanics Laboratory (VBL), Jumping
electrical circuits using appropriate CAD tools. Thegeneral criteria for basic level programs includes; students; program educationalobjectives; program outcome and assessments; professional component; faculty;facilities; institutional support; and program criteria [1]. In this paper we address theprofessional component in the electrical engineering program.The professional component requires that the engineering graduate should be exposedand involved in a major and practical engineering accomplishment to facilitate his/hertransition to practice in a real world engineering projects. The major design experienceshould utilize engineering standards and various constraints. These constraints include:economic, environmental, manufacturability, ethical
such as female and/or minority students?DataMultiple data sets were used to investigate the research questions. Two primary repositories ofdata were accessed including the national PLTW dataset provided by PLTW and the TexasEducation Research Center (ERC) data housed at UT Austin. The ERC houses education andworkforce data for the state of Texas. Data sets included the following: • National PLTW panel dataset covering 2008 to present that indicated whether a school offered a PLTW program and the type of program adopted. • Demographic, Course Information, and Outcome files • STAAR Test Scores files (Texas State Assessment for grades 3-12) • Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board College Graduation filesSampleWe examined
water quality assessment, water and wastewater treatment, emerging organic pollutants, and ecotoxicology. He holds a B.Sc. in Food Chemistry from the National University of Mexico, and a Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from the University of Maryland, College Park.Kristin Lewis, American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Kristin Lewis is a project director with the American Association for the Advancement of Science where she leads the Mass Media Science & Engineering Fellowship. Previously, she supported the development of the Fourth National Climate Assessment with the U.S. Global Change Research Program, and she holds a Ph.D. in Physics from the University of Michigan.Ms. Supraja N. Kumar
high need to improve success rates.On the Omaha campus, students spent a week reviewing pre-requisite materials before a quizover that content was administered. Students who scored below the designated threshold werethen offered (and strongly encouraged) to participate in additional review and targetedremediation in Assessment and Learning in Knowledge Spaces (ALEKS), an online tutoring andassessment program [9]. Table 1. shows results of the CRA exam from the Fall 2021 semester,showing the need to support students in these courses who did not pass the CRA exam.In the Spring 2022 semester, results of the CRA exam at the beginning of the semester weregiven to the retention and student success coordinator and an intervention was applied to
every week for 50 minutes per meeting. While the official coursedescription states that it consists of three weekly lectures with no laboratory components, theinstructor lectures twice a week while reserving the third class meeting for an active learning inclass project session where students implement the concepts they have learned about in the twolectures in that week.The student performance will be assessed via three different categories: 1. Weekly assignments: every week, students will be given homework problems pertaining to the lecture contents. In addition, students will have to implement a programming assignment during the third class meeting every week. Students will submit a weekly assignment including the solved
exchange ofideas on senior design course assessment and outcomes between the two institutions.Functional surfaces are the requirement of several industrial and engineering applications.Specifically, surface patterning with metallic structures is an important tool for differentbiomedical [1] and engineering applications [2]. Traditional patterning techniques such as so ftlithography [3], microcontact printing [4] or stencil micropatterning [5] have been used tofabricate microstructures, however, they require expensive tooling and multi-step processeswhich increase the fabrication time. With the recent advancement in additive manufacturingtechniques, considerable efforts have been demonstrated to pattern desired structures on differentsurfaces [6-8
upon that with topics on functions, file I/O,pointers, arrays, and sorting algorithms. As the students progress, they are required to writeincreasingly complex programs often with an engineering application.The second path is being piloted in the 2021-2022 school year and is showing promise, but it hasbecome apparent that not all the students who need the slower paced courses correctly chose thatpath. Many students were overly confident in their abilities and mistakenly enrolled in the fasterpaced Path One.The Parachute OptionWithout placement testing, there is no guarantee that all students will be placed in the bestcourses to ensure their success. Given the burden of testing, it was decided to allow students toself-assess and choose between