Paper ID #37987Board 289: Fab Friday and Its Impact on Computer Science Majors’Motivation and Career ReadinessMarisol Clark-Ibanez, California State University, San Marcos ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Fab Friday and Its Impact on Computer Science Majors’ Motivation and Career Readiness1. IntroductionThis paper is about a program created to improve the academic success and workforce readinessfor low income, high academic potential Computer Science (CS) majors. It was funded by theScholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (SSTEM) program of theNational
lectures,seminar talks to be prepared and held by the students, and a programming part.The design goal of this course has been to provide all the necessary theoretical knowledge tounderstand the concepts behind image compression technologies, such as JPEG2000. We arealso aiming at simulating the work-flow as found within an IT company as realistically aspossible, preparing electrical engineers and computer scientists as well as possible for theirprofessional life. This training does not only include the technical, but also the social skillsrequired to successfully complete larger projects.The subject of image compression offers the advantage of requiring a solid knowledge on termsof information science such as entropy, distortion, quantization
science bachelors programs and in the workplace also reportwidespread isolation, which makes them more likely to leave the field, decreasing the number of rolemodels and further reinforcing the stereotype of technology as a male field [3]. 2There are few pathways into engineering and an alarming rate of departure from the field, leaving girlssystematically left out of the very careers that are their shaping their future.Project Design and ExecutionOur project—Seeds of Change—takes an interdisciplinary approach to STEM education, infusingstudents’ technical training with leadership training through a lens of gender inequality – bringingtogether
://www.asce.org/uploadedFiles/About_ASCE/Ethics/Content_Pieces/Code-of-Ethics-July-2017.pdf17. Vanderbilt University. (2018). Teaching sustainability. Retrieved from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub- pages/teaching-sustainability/18. Smith, C. M. (2005, April). Origin and uses of primum non nocere—Above all, do no harm! Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 45(4), 371-377.19. Katz, E. (2006). Death by design: Science, technology, and engineering in Nazi Germany. New York: Pearson Longman.20. Werhane, P. H., and Moriarty, B. (2009). Moral imagination and management decision making. Retrieved from http://www.corporate-ethics.org/pdf/moral_imagination.pdf21. Bayles, M. D. (1989). Professional ethics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.22
and research purposes. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Cannons to spark thermal-fluid canonsAbstractHands-on projects are launch pads for sparking student interest. Specifically, design-build-test(DBT) projects can be effective tools for boosting students’ confidence in their ability to applytheoretical knowledge to practical engineering. Recognizing the need for relating the theoreticalaspects of thermodynamics to its application, an air cannon design-build-test project wasenvisioned and implemented.Air cannons can be simple and inexpensive to construct, while offering a robust platform toexplore thermodynamics, heat transfer, and fluid mechanics concepts. At the same
Paper ID #32635Work in Progress: STEM Students’ Experiences with Educational Technol-ogyToolsMr. Ahmed Ashraf Butt, Purdue University at West Lafayette Ahmed Ashraf Butt is a doctoral student at the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University. He is currently working as a research assistant on the CourseMIRROR project funded by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES). He is interested in designing educational tools and exploring their impact on enhancing students’ learning experiences. Before Purdue University, Ahmed has worked as a lecturer for two years at the University of Lahore, Pakistan. Additionally, he
Paper ID #26373Learn Materials: Making an Introductory Online Materials ResourceDr. Soma Chakrabati, Granta Design, Ltd. Hannah Melia leads the development of CES EduPack and Granta’s Education Hub at Granta Design. She has a degree in Materials Science and Metallurgy and a Post Graduate Certificate in Design, Manu- facturing and Management from the University of Cambridge. She has worked in the United States and Germany on medical device design and technology transfer. Over the last 10 years she has interacted with academics that use CES EduPack around the world.Dr. Kaitlin Tyler, Granta Education Division Kaitlin is
, conducted during the product-engineering phase are once again employed. Theadvertising director, packaging director and sales manager all use market strategy information intheir work. Students learn first hand the high dollar cost of advertising and packaging as theyprepare ad copy and design an appropriate container for the product.The Finance Department is an area most students shy away from, usually due to lack ofunderstanding. Those involved in this department quickly learn the necessity of keepingaccurate financial records and reporting. The purchasing director has the job of securingmaterials at the “right price, quality, quantity and time”. Problems acquiring materials hasfrequently been the bane of class companies. The finance director
not copy the solution directly. Students could then instantly see thescore that they would receive on their assignment as well as graphical and textual feedback fortheir mistakes. This allowed them to correct their work prior to submitting the drawing to theonline course management system.The instructor would then download the students’ drawings to his own computer. A script filewas constructed to convert the students AutoCAD DWG files to the ASCII DXF file format. Theinstructor could then grade all of the DXF files for one answer key in a batch format. Theprogram would store the results in a file that could be uploaded into the course managementsystem.After the first semester of using the program, students were asked if they used the program
traditional lecture-basedteaching, which mainly focuses on theoretical aspects of the technology and lacks hands-onexperiences, would not keep students motivated, meet their needs, or lead to enhanced learning.Pedagogical research in engineering education supports this project-based, student-centeredapproach to teaching [12]. Student-centered approaches have consistently been found to be equallyor more effective than traditional approaches, improving learning outcomes and key competencieslike teamwork, critical thinking, and problem solving [12,13]. More specifically, project-basedlearning has been shown to lead to higher student motivation and better understanding of how toapply learning to realistic problems [14]. Therefore, the instructor designed
Challenges!” Proceedings of the Joint International Conference on Construction Culture, Innovation, and Management (CCIM), M. Dulaimi, ed., Dubai, UAE. 6. Rubin, D. K., Powers, M. B., Tulacz, G., Winston, S., & Krizan, W. G. (2002). Leaders Come in all Shapes and Sizes But the Great Ones Focus on People. ENR: Engineering News-Record, 249(23), 34. Page 26.413.8 7. Nitsch, J. and Valence, P., F. (2009). “Business Development During Project Execution.” Marketing Handbook for the Design and
to satisfy the TAC of ABET 2000accreditation criteria and other accreditation needs to maintain accreditation of their programs. Thispaper discusses the hardware/software used in each group of the Computer Based Virtual EngineeringLaboratory (CBVEL), and its application to design Virtual Instruments (VI) modules for the analysis ofLinear, Time-Invariant (LTI) control systems.I. IntroductionThe fields of engineering, science, and technology at present are very dynamic, due to recent advancesin computer and other technologies. These advances resulted in a number of computer programs thatsolve traditional as well as novel problems. These programs, using the computer’s increasedcomputational capabilities, are key to the explosion and
assigned to our students with thetopics on virtual reality (VR) modeling related to renewable energy, power systems, environment,robotics, or other engineering topics. These projects have become a good example of student-centric green STEM program as well as providing valuable hands-on experience to the students.In addition to providing useful lessons in teamwork and project management, the projects providea working demonstration of a wind and solar energy system. The goals of all the projects are toexplore and enhance student understanding of the green STEM program and how they can betailored for fast graduation of enrolled students. The objectives of the final project in EET 320Renewable Energy Systems include: 1. To design a 3D model of Wind
professors expect ofengineering students saying: So they expect you to manage your time well um, expect you to do your work and get it done. Sometimes they give you a lot and they expect because of the caliber of student that they, I guess, become an engineer. It’s not for the fainthearted. They expect you to be able to handle it. Like I said, time management is a huge, huge thing (Rebecca)While time management is a skill, many of the words Rebecca uses to describe expectationswere global traits of the whole person, not a specific set of actions relegated to an engineeringstudent. She even specified that professors expect a certain “caliber” of students within theengineering program. Here, Rebecca seems to suggest that
Engineering Education. She holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech as well as M.S. and B.S. degrees in civil engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology.Dr. Stephen Secules, Florida International University Stephen is an Assistant Professor Engineering and Computing Education at Florida International University. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught a number of courses on design, sociotechnical contexts, education, and learning. He conducts research on equity and culture in engineering education and supports undergraduate and graduate student researchers through the Equity Research
member of the IBM/TQM UniversityPartnership, we have established an effective communication channel with a wide range of practicingengineering professionals. One of the primary objectives developed as a result of these interactions is the increased use of studentteams in both instructional and advisory roles. Both COE and IME have been using students to help evaluateteaching and in the promotion and tenure process for some time. We are now actively initiating a program tohelp in instructional process improvement. Students are serving as facilitators on TQM teams and in the fallterms of 1994 and 1995 senior engineering students were used to assist teams in the Engineering Orientation(ENGR 111) course. At the end of the terms, the student
teachers in classroom management: An experiment in secondary classrooms.Journal of educational research, 79, 51-58.3. Flanders, N. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley PublishingCompany.4. Harris, A.H. (1988). Sources of treatment effects in a teacher effectiveness training program. Unpublisheddissertation. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.5. Stallings, J. (1977). Learning to look. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.ALENE H. HARRIS is a Research Asst. Professor of Education in Peabody College of Vanderbilt University. Sheserves as the Director of Education Programs for the VaNTH ERC.CHAD W. WASHINGTON is a graduate student in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at VanderbiltUniversity
Paper ID #39219Board 311: Impacts of the ProQual Institute: Building Communities ofTechnical Stem Faculty for Long-Term Engagement in Educational ResearchDr. John Ray Morelock, University of Georgia Dr. Morelock is an Assistant Professor of Practice with an emphasis on engineering education research, and the Associate Director of Educational Innovation and Impact for UGA’s Engineering Education Trans- formations Institute (EETI). In addition to coordinating EETI’s faculty development programming, Dr. Morelock conducts research on institutional change via faculty development, with an emphasis on innova- tive ways to
Construction Engineering and Management., 135(8), 675–682. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE) 0733-9364 (2009)135:8(675) 2. Dougherty, D. (1992). “Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms.” Organization Science, May 1992 vol. 3 no. 2 179-202. doi: 10.1287/orsc.3.2.179 3. Sonnenwald, D. and Pierce, L. (2000). “Information behavior in dynamic group work contexts: interwoven situational awareness, dense social networks and contested collaboration in command and control.” Information Processing and Management, 36 (2000) 461-479 4. Puddicombe, M. (1997). “Designers and Contractors: Impediments to Integration.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 123, No. 3, September
independently. Thesurvey results indicate that students reported significant improvements in time management,research skills, and self-confidence. These findings reinforce the hypothesis that data-drivenresearch experiences contribute to both academic growth and the development of lifelonglearning skills. In conclusion, this paper provides insights into how undergraduate students atprimarily teaching institutions can benefit from hands-on, innovative data-driven AI researchexperiences. It also offers potential strategies for incorporating these valuable skills into futureundergraduate research opportunities, enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes.INTRODUCTIONData analysis plays a pivotal role in modern engineering systems and processes
support faculty career development and education research.Dr. Philip Reid Brown, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Philip Brown is an Associate Teaching Professor in Undergraduate Education at Rutgers School of Engineering. He has a PhD in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. He teaches, coordinates and develops curricula focused on engineering design, computer programming and data literacy. He also co-coordinates faculty development and peer-support groups based on pedagogical development and peer teaching observations. His research interests include student and faculty motivation, computer programming pedagogy, and faculty pedagogical development.Mary Elizabeth Emenike, Rutgers, The State University of
paper covers only three types of these projects, contracts, or collaborations, discussing theirbenefits to faculty, students, industry, and more importantly, the opportunity these projectsprovide to the college to enhance its laboratories and experiential learning of the students.Long Term, multi-year, CollaborationPurdue University Northwest department of Engineering Technology has had an “ApprenticeshipTraining” contract with BP since 2017. The annual contract has been as low as $38,000 to ashigh as $264,000, depending on training needs of BP of America. The base contract provides BPtraining space for their Machinist Apprenticeship program for up to 40 weeks per year, where thetraining is done by BP employees, using Purdue equipment
theory and facilitating interdisciplinary graduate programs; the identity development and experiences of interdisciplinary engineering graduate students and faculty; and the decision-making processes and factors impacting implementation of interdisciplinary graduate education initiatives. She works as a graduate research assistant for the Virginia Tech Disaster Resilience and Risk Management interdisciplinary graduate program, as well as for the VT Center for Refugee, Migrant, and Displacement Studies.Dr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center
Liberal Arts and Engineering Studies, Director of Women’s Engineering Programs, and CENG Interim Associate Dean. Although she has taught over 25 different courses, she currently teaches Financial Decision making, First Year engineering, Senior Project, and Change Management. Her research is in Engineering Education where she has received $11.8 million of funding from NSF as either PI or Co-PI. She researches equitable classroom practices, integrated learning, and institutional change. She spent the 2019-2020 academic year at Cal State LA.Dr. Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jane Lehr is a Professor in Ethnic Studies and Women’s and Gender Studies and Director of the Office of
most far-reaching has been the movement towards integrating a larger practice-basedcomponent within the undergraduate curricula. This response has been triggered in part byindustry criticism that engineering students are entering the workforce with significantcompetency gaps, which has necessitated remedial training on the part of the employer. Whilemuch of the focus has been centered on competency gaps related to design experience, similarconcerns have been identified in graduates with respect to manufacturing related skills1. In Page 6.270.1"Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
committees like the College Council, Faculty Hire Committee, Employer Survey DesignCommittee, Master Program Revision Committee, and ABET Accreditation (for BS in ComputerEngineering and BS in Computer Science programs). Since I have been involved with the programand course design for many years, so I was also asked to be part of the design and revision activitiesfor the MS in Computer Science program and the Information System Engineering programs aswell as BSCS Big Data Analytics, Database I, and Database II and MSCS Software Architecture,Software Engineering, Advanced Database Systems, Advanced Database Programming, DatabaseManagement Systems, and Database Management and Security courses. I have extensive program accreditation experience due
technologies that should be incorporated in a modernmanufacturing education experience.THOMAS W. GRAVER is RPMI’s Director of Operations and Assistant Director of the CIMS Program, amultidisciplinary manufacturing education program for graduate students. Prior to coming to Georgia Tech, Graverworked more than 10 years with Cincinnati Milacron. He continues to consult for industry in manufacturingsystems design and in product development. He holds degrees in ME, ISyE, and Management.LEON F. McGINNIS is a Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Director of CIMS, and Associate Page 2.166.4Director of the Manufacturing Research Center
experiencing every aspect ofimplementing new material, they can provide a unique perspective to the design andimplementation process. Teachers are a valuable resource to curriculum developers.The CIC in partnership with Louisiana Tech University has developed a range of new curriculafor K-12. The educational programs from NICERC span three states. The demographic makeupof the schools implementing the curriculum is diverse including urban, rural, and suburbanregions. The development model used to design these courses is based on the engineering designprocess5, 6. NICERC Subject Matter Experts, which included engineering and science facultyfrom Louisiana Tech University, designed the two courses with the fundamental content in mind.The design teams for
on a topic relevant to their chosen engineering sub-discipline, written andorganized according to disciplinary convention. To prepare students to organize and execute atechnical document, TWC instructors provide access and training in relevant softwareapplications. These applications include: reference managers; third-party compiled LaTeX,cloud-based collaborative writing tools, and applications designed to improve syntax and clarity.Students also practice delivering verbal briefs. Veteran engineering students often haveexperience delivering presentations and verbal briefs, and are well-positioned to modelpresentation delivery, provide peer student feedback, and help develop a sense of audienceawareness in their non-veteran
manufacturing design process. On the contrary, cost is not an issue for academicinstitutions since many software companies have educational programs offering drastic pricereductions.This study presents a general manufacturing process course utilizing manufacturing processsimulation tools as instructional aids. The objective of the course is to accomplish intelligent useof the software tools in learning design of parts, processes or tooling. Basics of numerical analysismethods, upon which the software are based, are also taught in the proposed course. With theassistance of these tools, students can visualize and better study the manufacturing processes.Issues such as cycle time, load and power requirements, material flow, solidification