already expressed our doubt on the efficacy of economics to trulyexplain the social context of technology. Olin College requires a course on entrepreneurship,which also seems to us limited. Villanova, like Rutgers, requires a course on professional ethics.University of Texas limits the humanities and social science courses that count for engineeringdistribution, but the remaining list is highly idiosyncratic and not limited to STS-type courses.Perhaps the “hero” of this group of 20 is Stanford, which has a “Technology in Society”requirement that demands that engineering students take one from among about a dozenspecified courses (although one of the options is entrepreneurship). Anecdotally, there are otherinstitutions that have more successfully
percentage of students selecting ratings from 1-8 are shown with 1 being “strongly disagree” and 8 being “strongly agree”.Examples of student comments related to problem-solving included: One of the other ways that this course has contributed to my education is that it provided me with opportunities to explore new problems and find creative solutions to problems that don’t already have a clear defined answer in the back of the book. (2016-17) This class was very empowering; I realized that I can solve problems, that I can do something new; that I can create. (2016-17) 10The third aspect in Figure 8 relates to global engineering where 84% of students felt confident
. This series of key engineering activities constitutes the major elementsof system architecture, which is an essential predecessor to any successful engineering effort,especially as the complexity of systems/systems of systems and socio-technical systems continueto grow.Unfortunately, these architecture-centric activities and system thinking techniques are nottypically part of an engineering curriculum. Undergraduate academics are so filled with corecourses and humanities that domain learning is primarily limited to the upper class years, leavinglittle room for system architecture. Noticing the gap in system architecture education, severaluniversities have recently started offering architecture related graduate degrees/certificates.However
hones students’ skills in soliciting community stakeholderfeedback in order to generate innovative solutions. In PFE I, students are introduced toengineering and ethical best practices, as well as various career opportunities. In PFE II, studentsare further introduced to careers in technology development, research, and academia. Studentstour engineering labs, experience faculty guest lectures, and consider how to solicit and integratecommunity stakeholder perspectives as they generate solutions to engineering-related problems.Finally, in PFE III, students learn how to use ethical engineering principles to create designs thatmeet societal needs. In each PFE I–III course, about 50 out-of-class hours are allocated forworking on students’ capstone
a local community foundation to bring technology to elementary studentsusing LEGO™ bricks, gears and pneumatic elements. That initial grant for over $6000 resultedin three separate days of workshops in three different schools. In each school workshops wereconducted simultaneously for as many as three different classes of fifth and sixth grade students.Nearly all the faculty and most of the staff of the Purdue College of Technology in Columbuswere involved in these workshops. Pre and post tests were given to attempt to determine howmuch learning had occurred. Thank-you notes received by the workshop organizers containedvery positive comments from the participants.After that first success, the author has received 9 more grants from
Paper ID #35327Changing the Mindset of Engineering Education through BiomimicryDr. Ross A. Lee, Villanova University ROSS LEE Dr. Ross A. Lee, Villanova University Ross Lee is a Professor of Practice in Sustainable Engineering at Villanova University where he teaches Biomimicry, Sustainable Materials and Design, and Engineering Entrepreneurship. In addition to his academic experience (joined Villanova in 2008), Dr. Lee has over 36 years of industrial experience with the DuPont company (retired July 2009) spanning a wide variety of technology, product and new business developments including films, resins
thousands of students each year. This is the largest event of its kind in the nation, and it culminates in an Annual Robot Rally. The REAL initiative has inspired thousands of young students to pursue STEM education. He is a pioneer in developing engaging, online tutorials. He founded APlusStudent, an online supplemental K-12 education company in 1998, and developed over 800 interactive, learning modules. More recently He has been involved in CSU course redesign initiative focused on redesigning bottleneck courses with technol- ogy. His interests are in the fields of education, entrepreneurship, product design and biomimicry. He has been instrumental in bringing many new products to the market from mere concepts, He is a
in 2017. The Change the Worldcourse was conceived as an opportunity to teach the skills and scaffold the process ofintrospection. The target audience for this course is undergraduate engineering students whohave some practice in dissecting the successes and failures of finished projects but often little orno practice in reflecting on themselves. The course also includes content, activities, andassessments that address two GCSP competencies (multicultural and social consciousness)present in Olin’s larger curriculum but less prominent (and less developed) in the typicalundergraduate experience than the talent, multidisciplinary, and entrepreneurship competencies.The primary learning objectives of Change the World are critical thinking and
during lectures and in-class examples. She also participated in a dissertation study about active learning in engineering disciplines when teaching at The University of Alabama.Dr. Andrew Scott, Alabama A&M University Andrew Scott has been a faculty member with the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Alabama A&M University, Huntsville, since 2002. He has a strong background in high- performance scientific computing, including algorithms and numerical analyses on parallel and distributed c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #17812 systems. He
A Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on stu- dent perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She was selected to participate in the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Frontiers of Engineering Education Sympo- sium in 2013, awarded the American Society for Engineering Education
between lecture and laboratory, academia andindustrial practice. Facilities for active learning are provided by the Learning Factory8 at each school. Thecurriculum consists of existing courses in Graphics, and Manufacturing Processes, as well as new courses inProduct Dissection, Concurrent Engineering and Technology-Based Entrepreneurship. The senior capstonedesign course has been upgraded to use industry projects almost exclusively. The Product Dissection course isthe subject of this paper. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Interdisciplinary Senior Year Design/Manufacturing Project Entrepreneurship
studies and narrative inquiry.Dr. Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Nadia Kellam is Associate Professor in the Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University (ASU). She is a qualitative researcher who primarily uses narrative research methods and is interested more broadly in interpretive research methods. In her research, Dr. Kellam is broadly interested in developing critical understandings of the culture of engineering education and, espe- cially, the experiences of underrepresented undergraduate engineering students and engineering educators. In addition to teaching undergraduate engineering courses and a graduate course on entrepreneurship, she
experiential education leading to systems thinkingdevelopment by using multidisciplinary teams assigned by professors to work on industry-ledprojects in the classroom that counts for a significant percentage of the final grade. It alsoexplains how industry is engaged through outside-class projects jointly supervised by industryleaders and professors; these inside and outside class room experiences become the primarymechanisms to develop the soft engineering skills required from engineering graduates. Whilewe encourage students and faculty internships with industry, we also schedule “industrypractitioners” for project reviews, seminars, workshops, and guest lecturers. Program objectivesand outcomes follow ABET guidelines and have been jointly defined
second year engineering students. Scott received his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh, with a focus on global engineering education. His current research areas include cultural competency in engineering education, pedagogical inmoves through game-based and playful learning, and engineering ethics education. Scott has recently received funding through the National Science Foun- dation (NSF) to conduct research on the impact of game-based learning on the development of first-year students’ ethical reasoning, as well as research on the development of culturally responsive ethics edu- cation in global contexts. He is an active member of the Kern Engineering Entrepreneurship Network
(Associate Professor) (Georgia Institute of Technology)Emily GrubertSusan E Burns (Dr.) (Georgia Institute of Technology)Iris TienKari WatkinsJohn H Koon (Professor of Practice)Robert Benjamin Simon (Academic Professional) Robert Simon serves as an Academic Professional for the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) at Georgia Tech. In this role, he administers certain aspects of academic operations and program development while also contributing to the undergraduate Global Engineering Leadership Minor by teaching in courses involving engineering leadership, innovation, and organizational effectiveness. He co-instructs the Innovation & Entrepreneurship in Civil Engineering Systems course, and is a member of the
Paper ID #37598Development of A Bootcamp for Freshman Student SuccessDuring COVID-19 TransitionNoe Vargas Hernandez (Assistant Professor) Dr. Vargas Hernandez is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at UTexas Rio Grande Valley with expertise on product innovation and entrepreneurship, design thinking, sustainable design, biomedical design, and design education. He has ample experience teaching design and innovation to student teams currently at UTRGV, and previously at UT El Paso and Carnegie Mellon University. He is currently leading an effort to promote Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the
, and Dentsu, among many others. David holds a Ph.D. (Cum Laude) in Applied Economics, Entrepreneurship and Strategy, from Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, a Ph.D., in Sociology from the University of Bucharest, a Master of Arts in Liberal Studies from DePaul University, and a Bachelor of Business Administration, in Marketing and Economics from Western Michigan University. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Reimagining Engineering Education: Does Industry 4.0 need Education 4.0?AbstractIndustry 4.0 is a commonly used term to refer to the fourth industrial revolution that is currentlyunderway. The
Research.Dr. Vikram Kapila, New York University Vikram Kapila is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics and Control Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a GK-12 Fellows project, and a DR K-12 research project, all funded by NSF. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests include K-12 STEM education, mechatronics, robotics, and control system technology. Under Research Experience for Teachers Site and GK-12 Fellows programs, funded by NSF, and the Central Brooklyn STEM Initiative (CBSI), funded by six philanthropic foundations
participation in in-class activities; the intent is forthese courses to be taught by a Professor of Practice. The PFE courses, which are taken in themiddle sophomore and junior years, also serve as a bridge linking the freshman engineeringdesign experience (all USF engineering students are required to complete the freshmanEngineering Foundations course), with the senior capstone design courses required of electricalengineering students. Table I lists the course objectives for each of the 1-credit PFE courses. Table I. Course Objectives for the Professional Formation of Engineers Course Series PFE 1 will provide students a PFE 2 will provide students a PFE 3 will provide students a foundation in: foundation in
andengineering. One study explored the relationship between mindfulness and innovation inengineering and found that dispositional mindfulness significantly correlated with innovationself-efficacy among students (Rieken et al, 2017). This study defined innovation self-efficacy asone’s confidence in their ability to innovate. There was another study that demonstratedmindfulness correlated with business skills self-efficacy (i.e. students’ confidence in performingbusiness skills) and the intent to pursue a career in a start-up or entrepreneurship (Rieken, Schar,and Sheppard, 2016). The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether engineering studentswould be receptive to potentially integrating contemplative practices such as mindfulnessmeditation to
, a local industrialist Henry M. Rowan made a $100,000,000 donation to the thenGlassboro State College in order to establish a high-quality engineering school in southern NewJersey. This gift has enabled the university to create an innovative and forward-lookingengineering program. Since 1996, the exceptional capabilities of each incoming class ofapproximately 100 engineering students at Rowan (average SAT score of 1260; average class rankof top 13%) have repeatedly verified the need for a quality undergraduate engineering school in thequickly growing region of southern New Jersey. The College of Engineering at Rowan is comprised of four departments: Chemical; Civiland Environmental; Electrical and Computer; and Mechanical. Each
settings [3]. The concerns about discrepancy between the industry expectations and graduate practice readiness has been alluded to for general engineering [6], studied within software engineering [11], civil engineering [10], and chemical engineering graduates [12]. Literature has shown that there are a number of approaches higher education institutions have taken to improve their graduates’ practice readiness, some of which have enhanced students’ employability through developing generic skills or holistic competencies [4]. Additionally, some institutions have implemented capstone design classes, in an effort to meet ABET criteria on student outcomes and address concerns regarding graduates ill-prepared for industrial
those encountered in the engineering world, including developing hard and toughmaterials, optimizing the division of labor and resources, maintaining constant temperature, andgenerating efficient propulsion in air and water. Biologically-inspired design (BID) refers toapplying such natural solutions to generate innovative design solutions for human-encounteredtechnical challenges. Such design is inherently multidisciplinary, bringing together disciplinesboth from engineering and the sciences. This article reports on ethnographic studies ofmultidisciplinary student design teams and a multidisciplinary team of educators in a senior-levelundergraduate BID class offered at our institution. The most significant challenges came at theadministrative
courses, estimated at perhaps two dozen, indicatesopportunity and need for expansion in order to increase the technological literacy of USundergraduates as both NAE and NSF have recommended. Among the current courses, several have been taught for more than ten years,others are as recent as one year. Class size varied from ten to several hundred, according Page 11.1239.2to campus. The highest enrollment examples were found at campuses where thetechnological literacy course fulfilled a technical or science distribution requirement fornon-engineering students. Thus the design of technological literacy courses to meet localdistribution and
discipline-driven path Pathways accounted for 19.84% and 13.49% of the total frequency, respectively. In addition, the interview data also reflects the engineering innovation path, which is to implement the construction of “New Engineering” by establishing innovation practice platforms and constructuring an engineering innovation and entrepreneurship center. Although the proportion of its frequency is only 4.80%, some universities have still fully affirmed this path during the interview. Table 5: Coding results of the implementation path of the "new engineering" construction based on the overall perspective Emerging Engineering Education Frequency The ratio of frequencies construction path Exogenously industry-led path
undergraduate Class Type Elective students on non-thesis track ISE students Target Graduate Juniors, Seniors, and Graduate Juniors AudienceOther Majors Vast Majority are ECE Yes No Instructor Lisa Fiorentini Shawn Midlam-Mohler Jack Slavinski Name Figure 1: Summary Table of PM CoursesOverview of ECE 6070: Project Management in Electrical and Computer EngineeringIn this course, students learn general PM principles, processes, and tools, team culture
teaching improvement, eitherfor specific disciplines or in conjunction with the annual meeting, have been held. Theseprograms continue with popular regional and National Effective Teaching Institutes, the latterheld in conjunction with the ASEE annual meeting. In 1983 the ASEE Quality in EngineeringEducation Project again called for more training of faculty in educational methods.Students suffer when professors do not learn to teach until after their first classes. Workshops arealso always constrained by the time available. A better approach is to learn to teach in graduateschool by taking a course in the College of Engineering on teaching methods. As early as 1972Professor Jim Stice pioneered this approach at the University of Texas at Austin3
Technology (“Georgia Tech”), providingteachers with curriculum resources, professional development, and site visit opportunities.Additionally, the university hosts the annual statewide competition each year [3]. The goal of theK-12 IP program is to increase students’ exposure to and experience with engineering andentrepreneurship, while placing a unique emphasis on student choice, collaboration, andteamwork [2]-[4]. Since the beginning of the program in 2012, teachers have adapted K-12 IPlesson plans in Kindergarten through 12th grade, implementing lessons in core classes, giftedclasses, out-of-school clubs, or with students working independently outside of school [2], [3],[6]. Over 12,000 students from across the state have participated in the K-12
. Unfortunately, although we haveidentified an object within our data, it still has no meaning or relative definition for use by anapplication. We need to introduce a hierarchy of sorts and provide a manner in which multipleobjects may be identified as the same type, or class of object, yet each object is distinct from theother. Furthermore, we must define a meaning or relative association to our object.Once the individual aspects of the data have been identified, RDF is used to provide logic andmeaning through the use of RDF triples. Similar to the way we use English language withnouns, adverbs and verbs to construct a sentence to define who does what and how that action isdone, RDF triples state the relationship between bits of data. For example, let’s
-confidence, high school preparation, interest and career goals, and race andgender,” which they believed were interrelated [3]. Of these studies, twenty-eight indicated thathigh school preparation was a factor. The studies revealed a host of high school pedagogicalreason for attrition, including inadequate mathematics (calculus) preparation, low performance inscience classes, including physics, social sciences, and chemistry, overall high school GPA, andhigh school class rank. Some studies indicate that women and racial minorities may have lessaccess to high quality educational resources and opportunities during their high school years,which could impact their level of preparation for engineering programs in postsecondaryeducation. A significant