activities that encourage collaboration and teamwork among the participants. Working in groups enhances problem-solving and communication skills, major skills much needed in STEM. 7. Personalized learning: Recognize the diverse interests and abilities of the students and offer opportunities for personalized learning paths. Pre-assessments to gauge the students’ knowledge should be considered and then, the curriculum can be tailored accordingly. 8. Safety protocols: For in-person or virtual hands-on activities and experiments, prioritize the safety and well-being of the participants. Extra care should be given to ensure that all participants understand and follow all relevant health and safety guidelines
Year 1 Cohort of S-STEM Scholars 4 4 3 3 Hispanic/Latino White/Caucasian Males Females Figure 1. Demographics of S-STEM cohorts in Year 1 (AY 2021-2022).An online survey was conducted to gather feedback on the team's year 1 planning andimplementation efforts, as well as the ongoing support provided to the seven scholars. Thesurvey included general perceptual questions aimed at assessing the satisfaction levels ofparticipants. The results of the survey are summarized in Figure 2.Upon analysis of the survey responses, it was evident
gather data and ini(ate interven(ons during this (me frame. The basic frameworkwas laid out in Asgarpoor’s paper [8], as indicated by figure 1 below. Figure 1: Proposed Steps of EAIS ProcessStep 1: Solicita(on. Iden(fica(on of key and common first year courses that impact a student’sreten(on in STEM majors.Step 2: Referral/Early Alert. Monitoring pre-course assessments, early term courseachievement, akendance, and faculty referrals to iden(fy students struggling early in the term.Step 3: Interven(on. Reach out to students by faculty, academic advisors, and/or student affairsprofessionals to help students think cri(cally about their struggles.Step 4: Support. Connect students to appropriate campus resources and follow up
, andgraduation for a contextual and robust description of the impact of the programmatic interventions. Thisresearch question requires coordination with the project evaluator and will be addressed later in the project,as longitudinal cohort data takes time to assemble.RQ3: How do the programmatic, social, economic, and institutional elements of Flit-GAP’s multi-institutional hybrid learning community support these outcomes and how can they be designed tosupport them further?In a post-COVID reality, many aspects of the internships, research experiences, and community buildingthat students engage in Flit-GAP continue to be virtual, and this level of community building has beenseldom assessed in education research. The multi-layered nature of the virtual
Paper ID #46179Exploring Black male participation on undergraduate engineering studentteams using interpretative phenomenological analysis (Work in Progress)Dr. Royce A Francis, The George Washington University Dr. Royce Francis is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering [EMSE] at the George Washington University. At George Washington, Dr. Francis’s engineering education research explores the relationships between professional identity formation and engineering judgment. His other research interests include infrastructure resilience and risk assessment, and safer chemicals
Paper ID #47819In the Age of LLMs, Is Dual-Submission Homework Dead?Dr. Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Dr. Gehringer is a professor in the Departments of Computer Science, and Electrical & Computer Engineering. His research interests include data mining to improve software-engineering practice, and improving assessment through machine learning and natural language processing.Madhur Dixit, North Carolina State University at RaleighKavya Lalbahadur Joshi ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 In the Age of LLMs, Is Dual-Submission Homework Dead
-reviewed publication.AssessmentSince 2017, 19 undergraduate students have participated in the SCUBA program. Table 1provides an overview of the annual student participation in activities since the program’sinception. At the conclusion of each SCUBA experience, the evaluation team conducted surveysand focus groups to assess participants' perceptions of the research experience and mentorship.While both surveys and focus groups were utilized, survey data was excluded to maintainrespondent anonymity. Additionally, due to the small number of survey responses this paperfocuses exclusively on the focus group data. Table 1: Annual student participation by year (*no activities due to COVID-19 pandemic
United States values local control of education; therefore,this paper will provide examples for how states are assessing the capacity needed should CSbecome a graduation requirement, and how the computer science education (CSEd) communitycan build off of each other rather than endorse a model for calculation. We encourage others touse these examples as a starting point to understand their own needs.This paper is particularly relevant to the Pre College Engineering Education community. Likeengineering, CS has traditionally been offered as an elective course, if it is available at all [6]. Inrecent years, the push to expand access to more students, particularly through graduationrequirements, means that more students, and potentially all, will
post-traditional students in terms ofcategories and extents of post-traditional status, 2) examine the intersectionality of the post-traditional population with other historically excluded demographic groups, and 3) assess theeducational outcomes for this intersectional and underserved population. We draw onintersectionality theory and Choy’s [1] post-traditional student status classifications tooperationalize the analytical categories and procedures for our quantitative study. We utilize thede-identified institutional data from undergraduate engineering students enrolled during the2023-2024 academic year at a large Hispanic-Serving Institution in the Southeastern UnitedStates and employ descriptive statistics, mean difference tests, and
with anexternal consultant, 20+ faculty members reflected on and identified a plan to enact equity-minded and inclusive teaching and learning practices. Specifically, they identified deficit-mindedand equity-minded statements on teaching documents, self-assessed their teaching philosophystatement and course syllabus, and designed a feedback/assessment component.Jumpstart boostcamp & Facilitator Training: The Jumpstart Boostcamp is a one-week longonboarding experience for incoming freshman CECS students. This program ameliorated thelack of high school rigor that inhibits academic success for some of our students, many of whomare first-generation college students. Jumpstart Bootcamps were offered right before the Fallsemesters. CBP also
enhanced by this approach. A parallel study of studentperformance on theoretical examinations or other methods to measure concept mastery wouldstrengthen the support for this methodology. The author hopes to present results of this analysisin future publications.References1 Wayne Chang, Seung Woo Ok, Matthew West, Sascha Hilgenfeldt, and Mariana Silva. "Effects of Integrating Computational Tools into an Introductory Engineering Mechanics Course". 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon, 2024, June. ASEE Conferences, 2024. https://peer.asee.org/472262 K. M. DeGoede, Competency Based Assessment in Dynamics, Proceedings of the 2018 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and
Chair, Professor and Chair in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of North Dakota. He holds a Ph.D. from the California Institute of Technology and a B.S from Brigham Young University.Dr. Bethany Jean Klemetsrud P.E., University of North Dakota Beth Klemetsrud is an assistant professor at the University of North Dakota where she studies equity and culturally relevant pedagogy in engineering education, waste to energy conversion, and life cycle assessment. Beth is from the White Earth Nation and is grateful to be able to work on my homelands and to be so close to my family and community. She graduated with her Bachelor of Science in Chemical Engineering at the University of Minnesota Duluth. She
. Figure 4 illustrates the GSM-based intelligent monitoring system, displaying the system status (Disarmed) and laboratory environmental parameters on the OLED. Figure 4. The GSM-Based intelligent monitoring system. 3. Evaluating the Impact of Hands-on Learning To assess the impact of hands-on learning in embedded systems design courses onundergraduate research, an anonymous student survey was conducted using the SurveyMonkeyplatform. The survey aimed to examine how practical learning experiences influencedundergraduate research and to gather insights from student research advising that could enhancemy teaching practices. The anonymous survey included nine questions: six multiple-choicequestions and three open
also effectively connects theoretical knowledge with real-world engineering practices, enabling students to appreciate the importance of trusses in bridgeconstruction and other infrastructure. Additionally, the lesson aligns with various educationalstandards and provides detailed instructions, vocabulary, and assessment tools to ensurethorough comprehension and practical application of the concepts.Weaknesses. A potential weakness of this lesson plan is its reliance on students' prior knowledgeof interior and exterior angles, which may not be uniformly understood by all participants.Without a strong foundational understanding, some students might struggle to fully grasp themore complex concepts of truss stability and load distribution
Engineering from the University of Louisville. Her research interests are in biomechanics and engineering education, particularly related to first-year students. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 First-Year Student Perceptions of Course Skills Utilized in Hands-On Final ProjectThis complete evidence-based practice paper is focused on assessing student perceptions of keycourse skills that they used while completing a final project for a hands-on makerspace course. Atthe University of Louisville’s J.B. Speed School of Engineering, all students – regardless ofdiscipline - are required to take a two-sequence introductory course that covers the fundamentalconcepts of engineering. The second of these
Team's Work • Interacting with Teammates • Keeping the Team on Track • Expecting Quality • Having Related Knowledge, Skills, and AbilitiesThese categories have been thoroughly researched through a multi-year, multi-university study knownas Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness (CATME)6 which was first reportedon in 2006. We have implemented the CATME peer evaluation system within our online capstoneproject management system EduSourced7. The survey form guides students through the evaluationprocess for each of the five categories with behaviorally anchored rating scales as shown in Figure 1for the “Contributing to the Team’s Work” category. Proceedings of the 2025 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual
Fred Lacy Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Southern University, Baton Rouge AbstractOver the last decade, the emergence of technician education has taken center stage at secondary andpost-secondary educational institutions through the proliferation of industry needs and employerpartner engagement. Through employer-partner engagement, Southern University at Shreveport,Louisiana (SUSLA), a community college unit within the Southern University and A&M CollegeSystem, conducted a systematic review, assessment, and revision of its curricula that addressed theneeds of industry. SUSLA’s comprehensive assessment, guided by employer
begins with Ask, where students identify a specific problem, research existingsolutions, and define the challenges to build a strong foundation. Next, in Imagine, they brainstormmultiple ideas, evaluate their feasibility, and select the most promising solution, fosteringcreativity and decision-making. During Plan, students organize their approach by creating detaileddiagrams, material lists, and step-by-step instructions, emphasizing systematic preparation. InCreate, they implement their plan by building and testing a prototype, linking theory to hands-onapplication and assessing functionality. Finally, in Improve, students analyze their results, refinetheir design, and make iterative modifications, promoting resilience, adaptability, and
ForwardTo address the needs revealed through the surveys, the library will continue to maintain a proactive,user-centered approach. The liaison librarian will work to identify opportunities for integratinglibrary resources into teaching through regularly engaging with faculty to identify emerging needsand align library services with their research and instructional goals. Piloting initiatives, such as theSTEM library peer-to-peer tutoring program for foundational engineering courses, which will beginin the spring of 2025, will be a focus as we continue to determine the best ways to meet the needs ofour engineering community. Most importantly, we will continue to assess and refine these servicesas we work toward improving student outcomes and
attainment, aswell as career success and satisfaction, especially for students from underrepresented groups [15].Mentoring support was to be positively associated with organizational identification and negativelyassociated with turnover intentions, particularly for individuals high in generativity [7]. By fosteringan inclusive environment through structured, student-aligned research projects and mentorship fromfaculty with similar backgrounds, URM students are more integrated into the academic community.In addition to the impact resulted from student project engagement, we will assess the role ofmentorship in the development of a student’s STEM identity and their sense of belonging, both ofwhich are critical predictors of persistence and success in
Control: The Control phase ensures that the improvements are sustained over time bymonitoring the process and preventing regression to old habits. Control charts, standard operatingprocedures (SOPs), and regular audits are used to maintain consistency and ensure that the processcontinues to meet the desired performance levels. Teams also establish feedback mechanisms toaddress any deviations promptly.Example: Regularly scheduled maintenance checks and ongoing operator assessments could helpmaintain reduced downtime levels.Implementing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) is essential for maintaining control oversystems because they establish a consistent, repeatable framework for operations. SOPs ensurethat tasks are performed in the same manner
that would include occludded fire, varying smoke intensity, and obstructions within the environment. • Real-World Tests: To truly evaluate a model like this, the best way to evaluate is to actually use drone captured images and assess that way. The difference between Training and evaluation data is to make sure that the algorithm is not memorizing certain aspects of fire but actually learning to identify fire across different scenarios. If deep learning is used in future work, certain performance metrics such as, precision, recall, and a F1-score, will be used on the evaluation dataset to measure accuracy and robustness.III. Software Implementation The software stack
encouragedinnovation and problem-solving. The iterative process of 16design and optimization presented challenges like 14improving sun-tracking accuracy, enhancing light 12reflection efficiency, and ensuring mechanical stability. 10These obstacles pushed students to critically assess 8potential inefficiencies and come up with creative 6solutions, cultivating the problem-solving mindset needed 4to tackle future energy challenges. 2 0Method and Approach
collaborated with powered cybersecurity solutions enhance enterprise securitywith Microsoft Copilot by detecting threats and automating IT individual assignments such as reflections, concept questions,workflows for safer operations [15]. In short, AI holds quiz, homework, and one individual design project.significant transformative potential, especially in education, butrequires a structured, ethical approach. In education, AI should III. METHODbe designed with pedagogical principles, data privacy, andethical guidelines at its core, supporting personalized learning We used Likert scale surveys to assess the extent to which[16
engineering structure fails, an investigation a stereomicroscope to examine a material sample surface by is usually launched to determine the cause of failure, which can manually tracking the location of flaws and voids. The data include an assessment of the materials used. For example, if a is collected and analyzed using principles of stereology. This concrete structure collapses, samples of the concrete are taken and examined through a petrographic analysis. A petrographer process can be tedious and slow. As an alternative, a flatbed traditionally requires the use of sophisticated microscopes and scanner may be used for image capture. Flatbed scanners are costly proprietary software programs, placing a high barrier
to improving web application security. By using inference onstudy employ a comparative analysis framework, using datasets datasets with vulnerability examples, these models can recog-of cookie security and cybersecurity logs, and apply prompt nize patterns and anomalies signaling potential security flaws.engineering to evaluate LLMs in identifying flaws in HTTP This method supports scalability and efficiency, allowing real-headers, analyzing security attributes. Our findings show LLMscan detect insecure cookie configurations, automate assessments, time monitoring and quick detection. Integrating LLMs intoand provide actionable insights, though challenges
University where he teaches courses on ethics/professionalism and water resources. Dr. Carpenter has served as the University Director of Assessment and theAlyssa TaubeLynne Seymour ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Collaborative Outreach to Inspire Interest in Civil and Environmental Engineering Through Stormwater Design using Best Management PracticesAbstractThis paper presents an engaging activity developed for the outreach event Blue Planet Jobs:Careers in Water, hosted by the nonprofit organization Pure Oakland Water (POW).Approximately 250 high school students participating in career readiness programs exploredopportunities in various water
is no attempt to enforce equal participation by allmembers. At the same time, the classroom activity is more structured than Feldman et al’sproposed active participation exercises (10), which last no more than 3 minutes at a time and donot result in a deliverable. Our exercises are thus somewhere between “Collaborative Learning”and unstructured active participation exercises in complexity and implementation; they require atangible product in the form of a completed worksheet, and thus give a sample of how studentsare doing, but are not used to assess student mastery of the material like, e.g., an exam or regularhomework assignment.A similar strategy to ours is Dimeral’s “workbook strategy” (11), in which textbook and lectureare augmented
engineering content presented in the course (which for the purposes of this paper is definedas those lectures delivered by the engineering faculty (CRT), ranged from quantifying energy useto Life Cycle Assessment, to an introduction to the formal Engineering Design Process. Giventhat there were no engineering students enrolled in the class, we felt this was an opportunity notonly to teach concepts traditionally identified with engineering, but to also present to the studentswhat it is that engineers do (a question that is often difficult for non-engineers to answer).As might be expected, if there was one aspect of the engineering content to which students wereless than receptive, it was the use of mathematics in making an argument or describing a
sustainable urban and resource-based uses. Homework assignments address population, landscape characterization, and the use of environmental assessment to define the impacts of humans on the landscape. GIS utilization included 2 assignments along with a one-week team project. The assignments were set up to help students learn the basics of GIS, such as importing data layers, and creating and effectively presenting a map. The project involved the analysis of potential environmental impacts resulting from residential development. Topics included map development, calculation of land areas and defining the effects of land use on water quality. CE 4061 “Hydrology”. CE 4061 (Hydrology) is a fourth-year undergraduate course that covers the