aninstructor-provided problem statement and problem illustration. The student had specific placeson the page to: a) gather information, b) organize their approach, c) sketch the system, d) analyzethe problem symbolically, e) solve the problem with numbers, f) report final numerical answers,and g) reflect on the answer. Parts a, b, and c together were worth 2/10 points. Part d was worth4/10 points, part e was worth 3.5/10 points, and part g was worth 0.5/10 points. To create theproblems, graduate research assistants browsed several dynamics books to understand the typicaltypes of problems used, and then created problems similar in scope and content. The homeworksolution template was designed to force students to utilize the problem-solving approach
“IF THEY KNOW, THEY WILL COME:” Collaboration between Penn State Harrisburg SDCET Program and Secondary Education Sofia M. Vidalis, Ph.D. & Joseph J. Cecere, Ph.D., CPC Pennsylvania State University at HarrisburgAbstractHigh school graduates continuing their formal schooling at higher education institutions mayexperience confusion as they explore and try to understand possible careers related to majorsthey think they want to pursue. High school counselors and teachers strive to keep abreast of thechanges and advancements in new and transforming careers in order to properly advise students.This information is important as students schedule
session, a professor from a particular disciplineintroduces his/her discipline and answers any questions about it. The second hour isstructured so that students research the particular discipline, for example, finding outwhat graduates in the field do, average salary, employment statistics, outlook, potentialfor graduate study, national needs, potential for advancement, career outlook, etc.Students purchase a textbook about engineering graphics and will be required to completeseveral graphics assignments. Students benefit from access to online tutoring material,some interactive sessions with an instructor, and questions and answers sessions spreadthroughout the semester.Enrollment in this course is currently capped at 16 students, with 8 lab
National Association of Colleges and Employers(NACE) has identified seven core competencies essential for (NACE) has identified seven core career readinesscareer readiness, including communication, teamwork, competencies essential for students' transition into theleadership, and professionalism [[6]]. These competencies workforce [[6]]. These competencies include communication,ensure that graduates are prepared to navigate workplace teamwork, leadership, critical thinking, professionalism,expectations and contribute effectively to their organizations. career and self-development, equity and inclusion, andWhile professionalism is often addressed in first-year technology. Each
enhance education by developing classes, workshops, and events focused on implementing hands-on, collaborative learning through solving real-world problems. He di- rects the operations of the Institute-wide Georgia Tech Capstone Design Expo, which highlights projects created by over 2000 Georgia Tech seniors graduating students on an annual basis. He serves as the fac- ulty advisor for the student organization of over 100 student volunteers who all train, staff, and manage the operations of Georgia Tech’s Flowers Invention Studio – one of the nation’s premier volunteer student-run makerspace, open to all of the Georgia Tech community. Dr. Jariwala’s research interests are in the field of makerspaces, evidence-based
out of the 217 public universities offering BSME degree are on thesemester system. A sample of 125 programs is then selected for this latter part of the study. Careis taken to ensure an unbiased selection of the programs included. The 125-program sampleintends to include representation from every state, and the number of programs selected iscorresponding to the state population. The selection of the programs within each state is thenbased on the number of graduates in AY2017-2018 [1] such that all the major programs in thenation are captured in the sample. It is noted that unfortunately none of the four Oregonprograms offering BSME degree is included in this sample study as the three public universitiesin the state (e.g., Oregon Institute of
students, and soon became a hallmark of the undergraduateprogram. By 2019, one of the course’s graduate teaching assistants was named one of threeInstitute Graduate TA’s of the Year [5]. In addition to the new course content, the course alsofeatured an optional study abroad experience in Japan (prior to the COVID-19 global pandemic).Student participants in the program toured various sites related to origami, engaged in an origamiworkshop with scholars from the University of Tokyo, and met with Koryo Miura, the creator ofthe Miura-Ori pattern.All students participated in the end-of-semester trade show, where students exhibited theirorigami solutions that addressed their chosen engineering or societal problem. Examples oforigami solutions presented
Paper ID #6575Fostering Critical Thinking Through A Service-Learning, Combined SewerAnalysis Project In An Undergraduate Course in Hydrologic EngineeringDr. Isaac W Wait, Marshall University Dr. Isaac Wait is an associate professor of Engineering in the Division of Engineering at Marshall Univer- sity in Huntington, W.Va. He conducts research and teaches courses in water resources and environmental engineering, and is a registered professional engineer in the states of Ohio and West Virginia.Prof. Jeffrey Thomas Huffman P.E., Marshall University Jeffrey T. Huffman is an assistant professor of Engineering in the Weisberg
industrialized nation [4]. Today, inthe United States (US), institutions of higher education are charged with educating the scientists,engineers, and technicians that are the vanguard of the industrial sector workforce and the humanresources that make us competitive in the world economy. Typically, engineers and scientistsstudy STEM-based (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) topics at four-yearcolleges (undergraduate and post-graduate level) with the aid of higher mathematics (typically,calculus and differential equations) to gain an extensive insight to the theory of the subjectmatter being studied. The goals of this type of education are to impart skills that enable graduatesto have the ability to solve problems and to be innovative
engineering education1. As stated by Felder et al2, a large andrapidly growing body of research confirms the effectiveness of cooperative learning in highereducation. Relative to students taught traditionally—i.e., with instructor-centered lectures,individual assignments, and competitive grading—cooperatively taught students tend toexhibit higher academic achievement, greater persistence through graduation, better high-level reasoning and critical thinking skills, deeper understanding of learned material, lowerlevels of anxiety and stress, more positive and supportive relationships with peers, morepositive attitudes toward subject areas, and higher self-esteem.On the other hand, and in a major shift influenced by pressures from industry and
curriculum.AcknowledgementsThis project is supported by the National Science Foundation through the ImprovingUndergraduate STEM Education (IUSE) program, Award No. DUE ########. Any opinions,findings, and recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.REFERENCES President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final_2-25- 12.pdf National Research Council and National Academy of Engineering (2012). Community
worked in entrepreneurial and technical management roles in a machine monitoring company.Cory A. Hixson, Virginia Tech Cory earned his B.S. in Engineering Science from Penn State University in 2007, graduating with honors. He is currently a NSF Graduate Research Fellow and is pursuing a Masters in Industrial and Systems Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Cory has experience as both a pro- fessional engineer and high school educator. It is this combination of experience that led him to Virginia Tech to pursue a doctoral degree in Engineering Education. His professional and research interests are un- derstanding the interaction between engineering/education pedagogy and entrepreneurship
ofEngineering. The model can be replicated on other campuses.IntroductionThere seems to be a general consensus that diminishing communication skills among school-aged children and young adults is reaching crisis proportions. This concern is not limited tostudents at certain universities, or those majoring in technical fields. In “ Why Johnny Can’tWrite, Even Though He Went To Princeton,” the Chronicle of Higher Education1 highlights theproblem of students progressing through their undergraduate education without developing thewriting skills necessary to communicate effectively in their chosen fields of study. In particular,employers of recent engineering graduates have noted for years a deficiency in thecommunication skills of college graduates. This
warehouses to name a few. Besides robotic control, The PLC based control system are usedin other types of applications including utilities, rides in theme parks, traffic control systems,railroad, aviation, and a variety of transportation modalities [1-6]. Traditionally, control usingPLCs is not taught in a ECE undergraduate or graduate curriculum. However, an electrical and/ormechanical engineer needs these skills to work in a variety of industries. Typical ECEcurriculum includes control theory, analog and digital electronics but seldom include courses inPLCs and integrating them with different equipment. This missing link led to the development ofPLC and industrial instrumentation related courses in remote learning and technology programs[7]-[10
workers have significantlyincreased for all manufacturing industries, “from the most labor-intensive (apparel) to the mosttechnology-intensive (medical instruments manufacturing)” [2]. While the first two factors, in Page 12.59.2Bivens’ view, are related to macro scale decision making at the government level, academic andeducational institutions are the major players in the third factor (shortage of skilled workers).The study by the Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME) identified communication skills,teamwork, project management, business skills, and life-long learning as some key competencygaps in recently graduated engineers [3]. Also
students in entrepreneurial companies__ 10%_ Employer surveys_______ Other metrics – please describeThe “Other metrics” included such things as research money raised, profits generated forthe university and the number of companies receiving external funding. While thesemetrics indicate that there is some emphasis on using entrepreneurship centers to generatethe economic benefits of entrepreneurial ventures, most of the metrics seem aimed atstudent engagement and satisfaction with the programs. While everyone agrees thatlongitudinal data after graduation may be more important to assess actual impacts, suchdata is not easy to collect. In addition to the usual barriers to successful surveys, there isa reluctance of alumni offices to bother
AC 2007-1327: DEVELOPMENT OF SCADA EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEMSTHROUGH STUDENT PROJECTS TO ENHANCE THE AUTOMATIONCURRICULUM IN A MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGYPROGRAMAndrew Otieno, Northern Illinois University Andrew Otieno is an associate professor in the Department of Technology at NIU. He has done extensive research in experimental and theoretical analysis of metal machining problems. His research and teaching interests include machine vision, manufacturing processes, finite element analysis, and manufacturing automation. Page 12.539.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Development of SCADA
instruc- tion. He also has worked on several programs and initiatives to help students bridge the gap between high school and college as well as preparing students for the rigors of mathematics. His research interests in- clude engineering education, excellence in instruction, water and wastewater treatment, civil engineering infrastructure, and transportation engineering.Dr. Edwin Hou, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Edwin Hou is a professor in the Helen and John C. Hartmann Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at New Jersey Institute of Technology. His research interests include embedded systems, autonomous vehicles, nonlinear optimization, and engineering education.Dr. Moshe Kam P.E., New Jersey
Paper ID #17065Update on the Development of an Electrical Power Technician Associate De-gree ProgramDr. Glenn T. Wrate P.E., Northern Michigan University Glenn T. Wrate received his B.S.E.E. and M.S.E.E. from Michigan Technological University (MTU) in 1984 and 1986, respectively. While attending MTU, he worked for Bechtel Power Corporation on the Belle River and Midland power generating stations. After graduating MTU, he worked for the Los Ange- les Department of Water and Power from 1986 to 1992, primarily in the Special Studies and High Voltage DC (HVDC) Stations Group. He returned to MTU in 1992 to pursue a Ph.D. in
. Students were asked about their motivation to learn course content for eachmodeling platform as well as their confidence in their ability to utilize each software package tosimulate real-world mechanical systems. Survey data was analyzed via SAS 94 English (SASInstitute, Cary, NC, USA) for statistical significance. Modeling Dynamics terminates each semester with a significant group term project. Open-ended instructions encourage teams to develop a research question about a real-world dynamicalsystem that can be investigated using the simulation tools taught in the course. Students oftenselect to use their simulation term project to supplement Capstone Design or graduate researchtopics, which typically requires students to learn and implement
research interests address a broad spectrum of educational topics, but her specialty is in how people learn problem solving skills.Prof. Gregory Richard Baker, Ohio State UniversityDr. Deborah M. Grzybowski, The Ohio State University Deborah M. Grzybowski is Professor of Practice in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engi- neering and Director of the Ohio Lions Eye Research Facility. She teaches for the First-Year Engineering Program in the Engineering Education Innovation Center at The Ohio State University. Dr. Grzybowski earned her B.S. (1980) and M.S. (1982) in Chemical Engineering and her Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineer- ing in 2000, all from The Ohio State University
need for large DAQ laboratories, has increased hands-on DAQ instruction, and has allowed expanded use of DAQ systems in ME 3701 and the otherundergraduate laboratories. With the experience gained in the undergraduate laboratories,current graduate students are using their own laptops and the PCMCIA cards (on a check-outbasis) to perform research. The history of DAQ instruction in ME at MSU, the current DAQinstructional methods, and benefits of the current ME 3701 pedagogy to the other MElaboratories and graduate instruction are detailed.IntroductionLaboratory sequences in many mechanical engineering programs are arranged for eachindividual laboratory to support a specific class, such as fluid mechanics, solid mechanics, orheat transfer
sense“real-life” problems that graduating engineers find in their first job efforts, and do help preparethe students to the multifaceted requirements of graduate research.We analyze the performances and the attitudes of different classes and students to the sledproblem and we report on a survey that reflects some of the students’ thoughts on such type ofchallenges and their usefulness.Introduction“The Sledder” is a simulation exercise in dynamics, developed at the Department of Physics andEngineering at Elizabethtown College. It was first offered in 1993 in the framework of a coursein Statics, and more recently has been incorporated into first-year Physics courses. Students areasked to simulate the dynamics of a sled along a trajectory of
preparing the Self-Study Report for the requested Criteria 2000 ABET visit was toaddress the old BSOE as the past/existing program (having graduated over 100 students), butpresent the new BSOSE as the replacement program, incorporating changes and processesevolving from assessment/feedback activities expected under Criteria 2000. An effort was madeto enhance pre-visit communications as much as feasible concerning this somewhat hybridprogram because past experience had demonstrated the value of pre-visit communications inaddressing in advance simple omissions/errors, clarifying misunderstandings, and expandingtime for more productive interactions during the actual visit (2Gerhard et al., 1999).The curriculum for the new BSOSE program is given in
discuss some of the issuesencountered including how introducing a structured writing component sparked areexamination of course content. They also present preliminary assessments of the plan.I. IntroductionIn recent years the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering (CEE) at MichiganState University has faced a reality confronting many engineering departments across thecountry. Engineering undergraduates are typically not well prepared to undertake the sortof technical communications tasks that they will face upon graduation. If the concerns offaculty, alumni and employers were not enough, the ABET Criterion 2000 standards havefocused even greater attention on this issue.After several aborted efforts to solve the problem, in 1999 the
reinforced and demonstrated throughout thesecondary and undergraduate programs. Upon graduation, these core competencies will be second nature tostudents, who will use them in all aspects of their professional lives to solve problems and manage processes.The core competencies identified are shown in Figure 1. External Validation. A process has been defined to solicit meaningful input into the proposedcurriculum modules and their content. An individual will be identified to “champion” the process, whichincludes the following steps: 1. Develop method for documenting input from key stakeholders. 2. Conduct interviews with representatives from industry and academia, reviewing the content of the modules and noting suggested
AC 2010-913: EVALUATING A PEER LEADERSHIP MODEL IN ALARGE-SCALE PEER MENTORING PROGRAMRosemary Patterson, Virginia Tech ROSEMARY R. PATTERSON is a graduate research assistant in the Mining and Minerals Engineering Department at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. She received her B.S. in Mining and Minerals Engineering with a business minor from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University and is currently pursuing a M.S. in Mining and Minerals Engineering with a focus in mine ventilation from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Erin Crede, Virginia Tech ERIN D. CREDE is a PhD student in the department of Engineering Education at Virginia
research. International Journal of Listening. 22 (2), 141-151.[4] Trevelyan, J. 2014. The Making of an Expert Engineer. CRC Press.[5] Crumpton-Young, L. Pamela McCauley-Bush, L Rabelo, K Meza, A Ferreras, B. Rodriguez, A. Millan, D. Miranda, M. Kelarestani, 2010, “Engineering leadership development programs: a look at what is needed and what is being done.” Journal of STEM Education, 11 (3/4), 10-21[6] Wikoff, K., J. Friauf, H. Tran, S. Reyer, O. Petersen. 2004. Evaluating the communication component of an engineering curriculum: A case study. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Session 2004-2532, 8 pp.[7] American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 2019. Civil Engineering Body
Steele, Louisiana State UniversityDr. Warren N. Waggenspack Jr., Louisiana State UniversityProf. Wei-Hsung Wang PhD, Louisiana State University Dr. Wei-Hsung Wang is an associate professor of the Center for Energy Studies at Louisiana State Uni- versity (LSU), an adjunct faculty member in the Departments of Environmental Sciences and Physics & Astronomy at LSU as well as the Pennington Biomedical Research Center, and a clinical associate pro- fessor of radiology at LSU Health Sciences Center New Orleans. He teaches graduate-level Radiation Protection and Exposure Evaluation, Environmental Radiological Evaluation and Remediation, and Nu- clear Facility Safety courses. He is also Director of Radiation Safety Office at
opportunities for application and hands on experience.University:[ ] UPR-M [ ] PSU [ ] UW [ ] Other__________________Major:[ ] Mechanical Eng. [ ] Chemical Eng. [ ] Industrial Eng.[ ] Other__________________[ ] Graduate student [ ] Undergraduate studentInvolvement with MEEP:[ ] Taken 1 course [ ] Taken more than 1 course [ ] Research Assistant[ ] Other__________________The program courses at your institution were offered as: (Check all that apply)[ ] as part of a minor [ ] as electives [ ] as part of a degree option [ ] required for the major[ ] Other__________________The courses were:[ ] interdisciplinary [ ] engineering students only [ ] students from only