2006-544: AUTOMATED ROBOTIC WORKCELL DESIGN TOOLKIT -PRELIMINARY EVALUATIONSheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University Sheng-Jen (“Tony”) Hsieh is an Associate Professor and member of the Graduate Faculty at Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. He holds a joint appointment with the Department of Engineering Technology and the Department of Mechanical Engineering and is a Halliburton Faculty Fellow for 2005-2006. His research interests include intelligent manufacturing system design, virtual instrumentation, thermal profiling for process and product characterization, and simulation and modeling. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation Laboratory, a state-of-the-art
industries. He worked as an Environmental, Health, and Safety System Analyst in the telecommunication industry. His research interests include human per- formance development/improvement, safety performance analysis, integration of safety principles into lean manufacturing, and development of effective online training modules. Dr. Nakayama holds a B.S. in Safety Management and M.S. in Industrial Management from University of Central Missouri and a Ph.D. in Technology Management, with specialization in Human Resource Development and Industrial Training from Indiana State University.Dr. Ali Alavizadeh, Purdue University Northwest Dr. Ali Alavizadeh is an Assistant Professor of Industrial Engineering Technology at Purdue
college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition, 2nd ed.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.[3] Terenzini, P.T. (1987). Studying student attrition and retention. J.A. Muffo & G.W.McLaughlin (Eds.). Tallahassee: Association for Institutional Research.[4] Shuman, L.J., Delaney, C., Wolfe, H., Scalise, A., Besterfield-Sacre, M. (June, 1999).Engineering Attrition: Student Characteristics and Educational Initiatives. Paper presented atASEE Annual Conference, Charlotte, North Carolina.[5] Ohland, M., Yuhasz, A.G., Sill, B.L. (July, 2004). Identifying and Removing a CalculusPrerequisite as a Bottleneck in Clemson’s General Engineering Curriculum. Journal ofEngineering Education, 93 (3) 253–257.[6] Klingbeil, N. W., & High, K
Paper ID #21469Engaging Engineering Students in Lectures Using Anecdotes, Activities, andGamesDr. Rania Al-Hammoud P.Eng., University of Waterloo Dr. Al-Hammoud is a Faculty lecturer (Graduate Attributes) in the department of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Waterloo. Dr. Al-Hammoud has a passion for teaching where she con- tinuously seeks new technologies to involve students in their learning process. She is actively involved in the Ideas Clinic, a major experiential learning initiative at the University of Waterloo. She is also re- sponsible for developing a process and assessing graduate
Paper ID #11203A Force-Directed Program Graph Visualizer for Teaching White-Box TestingTechniquesDr. Weifeng Xu, Gannon University Dr. Weifeng Xu is an associate professor in department of computer science of Bowie State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Computer Science from Southeast Missouri State University and Towson University at Maryland, respectively. He also received his Ph.D. in Software Engineering from North Dakota Statement University. His current research efforts focus on search-based software engineering, mining software engineering data, and software testing. He is a senior member of the
@vt.edu.EUGENE F. BROWNEugene F. Brown is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech and a former Chair of ASEE’sGraduate Studies Division. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in thermodynamics and fluidmechanics and is the author of many papers and reports describing his research in the areas of computational fluiddynamics and aircraft propulsion. He can be reached at efbrown@vt.edu. Page 8.1318.9 “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”
undergraduate programs. However, they can be adapted relatively easilyin the graduate plan of study. V. SUMMARYThe paper presents a class project in which students design and implement an embedded controllerfor a sun tracking solar panel system using microcontroller PIC-16F887. This class project is theculminating project in the “Introduction to Microcontrollers” class in the undergraduate program of Page 25.515.6studies in Engineering Technology. Students are given a previously designed solar panel with built-in true sun-alignment mechanism and are required to design and write C-program to control it
is due, in part, to the fact that there has been substantial research dealingwith distance education, and the findings prove conclusively that distance learning is asgood as traditional education. Numerous published assessment studies comparing web-based vs. classroom-based instruction have concluded that e-learning courses comparefavorably with classroom-based instruction and enjoy high student satisfaction 1.Despite the widespread use of the Internet as a conduit for content-based curriculumdelivery, the availability of engineering laboratory courses remains moderate, andeffective distance delivery of engineering laboratory courses remains a challengingproblem to be solved 2. Currently, there are very few engineering laboratory
emphasis on teaching the practice of engineering. In order to teach the practiceof engineering, students must be challenged to study the complex interactions of realengineering systems. Further, students must be exposed to professional standards andorganizations, governmental regulations, team dynamics, current and future trends andsocietal concerns. In short, students must be afforded the opportunity to practice Page 10.1297.1engineering, learning how to apply the underlying scientific principles to the design ofthese systems. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
. in the State of Mississippi.LARRY R. DUNNLarry Dunn is a junior in the BSIE program at Tennessee Technological University. He is currently employed bythe Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Department as an under graduate research assistant. Page 7.625.9 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education
by the project Page 22.1310.7as outlined above. Additionally, however, one student has indicated a desire to perform anindependent study associated with renewable energy; happily, this student will be enrolled in thecourse described above while engaged in the independent study project, so he will have therequisite exposure to the background necessary to understand the theory and functioning of thedistillation unit. To ensure the independent study project contains the necessary rigor, thatstudent will be required to perform additional research on solar distillation units, and to design,build, and test his unit. He will also be required to keep
Session 1566 Assessing and Improving a Senior Design Project Course for Undergraduates in Mechanical Engineering Based on New ABET Guidelines P. B. Ravikumar University of Wisconsin, Platteville, WIAbstractThe Senior Design Project Course in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville offers a format of instruction and student participation that is centered around industrysponsored projects. The course is designed to serve as a transition from education to the practiceof engineering to the graduating
. However, many developments are building upon the work ofmicro-level electric motors in silicon mediums. Fourth, the development of new materials con-tinues to have a significant impact upon electrical energy conversion systems. Examples includematerials such as piezoelectric ceramic, artificial muscle, permanent magnets, soft iron nanoma-terials and micro-fabrication methods. These topics are included in advanced graduate levelcourses at many research-based engineering colleges. However, the inclusion in undergraduateeducation has lagged even though the basic underlying science is accessible to junior and seniorlevel students. Consequently, a renewed energy conversion course would incorporate the previ-ously mentioned developments in nanoscience
, wepropose to adapt the J-DSPC environment, in order to develop modules that can supportunderstanding of DSP principles, and analysis and design of digital controllers suitable fordemanding power electronic applications. The laboratory exercises will be incorporated in higherlevel undergraduate level/graduate level power electronics courses. Page 22.445.4 Functions and exercises pertinent to analysis of analog and digital systems have beendeveloped. The students begin by constructing simple transfer function models and analyzingtheir step and frequency responses. The effects of feedback and cascading transfer functionmodels are also studied. The
Venkat Kadupukotta was enrolled in the College of Graduate Studies and the Department of Civil Engineering at Lamar Univeersity. He was awarded the Master of Engineering Degree (ME) in 2009.Sandeep Tirunagari, Lamar University Sandeep Tirunagari was enrolled in the College of Graduate Studies and the Department of Civil Engineering at Lamar University. He was awarded the Master of Engineering (ME) Degree in 2009. Page 15.618.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION: INDIAAbstract:In India, the majority of the residential buildings are constructed on a
Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She graduated with her BS in Environmental Engineering from Northwestern University and with her MS and PhD in Civil Engineering with an emphasis on Environmental River Mechanics from Colorado State University. Her graduate work focused on exchange of surface water and groundwater, as well as nitrate uptake, in streams with varying degrees of rehabilitation. Dr. Mueller’s areas of interest include water quality, sustainable design, watershed hydrology, and river hydraulics. Current projects involve pedagogical studies for incorporating sustainability and ethical decision making in undergraduate engineering education, with an emphasis on touchpoints throughout the four
jobs. Pew Research Center. This study investigates how AI impacts employment, a key component of your course’s curriculum.6. Kolbjørnsrud, V., Amico, R., & Thomas, R. J. (2016). Partnering with AI: How organizations can win over skeptical managers. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(2), 42–48. Focuses on managerial collaboration with AI, emphasizing leadership strategies over technical depth.7. 7. West, D. M. (2018). The future of work: Robots, AI, and automation. Brookings Institution Press. This book explores how AI and automation are reshaping industries, workforces, and policy, directly complementing course content on the societal and economic impact of AI.8. 8. Bughin, J., Seong, J., Manyika, J., Chui, M., &
Purdue University, West Lafayette in 1989. In 2004, he joined the Virginia Commonwealth University as a Professor of Mechanical Engineering. He has taught previously at Purdue University campus in Indianapolis (IUPUI). He has taught several courses in design, mechanics of materials, optimization, and directed many interdisciplinary projects related to design. Dr. Pidaparti’s research interests are in the broad areas of multi-disciplinary design, computational mechanics, nanotechnology, and related topics. Dr. Pidaparti has published over 250 technical papers in refereed journals and conference proceedings. Dr. Pidaparti received a Research Initiation Award from the National Science Foundation and the Young
Paper ID #14945Seeking New Perspectives: Engineers Experiencing Design through CreativeArtsDr. David M. Beams, University of Texas - Tyler Dr. David Beams first became interested in electrical engineering through a passion for amateur radio in high school. He earned BSEE and MS degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1974 and 1977, respectively, with two years of industrial experience separating the two. He then spent over fourteen additional years in industry before returning to graduate study, receiving a Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1997. In 1997, he became one of the
curriculum.The two engineering entrepreneurship sections each met for 15 hours during thesemester, and extra time was provided for meetings with success coaches and peermentors. The six main areas covered in the sections are detailed below: • Academic Success- study skills, time management, finding help for classroom material, test-taking skills, and college survival skills. • Professional Success – career planning and effective presentations. • Engineering Information – career and advisement information and research presentations/laboratory tours. • Engineering Design and Problem Solving – creativity, effective teams, brainstorming, process design, and product design. • Societal Issues of Engineers – ethics
different extent and for various purposes. The team partnered with evaluators from theUniversity Office of Evaluation and Educational Effectiveness (UOEEE) for assessmentcreation, data analysis, and reports.Research QuestionsThe following research questions were addressed by this study: ● Who are the users accessing the course modules? ● How did the users find the course modules? ● Why are users accessing the course modules? ● Before accessing the modules, what were users’ expectations of the modules? ● How are users using or planning to use these course modules? ● Are these course modules and the online sharing platform effective? ● How are these course modules impacting users’ courses and students?MethodologyAnswers to
teaching awards, and is internationally recognized in his primary research field.Dr. Catherine Maltbie, University of Cincinnati Dr. Cathy Maltbie is a Research Associate at the University of Cincinnati with a joint appointment with the Evaluation Services Center and the Arlitt Child and Family Research and Education Center. She has a BS in Chemical Engineering and a Doctorate in Educational Foundations. Her research areas include evaluation, cognitive and social aspects of educational environments, and STEM education from pre-K through graduate school.Ms. Julie Steimle, University of Cincinnati Julie Steimle received her Bachelor of Arts in English and Secondary Education from Thomas More College. She served as
Paper ID #19192Creating Pathways to Stackable Credentials in Robotics by Manufacturing aCommunity College and University Partnership – Year Two ProgressMr. Mark Bradley Kinney, Bay de Noc Community College Mark Kinney became the Dean for Business and Technology in July of 2012, but first came to Bay Col- lege as the Executive Director of Institutional Research and Effectiveness in February 2009. Prior to that, Mark served as the Dean for Computer Information Systems and Technology at Baker College of Cadillac and as the Chief Operating Officer and network administrator at Forest Area Federal Credit Union. He has taught a
. PEREZGraciela de L. Perez is currently a doctoral student at the University of Pittsburgh. She received her B.S. inIndustrial Engineering from the University of Cuyo in Argentina, a M.I.B. from the Ecole Natieonale des Ponts etChaussess in France. Before returning to graduate school to obtain her doctoral degree, she worked during 12 yearsin manufacturing, finance and marketing in her native country. Her research interests are in the decision -makingfield and modeling applications for quality improvement in service organizations.LARRY J. SHUMANLarry J. Shuman is Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh andProfessor of Industrial. His areas of interest are improving the engineering educational experience, and
. Criterion 2 states that engineering degree programs must define a set ofeducational objectives, promote those objectives to external interests, and have in place amechanism to evaluate the success of their objectives. Although ABET was reluctant at first todefine what was meant by educational objectives, recent agreement has resulted in the followingdefinition: Educational Objectives are broad statements that describe the career and professionalaccomplishments that the program is preparing graduates to achieve several years aftermatriculation from the BS degree. Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright © 2005
CAREER (Young Investigator) Award in 1995 and has received significant research funding from the U.S. Army, other U.S. governmental organizations, the State of Texas, and Raytheon E-Systems Company. He is highly active in professional societies. He has been an Associate Editor of both the IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing and the IEEE Signal Processing Letters and is past Chair of the Neural Networks for Signal Processing Technical Committee and Secretary of the Signal Processing Education Technical Committee of the IEEE Signal Processing Society. He is regularly involved in organizing professional meetings, most notably as the Proceedings Editor of the 1999 International
Page 23.225.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Assessment of Communication and Teamwork Skills in Engineering Technology ProgramsIntroductionInstitutions of higher education have acknowledged that an effective teaching/learning processmust involve assessing and evaluating what and how much students are learning. Assessmentand evaluation leads to improvements in the educational experiences.ETAC/ABET Criteria 3.B.e. and 3B.g. require that graduates demonstrate effective skills inteamwork and communication.1 Therefore, the goal of this project was to develop consistent andefficient methods for assessment of students’ skills in these areas for different programs
: Exploration 1) Exploration Phase – In this portion of the module the students will carry out short experiments to demonstrate or discover the Figure 2. Learning Cycle basic concepts of the physical phenomena or technology being studied. Students will be required to communicate their results in both written and spoken form. 2) Dialog Phase – This portion of the module will provide discussion of relevant theory or details of specific techniques that are appropriate to the solution of the problem. Techniques of problem solving, or information presentation would be found in this portion of the module. 3) Application Phase – In this portion of the module the student will be
., Dilworth, J.B., Potter, M.C., Young, M.F., Diefes, H.A., and Flori, R.E.,Engineering Your Future, 2nd ed., Great Lakes Press, Wildwood, MO, 560 pp. (2000).2. Glaser, R. and Roadcap, J., Swamped! A Team Adventure, Organization Design and Development, Inc. (1992).KENNETH F. REARDONKenneth F. Reardon is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Colorado State University. In addition toteaching this first-year course, he has taught sophomore-, junior-, and graduate-level chemical engineering andbiotechnology courses. His research interests are in the areas of biochemical and environmental engineering. Dr.Reardon received a B.S. degree from the University of Pennsylvania and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Caltech
increasing efforts thatsupport the recruitment and success of students in STEM [2-9]. Furthermore, many universitieshave implemented a variety of programs that employ high impact retention approaches,including advising, mentoring, active learning, student engagement, and other support services.[10-14]. While there are many causes that result in low graduation rates, it is more likely thatrates could be improved if students are well-prepared for college and have clear future careergoals. Studies have shown, for example, that K-12 students who participate in STEM programsincrease their chances to succeed in STEM disciplines once they are in college. Such programsprovide participants with important knowledge and skills and help them gain a