) an ability to usethe techniques, skills and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. Inaddition to ABET accreditation criteria 3(a-k) requirements, the Mechanical Engineering(ME) program at Alabama A&M University (AAMU) was designed to meet additionalrequirements by American Society of Mechanical Engineer, such as (l) an ability to applyadvanced mathematics through multivariable calculus, and differential equations; (m) afamiliarity with statics, linear algebra and reliability; (n) an ability to work professionally inboth thermal and mechanical systems areas including the design and analysis of suchsystems; (o) a knowledge of contemporary analytical, computational, and experimentalpractices; (p) a competence in
relationships with thepotential recruiting pool. It is easy to see the potential benefits to an organization that has a well-established internship program. The companies that hire our students agree that the following arethe top five benefits for organizations through the internship program.Top Five Benefits to Businesses from Internship Programs4 1. Hiring future talent. Page 24.678.3 2. Building loyalty and reducing churn rate. 3. Low-cost labor with a fresh perspective. 4. Establishing your brand and cultivating relationships. 5. Giving back to the community.IV. Structuring the Internship ExperienceOrganizations should
Student Identity: A Balancing Act between RolesAbstractGraduate students balance the roles of teacher, researcher, and lifelong learner at a point in theircareers when they are transitioning into professional identities. We examine the roles of studentsin engineering, education, and engineering education through a quantitative survey to betterunderstand their unique experiences.IntroductionGraduate students are often required to balance a variety of roles while completing theireducation and preparing for their careers. This transitional process is a critical part ofconstructing their professional identities. However, it is not clear how well students are able tobalance multiple roles or how well graduate programs support multiple role
willinclude 3D printers, laser cutters, hand tools or power tools, and electronics support, as well aslight-prototyping supplies including craft supplies and/or Legos. Beyond the technology, thesespaces are often viewed as a place for students to be creative, learn new skills, and practicevarious behaviors typically identified with engineering. Prior research has suggested theinformal-learning that happens in the makerspace is often due to the sense of community fromstudents working closely and learning from peers [4, 5].The integration of makerspaces into a first year engineering course can complement learningobjectives and improves student interest in the materials presented. Students surveyed by Avrithireported that the single most important
summary-level information. In this study,descriptive analytical techniques included frequency analyses. Frequency distributions wereproduced from the analyses.For the interview data, a thematic analysis was performed. Audio interview files weretranscribed, and preliminary data analysis was performed during data collection, using aconcurrent data collection-analysis process. The transcribed data files were prepared, sorted,labeled, and coded. Then, thematic data analysis was used to analyze data and developmeaningful interpretations of the data. Through thematic data analysis, an examination ofpatterns and trends in the responses was performed. Using ATLAS.ti, a qualitative data analysissoftware program, these tasks were performed in an
opportunities,” J Pers Assess, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 291–305, Jun. 2004, doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8203_05. [3] Y.M. Tsai, M. Kunter, O. Lüdtke, U. Trautwein, and R. M. Ryan, “What makes lessons interesting? The role of situational and individual factors in three school subjects.,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 460–472, May 2008, doi: 10.1037/0022- 0663.100.2.460. [4] J. M. Harackiewicz, K. E. Barron, J. M. Tauer, and A. J. Elliot, “Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 94, pp. 562–575, 2002, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.562. [5
] McBroom, D. G. and McBroom. W. U., (2001). Teaching molecular genetics to secondary students: anillustration and evaluation using problem-based learning. Problem Log, 6, 2-4.[10] Ross, P., Tronson, D., Ritchie, R. J., (2005). Modeling Photosynthesis to Increase Conceptual Understanding,Journal of Biology Education, 40 no2 Spring 2005, 84-88[11] Rangachari P. K., and Crankshaw, D. J., (1996). Beyond facilitation: The active tutor in a problem-basedcourse. Biochemical Education, 24, 192-195.[12] Stice, J. E. (1987). Developing critical thinking and problem-solving abilities, San Francisco; London: Jossey-Bass.[13] Whiting, C., (2006). Data-based Active Learning in the Principles of Macroeconomics Course: A Mock FOMCMeeting, Journal of Economic
AC 2008-1296: THE ENGINEERING LEARNING ENVIRONMENT: A PROPOSEDMODELNadia Kellam, University of Georgia Nadia Kellam is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Georgia. Her research involves an integration of systems and engineering ecology with engineering education, resulting in a deeper understanding of student learning through a complexity lens. In particular, she is developing the Ecological Inspiration for Engineering Education research program, which involves an innovative approach of borrowing concepts from healthy, ecological systems and applying these to engineering education systems. Ecological concepts such as distributed cognition, systems
. [2] Cook, Joshua Eaton, Adam, Richmond, Britney, Warners, Kimberly. “Designing and Utilizing an Apparatus to Study the Ray Properties of Light,” ASEE North Central Section regional conference proceedings, March 28-29, 2008, Wright State University, Dayton, OH. [3] Tsang, Dr. Edmund, “Western Michigan University’s Collaborative Effort to Enhance K-12 STEM Teaching and Learning,” International Network for Engineering Education and Research (iNEER), Special Volume, March 2005, pp. 17-32. [4] Tsang, Dr. Edmund, “First-Year Design and Beyond: A Sequence of Service-Learning Design Courses to Build Student's Professional Skills,” INNOVATIONS 2008: World Innovations in Engineering Education and Research
thecomplexity of our current problems and the social and environmental injustice that mostpeople endure demand engineering to go beyond the technical problems, question theimpact of our engineering solutions, and incorporate other ways of doing and being inengineering. Engaging in engineering, and engineering education without awareness ofother beings and the Ecosystem, leads to immense harm, especially to underrepresentedpeople and their ecosystems. In this article, I present my first thoughts on an engineeringeducation framework that hopefully will guide educators and students through therelationships and interconnections between three levels: individual, people, and theEcosystem. To illustrate these interconnections, I use the biological concept of
US15,83. Clearly, the future of American innovation leadership is not as certain as in the past, andother countries are strong competitors in this innovation race. One potential solution is toincrease understanding about the best way to manage innovation. To that end, we offer atheoretical framework, Organized Innovation, which could be used to help leaders better manageinnovation efforts. It is based on our decade-long research program on National ScienceFoundation (NSF) Engineering Research Centers (ERCs)84. The ERC Program was launched in1985 with a mission to strengthen the competitiveness of US firms through improved researchand education. The central tenets of the ERC Program include an emphasis on educating futurescientists
mind” which is coincident todaywith what many educators call “the development of the whole person.” It is becomingclear that as knowledge has become increasingly fractionalised that there is a need foran education beyond school that re-asserts the primacy of “enlargement of mind” as agoal of education. Such an education is necessary in the sense that it should help thestudent to “connect views of the old with the new;” indeed with the current explosionof knowledge one might add the new with the new. Its purpose is to give “insight intothe bearing and influence of each part upon every other, without which there could beno whole […] It is knowledge not only of things but of their mutual relations.” Thisinsight is achieved through a comprehensive
first mechanisms through which the campus beganexploring and articulating a cohesive STEM vision. For example, 41 faculty and staff in nearly Page 24.328.620 departments came together in fall 2008 in an ad hoc STEM Caucus focused on STEM education research and K-12 initiatives. This grassroots interest led to more formal facultylearning communities and symposia, and eventually to the integrative I^3 grant in 2010.A particular effort to specifically support STEM faculty development was begun in January2011. A “Best Practices in STEM Teaching Symposium” was held in which STEM faculty whohad already
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Holistic Engineering: A Concept Exploration in a Cross- Disciplinary Project Course ExperienceAbstractHolistic engineering is an approach to the engineering profession, rather than an engineeringdiscipline such as civil, electrical, or mechanical engineering. It is inspired by the realization thattraditional engineering does not adequately harness professional skills in its problem-solvingrepertoire. Holistic engineering asks engineers to look outward, beyond the fields of math andscience, in search of solutions to entire problems. While engineering graduates are well preparedin the technical aspects of the engineering
Abstract The Department of Computer Science and Engineering at Arizona State University has deployed a novel infrastructure for a concentration track in embedded systems that combines important aspects of academic content with the latest in research and industrial practices. The concentration track emphasizes fundamental issues such as the balance between hardware and software and the respective trade-offs of building embedded systems. It is realized through the use of formal course work and hands-on experience that is channeled through a capstone project implemented as internships.1 IntroductionRapid proliferation of embedded systems in a wide range of consumer and
design solution. During the first semester, the students present their research to one another with potential solutions to problems. Faculty act as moderators attempting to keep the students on track, and within some reasonable budget. The big question for this project was whether to use an equatorial3 or altitude azimuth4 design for the telescope’s rotation. The equatorial is a far simpler design for tracking the stars as it only needs to rotate about one axis once it is set up. However, the mechanical issues were far more difficult, and an altitude azimuth arrangement was chosen. Fortunately for this project, the students continued to work on the design issues through the fall semester while they were doing their last
://www.aaee.com.au/journal/2003/mills_treagust03.pdf[12] H. A. Hadim and S. K. Esche, “Enhancing the engineering curriculum through project- based learning,” in 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2002. doi: 10.1109/fie.2002.1158200.[13] S. Kaul and W. Stone, “Learning Outcomes of a Junior-Level Project-Based Learning (PBL) Course: Preparation for Capstone,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2015.Appendix A: Deliverable descriptions and grading rubrics Project ChoicesMaterial and Process Selection Project: Topic List For your semester you will undertake material and process selection to replace a component in a recalled product. You are not redesigning the entire product, only the failed component. Six project options are
, although women constitute 46 percent of the labor force, less than aquarter of the scientists and engineers in this country are women.1 A July 2001 report released byThe National Council for Research on Women finds that much of the progress that women havemade in these areas has stalled or eroded. The report underscores the increasing need for ascientifically and technologically literate workforce as we enter the new millennium. One yearearlier, the Morella Commission, charged with developing strategies to attract more women andminorities into science, engineering, and technology, reported to the Committee on Science ofthe House of Representatives that significant barriers to attaining that goal are present fromelementary school through college
individuals.Sprinkling brainstorming activities throughout a curriculum may well increase the creative“fluency” of an individual, but such activities remain narrowly focused, ignoring the realcomplexities of the creative process as well as individual and disciplinary differences. Through detailed case studies that present the engineering involved in productsranging from paper clips to building systems, Petroski (1996) postulates that engineeringinvolves more than technical knowledge and expertise. Petroski makes the case fordeveloping creativity in engineering thinking: “Mathematics and science help us to analyzeexisting ideas and their embodiment in ‘things’ but these analytical tools do not inthemselves give us those ideas. We have to think and scheme
established to enable non-BSIEs to enter the program and, within a semester, beprepared to tackle seven required quality engineering courses. The prerequisites are:& Calculus, through differential equations (offered every semester, including summer)& A two-semester undergraduate-level course in probability and statistics, or enroll in GES 500 Engineering Statistics (survey) during first semester in program (every semester). Page 3.51.1 1& A two-semester undergraduate-level survey of Operations Research techniques, or enroll in GES 501 Operations Research (survey) during first
the following reasons: 1. To ascertain the relative benefit of using a peer-to-peer active learning technique with a first semester freshman class. 2. To encourage students to communicate, provide teamwork practice and encourage learning techniques for self-directed continuing professional development − all of which are criteria of the “Program Outcomes for Engineering Technology Programs” by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)15 and part of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Green Report – “Engineering Education in a Changing World.” 3. To add variety to a nearly 3 hour lecture class that does not have a laboratory component beyond soil sieve testing, thus
synthesize a given problem and develop appropriate solutions;· Presentation - emphasis is placed on communication, both oral and written; Page 7.13.2 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conferen ce & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education” Session 1606· Creativity – thinking beyond the ordinary and given path; to use your background and personal interpretation to put things together in new ways;· History and Theory – through lectures
. Although the lure of hard money wasbeginning to look like a significant problem for establishing long term continuity, we had nochoice but to initiate the hiring process once more under grant funding. This time a larger andmore diverse applicant pool emerged, perhaps a consequence of timing or a declining economy,and we had become more proficient in the screening process. With several good candidates inthe queue, we were able look beyond the basic knowledge and skills needed to also considerideas they might have to grow and strengthen the program. In a record time of two months wewere able to make a selection and we have not been disappointed. We now look forward to newaccomplishments and new programs to develop (7).From its inception, all
than"alternative" vs. "traditional" energy. The topics start with a quick overview of the conservationof energy. Conversion of chemical energy to electricity was the first topic, which coversphotovoltaic, fuel cells, and batteries. Then, electromagnetism and how rotational power can beconverted into electrical power by moving magnets through a magnetic field was addressed,which set up the concept of converting rotational energy to electricity. The generation ofrotational energy provided the framework of the remainder of the topics, including hydroelectric,wind, and tidal, which directly generate rotational energy using a variety of physics, but alsosteam turbines, which produce rotational energy by means of thermal energy. The production
to identify a pathway toward a more sustainable campus. Subsequently,the survey was distributed among Facility Management staff to identify gaps and proposesolutions. The results of this research are expected to pave the way for a more attractive,productive, and environmentally friendly campus, resulting in more students becoming familiarwith sustainability concepts and practices.MethodologyThe influence of sustainable buildings on employees and students goes beyond environmentalfactors. It includes aspects such as physical health, mental well-being, productivity, and thecultivation of a sustainable mindset that can have a positive impact on the wider community.Atici et. al [6] explored the potential correlation between environmentally
review investigates the gender disparitieswithin intellectual property (IP) fields and examines how engineering education can addressthese issues. Through a narrative literature review of recent studies, the paper highlights thenecessity of transformative changes in STEM education and IP frameworks to create a moreinclusive innovation ecosystem. The research underscores the importance of diversity ininnovation, noting that diverse teams generate more creative solutions, particularly in areas suchas healthcare and caregiving technologies where women tend to focus. Furthermore, the studyexplores how engineering education influences career trajectories and the role of early exposureto engineering concepts in fostering innovation. Integrating
Paper ID #47345A Complete Redesign of CS1 for Engineering StudentsMr. Yuxuan Chen, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Yuxuan Chen is a Master of Science student in Computer Science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. His primary research interests focus on computer science education and artificial intelligence. He is dedicated to enhancing student learning experiences and accessibility in computing education through both innovative technology and research-driven teaching practices.Mr. Chenyan Zhao, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Master of Science student in Computer Science at University of
introduces students to a variety of typical SPMskills including project planning, project estimation, risk management, as well as human aspectssuch as teamwork and performance evaluations. Students obtain a “hands-on” experience withthese and other SPM skills through a collaboration with the TSP course. (SPM course details arein the middle column of Table 2.)The collaboration began in 2015 with the first offering of the SPM course as part of a new SEprogram [3]. SPM students are assigned to manage TSP student teams. In addition to the SPMcourse meetings, managers attend one TSP course meeting per week to meet with their teams(scheduled as a lab meeting time for SPM students.) Managers perform tasks consistent withtopics in the SPM course, such as
Conference and Exposition, 2022.[2] Office of Institutional Effectiveness, “Student Enrollment,” California State University, Los Angeles. Available: https://www.calstatela.edu/InstitutionalEffectiveness/student- enrollment (accessed May 9, 2021).[3] S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, R. A. Layton, and M. M. Camacho, “Beyond pipeline and pathways: Ecosystem metrics,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 32–56, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20250.[4] H. Metcalf, “Stuck in the Pipeline: A Critical Review of STEM Workforce Literature,” Interact. UCLA J. Educ. Inf. Stud., vol. 6, no. 2, 2010, doi: 10.5070/d462000681.[5] K. Witham, L. M. Malcom-Piqueux, A. C. Dowd, and E. M. Bensimon, “America’s unmet promise: The
experience, as well as insupervisor expectations across projects. An attempt to facilitate consistency in approach andassessment was launched in 2009-2010, with the help of faculty from the EngineeringCommunication Program, through the development of a set of rubrics for course deliverables.These rubrics were designed with the input of engineering faculty members from a diverse setengineering disciplines to measure aspects of “communication” and “investigation” relevant tothe undergraduate thesis experience: they were also intended to help students and supervisorsarrive at a common understanding of expectations and requirements. However, the variability ofthe students’ research projects presented significant challenges for common rubric development