to more fundingthat allows more adoptions of PLTW Gateway programs. In the area of computer science, TEApassed rules in 2016 that allowed Computer Science to fulfill the foreign language requirementin High School. This policy freed up space in the high school curriculum for students to enroll incomputer science. There was a significant increase in the number of computer science adoptionsafter this policy went into effect.Table 3 provides summary statistics for PLTW adopting school district characteristics and thoseof non-PLTW school districts. A series of independent samples t-tests were calculated toinvestigate general differences in between these two samples. It was found that adopting districtsare much larger in terms of enrollment size
thinking and making processes to their work. He is interested in the in- tersection of designerly epistemic identities and vocational pathways. Dr. Lande received his B.S. in Engineering (Product Design), M.A. in Education (Learning, Design and Technology) and Ph.D. in Me- chanical Engineering (Design Education) from Stanford University.Dr. Karim Heinz Muci-Kuchler, Texas State University Dr. Karim Muci-Kuchler is a Professor and Mechanical Engineering Program Coordinator at the Ingram School of Engineering of Texas State University. Before joining Texas State University, he was a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Director of the Experimental and Computational Mechanics Laboratory at the South Dakota School of
colleagues. Unfortunately, at many schools, theemphasis on drawing skills has focused on computer aided drafting and design (CADD), at theexpense of hand sketching. The result is unsatisfactory and sloppy sketching by civilengineering and civil engineering technology students and graduates. Although manyengineering drawing courses no longer emphasize hand sketching, engineering educators can stillprovide opportunities for students to develop and practice hand sketching skills. This paperpresents suggestions for incorporating hand sketching assignments in the undergraduate civilengineering technology curriculum and provides assessment results for several sketchingexercises used by the author.IntroductionHand-drawn sketches have traditionally been an
) education. Afterpilot classes were developed, in 1998 the FC curriculum was implemented college-wide. In2003, the university adopted a track system with the FYE foundational courses separated intothree tracks: Track A (aerospace, agricultural, biomedical, civil, industrial, mechanical, andnuclear engineering), Track B (computer and electrical engineering), and Track C (chemical andpetroleum engineering). Track A was primarily project-based and used Mindstorms, Legos,magnetic balls, and beams to build structures. Track B focused on circuit design and computerprogramming. Only Track C maintained the FC curriculum until 2013. The target population ofthis study is first-time-in-college (FTIC) chemical or petroleum engineering students who startedin
exploration ofthe topic. Resources have been added to the camp each summer; the items currently used forinstruction are listed below followed by a narrative of the daily curriculum. Materials Needed • Computer workstations with Arduino IDE and NI Multisim • NI ELVIS board (or similar device) or a multimeter, variable power supply, function generator and oscilloscope for each workstation • Breadboard, wire kits, resistors, potentiometers, transistors, diodes, LEDs, and Laser diodes with wire leads • Photoreceiver or photoresistor • Laser pointers (preferably an assortment of red, green and purple) • Fiber optic cables • Diffraction grating glasses • Arduinos with USB
, computer-aided design, kinematics and dynamics of machinery, and manufacturing science. He received his BSME from Ohio Northern University and a PhD in Bioengineering from the University of Notre Dame. Current interests include bone tissue mechanics, engineering pedagogy, and robotic football. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Integrating Entrepreneurial Mindset into First-Year Engineering Curriculum through Active Learning ExercisesAbstractEntrepreneurial principles have been an increasing focus of undergraduate engineering curriculaat multiple levels of integration. Here, the Entrepreneurial Mindset (EM) has been integratedinto a first-year, general engineering
Education Research Community of Practice through a Structured Workshop Curriculum," Proceedings, 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.[10] Borrego, M., "Conceptual Hurdles Experienced by Engineering Faculty Becoming Engineering Education Researchers," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 96, No. 2, 2007.[11] Wenger, E., Communities of Practice. New York, NY: Oxford University, 1998.[12] Wenger, E., R. McDermott, and W. Snyder, Cultivating Communities of Practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2002.[13] Fincher, S. and J. Tenenberg, "Using Theory to Inform Capacity-Building: Bootstrapping Communities of Practice in Computer Science Education
computing desired quantities2–5. TheDLR project team recognized that chemical engineering students are expected to applyconversation of mass throughout the chemical engineering curriculum and decided thatdeveloping a CoM ICC that would introduce students to applications of CoM as well as providereview and practice in later courses would be a high priority for the project. In its current form,the ICC has eight learning outcomes. Upon completion of the ICC, students will be expected to: ‚ Define terms relevant to developing mathematical models of physical situations using conservation of mass: mass, accumulation, steady state… ‚ Create a concept map6,7 involving concepts related to conservation of mass ‚ Explain the difference between
AC 2012-4686: INTEGRATING ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND INNOVATIONINTO AN ENGINEERING CURRICULUM THROUGH SERVICE LEARN-ING AND THE LIBERAL ARTSDr. Katherine Hennessey Wikoff, Milwaukee School of Engineering Katherine Hennessey Wikoff is an Associate Professor in the General Studies Department at Milwaukee School of Engineering, where she teaches courses in communication, literature, film studies, and political science.Dr. Michael Hoge Carriere, Milwaukee School of Engineering Michael Carriere is an Assistant Professor at the Milwaukee School of Engineering, where he teaches courses on American history, public policy, political science, environmental studies, and urban design. He has written for such publications as the
Session 3461 An Evaluation of Humanities and Social Science Requirements in an Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum Ken Van Treuren and Steve Eisenbarth Baylor UniversityAbstractEngineering design is a structured, creative process, where engineers strive to develop solutionsto perceived problems or needs by the application of theoretical and practical knowledge. Thedesign process is a quest for technological objects, wherein the solution to the posed problem isintrinsic or inherent in the resultant object. However, the design solution [object] must exist in areal
work teams, In: Handbook of Organizational Behavior, Jay W. Lorsch, (ed.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1987.7. Hicks, Philip C., Westbrook, Jerry D., and Utley, Dawn R. (1999). What are We Teaching Our Engineering Managers? Engineering Management Journal, 11(1), 29-34.8. Hoffman, William. (2005, January 10). Logistics’ Evolving Curriculum. Traffic World, 19-21.9. Jarvenpaa, Sirkka L, and Leidner, Dorothy E., (1998) Communication and trust in global virtual teams, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, Vol. 3, No. 4.10. Jefferson, R. W., (2001) Preparing for Globalization—Do We Need Structural Change for Our Academic Programs? Journal of Education for Business, 76(3), 160-166.11. Kitsantas, A., (2004) Studying
Paper ID #7713Organizing the curriculum: introducing engineering principles through biomed-ically related experiments: Module DevelopmentDr. Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University Dr. Stephanie Farrell is an associate professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. She ob- tained her Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from New Jersey Institute of Technology in 1996. Prior to joining the faculty at Rowan in 1998, she was an assistant professor of Chemical Engineering and ad- junct professor of Biomedical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University. Dr. Farrell has made significant contributions to engineering education
Paper ID #29084WIP - Integration of Voice Technology into First-Year EngineeringCurriculumDr. Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Jaskirat Sodhi is interested in first-year engineering curriculum design and recruitment, retention and success of engineering students. He is the coordinator of ENGR101, an application-oriented course for engineering students placed in pre-calculus courses. He has also developed and co-teaches the Fundamen- tals of Engineering Design course that includes a wide spectra of activities to teach general engineering students the basics of engineering design using a hands-on
Paper ID #28425Work in Progress: Incorporation of Diversity and Inclusion intoUndergraduate Chemical Engineering CurriculumLisa M. Weber, Colorado State University I am a PhD Candidate and Instructor in the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering at Col- orado State University. My research interests include improvements in undergraduate engineering ed- ucation, diversity and inclusion in undergraduate engineering education, and gaining a quantitative un- derstanding of various aspects of DNA binding interactions and gene expression through computational modeling.Dr. Rebecca A Atadero P.E., Colorado State
and 2006-07 academic years, the department has developed andbegun to implement a revised curriculum that addresses many of the advisory board’srecommendations – the full four-year sequence is provided on the following page. Thecurriculum has three major components: Liberal Learning, Education courses, and threetechnology threads – mechanical systems, electrical systems, and the designed world.The major revisions have been: ‚ A substantial increase in the basic math and science requirements in the Liberal Learning program that now requires the students to take o Calculus A o Engineering Math o General Physics I o Choice of Physics II, Biology I, Chemistry I, Computer Science I ‚ The
AC 2007-691: A DEPARTMENTAL REFORM STRATEGY AND THE RESULTANTNATIONAL MODEL FOR AN UNDERGRADUATE INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERINGCURRICULUMSandra Furterer, East Carolina University Sandra L. Furterer, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Industrial Distribution and Logistics Program, in the College of Technology and Computer Science at East Carolina University. Dr. Furterer has extensive industry experience in Quality, Six Sigma, and Information Systems Analysis. Dr. Furterer's research and teaching interests are Six Sigma, Quality Management, Lean Enterprise, and Engineering Education.Sandra Furterer, University of Central FloridaAbeer Sharawi, University of Central Florida Abeer Sharawi is a Ph.D
AC 2008-2018: A FRESHMAN ENGINEERING CURRICULUM FOR ABACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING PROGRAMLaura Ruhala, University of Southern Indiana Laura Ruhala earned her BSME from GMI Engineering & Management Institute (now Kettering University) in 1991 (as Laura Wilson) and her PhD in Engineering Science & Mechanics from The Pennsylvania State University in 1999. She has three years industrial experience at General Motors, served as Director of Safety at Pride Mobility, and taught at Lafayette College. She has been an Assistant Professor rank in the Engineering Department at USI since 2002, and has developed and taught many of the freshmen engineering courses, including ENGR 107 (Intro to
AC 2009-1803: INTEGRATION OF ASSESSMENT AND CURRICULUM INENGINEERING, MATHEMATICS, AND PHYSICAL-SCIENCE PROGRAMSEduardo Chappa, Texas A&M International University Dr. Chappa is an Assistant Professor of Mathematics at Texas A&M International Unversity (TAMIU). He received his B.S. and M.S. degree in Mathematics from Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile in 1990 and 1993 respectively. Dr. Chappa received his Ph.D. from University of Washington in 2002. Dr. Chappa was a visiting assistant professor at Texas A&M University before joining TAMIU, and is a member of the AMS.Terutake Abe, Texas A&M International University Dr. Abe is an Assistant Professor of Mathematics at Texas A&
interaction, and improvelearning outcomes. This paper presents the learning theory that supports hands-on experience,the basic structure of the course, the implantation and logistics of the projects, and assessmentapplied to evaluate outcomes as a result of this hands-on addition.Introduction“The function of the engineering profession is to manipulate materials, energy, and information,thereby creating benefit for humankind. To do this successfully, engineers must have aknowledge of nature that goes beyond mere theory.” [1] Various forms of laboratory learningexperience are utilized in engineering curricula to assist students to gain this knowledge. Amongthese laboratory approaches, simulation based on computer software [2, 3] and hands-onexperiments
Paper ID #15300Incorporating a Software System for Robotics Control and Coordination inMechatronics Curriculum and ResearchDr. Maged Mikhail, Purdue University - Calumet Dr. Maged B. Mikhail, Assistant Professor, Mechatronics Engineering Technology Ph.D., Electrical Engi- neering, Tennessee State University, Nashville, Tennessee, August 2013. Dissertation title: ”Development of Integrated Decision Fusion Software System For Aircraft Structural Health Monitoring” M.S., Electri- cal Engineering, Tennessee State University, Nashville, Tennessee, May 2009. Thesis title: ”Development of Software System for Control and
experiences to their long term goals, and (3)minimize gaps between courses intended to build on each other. Hands-on experiences now existin all but one quarter of our four-year curriculum. The experiences incorporate open endeddesign problems as well as thoughtfully constructed laboratory experiences. Flexibility has beenadded by allowing students to select three to four courses from pre-approved math and sciencecourses, by opening up the timing of these courses as well as general educational requirementswithin the four year curriculum, by doubling the number of mechanical engineering technicalelectives available, and by allowing students to take technical electives from any of our threeengineering programs (Mechanical, Electrical, and Computer
Session Number: 2004-612 CIVIL ENGINEERING CURRICULUM AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA AND THE NATIONAL AUTONOMOUS UNIVERSITY OF HONDURAS By Valerie Paredes-Bonilla Graduate Student, And Dr. Fazil T. Najafi Professor Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering University of Florida
synchronous and asynchronous operation. 9. Use modern computer tools for digital design/verification using VHDL. 10. Understand the characteristics of modern programmable logic devicesCurriculum Modules:Hands-on learning is infused into a sequence of instructional modules, each module has anassociated laboratory exercise to enforce the learning experience of students. The curriculum iscomposed of eight modules to allow students to pick and choose components to match his/or herlearning needs. All of the laboratory exercises are conducted using The Altera® Development andEducation (DE2) board [10] which provides an ideal vehicle for learning about digital logic,computer organization, and FPGAs. The following is a description of each module
Development of Engineering Case Studies for Integrating Finite Element Analysis into a Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Dr. Robert G. Ryan, Dr. Stewart P. Prince California State University, NorthridgeAbstractThe Mechanical Engineering Department at California State University, Northridge usesSolidWorks and related analysis applications such as CosmosWorks and FloWorks as thecomputational tools of choice for solid modeling (CAD) and finite element analysis (FEA).Originally the use of these tools was concentrated in the senior design capstone course, but oneof the Department’s goals is to integrate the use of this
Session 1332 Introducing Undergraduate Research Results in RF Microelectronics into the Undergraduate ECE Curriculum Robert Caverly, Timothy Walsh, Sean Pearson, Jane Hall1, Jeffery Cotton2 ECE Department, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085Abstract -- Smart communications technology is currently implemented in a variety ofapplications ranging from smart antennas to wireless LANs. Microelectronics technology is theonly means available to fit the ever-increasing amount of system functionality in a smallerphysical footprint. This paper will present how
Session 3280 Curriculum Integration Using Case Study Approach for the Enhancement of Technology and Engineering Education William L. Call, Saleh M. Sbenaty Murray State University (Kentucky)/Middle Tennessee State UniversityAbstractIntegrating physics, mathematics, and communication skills in engineering and technologyeducation is one objective of the three-year NSF-funded grant titled “The South-East AdvancedTechnological Education Consortium, SEATEC.” The consortium is a collaborative effort of fivedifferent teams across Tennessee. Each team includes multi-disciplinary faculties, industrypartners
Session 1260Engineering Education and Curriculum as an Extension of Engineering Discourse in the Post-Williams Era. Josef Rojter, Department of Mechanical Engineering Victoria University of Technology Melbourne MC PO BOX 14428, VIC Australia Page 3.245.1 1ABSTRACT It is nearly 10 years since the Williams inquiry into discipline of Engineering inAustralia. Like its earlier British counterpart, the Finniston inquiry, the Williams reportbecame the landmark in the study of
Session 1463 TS/ 3 Incorporating Robotic Simulation Technology into the Undergraduate Curriculum of Robotics and Industrial Automation Frank Cheng, Daniel Chen Department of Industrial and Engineering Technology Central Michigan University fcheng@iet.cmich.eduAbstractSimulation technology has not only fundamentally changed the way of conducting integratedproduct design and process development in industries, but also provided educators with newapproaches to enhance the learning
. Civilengineering will cover aspects of the proposed curriculum that deal with statics, structures,strength of materials, fluid mechanics, foundations, construction materials, constructionengineering, steel design, concrete design, and economics. Mechanical engineering will coveraspects of the proposed curriculum that deal with thermodynamics, as well as plumbing, heating,ventilation and air conditioning systems design. Electrical engineering will cover aspects of theproposed curriculum that deal with circuits and electromagnetic devices, as well as electricalpower building systems design. And, industrial technology will cover aspects of the proposedcurriculum that deal with computer-aided design and building construction.CONCLUSIONS It is anticipated
, and thereview and modification of several courses and assignments.The new curriculum consists of a series of twelve integrated courses beginning in the freshmanyear and ending in the senior year. Some of these courses cover topics that were included inprevious civil engineering (CE) curricula, such as: ß Civil Engineering Projects ß Engineering Problems with Computational Laboratory ß Graphics for Civil Engineering ß Civil Engineering Capstone DesignHowever, the new curriculum places a strong emphasis on the following professional practiceskills: ß Leadership Skills ß Team Processes in CE Practice ß Interpersonal Skills ß Communication Skills ß Project Management ß Agreements and Contracts ß Continuous Quality