through automation.Mr. Alec William Maxwell, San Francisco State University Alec Maxwell is currently an graduate student in the School of Engineering at San Francisco State Uni- versity (SFSU). Besides actively conducting research on innovative tools for engineering education in the Intelligent Structural Hazards Mitigation Laboratory at SFSU with Prof. Zhaoshuo Jiang, he also serves the community as the President of the American Society of Civil Engineers for the SFSU chapter.Dr. Amelito G Enriquez, Canada College Amelito Enriquez is a professor of Engineering and Mathematics at Ca˜nada College in Redwood City, CA. He received a BS in Geodetic Engineering from the University of the Philippines, his MS in Geode- tic
the methods to be employed maximize the objectives of the course.Student choice and student evaluation, while increasing the interest and motivation of thestudent, present potentially greater risks in attaining course objectives. For individual projects,there is the added problem of an unpredictably wide variety of choices. This paper reports theresults of progressively encouraging student participation in both of these areas.The paper is based upon over thirty years of teaching undergraduate and graduate field researchcourses.IntroductionThe focus of this paper is one of many teaching techniques, the use of field projects, and aparticular type of project, applying the methodology of field research to testing an a priorihypothesis concerning
participation in research, we hope this will lead to an increase inrepresentation at the graduate level.Using the University of Florida as a case study, we are establishing a comprehensive survey ofwhich individual research programs across the campus are conducting research in topics ofdisabilities. Disability categories were chosen to align with the University of Florida’s DisabilityResource Center’s accommodation survey categories. These categories are as follows: hearing,physical/mobility, mental health, ADD/ADHD, visual, medical health, learning, AutismSpectrum Disorder, and Other (Traumatic Brain Injury, Speech, etc.). This project intends toreview all research programs in every college – there are currently 16 colleges at UF – however,this work
, University of Texas at El Paso ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Student Research Involvement in a Scholarship for Service ProgramAbstractResearch for students can be an essential addition in the education of future professionals,particularly in rapidly developing areas such as cybersecurity. The future workplaces requireprofessionals that can identify, analyze, act, and document findings as part of their profession.Students who graduate having absorbed these skills are better positioned to be effective in thecybersecurity profession, thus benefiting society overall. In this paper, we discuss one potentialopportunity for research experience provided by the
Science Foundation GK-12 fellow – teaching and bringing real- world STEM applications in two urban high schools. Since then, he has worked with university faculty to promote and extend K20 STEM outreach in Ohio, Oregon, Texas, and Wyoming. He has authored peer-reviewed articles and papers, presented at national and international conferences, and taught under- graduate/graduate courses in Computer Security, Data Mining, VLSI and pedagogy in STEM. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Novel STEM Research Programs Could Minimize Attrition in Undergraduate EngineeringAbstractMany institutions across the country suffer from high attrition rates in their
). Ms. Sandekian joined the Engineering for Developing Communities Program (now known as the Mortenson Center in Engineering for Developing Communities) in spring 2004, just as the first EDC graduate track was approved. With MCEDC, her main duties have included student advising and academic program development. In ad- dition to her management role in the Mortenson Center, Ms. Sandekian has taught an Engineering Projects course around the theme of appropriate technology and conducted research on social entrepreneurship and sustainable community development in Nepal in 2008. Ms. Sandekian earned a Specialist in Education (Ed. S.) degree in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Northern
matriculatedstudents regardless of undergraduate major (numbering 17,759) it was 30.8 ± 3.1.Approximately 60% of our current students participated in the online survey, and nearlycomprehensive data was available from 2006 and 2007 graduating 4th years. In aggregate theyhad a mean MCAT total score of 32.6±4.9 (SD, N=35). This is significantly higher than thenational average for physical science applicants to medical school, and for all matriculants inmedical schools.Accurate numbers on the rate of matriculation into medical school are difficult to obtain, for avariety of reasons. The principal reason is that many students take one or more years betweenundergraduate and medical school study to work, volunteer, or attend graduate school. In fact,the national
aprevious graduate student. Using the techniques depicted in those references, the students wereprepared to begin the energy audit process. The process required to complete an energy auditconsists of: site overview visit, inventorying of all equipment, determination of equipmentoperating hours, calculating the site’s total predicted energy consumption, developing energyconservation goals by researching applicable energy consumption techniques and alternativeequipments, and lastly, creating a technical report for the client.To aid with tracking of the project’s goals, the students were shown how to develop a Ganttchart. The final goal for this project was to create an energy audit report for the client by April25th, 2011. With this endpoint defined
detonations. The study was motivatedby the reality that many steel structures are exposed to public spaces and the protection of thesestructures against close-range blast effects is a major concern to engineers and facility owners,while no building code requirements or procedures are present at the moment. The blast analysisinvolves both highly non-linear finite element analysis based on solid mechanics andcomputational fluid dynamics. The theoretical backgrounds of the analysis are mathematicallyintense and require knowledges from several graduate level courses.To engage undergraduate students in a highly technical and theoretical research project, a newpedagogy is needed; a guided learning component shall be more utilized than an
emphasized. All of its programmes wereaccredited with an ‘A’ Grade by the National Board and Professional Societies. VIT became aDeemed University in 2001, continued adding infrastructure, laboratories and research centres,starting new and innovative graduate and post-graduate programmes and implementing acontinuous quality improvement management system. The two main ingredients9 foruniversities, such as VIT University, to emerge as premier institutions have been thecommitment of the leadership and the commitment to quality which are the keys to their successand sustained growth. The leadership provided by Dr. G. Viswanathan as its Chancellor and hiscommitment to quality are responsible for VIT University emerging as a premier nationalinstitution
general higher education in the country. Compared with developedcountries, the number of engineering graduates in China is also dozens of times higher. However,the so-called "strong" not only means an advantage in quantity, but also requires an increase invalue [1]. China's engineering ethics education started relatively later. The "Engineering EthicsResearch" conducted by Southwest Jiaotong University in 1998 represented the first attentionpaid by Chinese universities to engineering ethics, and the research results were ultimatelytransformed into China's first engineering ethics characteristic textbook. The official birth markcan be traced back to 2000, when various universities established elective courses. In 2007,Zhejiang University, a
as practitioners. Her main research interest lies in evaluating programs that hold the promise of enhancing the lives of traditionally underserved populations (children, parents, and communities).Dr. Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monica E. Cardella is the Director of the INSPIRE Institute for Pre-College Engineering Education and is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University.Tamecia R Jones, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tamecia Jones is currently a doctoral student in the Engineering Education department at Purdue Uni- versity with a research focus on K-12 engineering education, assessment, and informal and formal learn- ing environments. She is a graduate of
. Generation of physician-scientists manpower: A follow-up study of the first 294 graduates of the Harvard-MIT Program of Health Sciences and Technology. Journal of Investigative Medicine 45(5)272-275, 1997.5. Bradford, WD, Anthony, D, Chu, CT, Pizzo, SV. Career characteristics of graduates of a Medical Scientist Training Program, 1970-1990. Academic Medicine 71:484-487, 1996.6. Ley, TJ, Rosenberg, LE. Removing career obstacles for young physician-scientists: Loan-repayment programs. New England Journal of Medicine 346:368-372, 2002.7. Follen M, Richards-Kortum R; New Pathways to Educate Future Translational Researchers: Foundations for Undergraduates, submitted, Lancet, 2005
future work partners. Thisexposes the engineering student to the multidisciplinary approach required to combineengineering and medicine. By working with non-engineering medical professionals, the studentbegins to understand how to communicate effectively with those who do not have the sameeducational background. These people have diverse viewpoints and approaches from thoseusually associated with classical engineering projects.A second general objective is to give the student a chance to evaluate future employmentdirections in research, industry and graduate studies. By working in a clinically-based setting,the student has an opportunity to determine if this path is the correct one for them. The studentalso obtains a grasp of what is required to
Teaching and Educational Research in EngineeringAbstractThe use of generative Artificial Intelligence (genAI) in teaching and education has receivedattention and rapid growth in university engineering programs since OpenAI released ChatGPT inNovember 2022. In this paper, the authors explore the use of genAI in teaching and educationalresearch in engineering disciplines and examine potential benefits and challenges whiletransitioning to genAI implemented in engineering education. This study A) Analyzes howeducators and learners understand and identify the usage of genAI and ChatGPT in engineeringeducation; B) Explores the potential benefits, challenges, and limitations of using thesetechnologies; and C) Identifies educators' perceptions of using
research projects. We then discuss the formation of thecollaboration, the decision to initiate an off-campus project, and the positive and negative aspectsof this solution. Most institutions require research activity which is documented through grant proposalsubmissions and peer-reviewed publications. Before embarking on these time-consumingactivities, one must first choose a suitable research project. For junior faculty members freshfrom their Ph.D. work, this selection process can be discouraging, especially if the researchinvolves experimental studies. Unless their new institution has laboratory facilities similar totheir degree-granting institution and a substantial development budget or unless the new Ph.D.already has significant
Session 2793 A Case Study of Project-based Learning in Structural Engineering Julie Mills University of South AustraliaAbstractEngineering education remains dominated by the “chalk and talk” technique, despite the largebody of education research that demonstrates its ineffectiveness. Structural engineeringeducation also remains dominated by this pedagogy, with a heavy emphasis on lecture-baseddelivery of the theories of structural analysis and the behaviour of common constructionmaterials. The integration of these fields
the graduate level.Keywords: software engineering, instructional technology, mentoring, independent study,teaching assistants1. The concept of a course “ecosystem”A conventional way to look at a course is as a piece of a curriculum. It has certain learningobjectives, and if students have achieved them by the end of the academic term, then the coursecan be considered a success. However, there is another, more active, way to view a course: acourse is an opportunity to direct students in their learning. This is a more powerful perspective,because it suggests that students learn by doing, not necessarily following the same path as otherstudents. Also, by following different paths, students can make their own contribution to theinstructor’s
, OtherIn addition to grant funding, guidelines for other sources of funding vary. Guidelines regardingthe distribution of state funds can be important and are often linked with CIP codes [11]. Somestates fund programs based on formula codes, where more expensive programs are funded at ahigher level than less expensive programs. State funding models vary widely, and while manyundergraduate programs at public universities receive state funding, most public universities donot receive formula funding for graduate studies [12]. Where graduate programs are funded, theyoften receive a higher funding level per student than undergraduate programs due to their highercost per student. For example, in the formula funding used in Texas, master’s level
Paper ID #37403An Empirical Study of Programming Languages Specified inEngineering Job PostingsLisa Schibelius (Graduate Student) Lisa Schibelius is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her background includes a B.S. and M.S degree in mechanical engineering from the University of South Alabama. She spent 4+ years in the aerospace industry with Airbus as an engineer in airworthiness & certification and retrofit of aircraft cabins in the Upgrade Services department. She aspires to use her connections from industry to bridge the gap between engineering education and
experts in theirparticular fields and lack pedagogical training. The majority teach as they had been taughtthemselves. To compound the issue, instructors in the “hard” disciplines deal with instructional 2material that lends itself to a more “teacher-centered” approach to learning where transmission ofinformation and worked examples are the highest goal.1 However, some research studies havefound that this approach is linked more to surface learning. Deeper learning has been linked to amore “student-focused/conceptual change” approach, more regularly seen with instructors in thehumanities and soft sciences. 2At a land-grant, research-intensive
Paper ID #17989Assessing Students’ Researcher Identity and Epistemic CognitionDr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is a Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, with a joint appointment in Bioengineering. Her research focuses on the interactions between student motivation and their learning experiences. Her projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their problem solving processes. Other projects in the Benson group include effects of student-centered active learning, self-regulated learning, and incorporat
2006-209: WRITING IN THE DISCIPLINE - A CASE STUDY IN CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENTAmitabha Bandyopadhyay, SUNY Amitabha Bandyopadhyay, Ph.D., P.E. is a Distinguished Service Professor and Chair of Architecture and Construction Management Department at State University of New York -Farmingdale. He has been involved in Writing Across Curriculum and Writing in the Discipline for last fifteen years. Page 11.1458.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Writing in the Discipline – A Case Study in Construction ManagementAbstractCommunication for the engineering and technology graduates always scored very
Moving from STEM to STEAM: Broadening an Interdisciplinary Study Abroad ProgramAbstract:In order to encourage students to pursue STEM careers, and to broaden the perspectives ofstudents in STEM curricula with an infusion of the humanities in an effort to move toward aSTEAM model, a multidisciplinary team of five faculty members created a family of six six-credit courses for students with a variety of academic interests. Graduate students wereintegrated with undergraduate. Pedagogical techniques include face-to-face as well as bothsynchronous and asynchronous distance delivery, in addition to a faculty-led European studytour in each course. Courses in Intercultural Communication and Interpersonal
Engineering Education, 2019 Reflections on Eight Years of Undergraduate Research at Our Community CollegeAbstractSince 2010, San Antonio College (SAC) has been the center of a continuously increasing familyof undergraduate research projects hosted by Texas’ first Math, Engineering, and ScienceAchievement (MESA) Center. A paper presented at the 2012 ASEE Conference in San Antoniodescribed the start of this program at this community college. It has been widely reported thatundergraduate research programs at four-year institutions increase retention, improve students’success, and produce higher quality graduates. Results demonstrate that two-year institutions canalso initiate and maintain successful
innovation skills, which will enhance their careers.Case studies and examples on how to produce new innovative ideas and patents are given.1. IntroductionThis paper is meant to be a hands-on opportunity for professors and students to experience andpractice the creative problem solving process throughout all undergraduate and graduate coursesin the Electrical and Computer Engineering curriculum. Certainly, the benefit of this paper canbe extended and used in all engineering education disciplines including, but not limited to,mechanical, chemical, and civil engineering.The framework of this paper is also very useful for practicing engineers, project managers, andexecutives. The ideas presented in this paper intend to enhance students’ creativity
Jariwala, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Jariwala is the Director of Design & Innovation for the School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech. He graduated with a Bachelors Degree in Production Engineering from the University of Mumbai, India with honors in 2005 and received Masters of Technology degree in Mechanical Engineering in 2007 from IIT Bombay, India. He was awarded a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2013, with minors in Entrepreneurship. Dr. Jariwala has over nine years of research experience in modeling, simulation, engineering design, and manufacturing process development, with research focus on design of polymer based micro additive manufacturing process. During his Ph.D
to bring these new important research findings toseniors and first year graduate students in engineering. The course materials were madeavailable on the web and the course was taught at two campuses simultaneously. A seriesof short courses were also offered to industries and at universities and research centers inthe US and abroad.Introduction Particle transport, deposition and removal are the key in many technologies thatare of critical importance to the competitiveness of US industries, as well as in a numberof environmental processes. Last decade has seen development of significantcomputational as well as experimental tools for studies of particle transport, depositionand removal. The primary objective of this combined
between 30-45 minutesin length. These supplemented and/or furthered the examination of problem explorationheuristics provided in the self-recorded videos. During these sessions, families shared theirdecision-making process regarding their identified problem, solution, design sketches andmaterials, and in-process prototypes. Families asked one another questions (e.g., “What kind ofwood will you use?”), while also providing suggestions (e.g., “I think you can also market youridea to older adults.”).Data AnalysisAnalysis of the video data began by using the 42 problem exploration heuristics developed fromStuder’s [37] research study with undergraduate and graduate mechanical engineering students.This approach aligned with Watkins et al. [13
was decided that the students study freshmen and junior years at ITUand sophomore and senior years at SIUE. This implementation required ITU to openadditional sections of Industrial Engineering courses to be taught in English in the junioryear. Faculty who were assigned to teach these classes received substantial overloadpayments.It is noted that SIUE required completion of 128 credit hours for graduation, whereasITU required 142. It was agreed that ITU would teach 37 credit hours in freshmen and39 in junior year for a total of 76 hours, whereas SIUE would teach 32 credit hours insophomore year and 34 hours in senior year for a total of 66 hours.The enrollment and graduation statistics over the years are shown in Table 1. Enrollmentnumbers