in K-12 outreach through sev- eral venues including Summer Ventures, high school STEM day, the N.C. Science Olympiad, a Math Science Partnership grant, volunteer work with a local literacy camp, Boy Scouts Robotics Merit Badge counseling, and teaching the science portion of VBS and children’s Sunday School at his local church. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Flipping the Microprocessors Classroom: A comparative assessmentAbstractAt East Carolina University (ECU), undergraduate students in an electrical engineeringconcentration within a general engineering program are required to complete a microprocessorscourse. This course has been
University of Michigan. Retrieved from: http://milproj.dc.umich.edu/., 20083. D.E. Goldberg and M. Somerville, A Whole New Engineer: The Coming Revolution in Engineering Education, threejoy, Douglas, MI, 2014.4. ABET, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Reviews During the 2015-2016 Accreditation Cycle, 2014, retrieved June 7, 2015, http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation- criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2015-2016/.5. D.H. Jonassen, Designing Research-Based Instruction for Story Problems, Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 267-296, 2003.6. M. Eraut, Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence, Falmer Press, London, 1994.7. M.D
infrastructureneeds, and to provide enhanced options for their students to communicate, collaborate,trouble-shoot and adapt in the classroom and online, whether it be the physical or virtualclassroom.What Makes DeVry University Unique?DeVry has existed for more than eighty years where it established its humble beginningsin Chicago, Illinois. DeVry has expanded to establish campuses in over 95 locationswithin the United States and Canada, as well as offering online education. Over the yearsDeVry deems itself as more than a school of technology, and now has five collegeswithin the DeVry family: Business & Management, Engineering & Information Sciences,Health Sciences, Liberal Arts & Sciences, and Media Arts & Technology. In 2003DeVry acquired
, and the scholarship of teaching and learning. He serves as editor of the Journal of Engineering Education and as a member of the College Teaching and Accountability in Research editorial boards. He is a Carnegie scholar and an IEEE fellow. Professor Loui was associate dean of the Graduate College at Illinois from 1996 to 2000. He directed the theory of computing program at the National Science Foundation from 1990 to 1991. He earned the Ph.D. at M.I.T. in 1980.Renata A Revelo Alonso, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Page 23.719.1 c American Society for Engineering
. Python 127. MATLAB93. Statistics 105. Mathematical 116. R 128. Scala94. Algorithms Optimization 117. Apache Hadoop 129. NoSQL95. Data Engineering 106. Data Architecture 118. Java 130. Power BI96. Agile Methodology 107. Automation 119. Tableau 131. Object-Oriented97. Extract Transform 108. Artificial Intelligence 120. Apache Spark Programming Load 109. Data Management
Communication Society, he is primarily interested in designing curricula and tools which can help engineers and scientists develop life-long competencies in communication. In the past seven years he has also been the Lead of co-Principal Investigator in projects related to the design, implementation and assessment of learning technologies, especially in the domains of language learning, health communication and public discourse.Suguru Ishizaki, Carnegie Mellon University Suguru Ishizaki is an Associate Professor of Rhetoric and Communication Design in the Department of English at Carnegie Mellon. His current research interests include pedagogy of commu-nication and de- sign for students and professionals in the technology
with good understanding of theunderlying mechanism of a simulation engine. Each group of 2-3 students was assigned to oneproject. SimPlus is the result if one group. Over the course of the project, SimPlus gainednumerous advanced features such as a global static kernel implementing the Singleton designpattern, and callback-method automated event processing.1. IntroductionSimulation tools aims at facilitating the tasks of analysts or engineers. Without such tools,writing a simulation program often becomes difficult and requires reinvention of the wheel at thebeginning of each project. As a result, simulation tools have become very popular for industrial,defense, and educational applications.For educational purposes, the final class project of
Paper ID #17789A Helicopter Flight Laboratory Experience in an Undergraduate HelicopterAeronautics CourseLt. Col. Richard Melnyk, U.S. Military Academy LTC Rich Melnyk is an Army Aviator and Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point. He developed and implemented the first course offering of Thermal-Fluid Systems I in 2005. He was an Instructor and Assistant Professor from 2004-2007 and returned to teaching in 2015. He has a PhD in Aerospace Engineering, a PE in Mechanical Engineering, an MBA in Technology Management and recently commanded a
.[6] L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.[7] Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board, “A Guide to Outcomes-based Criteria,” 2015.[8] J. J. Pembridge and M. C. Paretti, “Characterizing capstone design teaching: A functional taxonomy,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 197–219, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20259.Appendix 1: Questionnaire for students of study 1Données démographiques (demographic data) ● Vous êtes dans quel programme? (Which program are you in?) ● Êtes-vous dans une équipe multidisciplinaire? (Are you in a multidisciplinary team?)The scale used for the rest of the questionnaire is as follows: Totalement en désaccord (Strongly disagree) En désaccord (Disagree
Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationBefore releasing the students to have their first client meeting, lecture material ispresented on the basics of user-centered development and guidelines are given on how togather information and conduct interviews. The students cover HCI principlesthroughout the course, but the basic development methodologies for designing andimplementing solutions for the clients are studied in the first weeks of the semester. Akey step in analyzing requirements is for the students to determine all the stakeholdersassociated with the system they are assigned. Students are directed to emphasizescenario-based design using Rosson and Carroll’s9 or McCracken &
Session 3226 Cooking Without Recipes: a Case Study for an Open-Ended Laboratory Experience in Semiconductor Processing E.L. Allen, E.D.H. Green, L.S. Vanasupa San Jose State University/California Polytechnic University-SLOIntroductionThe need for graduate engineers with the ability to think critically about a design problem, work withteammates from different disciplines, communicate ideas effectively in both written and oral format, and tocomprehend “the big picture” has been well-documented1,2. We have proposed a new method of designinglaboratory
(Associate Professor and Department Chair) (BucknellUniversity) Stu is an associate professor and chair of the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Bucknell University, in Lewisburg, PA. While his teaching responsibilities typically include digital design, computer-related electives, and senior design, his focusAlan ChevilleAbdelghany AbouelnaggaNatalie Kreusch © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work-in-Progress: A Review of the Type, Breadth, and Limitations of Publicly Available Educational Technology Products in 2022Introduction and MotivationOne of the major changes in the higher
years. He is currently Ph.D. candidate in Electrical Engineering at Arizona State University. His interests are inComputer Communication, Network Management, and Multimedia Communication Systems.DON L. EVANS is the Director of the Center for Innovation in Engineering Education and a Professor ofEngineering in the Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Department at Arizona State University. He completed hisBS (’62) at the University of Cincinnati, and Ph.D. (’67) at Northwestern University in Mechanical Engineering.Since then he has taught a wide variety of courses in Engineering at Arizona State University. He is an activemember of ASEE, and has served as Division Chair, Program Chair, and Executive Committee Member in theFreshmen Program
. The CISTEME365 program’s electrical engineering curriculum included avariety of topics including analog and digital circuits, properties of waves and signals, optics andimaging, algorithms, power and energy, and engineering design. Overall, 76% of participantsreported altering their practice of teaching as a result of their CISTEME365 experience. A few ofthe notable ways participants altered their teaching included reinforcing a growth mindset instudents (86%) and planning with administration to sustain self-efficacy strategies in theclassroom (55%). 82% of participants rated the CISTEME365 program as being within the top30% of effective professional development programs they experienced. And 55% of participantsrated the CISTEME365 program as
Studies at Virginia Tech.Ms. Emily E. Liptow, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Emily Liptow currently works at a tech startup accelerator in Cleveland OH where she manages a cowork- ing space and promotes community and diversity in the city’s entrepreneurship ecosystem. She served as an AmeriCorps VISTA member at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo where she was involved with a variety of diversity and inclusion efforts in the College of Engineering ranging from student support programs, faculty bias awareness trainings, and inclusive cultural change. Prior to her work at Cal Poly, received a B.S. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Ohio State University, where she
locations throughout the state allow Purdue to developdistinct technology programs designed with input from business and industry in the eachcommunity. The newest statewide location at Lafayette (SOT at Lafayette) was established in1996 with an independent office created in 1999 at Subaru-Isuzu Automotive (SIA). SOT atLafayette currently offers two programs of study Industrial Technology (IT) and OrganizationalLeadership and Supervision (OLS). Page 7.388.1 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”In
sensing, monitoring, and reporting patient vitals, often with the intent ofcommunicating findings with healthcare professionals (HCPs). For the past two summers, 2020and 2021, four undergraduate electrical/computer engineering and computer science students, andtwo high school STEM teachers, worked with two graduate student mentors to explore variousIoMT use cases via their participation in a Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) andTeachers (RET) program. During both summers, the REU/RET program was conducted remotelyover nine weeks, not including pre-summer engagement activities. These pre-summer activitieswere designed to promote and encourage healthy mentor-mentee interactions while also providingan additional opportunity for
involvement due to the lack of student technical,design, programming, and engineering experience combined with the complexity of the roboticscompetition requirements. Analyzing more veteran teams, we saw some mentors’ visions changeto allow more student ownership of the team. In the mentor-student behavioral model, we sawtwo veteran teams with stark contrasting mentorship types. The mentors maintained their heavyinvolvement on one team whereas mentors changed their roles to allow students to run andorganize on the less mentorship team. This change over years is important to understand andconnect back to their rookie year by observing change over time. As teams move into moreveteran status some teams may maintain heavy mentorship involvement while
://belabs.seas.upenn.edu) in the Department of Bioengineering at the University of Pennsylvania. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Under the Hood of a Bio-MakerSpace: Automating Lab OperationsIntroduction Can academic MakerSpaces and open educational laboratories, serving both structuredclasses as well as general project work, be efficiently staffed, managed, and operated?Traditionally, these spaces are regularly staffed by part-time student employees with regularturn-over. In addition, such lab spaces must quickly switch between different lab courses duringthe day, as well as open lab use, in a schedule that may vary from day to day. These constantchanges may
previously served on the electrical engineering faculty at the University of Portland, and Portland State University, and on the engineering staff at Hughes Aircraft Company. Prof. Schubert is a member of ASEE and IEEE and is a registered professional engineer in Oregon. He is the 2012 winner of the ASEE Robert G. Quinn award for excellence in engineering education.Ms. Cyd Burrows, University of San Diego Cyd has been with the University of San Diego since 2003 and is currently the Manager of the Instruc- tional and Media Technology unit in Academic Technology Services. She oversees the Instructional Design and Training team, and the Media Services team. Collectively they are responsible for supporting faculty in their
with tutoring services outside the classroom. • Finally, the students believed that lean can be applied more effectively through the involvement of customers, university administration, faculty, staff and the students. The students suggested involving themselves in the university system and to work together with the customer to continuously improve the quality of education.The study took place in program accredited by the Association of Technology, Management, andApplied Engineering (ATMAE). However, the activity would also support the learning goals andoutcomes of an ABET accredited program. Specifically, this type of activity would supportdemonstration of (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process
School of Engineering, Mr. Goss leads Global Engagement, ASU Engineering Online graduate degree programs, and Executive/Professional Development programs. His research areas include global workforce development learning models and the development and application of new technologies and distributed-media models for adult learning. Since 2010, Mr. Goss has been the Principal Investigator/Project Director for the Higher Engineering Education Alliance Program (HEEAP), focused on modernization and transformation of teaching and learning in undergraduate engineering programs in Vietnam. In this role he has worked in both Vietnam and the United States on faculty and curriculum development to advance Vietnam’s economic growth
. He is past Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility and Radio Science. As the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs and Student Services he is responsible for oversight of the accreditation pro- cess, recruitment and retention of students, community college visitation, management of the scholarship program and services to university and state committees.Ashley Ater Kranov, Washington State University Dr. Ater Kranov is Director of Educational Innovation and Assessment for the College of Engineering and Architecture at Washington State University, USA. She is affiliated assistant professor in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science where she co-teaches the 2
diagram. Fig. 3 shows the unique vector paths in different colors. 3 engineering tools and practices: the SCRUM project management methodology [x], Doxygen [xi], code reviews, and Mob Programming [xii]. The research scientists were not familiar with the SCRUM project management
Venkataraman, San Diego State University Satchi Venkataraman, Ph.D., is a Professor of Aerospace Engineering. He has served as Graduate Advisor for the Aerospace Engineering program (17 years) and as an Associate Director at the Computational Sciences Research Center at San Diego State University (11 years). His expertise is in computational mechanics and optimization applied to design of lightweight and durable composite aircraft structures. He has extensive experience in developing programs for student professional development and broadening participation (co-PI and PI on three NSF S-STEM grants). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Exploring Interdisciplinary Identity Formation in
. Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Washington. She also received the M.T.S. degree from Harvard Divinity School. She is currently Professor and Chair of the Department of Integrated Engineering at Minnesota State University, Mankato and is a Fellow of ASEE.Dr. Gary Lichtenstein, Arizona State University Gary Lichtenstein, Ed.D., is founder and principal of Quality Evaluation Designs, a firm specializing in education research and program evaluation. He is also Affiliate Associate faculty member in Rowan University’s Experiential Engineering Education department.Dr. Karin Jensen, University of Michigan Karin
installation, the syngas burning chamber would swing to a verticalposition for operation. A scaled model of the fresh and new conceptual design was sent to the 3Dprinter in our rapid prototyping lab (see Figure 2). This model practically stole the spotlight atthe DoD Maintenance Symposium in November 2012. An electrical engineering grad student was given the assignment to rebuild and test the electrical control system. The central
defined and fraught with value judgements.Because no single perspective can fully encompass the whole system or issue at hand,multiple representations of the issues or problems are necessary. Resolving these complexdesign choices can require many ‘actors’ who bring different types of knowledge into aforum for extended dialogue. Recognising how to accommodate and even benefit from thesediverse and often competing perspectives is a major challenge for the design process and theengineers undertaking the process.Within engineering education the challenge to prepare students to broaden the basis uponwhich decision-making can occur is recognised within the generic attributes expected ofundergraduate engineers. Recently developed accreditation outcomes
concerning the effects of flexible learning spaces and formative assessment techniques.Ms. Candace Rose Wiwel, University of Michigan Candace Wiwel is a third year undergraduate student studying Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering at the University of Michigan.Jessica P HernandezDr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Associate Professor of Education, and Director and Graduate Chair for Engineering Education Research Programs at University of Michigan (U-M). Dr. Finelli is a fellow in the American Society of Engineering Education, a Deputy Editor of the Journal for Engineering Education, an Associate Editor of the IEEE
3: The Result of Simulation with Facility & Resource Utilization IndicesHamid KhanHamid Khan is an Assistant Professor in the School of Industry and Technology of East CarolinaUniversity. His teaching interest is focused on Computer Aided Machine and Tool Design,Computer Graphics, Concurrent Engineering in Mechanical Design, and CAD/CAM/CAE/and RP.His research interest is focused on the above as well professional development of ProfessionalEngineering and Technology Managers to integrate teaching for practice. Dr. Khan has a BS inMechanical Engineering, an MS in Industrial and Management Systems Engineering, an MBA inProduction Strategy and a Doctorate in Management Education. Hamid is a Registered ProfessionalEngineer. He is active in