Paper ID #26640Work in Progress: A Clinical Immersion Program for Broad Curricular Im-pactDr. William H Guilford, University of Virginia Will Guilford is an Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Virginia. He is also the Assistant Dean for Undergraduate Education in the School of Engineering. He received his B.S. in Biology and Chemistry from St. Francis College in Ft. Wayne, Indiana and his Ph.D. in Physiology from the University of Arizona. Will did his postdoctoral training in Molecular Biophysics at the University of Vermont. His research interests include novel assessments of educational
, design activity, and design outcome," Design Studies, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 649-669, 2005.[6] M. C. Yang, "Concept generation and sketching: Correlations with design outcome.," in ASME 2003 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 2003.[7] B. M. Linder, Understanding estimation and its relation to engineering education, Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1999.[8] D. Woods, "Teaching Problem Solving Skills," Engineering Education, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 238-243, 1975.[9] C. Maker, "DISCOVER: Assessing and developing problem solving," Gifted Education International, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 232-251, 2001.[10] H. L. a. A. Hosoi, "Starting
study will be determined by threeexternal factors: structuredness, complexity, and dynamicity of problem [16].There are three indicators used to assess problem structuredness: (1) the number of unknownaspects or elements in the problem [19]; (2) the number of possible methods or approaches tosolve the problem [20]; and (3) the number of potential solutions for the problem [20]. Problem’scomplexity [21] is indicated by: (1) the number of issues, functions, or variables involved in theproblem; and (2) the level of uncertainty about which concepts, rules, and principles that arenecessary to solve the problem. Problems vary in their stability or dynamicity, which indicatesthe likeliness of needing continuous adaptability for understanding of the
direct follow-ups to draw a richer narrative. This method will decrease the chance of survey fatigue andprovide us with more detail on each individual. This work in progress focused on establishing preliminary relationships within motivationand identity respectively. Ultimately, we seek to assess whether these constructs are sufficientlycorrelated that one may be used as a valid and reliable means of measuring the other. Thus, ourdata analysis will include evaluating criterion-related validity (both predictive and concurrent)[10]. If such a relationship exists, it could support the usefulness of one construct in predictingthe other. References[1] Blustein, David L., et al. “Relationship between the Identity Formation Process and Career
., & Schneider, K., & Gaines, A. L. (2013, June), Implementing an Engineering Applications of Mathematics Course at the University of Arkansas and Assessing Retention Impact Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. https://peer.asee.org/19721 3. https://registrar.uark.edu/graduation/senior-walk.php
“major comparison” as othertopics/assignments that equally contributed to their major exploration.Students were also asked if they were still undecided about a major, and 73.33% said no. Ofthose who were still undecided, the following comments were offered when asked whatinformation/support would be helpful in choosing a major:“More opportunities to work with those in multiple engineering fields”“Explore classes in different majors”exploring the success of this effortIn order to assess the effectiveness of this overall effort, which included both a targetedcommunication plan and modified activities in UNIV E101 meant to engage students in majorexploration, it’s important to look at supporting data. The following table details the number
as ateam, being introduced to the product design process, doing online research and applying theirproblem-solving skills. We assessed the effectiveness of these activities using an online survey atthe end of the activities.Student Participation and Feedback - After the activities were concluded, an online surveywas conducted to help better understand the effectiveness of these activities and possible ways toimprove them for the next semester. 64 students from Spring and Fall 2018 semesters respondedto the survey. Table 1 presents the results. Figure 4. Contribution of this activity for improvement on each aspect based in survey resultsTable 1. Average scores on Likert scale (1-5) obtained from students
camp program.The logistics were co-determined by the participating institutions and were based on the planned,annual activities of the experienced outreach organization. The experiences of the US studentcohort mirrored the activities (on a modified timeline) that participating Canadian studentsendured. For this project, we worked within a qualitative research paradigm to explore theelements of the collaboration. Data collection thus far for the project was conducted through twomethods: document analysis and open-ended survey. Document analysis examined the physicalartifacts [9] from the Canadian and US outreach groups, including agenda, program schedules,manuals, curriculum documents, and training materials. Documents were assessed
concepts, engaging the engineering design process, and considering ethics at the end of the unit (Appendix C). Students rated their ability to perform a certain skill on a 5point Likert scale, with the lowest value being “Hardly at all” and the highest value being “Very well.” Additionally, students in the second year selfassessed their attitudes about problemsolving, ethics, and STEAM careers before and after the unit (Appendix D). A 5point Likert scale was used with responses ranging from “Strongly Disagree” to “Strongly Agree.” These questions were adapted from the Friday Institute survey designed to assess middle school student attitudes toward STEM [4]. Additionally, openended questions asked students to reflect on their most
hypotheses rather than conclusions. First, PIsexpect undergraduate lab workers to express “interest” and “excitement” about research. Weworry that assessing students according to how a professor perceives their “enthusiasm” canunintentionally exclude students who differ from the professor, such as by gender, race, class, orculture. Second, members of the two labs tell stories about failure to undergraduates in differentways, which serve as powerful modes of socialization. Discourse styles as reflected incommunities’ storytelling may influence undergraduates’ sense of belonging. Third, we tried anew methodology of inviting students to discuss their different kinds and levels of expertise withregards to the concept of T-shaped expertise, i.e., having
the President. 2. Brass LF, Akabas MH, Burnley LD, Engman DM, Wiley CA, Andersen OS. Are MD– PhD programs meeting their goals? An analysis of career choices made by graduates of 24 MD–PhD programs. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2010 Apr;85(4):692. 3. Chan LS. Building an Engineering-Based Medical College: Is the Timing Ripe for the Picking?. Medical Science Educator. 2016 Mar 1;26(1):185-90. 4. Dalkey N, Helmer O. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management science. 1963 Apr;9(3):458-67. 5. Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research &
Paper ID #21475The Effect of Engineering Summer Camps on Middle School Students Inter-est and IdentityDr. Indira Chatterjee, University of Nevada, Reno Indira Chatterjee received her M.S. in Physics from Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio in 1977 and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah in 1981. Indira is Associate Dean of Engineering and Professor of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering at the University of Nevada, Reno. As Associate Dean she oversees undergraduate and graduate education in the college including assessment, accreditation, recruitment, retention
experience.AcknowledgmentThe authors would like to acknowledge the Doctoral Teaching Program in College of Engineeringat The University of Akron for providing teaching fellowships for S. Cyrus Rezvanifar.References[1] Hassini, E., 2006. Student–instructor communication: The role of email. Computers &Education, 47(1), pp.29-40.[2] Gramoll, K., Hines, W. and Kocak, M., 2005, June. Delivery and assessment of teachingStatics over the internet to community college students. In ASEE Annual Conf. Proc., Portland,OR (pp. 12-15).[3] Frees, S. and Kessler, G.D., 2004, October. Developing collaborative tools to promotecommunication and active learning in academia. In Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004. 34thAnnual (pp. S3B-20). IEEE.[4] Atamian, R. and DeMoville, W
perceive competition, and they suggest that anyenhancement in progress and performance was likely because of a more structured sequence ofrequired deliverables and the desire to have something to present at the weekly Team Leadermeetings rather than a desire to “keep up with other teams” because of the Team Leadermeetings. While it would be expected for non-team leaders to have little incentive to keep upwith other teams, as they have little or no formal opportunity to evaluate other teams, we weresurprised that “keeping up with other teams” was consistently ranked by team leaders as the leastinfluential of the named categories.ConclusionWhen taken together, our preliminary assessment of the presence and role of competition due toweekly peer
programs create trackswhich align the educational focus with faculty research interests; however, they further add tocurricular rigidity, as they are often composed of courses largely outside of our department.When speaking with peer institutions, it became clear that many institutions experience thesechallenges, and in particular, the debate over the benefit of technical tracks appears to beongoing. Beyond challenges to students, technical tracks present difficulties for administrators,as maintaining relevance to modern bioengineering practice requires continual assessment andforecasting due to the rapid changes in the field and can never comprehensively satisfy alltechnical needs in bioengineering industries. Managing the content of the tracks
of varying shapes) used during alesson on stress concentrations. The author will present the lesson and the use of the physicalmodels (cut out shapes with discontinuities). The physical model allows each student toplay/demonstrate to themselves the importance of the change in shape and the placement of holesand notches. Assessment of homework data will highlight the value of simple hands on activitieswithin as many classes as possible. Each person in the session will participate in the use of thisphysical model.IntroductionMechanics of Materials is a critical course in most engineer’s technical development, butespecially civil and mechanical engineers. Up to this point in their education, all analysisassumes the body is rigid, but we all
our rankings.IntroductionAcademic programs are ranked using different objective and subjective metrics, providingdifferent perspectives on the quality, productivity and affordability of the programs. Programrankings are closely followed by aspiring students, universities and employed in hiring andfunding decisions. Among the many rankings of programs, U.S. News rankings have a widefollowing. U.S. News updates the ranking of graduate programs in multiple fields annually.According to the statement from U.S. News’ website 1 , they rank the graduate programs based onboth statistical data and expert assessment data. The statistical data includes both input and outputmeasures, reflecting the quality of resources into the programs and educational
relevant to the Naval services; especially efforts supported with non-Navy fundsMetrics Ensure the appropriate and consistent metrics are in place across the Naval STEM Portfolio, which assess both progress and impactGo Viral Invest in programs and social networking tools that have the potential for rapid growth and geographic expansion 1617 Web Site Information The Office of Naval Research (ONR) coordinates, executes, and promotes the science and technology programs of the United States Navy and Marine Corps through schools, universities, government laboratories, and nonprofit and for-profit organizations. The Business Opportunities web site at: http
Develop your ideas What do I have, and what would I like to do with it? • Evaluate your research strengths (individual, departmental, institutional) • Identify specific, possible research projects, areas of emphasis for a Center, and/or related educational activities Ideas can be revised, but you need to start somewhere! 14 What else is needed? • Determine what you need to complement your strengths • Collaborator with particular skills? • Access to equipment with particular measurement capabilities unavailable commercially? • Access to samples or data? • Review the laboratory’s website and/or FLC listing to assess
Instructors.future workAs it is important to monitor, assess and revise the course after each offering, this process will becompleted before the next academic year. In the interim, adjustments to the course evaluationsurvey noted in the “Student Evaluation Survey Results” section of this paper will beimplemented. Additionally, it is acknowledged that this study defines student “success” based ontheir performance in the course only, and an inference is being made between success and futureretention in the engineering program. However, additional data will be reviewed on a Universitylevel to determine if: 1. Retention continues in the College of Engineering – even if a studentchanges their engineering major; and 2. If a correlation exists between the level of
meaningful project skills andlearning which might be significant when considering the lower amount of effort required.References1. Gelmon, S. B. (2001). Assessing service-learning and civic engagement: Principles and techniques. Campus Compact, Brown University.2. Lima, M., Oakes, W. C., & Gruender, J. L. (2006). Service-learning: Engineering in your community. Wildwood, MO: Great Lakes Press.3. Ropers-Huilman, B., Carwile, L., & Lima, M. (2005). Service-learning in engineering: A valuable pedagogy for meeting learning objectives. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), 155-165.4. Coyle, E. J., Jamieson, L. H., & Sommers, L. S. (1997). EPICS: A model for integrating service-learning into the engineering curriculum
, February). “Concept to Commercialization – fosteringinnovation through university resources.”5 Sharma, P. (2017, February 6). Transmission Line Insulators. Retrieved October 14, 2018, fromhttps://www.emworks.com/application/power-line-insulator6 Daware, K. (October 2016). Transmission Line Insulators. Retrieved October 7, 2018, fromhttps://www.electricaleasy.com/2016/10/insulators-used-in-overhead-power-lines.htmlBiographyAfshin Zahraee is currently a Visiting Instructor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at Purdue UniversityNorthwest and PhD Candidate in the Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering at IllinoisInstitute of Technology. His research is in the areas of structural condition assessment and health monitoring
Engineering and assess and manage riskEconomics courses. To address this challenge at Baylor’s Creating Value: Students will identifySchool of Engineering and Computer Science, a series of unexpected opportunities to createproblem-based homework assignments focused on personal extraordinary value and persist through andinvesting and tax return preparation have been developed learn from failureand integrated into the Global Business Economics and It has been shown in prior work3,5 that courses inCommunication course. This transition in course structure Engineering Economics effectively support the developmenthas resulted in
Chair of the 2007 Bioengineering Quiz Bowl. She is also liasion of the UCSD Student Chapter of the Biomedical Engineering Society to the Bioengineering Undergraduate Studies Committee.Michele Temple, University of California-San Diego Michele M Temple, PhD, is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Bioengineering at UCSD. Her educational research interests include teaching evaluation, assessments, and course and curriculum improvement. Her teaching interests include physiology, tissue engineering, and introductory biomechanics.Edward Chuong, University of California-San Diego Edward B Chuong is currently a senior in the Bioengineering: Bioinformatics major of the Department of
methods were employed to assess the students’ learning outcomes. Peer evaluation of theprojects was conducted in class presentations. Course project evaluation was conducted byfaculty in Students’ Projects Presentation Day on the last week of each semester. A survey wasconducted in the classes of MANE 310 and ENGR 200 to collect the learning outcomes and theinterest areas of the students enrolled in these courses. The results of the survey collected fromseventeen students involved in product realization projects are shown in Figure 7. 101 100 99 98 97 96 95 94
Transfer Between Oregon Community College and Oregon UniversitySystem Institutions. New Directions for Community Colleges. 114Burger, J. B. & Malaney, (2001, March) Assessing the transition of the Transfer Students from communitycolleges to a university. Paper presented as the presented to the Annual Conference of the National Associationof School Psychologists. (ED 453489)California Postsecondary Education Commission. (2002) Student Transfer in California PostsecondaryEducation. Presented to the California Postsecondary Education Commission at its December 2001 meeting.(ERIC ED464672)Kozeracki, C. A. (2001, Summer) Studying Transfer Students: Designs and Methodological Challenges. NewDirections for Community Colleges.Townshed, B. K. (2001
calms everyone down, does the entrepreneurial leader balance both?This research explores the construct of entrepreneurial leadership using the followingindependent elements as a guide: gender as a social experience, past parental relationships,cultural roots, real time strategic risk taking behavior, capacity to predict and create cross-functional teams, and a character type that thrives on the challenge of change. Specificconsideration is given to emerging dimensions and attributes influencing survival. Discussionincludes: 1) ways that the entrepreneurial leader assesses the audience with precision, 2) acts onthe belief that various sectors of technology drives leadership, 3) calculates the growth towardswhat is authentic and new, 4)expects
theoretical work associated with both junior-level Fluid Mechanics (ME571) andsenior-level Aerodynamics (ME628) courses. An inexpensive method of constructing simpleand effective special-purpose pressure taps is presented, which could be incorporated intovirtually any wind tunnel facility. These taps significantly complement existing built-in pressuretaps normally associated with the standard test section region, and are shown to provide themeans to map the axial pressure distribution within the entire wind tunnel. They also provide ameans of assessing the validity of the Bernoulli principle and provide further reinforcement ofthe stream tube concept in relation to the wind tunnel flow.Measurements of the pressure distribution confirm the presence of
speakers were invited to address evolving principles of sustainable civilengineering, eco-renovation, ecological home improvements, deconstruction as discussed above,besides many issues.CONCLUSIONSThe green construction engineering course provides skills and techniques in sustainabilitythat is becoming an essential component of the civil engineering practice. A number ofresults measured throughout this course include skills in critical thinking, datainterpretation and analysis, integrative ability, data collection techniques of various greenconstruction projects. The qualities assessed include curiosity, creativity, appreciation forrole of science and technology (e.g., using LEED by the USGBC in design andconstruction), and a continued interest in
better problem solving skills and project managing skills will stand out in the workforce.The MET department and the college will be known for producing problem solvers, creativethinkers, and project managers. Increased levels of community and industry involvementespecially from manufacturing companies will take place at the College. The assessment methodologies for the program outcome are being investigated and willbe added to the program as part of the curriculum enhancement.Industrial Partners and Support The college currently has a strong reputation in local industry for producing graduateswho “hit the ground running” as a result of the co-op experience. The College also requires thateach BS graduate must have completed a senior