Conference Session

Focus on IE Course Design and Assessment

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul Kauffmann, East Carolina University; Cathy Hall, East Carolina University; Gene Dixon, East Carolina University; John Garner, East Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering

infall 2004 into a systems engineering concentration. Engineering management and bio processengineering were added in 2005, with biomedical engineering in 2006. Page 13.990.3The new program faced several challenges. The region’s ability to maintain economicmomentum and grow technology driven businesses is, in large part, dependent on attracting andretaining engineering expertise. However, local, national and global firms often have difficultyattracting and retaining engineers in a region that is primarily comprised of rural towns and smallcities. The ability to grow local engineering and technology talent, with family roots in theregion, was

Conference Session

Faculty Development Round Table

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University; Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas, El Paso; Gemma Henderson, University of Miami; Ines Basalo, University of Miami

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Constituent Committee

. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Impact of faculty development workshops on instructional faculty at Hispanic-serving institutionsAbstractThis research paper will examine the experiences of instructional, non-tenure line (non-tenure-track/tenured) faculty at Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) during and after participation in amulti-institutional faculty development workshop series. As engineering programs increase insize, the demand for instructional, non-tenure track faculty increases. These instructional facultyrepresent a large percentage, from 25% to over 50%, of the faculty members at both two andfour-year institutions. Given their high number of contact hours with engineering students

Conference Session

Engineering Education Research and Assessment III

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Miguel A. Padilla; Timothy J. Anderson; Matthew Ohland; Guili Zhang

research is in freshman programs and educational assessment. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education Table 4. Intercepts- and Slopes-as-Outcomes Model Fixed Effect Estimate SE df t p-value School CGPA Mean Base, γ00 2.5459 .009137 5 278.63 .0001 Rural, γ01 .15290 .004774 5 32.02 .0001 Suburban, γ02 -.07266 .004716 5 15.41 .0001 Research, γ03 .21120 .005667 5

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 11: Leadership and Collaborations in Engineering

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gemma Henderson, University of Miami; Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas, El Paso; Ines Basalo, University of Miami; Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

facilitated faculty development initiatives, communi- ties and events in online course design, formative assessment, narrative techniques and 3-D technologies in undergraduate education. Since Fall 2016, in partnership with the College of Engineering and the LIFE team, Gemma designed and supported faculty development workshops in active learning pedago- gies, provided regular consultations and also joined the UM team at Olin College’s 2017 Collaboratory Summer Institute. Gemma is a recent graduate from the MSc Digital Education program at the University of Edinburgh.Dr. Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas, El Paso An Assistant Professor at The University of Texas at El Paso, Dr. Meagan R. Kendall is helping develop

Conference Session

ETD Technical Session 5 - ET Curriculum and Programs II

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Orlando Ayala, Old Dominion University; Kristie Gutierrez, Old Dominion University; Francisco Cima; Julia Noginova; Min Jung Lee, Old Dominion University; Stacie Ringleb, Old Dominion University; Pilar Pazos, Old Dominion University; Krishnanand Kaipa, Old Dominion University; Jennifer Kidd, Old Dominion University

. Small Engineering Project Week 16 15.0% Evaluation of the Implementations Students’ learning and satisfaction for both PBL implementations were evaluated andcompared. A shortened version of the NCEES FE exam, the CATME survey, and reflectiveassignments were utilized. A shortened version of the NCEES FE exam Students completed the FE exam during the first week and then again during the lastweek of the semester for the purpose of assessing students’ growth in fluid mechanicsknowledge. The 16 questions can be found here: https://tinyurl.com/shortenedFE. Students'scores from the FE exam were analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to test forpotential differences

Conference Session

PSW Section Meeting Papers - Disregard start and end time - for online paper access only

Collection

2019 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Pejman Akbari, California State Polytechnic University in Pomona ; Brad Kevin Thomas, Electro Mechanical Systems Engineering Technology; Christopher John Tait, Cal Poly Pomona; Colby Stark

Tagged Topics

Pacific Southwest Section Meeting Paper Submissions

becomequalified candidates to work with faculty members who conduct research in the field ofturbomachinery. Senior Design ProjectFor students entering their senior year, it is common among engineering programs in the nationand worldwide to participate in senior design group activities. These activities are prominentelements of engineering degree programs and are critical to the development and assessment ofstudents’ professional skills for their earned degrees. They provide a unique opportunity forstudents to work together on a hands-on project in a timely fashion and develop their engineeringskills by solidifying much of what is learned in the classroom. Additionally, executing a seniordesign project improves their technical knowledge, as well as their

Conference Session

Activities and Assessment for “Awkward ABET Outcomes”

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Clifton B. Farnsworth, Brigham Young University; Ronald W. Welch, The Citadel; Michael J McGinnis, University of Texas at Tyler; Geoff Wright, Brigham Young University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

. This step is important in helping studentsassess their creativity and learn to acknowledge both strengths and weaknesses in their efforts.Introduction to Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) programming: This particular topicconsisted of several different lab exercises, intending to explain basic VBA language elementsand then using VBA programming within Excel to perform basic functions and decision making.Although there are a number of preliminary tasks associated with understanding how to interpretand write VBA programming constructs (in other words, teaching fundamental VBAprogramming), the final task allows the students to exercise their creativity in utilizing theirfreshly acquired skills in writing a small computer program to explore

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Program Development & Desired Outcomes

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Nilsen, VentureWell; Victoria Matthew, VentureWell/Epicenter; Angela Shartrand, VentureWell; Thema Monroe-White, SageFox Consulting Group

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

NSF-funded projects that are advancing entrepreneurship education in STEM fields, including Epicenter and I-Corps(tm). She and her team are currently examining the experiences of innovators commercializing and scaling-up new technologies, products, and services, and are developing ways to assess the venture and product develop- ment status of innovation teams. She received her B.A. from Williams College, an Ed.M. from Harvard University and a Ph.D. in Applied Developmental and Educational Psychology from Boston College.Dr. Thema Monroe-White, SageFox Consulting Group Thema Monroe-White is a senior evaluator at SageFox Consulting Group, specializing on driving organi- zational and program performance through

Conference Session

BME Assessment and the VaNTH ERC

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Cordray, Vanderbilt University; Alene Harris, Vanderbilt; Thomas Harris, Vanderbilt University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

experimental designs, with randomization (SeeCordray, Harris and Gilbert4). The other (60%) comparative studies used quasi-experimental methods (with non-random assignment) to assess the effectiveness ofmodules and course augmentations. Although an experimental approach to improving engineering education isdemanding, it provides the only path to deriving unbiased estimates of the effects oflearning on students. On the other hand, practical and ethical issues must be addressed. Page 12.13.3One particularly difficult practical constraint in using true experiments in assessing 2VaNTH materials entailed small class

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division: Ethics Education Assessment

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kingsley Reeves, University of South Florida; Michelle Hughes Miller, University of South Florida; Grisselle Centeno, Florida Polytechnic University; Elaine Englehardt, Utah Valley University; Michael Pritchard; Susan LeFrancois, Florida Polytechnic University; Ideliz Roman, University of South Florida

advantage of this opportunity, our research proposes to make use of a featureof engineering programs that, as far as we have been able to discover, is largely overlooked inefforts to develop ethical engineers and meet the ABET ethics requirements: student internships.Our research builds on what little is known about the impact of ethics training on studentdevelopment of a professional engineer identity by conceptualizing, measuring, and analyzing thedevelopment of an ethical dimension to this identity.Enhanced Engineering InternshipsWe employ and assess a novel pedagogy that merges professional STEM ethics training with co-curricular STEM internships. Our pedagogical innovation, which we call an enhanced internship,includes the provision of ethics

Conference Session

Engineering Education Research and Assessment II

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Mary Frances Stewart; Malgorzata Zywno

-hand how the students interacted with the object.Usability feedback obtained from the participants brought us immediate benefits in our goal ofcreating a user-friendly and valuable learning object. The comments from volunteers regardingthe usability of the object have already been implemented. Quantitative data analysis presentedhere completed the first, preliminary stage of the study. In the second stage, the authors willfurther analyze the visual data obtained from the taping of the sessions using qualitative analysis,which may yield further helpful insights. The authors are planning to follow this small study witha large scale longitudinal analysis of learning styles and teaching strategies across severalengineering disciplines

Conference Session

Track: Faculty - Technical Session I

Collection

2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity

Authors

Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas, El Paso; Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University; Ines Basalo, University of Miami; Gemma Henderson, University of Miami

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Faculty

educators provided. Given thenumber of HSIs in the regions of interest, the sample sizes in this study are small. However, this studywas exploratory and sought to optimize the depth of interactions with a diverse set of institution andeducator types over having a large sample size. Future studies should include additional participants andother stakeholders beyond educators, such as students or employers. In addition, 50% of participants atthe Texas workshop and 44% of participants at the Florida workshop were from the respective hostinstitutions. Therefore, the over-sampling of faculty from the host institutions may have biased the resultstowards the dominant perspectives at the host institutions. To minimize the impact of oversampling,results are

Conference Session

Assessment of Student Learning and Skills

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Timothy E. Allen, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

Paper ID #27353Retrospective Multi-year Analysis of Team Composition Dynamics and Per-formance within a Yearlong Integrative BME Laboratory SequenceDr. Timothy E. Allen, University of Virginia Dr. Timothy E. Allen is an Associate Professor and Interim Undergraduate Program Director in the De- partment of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Virginia. He received a B.S.E. in Biomedical Engineering at Duke University and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Bioengineering at the University of Cal- ifornia, San Diego. Dr. Allen’s teaching activities include coordinating the core undergraduate teaching labs and the Capstone Design

Conference Session

Improving Presentation Skills Through Summer Research and Ambassador Programs

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth L. Miller, Pennsylvania State University; Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

). Effect of Differing PowerPoint Slide Design on Multiple- Choice Test Scores for Assessment of Knowledge and Retention in a Theriogenology Course. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Education, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 312-317.8. Joanna K. Garner and Michael Alley (2016). Slide structure can influence the presenter’s understanding of the presentation’s content. International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 32, no. 1(A), pp. 39-54.9. Melissa Marshall, Michael Alley, Sarah Zappe, Karen Thole, Mary Frecker, and Renata Engel (2010 October). Ambassador Program for Recruiting Girls into Engineering. 2010 Frontiers in Education Conference (IEEE: Washington, DC).10. Christine Haas, Michael Alley, and Joanna Garner (2016 June). Engineering

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 3

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gemma Henderson, University of Miami; Ines Basalo, University of Miami; Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University; Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas at El Paso

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

. Two cohorts of EIF participantswere hosted at a HSI local to them, in the fall of 2022 and 2023. Upon application andacceptance to the program, these engineering instructional faculty were recognized as fellows ofthe project, awarded a stipend, and guided through scoping a project focused on educationalchange to work on throughout the rest of the program. This paper focuses explicitly on the groupcoaching model, with the framework for this institute outlined in prior work [10].The case study research and the subsequent curriculum design for the group coaching modelwere guided by theoretical frameworks of self-efficacy [11] and agency [12]. These frameworksprovide a foundation for understanding the influences on an individual's decision to

Conference Session

New Teaching Pedagogies: Methods and Assessments

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey F. Rhoads, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Eric Nauman, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Beth M. Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Charles Morton Krousgrill, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics

developedindependently by distinct instructors, each is founded upon the same five core elements:  Largely Traditional Lectures;  Hybrid Textbooks/Lecture Notes;  Extensive Multimedia Content;  Course Blogs; and  Refined Student Assessment ToolsThese elements are briefly described below. Page 24.1241.2Key components of the PMFC experience are the hybrid textbook/lecture notes sets1,2, dubbed“Lecturebooks”. These hybrid texts, used in place of a traditional textbook, are designed topresent the students with pertinent background information in a concise fashion, highlightfundamental engineering principles and optimal problem solving

Conference Session

New Teaching Pedagogies: Methods and Assessments

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Luz Adriana Amaya-Bower, Central State Connecticut University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

classroom methodology in juxtaposition to the traditional method of delivery. Theimplemented changes have streamlined course contents and noticeably improved studentunderstanding of the covered material. The pilot course is a three credit, 200 level engineeringclass which aims to teach students the tools for problem solving, graphing and analyzingengineering data, programming of formulae, and procedures. This class uses Excel and Matlab asthe software to implement these tools, and approximately twenty chapters are covered within twodifferent textbooks. The following changes have been implemented in this software-based course:First, the structure of the class was modified. Initially, Excel was taught at the beginning of thesemester and Matlab in the

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Learning Outcomes and Assessment

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeremiah J. Neubert, University of North Dakota

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

formentoring a successful team. In addition to providing information specific to the robotic miningcompetition, the paper will also provide more generic solutions to common problems that can beused in any multidisciplinary student competition.BackgroundThere is a belief that systems engineering is best taught by providing students with a hands-onexperience5,6. Providing students with a multidisciplinary systems engineering experience can bedifficult because it requires professors from multiple departments to work together with arelatively small group of students4. One of the easiest places to insert such an experience is thesenior capstone course. Several institutions have used their capstone courses to teach theirstudents about systems

Conference Session

MASS: Mastery, Assessment and Success of Students

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Amie Baisley, University of Florida; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

failures around for the rest of the semester. The system alsorequires many assessments (generally seven in a fifteen-week semester plus a final exam that hasmultiple, usually four, opportunities). Hence, the pressure that students feel on any given assessment isrelatively small, and significant hope of mastery remains right up to the end of the course.Each student’s progress toward mastery is tracked and fed back to them periodically throughout thesemester in the form of a dashboard. The dashboard for a student at the end of the semester is shown inFig. 1. There are several aspects to the dashboard, but the part associated with mastery of the objectives isin the lower right corner. This figure is an example of a student who earned a grade of A in

Conference Session

Engineering Education Research and Assessment I

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Susan Mosborg; Robin Adams; Rebecca Kim; Monica Cardella; Cynthia Atman; Jennifer Turns

material sciencesengineers, and 2 were systems engineers. Among the engineers, mean number of yearsexperience in the field was 19 (range 7-32 years). Eight of the engineers had master’s degrees ina subfield of engineering, and an additional 4 had Ph.D.s. Fourteen of the engineers were whitemales, 3 were Asian / Pacific Islander males, and 2 were white females. The landscape architectwas a white male with 13 years experience in the field and an undergraduate degree in landscapearchitecture. The greatest portion of participants (9 of the 19 engineers) were currently employedin large corporations with over 10,000 employees, but others were from small to medium-sizedfirms and as a group had previously worked as engineers, on average, at two other

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division: Ethics Education Assessment

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Green, LeTourneau University; David Dittenber, Cedarville University

may include the difficulty of the subject matter, the high workloads, and anincreased presence of competition in their courses, but not all research supports theseconclusions [4], [5], [6]. Across all studies, however, it appears that the quantity of engineeringstudents who participate in at least some form of academic dishonesty while in college may be ashigh as around 95% [7], [8], [9].Factors in Cheating BehaviorBesides the program of study, other demographic, situational, and psychological factors havebeen examined to assess their correlation with cheating behaviors. In most studies, it does notappear that demographics, such as gender or ethnicity, play an important role [3], [6]. As onepossible exception, however, international students

Conference Session

Concept Inventories and Assessment of Knowledge

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carli Denyse Flynn, Syracuse University; Cliff I. Davidson, Syracuse University; Sharon Dotger; Meredith Sullivan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

questionreceived a large number of “Total guess” ratings, it could be considered too difficult or confusingfor students to answer. In both Survey 1 and Survey 2 results, the majority of questions receivedeither one or zero guesses among all student responses. The questions with the most guessesincluded Q5a (7 guesses on Survey 1 and 3 guesses on Survey 2) and Q7a (5 guesses on Survey1 and 5 on Survey 2). This level of guessing was not deemed to be so large as to skew theanalysis of the results or to consider the removal of a question from the analysis. While assessing the student confidence ratings, it was noted that there were somedistinctions between the ratings among the female and male students. Table 8 includes abreakdown of the confidence

Conference Session

History, Program Design, and even a Journal Club

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Farison, Baylor University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

interest and role inASEE and the educational and accreditation processes from whose output they recruit.Multidisciplinary Engineering ProgramsThe data presented in this paper are drawn from the current ABET website,1 as accessed onMarch 2, 2010. That site maintains a list of all accredited engineering programs under a set ofdrop-down menu titles, one of which is “Engineering, Engineering Physics & EngineeringScience.” This list currently comprises programs with one of those three titles, plus GeneralEngineering and a small number (three) of uniquely distinct titles that ABET has assigned to theASEE set. The most recent roster assigned to ASEE for program accreditation includes 68institutions offering 69 accredited multidisciplinary engineering

Conference Session

Getting Started: Objectives, Rubrics, Evaluations, and Assessment

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward Gehringer, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

finally, faculty should avail themselves of institutionalsupport for improving teaching.1. IntroductionIn most engineering schools, except for research, teaching is the most important factor on whichreappointment, promotion, and tenure are based. And teaching is most often evaluated usingstudent course evaluations. This places faculty in a delicate position, a reciprocal relationshipbetween their students and them, in which each party is assessing the other and influencing theirsubsequent advancement. For this reason, student course evaluation is one of the mostcontentious issues [1] in all kinds of academic departments and all kinds of institutions.Instructors rightly point out that other factors should be considered when determining theefficacy

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Jerry Sellers; Douglas Bayley

program achieves its academicgoals. The basic philosophy that initiated the Academy’s small satellite program in thefirst place was a belief that students learn far more by building, testing and doing than bylecturing and exams. While it’s always difficult to assess the long-term efficiency of anycurriculum changes, initial student feedback is extremely positive. Students haveresponded very well to a class based on real-world problems. In fact, their primaryfrustrations have been those that all engineers must face after graduation. One concern ofgoing to purely design-based classes as opposed to additional lectures was that therewould be a de-emphasis on depth in favor of breadth. However, this has not been thecase. Each student has a particular

Conference Session

ENT-8: Mentorship, Creativity, and Ethics in Academic Entrepreneurship

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anne K DeChant, Penn State University Hershey College of Medicine; Erika Swift, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine; Alyson Grace Eggleston, Pennsylvania State University; Robert J. Rabb P.E., Pennsylvania State University; Mark Daniel Pacey, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)

datasets, and conducted community-driven research with indigenous communities in Nicaragua. As a social scientist, she was tenured faculty at The Citadel – Military College of South Carolina and served for 8 years in advisory accreditation and evaluation roles at the pleasure of the Provost. Her research and teaching background focus on program assessment, STEM technical communication, industry-informed curricula, and educational outcomes for Veteran and active duty students.Dr. Robert J. Rabb P.E., Pennsylvania State University Robert Rabb is the associate dean for education in the College of Engineering at Penn State. He previously served as a professor and the Mechanical Engineering Department Chair at The Citadel. He

Conference Session

Strategies and/or Approaches to Engage Students in Agricultural, Biological, or Similarly Named Programs

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Madhumi Mitra Ph.D., University of Maryland, Eastern Shore; Abhijit Nagchaudhuri, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore; Jesu Raj Pandya, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biological and Agricultural Engineering Division (BAE)

projects that leverage robotic agriculture andFarmBots to address the specific needs of communities. Initiatives such as community-led urbanfarming projects, training programs, and cooperative models are being considered to enhance thesecollaborations and empower communities at large.1.D. ObjectivesThe following educational objectives for the students participating in the experiential learninginclude: a) To foster a comprehensive understanding of the interconnectedness of agriculture and broader societal issues through experiential learning by weaving together the scientific exploration of crops with the historical and social context, b) To gain insight into the integration of technology within farming/agriculture, including the

Conference Session

Tech Session 1: Integrating Sustainability in Engineering Curriculum: Pedagogy, Assessment, and Systems Thinking

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christopher Papadopoulos, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Christopher X J Jensen, Pratt Institute; Ivan J Baiges-Valentin, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Krystal Colón-Rivera, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering & Sustainability Division (ENVIRON)

University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. Papadopoulos has diverse interests in structural mechanics, sustainable construction materials (with emphasis in bamboo), engineering ethics, and engineering education. He is co-author of Lying by Approximation: The Truth about Finite Element Analysis, and after many years, he has finally (maybe) learned how to teach Statics, using an experiential and peer-based learning ”studio” model. As part of the UPRM Sustainability Engineering initiative to develop a new bachelor’s degree and curricular sequence, Papadopoulos is PI of A New Paradigm for Sustainability Engineering: A Transdisciplinary, Learner-Centered, and Diversity-Focused Approach, funded by the NSF HSI program, and he is also a

Conference Session

AI, Technology, and Data-Driven Learning in Biomedical Engineering

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mercedes Terry, University of North Dakota; Abigail Tubbs, University of North Dakota; Brandon Fugger, University of North Dakota; Blair Dupre, University of North Dakota; Enrique Alvarez Vazquez, University of North Dakota; Ryan Striker P.E., University of North Dakota

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

CD help students successfullyengage in innovation tasks. This study was conducted within a BME program with an IBL framework. Theparticipants included undergraduate and graduate students who completed surveys at thebeginning and end of the semester to capture changes in CD and ISE. The CD survey wasadapted from a validated scale to reflect IBL-specific scenarios, assessing students' psychologicaldiscomfort when confronting conflicting ideas or ambiguous challenges. ISE was measuredusing an established scale, which evaluates confidence in completing innovation-related taskssuch as generating creative solutions and addressing complex problems. Data collection wasfacilitated through the MOOCIBL platform (a custom LMS) to ensure

Conference Session

Faculty and Student Perspective on Instructional Strategies

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kristi Glassmeyer, Arizona State University; Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University; Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

professor in the Materials Science Program in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include faculty development and evaluating con- ceptual knowledge and strategies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for mate- rials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback and internet tool use affect conceptual change and impact on students’ attitude, achievement