epistemological (what do engineersneed to know) and ontological (what does it mean to be an engineer) underpinnings ofengineering and the presence of systemic exclusionary mindsets and behaviors that permeatevarious cultures of engineering. These issues are highly complex, interconnected, and notamenable to simple solutions; they require design thinking. Thus, we have initiated a researchproject that seeks to achieve an understanding of current cultures and of potential changestrategies through a design thinking approach that involves stakeholders (students, faculty, staff,administrators, and alumni ) in the design process to co-create potential solutions within theSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) and the Weldon School of
Paper ID #33774Industry Driven Design and Manufacturing Course for Aerospace Engineer-ingDr. Zhenhua Wu, Virginia State University Dr. Zhenhua Wu, is currently an Associate Professor in Manufacturing Engineering at Virginia State University. He received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Texas A&M University. His cur- rent research interests focus on cybermanufacturing, friction stir welding, sustainable manufacturing, and adaptive machining.Mr. Lorin Scott Sodell, Virginia State University College of Engineering and Technology Mr. Lorin Sodell is the Director for External and Industry Engagement at Virginia State
. Page 11.403.21 Introduction: Motivation and Background1.1 Benefits of Understanding Design Context Engineers are often called on to design for frontier design contexts outside theirexperience and expertise. This situation occurs by default because engineers are a subset ofsociety; they design products to be used by children, remote villagers, the illiterate, and othergroups typically not represented among design engineers. Additionally, the importance multi-national companies place on positioning products in a global marketplace requires design forcustomers in other countries, cultures, and economies. Although most design engineering isperformed in developed countries, 86% of the world lives in a developing country9. A specialcase of
that student views onstakeholders during design varied significantly; from a complete lack of appreciation forstakeholders during design to the development of significant relationships with stakeholders asdesign collaborators14.As an increasingly appreciated methodology in engineering design, the use of designethnography and the ways in which students learn to practice design ethnography requirethorough study. An understanding of these techniques can help improve their application duringdesign and support the development of relevant and effective design pedagogy. The researchdescribed in this paper contributes to addressing these gaps in knowledge by studying howengineering students apply design ethnography techniques in their capstone design
examines the impact of the activity on students’ understanding of the role of human-centereddesign in design for manufacturability in engineering. The paper concludes with guidelines on howto modify the activity for future implementations in the course.What is Human-Centered Design? Human-Centered Design (HCD) is an interdisciplinary, problem solving approach thatidentifies the unmet needs of a population in order to collaboratively develop solutions. Thisapproach puts humans in the center of the design process and seeks to understand them, collaboratewith them, and involve them in the design process in order to make products or services useful,usable, and desirable [1]. To do so, human-centered design involves the implementation
) how the engineering design process is enacted in the course and(2) how fabricating physical artifacts relates to course learning outcomes in design and analysis.In this work, we conduct an extensive review of undergraduate mechanical engineering curriculaacross several institutions to understand students’ design and analysis backgrounds prior totaking upper-division mechanical design courses. We also develop two survey instrumentsfocused on project-based learning within mechanical design courses. The first survey focuses onhow the design process is enacted by students during their projects. The second survey examineshow students make fabrication decisions to support their project work.A pilot study using both instruments was performed with
. Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University Marisa K. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research on ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.”Dr. Rebecca Brent, Education Designs, Inc Rebecca Brent is President of Education Designs, Inc., a consulting firm located in Chapel Hill, N.C. She is a certified program evaluator and a faculty development consultant. Brent received her B.A. from Millsaps College in
feedback on solution concepts [2], [7], [11]–[13].However, one challenge that designers often encounter when eliciting requirements or solicitingfeedback is that individual users have their own unique perspectives that often change over timeor conflict with those of other similar users [2], [6], [7], [14]–[16]. As such, understanding andbalancing the perspectives of different users can be a difficult task, but one that has substantialimplications for the success of a given design project.Engineering students in particular may encounter difficulties when interacting with users to elicitrequirements or solicit design feedback. For instance, previous studies have described caseswhere engineering students struggled to manage the subjective aspects of
geographic context in which the program is embedded. These specific emphasesand scopes impact students’ understandings of design, and how students negotiate designdecisions within the project team experience. Therefore, research that can ascertain how studentsin these various contexts perceive and make sense of design, as well as what they believe isrelevant and important in a design project, provides an important empirical basis for improvingengineering programs and meeting the criteria set forth by engineering and technology’saccreditation organization, ABET, for effective engineering curriculum.14The authors employ a discursive psychological approach to analyze interviews with studentsfrom four different institutions working on multidisciplinary
Educational Research and Policy Analysis from NC State University in 1996. She also has an MBA from Indiana University (Bloomington) and a bachelorˆa C™Dr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a variety of consulting firms, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including tDr. Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University Marisa K. Orr is an Associate Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University.Dr. Rebecca Brent, Education Designs, Inc Rebecca Brent is President of
AC 2007-2366: CAPSTONE DESIGN PROJECTS WITH INDUSTRY: USINGRUBRICS TO ASSESS STUDENT DESIGN REPORTSPatricia Brackin, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology M. PATRICIA BRACKIN is an Associate Professor of M.E. at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology where she teaches a variety of design courses, and graphics. Her BS and MS are from the University of Tennessee in Nuclear Engineering and her Ph.D. is from Georgia Institute of Technology in ME. She has also been an Associate Professor at Christian Brothers University. Her industrial experience includes Oak Ridge National Laboratories and Chicago Bridge and Iron. She is a registered PE.J. Darrell Gibson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
collected from thirty-five student interviews, we developed aconceptual framework for CCD progression. The Culturally Contextualized Design frameworkrepresents three levels of sophistication – novice, aware, and informed – for each of the fiveCCD aspects: (1) human-centered, (2) collaborative, (3) intentional, (4) open to flexibility andambiguity, and (5) invested and committed. The goal of this paper is to present the examples ofthree engineering students with different backgrounds and experiences and to map theirdevelopment within the framework. We also discuss the potential utility of this new frameworkto understand how engineering students learn to integrate culture and design and to assess theimpact of educational practices.Introduction and
Engineering Ethics; and the editorial board chair for the Online Ethics Center. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com WIP: Empathy Development in Community-Engagement CourseAbstractThis Work in Progress paper presents an ongoing study on empathic development within acommunity-engaged engineering design course. Empathy is increasingly recognized as a criticalskill and disposition for engineering practice as it can help engineers effectively contribute to theneeds of their community. Understanding how empathy changes in a community-engaged designexperience can inform the development of a wide range of design and community
Paper ID #9899Evaluating the Implementation of Design Heuristic Cards in an IndustrySponsored Capstone Design CourseDr. Daria A Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado, BoulderDr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Research Scientist and Adjunct Assistant Professor in the College of Engi- neering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research focuses on idea gen- eration, design strategies, design ethnography, creativity instruction, and engineering practitioners who
Paper ID #27077Animations for Learning: Design Philosophy and Student Usage in Interac-tive TextbooksDr. Nikitha Sambamurthy, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Nikitha Sambamurthy completed her Ph.D. in engineering education at Purdue University in 2017. Nikitha works with zyBooks, a startup that develops interactive, web-native textbooks for college courses in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) disciplines.Dr. Alex Daniel Edgcomb, Zybooks Alex Edgcomb is Sr. Software Engineer at zyBooks.com, a startup spun-off from UC Riverside that develops interactive, web-native
student outcomes criterion (h) related to developingan understanding of the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental,and societal context, as well as criterion (d) related to functioning on multidisciplinary teams.The end result was that these teams were able to produce at least a partial prototype of theirdesigns; many other teams only produce computer models to accompany their design reports.Since students self-select for these projects, it is impossible to obtain meaningful data on studentattitudes toward the subject matter of rehabilitation engineering in comparison to their peers.Nevertheless, it is clear that exposure to this type of design problem provides a backdrop forstudents to work in a more
students tosee a variety topics discussed in class come to action. The guest speakers from the industryreinforced the importance of the concepts that the students learn in class. Industry involvementand support has helped the students understand the importance of the class and the significanceof the topics. Another assessment will be made the semester that the changes to the course andproject are implemented and a follow up paper will describe the impact of the improvements.Bibliography 1. Angelo, T. and Cross, K. (1993), Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers, Jossey-Bass. 2. Perrenet, J.C., Bouhuijs, P.A.J. and Smits, J.G.M.M., 2000. The Suitability of Problem-Based Learning for Engineering
University and her MFA from ArtCenter. She is also an accreditor for NASAD, The National Association of Schools of Art and Design. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 RETENTION STRATEGIES FOR EDUCATORS FROMWOMEN STEM GRADUATES OF THE 1970’S & 1980’S CoNECD Conference February 20 to 23, 2022 Kathleen Buse, Ph.D. Debra Musch Allison Goodman Abstract • Research study on the career experiences of women • All obtained STEM degrees between 1979 and 1983 • Explores expectations, achievements, challenges, and reflections on career journey • Recommendations are provided to
assessed ideation shiftsquantitatively from the first to the second ideation sessions by comparing counts and proportionsof both metrics. Comparing the different quantitative measures provided a test of the advantagesand disadvantages of the different ways to characterize ideation shifts.1. IntroductionEngineers face complex design problems that require unique and practical ideas to solve. Togenerate these ideas, engineers need flexibility to apply a range of different design approaches.Our larger project1—of which this study is a part—seeks to understand how to educateengineering students to be more flexible in their ideation approaches. This goal relies on theability to characterize ideation flexibility, so that we can understand how
engineering careercounsellors. Our outreach effort consisted of a demo showcase of a robotic microfluidic liquid handler,which although was outside the scope of this study, was supported by our industry partners.From Fall 2019 to Spring 2020, we surveyed N=49 students across three different classes(Thermodynamics, AC circuits, and Control Systems) to first build awareness of the DNA instrumentationindustry. Selected students then participated in our yearly Undergraduate Research Program, whichfaculty designed as an 8-week authentic product development effort our industry partners.Student performance outcomes (project deliverables) included successful 3D print verification of our 32-channel dispenser design, raising awareness and self-attitude of
-recipient the NEA’s Bernard M. Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education, the Campus Compact Thomas Ehrlich Faculty Award for Service-Learning; the NSPE’s Educational Excellence Award.Steve Chenoweth, Rose Hulman Institute Of Technology Steve Chenoweth is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. His principle areas of work relate to the design of complex systems and also these systems’ associated people concerns – such as how to get all the stakeholders in a large project to understand each another and the system being proposed. He was a visiting Fellow for EPICS in 2009-2010
work has been trying to under- stand the bidirectional impacts that occur when students attempt to coordinate ideas and practices from the more basic disciplines of Science and Mathematics with related ideas and practices from the more applied disciplines of Technology and Engineering. This focus includes investigating how students learn to use the engineering design process as a tool for improving their understanding of situations along with their ability to design solutions for those situations.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Research Scientist and Adjunct Assistant Professor in the College of Engi- neering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering
strategies, mindsets, and approaches to design. In this study, we build on oneframework that is based on engineering students’ experiences, as described next.Theoretical FrameworkDiscrete Ways of Experiencing Human-Centered DesignZoltowski et al. [2] utilized a phenomenographic methodology to categorize different waysstudents experience, understand, and demonstrate human-centered design. Through this study,the researchers identified seven distinct ways of experiencing human-centered design: 1. Technology Centered 2. Service 3. User as Information Source Input to Linear Process 4. Keeping the Users’ Needs in Mind 5. Understanding the Design in Context 6. Commitment to Involving Stakeholders to Understand Perspectives 7. Empathic
Paper ID #22642Academic Practice/Design Interventions: An Activity-Based Design Coursefor Conceptualizing Failure and Factor of SafetyMr. Nikolaos E. Vitoroulis Jr, Stevens Institute of Technology Nikolaos Vitoroulis supervises the Engineering Design Laboratories at Stevens Institute of Technology. He earned his Bachelor and Master of Mechanical Engineering at Stevens and specialized in Robotics, Mechatronics, and Manufacturing. As a member of the Innovation, Design & Entrepreneurship at Stevens (IDEaS) team, he works with the development team to update and generate engineering curriculum con- tent. His past industrial
AC 2012-4089: DESIGNING TO LEARN, DESIGNED FOR FUN: AN UN-DERGRADUATE VIDEO GAME DEVELOPMENT COURSEMr. Michael J. Reese Jr., Johns Hopkins University Michael Reese is the Associate Director at the Johns Hopkins Center for Educational Resources. Reese previously worked as an Educational Technologist at Caliber Learning and Booz-Allen and Hamilton. He also consulted with the University of Maryland School of Nursing to launch their distance education program. He earned an M.Ed. in educational technology from the University of Virginia and a B.S. in electrical engineering at Virginia Tech, where he was named the Paul E. Torgersen Leadership Scholar.Dr. Peter H. Froehlich, Johns Hopkins University Peter H. Froehlich is a
engineering. As part ofthese professional learning sessions, teachers had opportunities to collaboratively andindividually develop environmental justice curricula, which they could then modify whenteaching their own students in ninth- and tenth-grade engineering courses. Due to stressorsrelated to COVID-19, such as repeated worries about school closures or transitions tohybrid/virtual learning, only two teachers participated in the professional learning for a fullacademic year. MethodsThe purpose of this exploratory multiple case study was to understand the pedagogical principlesthat informed the design of the curricula. To achieve this purpose, we analyzed several hundredpages of curricula that were
students to make andjustify engineering decisions on how to proceed. To make the experience immersive the studentsare inputted into the fictitious world of Planet Vayu*. Here they are solving a problem that isplaguing the planet. They are provided with a background of the problem and how it is affectingthe planet. They are asked to understand the needs of the community, designer, manufacturer, andany other possible needs. The scaffolding provided through the class included an outline of thedesign process the students follow given during each lecture to show where the new informationtakes place. Also in each assignment the inputs and outputs are shown -bringing over theinformation from the previous assignment that they will use for the current one
assistants.This paper discusses a framework that is used in ME 347 for the first design project (Project 1),which typically takes about 9 weeks to complete. The project involves building a 3-D model inCAD, using rapid prototyping to 3-D print their respective improved best model, and doing a livedemonstration of their CAD model and 3-D printed part. The final deliverable is a professionalwritten report that includes documentation of their completed design, related engineeringdrawings, reflections on improvements to be made, and what they learned from doing theproject.1.1 Project SelectionOpen-ended projects are a great way to promote deep understanding of engineering designprinciples. In ME 347, Project 1 is creation of a SolidWorks assembly and
Engineering Education, 2007 Design Oriented Course in Microprocessor Based ControlsAbstractPreviously, the microprocessor based control class at Texas A&M University - Kingsville hasbeen taught using lecture based class material and microprocessor simulators to illustratemicroprocessor operations and control system issues to students. “However, students learn moreand get more engaged in a project oriented learning environment.”16 For this reason the coursehas been completely restructured to include a practical design project as opposed to onlysimulations that will enable the students to directly apply the knowledge that they have gainedfrom the course. This experience “will enable the students to gain a greater understanding of
Paper ID #9582Aligning Design to ABET: Rubrics, Portfolios, and Project ManagersDr. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University Alan Cheville studied optoelectronics and ultrafast optics at Rice University, followed by fourteen years as a faculty member at Oklahoma State University working on terahertz frequencies and engineering edu- cation. While at Oklahoma State he developed courses in photonics and engineering design. After serving for two and a half years as a program director in engineering education at the National Science Founda- tion, he took a chair position in electrical engineering at Bucknell University. He is