singular graduate research assistant who waspurposefully provided no details regarding the goals of this study, and had not read any papersrelated to CELT’s previous playground analyses. This approach supported an inductive or“open” coding analysis, allowing themes to emerge from the data.34, 35 Initial stages of codinginvolved a read-through of content to generate preliminary codes, followed by three iterations ofapplication that involved code addition, and altering code applications, nomenclature, anddefinition. Revisions were further supported as codes were discussed in CELT research meetingsto clarify definitions and application. Finally, in order to ensure the replicability of the codingscheme, a senior researcher coded two randomly chosen
. Leslie received a Bachelor of Arts in Government with a minor in Music from The College of William & Mary in Virginia.Jay A. Puckett (Professor)David A. Dzombak (Hamerschlag University Professor and DepartmentHead) David Dzombak is the Hamerschlag University Professor and Head of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. The emphasis of his research and teaching is on water quality engineering, water resource sustainability, and energy-environment issues. Dzombak received his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He also holds an M.S. in Civil Engineering and a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Carnegie Mellon, and a B.A. in Mathematics from
Paper ID #38097Industry 4.0 or the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) - itsfuture impact on two-year engineering technology educationGary J. Mullett (Professor & Dept. Chair) Gary J. Mullett, a Professor of Electronics Technology and the present Department Chair of the Advanced Engineering Technologies (AET) Group, presently teaches advanced technology topics at Springfield Technical Community College (STCC) located in Springfield, MA. A long-time faculty member and consultant to local business and industry, Mullett has provided leadership and initiated numerous program and/or curriculum reforms as either the
developed to obtain longitudinal data on the effects of theimprovements.IntroductionWestern New England College has a long history of incorporating engineering design into itslaboratories and courses. 2006 marks the college’s 44th annual capstone design effort. Inaddition, interdisciplinary team efforts are initiated in the freshman year and continue for all fouryears1. This paper describes improvements to one such interdisciplinary lab exercise, performed Page 11.766.2in the fall of the student’s senior year. The design project brings together students fromMechanical (ME), Electrical (EE) and Computer Engineering (CPE). In the past two years
Tandon School of Engineering. She received her Bachelor of Arts in Mathematics and Philosophy from the Uni- versity of Rochester and her Master of Science in Mathematics from NYU Tandon School of Engineering. She manages the FITL Center, which encourages and promotes innovative teaching strategies and tech- nologies for learning. The Center provides faculty with training on new classroom technologies, access to technologies and resources, opportunities for research and design, and collaboration on educational and technological projects. Ms. Jean-Pierre has taught Mathematics, Problem- Solving and Academic Success Seminars at Polytechnic University and Columbia University. In addition to her experience in academia
, and aviation law. He has a strong interest in simulation technology to enhance aviation courses, and continues to explore innovative methods that help students gain proficiency and confidence as they move forward in their education and training. He continues to explore the use of instructional technology researching simulation in aviation education. Dr. Lindenfeld’s educational background includes a BS in Aeronautics, a MS in Education, and an EdD in Educational Administration, Leadership, and Technology.Prof. Louis A. Scala, Farmingdale State College Professor Louis (Lou) Scala’s career in aviation began ”back in the day” (1965) as a freshman at Aviation High School, in Long Island City, New York. At Aviation High
Paper ID #17679Introducing the Galerkin Method of Weighted Residuals into an Undergrad-uate Elective Course in Finite Element MethodsDr. Aneet Dharmavaram Narendranath, Michigan Technological University Dr.Aneet Dharmavaram Narendranath is currently a Lecturer at Michigan Technological University (Michi- gan Tech). He received a PhD in Mechanical Engineering-Engineering mechanics in 2013. Subsequently, he worked as a visiting assistant professor at Michigan Tech from 2013-2014 and then as an Engineer at the French Nuclear Commission (CEA) in France until 2015. His research interests are mathematical modeling of fluid physics
process was cheap and fast, making sculptural portraiture accessible to wideswaths of the bourgeois class. Technically speaking, photosculpture also afforded a mechanisticmethod of producing portraiture that was more mathematically and anatomically exact thancould be achieved by the traditional “sketch-and-mold” methods of sculpture. These factors ledto general praise of the photosculpture process by its clients; Willéme’s studio, as well as itsoffshoots in France and America, was relatively economically successful for the first few years.27Critical success, however, did not follow the initial positive consumer response to thephotosculpture process. Despite initial praise in Le Monde by art critic Théophile Gautier (whohimself was employed by an
applied to the many technological endeavors that dominate our lives. For instance,most electrical engineering students are not able to engage in anything more than asuperficial discussion about how electrical engineering innovations enable vital elementsof our modern economy and help to create our standard of living. The products ofelectrical engineering such as power transmission, communication systems, medicaltechnology and complex control systems are ubiquitous in the daily lives of most people.These technological applications have initiated many changes in the pattern of everydaylife, yet engineering students rarely think critically about this aspect of technology.To help develop the dimension of critical thinking and decision-making these
Paper ID #15017Designing a Big Machine: A Description and Assessment of a Mechanical En-gineering Design ProjectIrene B. Mena, University of Pittsburgh Irene B. Mena has a B.S. and M.S. in industrial engineering, and a Ph.D. in engineering education. Her research interests include first-year engineering and graduate student professional development.Prof. William W. Clark, University of PittsburghEllen M. Moe c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Designing a Big Machine: A Description and Assessment of a Mechanical
department. In this role he has led department-wide changes in curriculum with emphasis on project- and lab-based instruction and learning. His research interests are in the areas of engineering education, semiconductor device characterization, design and simulation, signal integrity and THz sensors. He is a member of IEEE and ASEE.Mr. Phillip Wong, Portland State University Phillip Wong received an M.S. degree in electrical engineering from Carnegie Mellon University in 1990. Since then, he has been with Portland State University, Oregon, USA, where he is currently the ECE Lab Coordinator and an instructor. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Exploring Proficiency Testing
Paper ID #21307Work in Progress: Development and Implementation of a Self-guided Ar-duino Module in an Introductory Engineering Design CourseDr. Jillian Beth Schmidt, Missouri University of Science & Technology Dr. Jillian Schmidt is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology. She teaches primarily first and second- year engineering design courses, and her research interests include technology incorporation and team dynamics in project based courses. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
AC 2008-565: STATICS AND DYNAMICS PROJECTS EMPHASIZINGINTRODUCTORY DESIGN AND MANUFACTURINGMichael Hennessey, University of St. Thomas DR. MICHAEL P. HENNESSEY is a tenured Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering within the School of Engineering. He has taught over 15 different courses in mechanical engineering at the undergraduate and graduate level and has written 33 papers in research (kinematics, dynamics and control of mechanical systems and related areas of applied mathematics) and mechanical engineering education, including the presentation of 10 papers at ASEE conferences (National (3), along with North Midwest (6) and St. Lawrence (1) sections
with the contesttechnology. We considered interaction to be series of events, each consisting of an action bysome actor followed by a response of the technology. We initially considered the followingactors: • Competing teams • Supporters of competing teams (teachers, mentors, parents, etc.) • Client software author/maintainer • Judging system software author/administrator • Contest coordinator • Contest judge • Database administrator • General system administrator/technician • Webmaster Page 11.547.4 • “Bad guy” (malicious Internet entity)There is no strict relationship between actors and people; an actor in the
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationCognitive Fuzzy MapKosko14 combined some aspects of cognitive maps, proposed by Axelrod, with fuzzy logic,creating the tool known as Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM). This tool enabled the representationof human thought, adding parallelisms (concurrent information), considering vagueness andeven combining other different maps, enlarging at any time the initial map, to represent morecomplex systems. FCM has become especially important to mathematically represent systemsthat portray incomplete definitions, the lack of them, and/or linguistic imprecision.Kosko considered that the causal uncertain (fuzzy) knowledge was stored on a map, a signeddigraph, with feedback where the causality degrees among
Session 2125 Integrating PLM Methods into the Undergraduate Curriculum Russell T. Frame, Charles Pezeshki, M. Grant Norton School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164Abstract The methodology used to design new products is changing as computertechnology advances. Companies worldwide are adopting Product Lifecycle Management(PLM) solutions to stay competitive. This technology allows control of all aspects of thedesign process from initial concept to obsolescence and disposal. A database manages allinformation, controls access to data, and lets
thecollege control of approximately 10,000 square feet of contiguous space that had previouslyhoused an on-campus laundry. The space was not, however, in good shape, with large trenches inthe floor from drains, no air conditioning, and insufficient power for most uses. Numerous useswere proposed for the space, but for various reasons, including allowable floor loading, drainage,noise, ceiling height, and power availability, the space had not been found suitable for a numberof research-oriented efforts. In 1995, the university made $600,000 available to the college forrenovation of the space. Dean Bill Stephenson gave the approval to convert the space into astudent project laboratory and tasked the author, who was at the time an associate dean and
(S) by manipulating the dilution rate (flow of feed into the process, D), the gasdilution rate/flow (W), and recycle fraction (r). There is some noise present in the measurementsand occasionally there is a disturbance in the feed substrate concentration, Sin. Table 1 Inputs for Wastewater Treatment Input Baseline Final Step Constraints (initial) Dilution Rate D = 0.13 hr-1 D = 0.15 hr-1 Dmin = 0 hr-1 Dmax = 0.4 hr-1 Gas Rate W = 110 hr-1 W = 100 hr-1 Wmin = 0 hr-1 Wmax = 400 hr-1 Recycle % r=0.6 r=0.7 rmin=0 rmax = 1Distubance InputSin=200 g/L Baseline Sin_dist = 180
Project for High SchoolsAbstractMany current political leaders in the United States advocate an increased emphasis on STEMtopics in the primary and secondary school systems. As a result of this focus, there are multiplesources of funding available in the STEM outreach arena. It is tempting to seek funding throughthese various means and produce what could be labeled as a "Show-and-Go" program. Thispaper defines "Show-and-Go" as a project with a short-term focus, with little-to-no long terminvestment. Additionally, Show-and-Go projects focus on the “fun” aspects of engineering withvery little emphasis on the underlying fundamental mathematics and science principles. Theseprojects do create a sizable amount of initial interest, but without follow up
is part of the development team for Clarkson’s First Year Engineering/Interdisciplinary course described in this paper. Her current research interests include the implementation and evaluation of evidence-based effective learning practices in STEM education, environmental education, and energy education.Dr. John C. Moosbrugger, Clarkson University John C. Moosbrugger, PhD, is a Professor of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering and Associate Dean for Academic Programs for the Wallace H. Coulter School of Engineering at Clarkson University.Prof. Peter R Turner, Clarkson University Currently Dean of Arts & Sciences having previously served as Chair of Mathematics and Computer Science, and before that on the
Paper ID #46536Peer and self-assessment of teamwork for students with accommodations in aproject-based laboratory course.Dr. Bridget M. Smyser, Northeastern University Dr. Smyser is a Teaching Professor in the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering department at Northeastern University with research interests including lab and design pedagogy, inclusive teaching, and neurodiversity in STEM. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Paper from Practice: Peer and self-assessment of teamwork for students with accommodations in a project-based laboratory course.Student accommodations for
Respectful, Equitable Teamwork in a First- Year Design CourseAbstractThis Work In Progress paper describes the initial implementation of activities aimed to enhanceteamwork in a first-year design course. Teamwork plays a central role in the experience ofstudents in many first-year engineering design programs. The first-year design class at DukeUniversity revolves around student teams (typically four or five members) working on aspects ofa client-based project. Although most teams in the course function reasonably well, there existareas for improvement: respectful communication among team members and ensuring that theperspectives and skills of all group members are appropriately valued. Each year, a few groupshave problems in
. This study analyzes the results of the three cohorts to understand the effects ofusing the PSS approach for teaching this subject.Key Words: Problem-Solving Studio, classroom research, learning outcomes assessment1. IntroductionThe problem-solving studio (PSS) is a pedagogical technique that focuses on problem-basedlearning. Because of PSS’s features, instructors can adjust the level of support they provide inreal time, as well as the difficulty level of the problems, to ensure that each student is challengedat a level that is beyond what they could achieve on their own, but at the upper end of what theycan achieve in a PSS setting [1]. This approach was initially implemented in the BiomedicalEngineering program at Georgia Institute of
Paper ID #36471The Myowearable Sleeve: A Surface ElectromyographyInjury Prevention DeviceBala Maheswaran (Professor) Bala Maheswaran is currently a senior faculty in the College of Engineering, Northeastern University. He has contributed and authored over one hundred publications consisting of original research and education-related papers, and conference proceedings. He has over twenty years of experience in teaching at Northeastern University. He is the Chair of the Engineering Physics Division, ASEE, Chair and executive board member, ASEE NE Section; the co-chair of TASME Conference (Technological Advances in
Paper ID #36519Student Reflections on Learning as the Basis for CourseGradesEmily Dosmar (Assistant Professor) Assistant Professor of Biomedical EngineeringJulia M. Williams (Professor of English) Julia M. Williams joined the faculty of the Humanities and Social Sciences Department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 1992, then assumed duties as Executive Director of the Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment in 2005. From 2016-19, she served as Interim Dean of Cross-Cutting Programs and Emerging Opportunities. In this role, she supported the work of faculty who create multi-disciplinary
Paper ID #40269Integration of Design Process, 3D printing, Simulations and ExperimentalTesting in a Laboratory through Design-Build-Test CycleDr. Deeksha Seth, Villanova University Deeksha Seth is an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering department at Villanova Univer- sity. Her primary research interests include bio-robotics, mechatronics, engineering design and STEM education.Dr. Garrett Miles Clayton, The College of New Jersey Garrett M. Clayton received his B.S.M.E. from Seattle University and his M.S.M.E. and Ph.D. in mechan- ical engineering from the University of Washington, Seattle. He is an Assistant
courses are designed to satisfy the “major designexperience” portion of ABET’s Curriculum outcome, they must, by definition, be “based onknowledge and skills acquired in earlier course work” [3]. Moreover, the learning in capstonedesign is not only related to discipline-based skills and knowledge, but something greater: theapplication and integration of that knowledge into the solution of a new problem, sometimes aspart of a team. This represents the sort of experience students will have as engineers once theygraduate and go on to work. Indeed, capstone design projects have evolved to prepare studentsfor “design and practice” as a supplement to core curriculum focused on “theory and research”[4], and capstone is some students’ first significant
and relate to new concepts, improving learning outcomes. Wang and Wang [9] formalized the use of Strategic Options Development and Analysis (SODA) maps – a type of conceptual model developed for operations research – as a tool for teaching systems thinking in a classroom setting. The SODA map allowed students to practice collaborative and higher level problem-solving by deriving and visualizing different strategies for a case study. Eppler [12] discussed applications of concept maps in the classroom and the benefits of complementary visualization by combining different mapping methods to enable a “richer learning experience for students.” Tranquillo et al. [15] explored various one-page canvas frameworks as tools to help students model and
Paper ID #35104Virtual Engineering Summer Camp in the age of COVID-19 PandemicDr. Anveeksh Koneru, University of Texas Permian Basin Dr. Anveeksh Koneru is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas Permian Basin. He is the coordinator for the Engineering Summer Camp at the College of Engineering. His primary research includes thermoelectrics, photocatalytic water splitting, and catalysis.Dr. George Nnanna P.E., University of Texas of the Permian Basin George Nnanna is the Inaugural Dean of the College of Engineering at the University of Texas Per- mian Basin. The College has 503 students and
Paper ID #31280Work in Progress: Professional Development Module in First-YearEngineering CourseDr. Olukemi Akintewe, University of South Florida Dr. Olukemi Akintewe is an instructional faculty in the Medical Engineering Department at the Univer- sity of South Florida. She received a B.E. degree in chemical engineering from City College of New York, CUNY, a M.Sc in materials science and engineering from the Ohio State University and a Ph.D. in chemical engineering from the University of South Florida. Dr. Akintewe’s research focuses on project- based learning in engineering education; engineering predictive assessment