energy and data science research to be put into practicethrough curricular modules by educators in middle and high schools. This COP consisted ofTexas A&M University-Kingsville (TAMUK) engineering faculty members, an educationfaculty member, engineering graduate students, industrial advisors, and middle and high schoolSTEM teachers. To create a shared domain within the COP, 10 middle and high school STEMteachers participated in 5 summer research projects focusing on renewable energy and datascience. Each research project included a team of 2 teachers mentored by an engineering facultymember and graduate student as well as an industry professional. These research teamsparticipated in hands-on research and used the research to create
satellite communications. For the past several years, he has been active in the Kern En- trepreneurship Education Network (KEEN) initiative at Gonzaga University that focuses on developing the entrepreneurial mindset in undergraduate engineering and computer science students.Dr. Jay Wierer, Milwaukee School of EngineeringDr. Wenli Huang, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, U.S. Military Academy, West Point,NY Page 26.921.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Improving Learning in Continuous-Time Signals and Systems Courses Through Collaborative
philosophy of building design with an applied technical knowledge ofconstruction systems and materials” [9]. The program offers core courses in drafting, design,visualization, construction documentation and construction methods and materials. One of themainstays of the AS program in the AMS department is a series of documentation courses that isoffered right from the freshman level. The first course in the sequence is AMS 163; ArchitecturalDrafting, where students are taught architectural projections, dimensioning and modeling usingboth hand sketching as well as AutoCAD (ACAD) [10], this course is taken by students in theirfreshman year and it here that they are introduced to computer-aided drafting (CAD). AMS 163is followed by AMS 263
main activities: (1) hands-on, museum-style exhibits anddemonstrations in the engineering building, (2) small group sessions facilitated byundergraduates with discussion and hands-on activities, (3) a concert where all 350 fifthgraders accompanied the artists-in-residence on custom instruments designed and built byundergraduates for the performance of a classical music work composed by the artistsspecifically for this educational event.IntroductionFifth grade academic standards for music in Indiana call for an understanding of the“relationships between music, the other arts, and disciplines outside the arts,” specificallyciting examples in mathematics. Neither the standards for mathematics nor science (thestate does not have fifth grade
resources can be named asfew of the intermediate technologies. (5)ConclusionAdvanced electronics and computer technology has undoubtedly revolutionized the wayengineering sciences and technologies are effectively transferred globally in the shortest amount oftime possible. These resources benefit those countries with competitive advantages in laborresources and are producing a variety of goods for the world markets.The engineering academic community currently has access to a wide range of material on theinternet. This has led to an explosion of information, particularly with regard to current researchand teaching methods. Engineering is suited to the use of educational technologies ranging fromsimulating dangerous environments, to replacing
starting in 2016. Dr. West is active in several professional societies including ASM (directing the ASM Materials Camp for high school students), The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, and the American Welding Society (serving as faculty advisor for the Black Hills American Welding Society chapter on the SD Mines campus).Dr. Jon J Kellar, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Kellar is the Douglas Fuerstenau Professor of Materials and Metallurgical Engineering at the SD School of Mines and Technology. He has been on the faculty since 1990, and in 1994 was selected as an National Science Foundation Presidential Faculty Fellow and in 2016 a Distinguished Member of the Society for Mining, Metallurgy and
P.E., United States Military Academy Dr. Brock E. Barry, P.E. is the Director of the Civil Engineering Division and Professor of Engineering Education in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Tech- nology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United States. He is a licensed professional en- gineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include
anintegration of process and knowledge to better serve the society are an essential part of theprofessional education of engineers [1]. Engineers, by definition, engage in problem solving on aregular basis, which has been identified as one of the 21st century skills [2]. However, researchhas shown that the problem types engineering students and practitioners solve differ [3], [4].Engineering students are typically given well-structured (also known as well-defined) problems,which have pre-defined solutions. They are used to reinforce recent course material covered inclass, and are heavily in a written and well-documented form. Practitioners, however, tackle ill-structured (i.e. complex real-world) problems, which are more vague and ambiguous
2 1 1 2 6/4 1.50 Predetermined Time Systems/M.O.S.T. System 2 1 1 4/3 1.33 Standard Data 2 1 1 1 5/4 1.25Advisory Board Member Comments:I considered operations analysis to be equivalent to Process analysis which would include topics like Mistakeproofing and FMEA’s (Jim Swick)I truly believe that our young professionals entering the work force need to be able to not only understand theprinciples and theory but, apply them as well. This is where I feel Honda struggles with young engineers who do nothave the hands on applications. (Paul Dentinger)(Following from Jeff Okrutny)The need for design
; Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationshown that over 80% of first year engineering students do attend the “prep year,” during whichstudents embark primarily on learning English skills. The author has proposed to reform the“prep year” by making it a two-year program, and widening the scope of the subject matter toinclude (in addition to building up English language skills to a pre-set level), the followingtasks:(i) math and science courses, in preparation for engineering “gateway” courses;(ii) apractical hands-on “pre-college” training period; and (iii) fostering a “proper learningenvironment”, in order to help students acquire desirable attributes such as: analytical skills,curiosity and
(see Table 1). Our hypothesis was this would pro-vide the students more opportunities for connecting fundamental concepts made transparent inthe CTSiM models to behaviors observed in the scaled-up real-world but more black-boxC2SuMo simulations.3.0 Methods3.1 Participants and procedureTwenty-six 10th-grade honors students in an elective science course participated in the study. Thehonors program is implemented through a partnership between the local Tennessee public schooldistrict and the Vanderbilt School for Science and Math. Its curriculum connects sciences, tech-nology, engineering, and mathematics through hands-on exploration with a progressive increasein depth and independence as students progress from the 9th-grade through 12th-grade
Paper ID #12004Technology education in primary school in Sweden: A study of teachers viewson teaching strategies and subject content.Mrs. Birgit Fahrman, KTH Royal Institute of Technology Birgit Fahrman is PhD student at The School of Education and Communication in Engineering Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology. Her research focuses on teachers’ use of practical exercises in teach- ing technology and engineering. She teachers technology in secondary school.Dr. Lena B. Gumaelius, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden Dr Lena Gumaelius has a background as a researcher in Biotechnology, in which field she
time and sacrifices opportunities foractive learning activities such as team-based design work. These same experts can often deliverthe main messages relevant to their topic in a shorter time frame when asked to do so in front ofa video camera. Also, with these online learning objects, students can access the material whenconvenient and at their own pace (repeating and rewinding the video as necessary). Finally, theseresources are available online to other faculty members who teach engineering design and maynot have easy access to experts on particular subjects.In engineering design courses, most learning is hands-on, self-directed, and otherwise “active.”Of the online learning objects implemented in BME design courses in the Fall 2008
enter the Information Technology Age, I believe that technical communication instruction must include the use of appropriate multimedia tools. 5. Finding faculty able or willing to teach students how to use these tools. As stated in Vest et al.1, “…engineering faculty may neither be able…to allocate time specifically for communication skills training nor be comfortable teaching specialized communication skills.” 6. Finding appropriate instructional materials. Commercially available books tend to focus on a single tool in great depth. In order to provide instruction on an animation tool, an illustration tool, an image manipulation tool, and a video editing tool students would need to buy four books
student performance and feedback have led to significant changes. Beginning inthe fall of 2002, the course will become completely electronic and will be pedagogicallyrepackaged into integrated video stream lecture vignettes and related text material contained on aCD-ROM while the day-to-day course administration and student-to-faculty communicationswill continue to be conducted via the internet. Student evaluations and performance arepresented, as well as some lessons learned.Index Terms – Electronic technologies, engineering economy, Internet, remote learning, videostreamingIntroductionElectronic technology, such as video tapes, satellite transmissions, and the internet, has beenused to address the needs of off-campus students where either their
Engineering Education, vol. 86, no. 2,1997, pp. 167-171.[12]. Buttertield, R., "Benefit Without Cost in a Mechanics Laboratory," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, no. 4, 1997, pp. 315-320.[13]. Rresta, S.M., "Hands on Demonstrations: An alternative to Full Scale Lab Experiments," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 87, no. 1, 1998, pp. 7-9.[14] Pang, M.F. and F. Marton, "Beyond lesson study'—Comparing Two Ways of Facilitating the Grasp of Economic Concepts," Instructional Science, Vol. 31, No. 3,2003, pp. 175-194.[15] Linder, C, D.M. Fraser, and M.F. Pang, M.F, "Using a Variation Approach to Enhance Physics Learning in a College Classroom," The Physics Teacher, Vol. 44, 2006, pp. 63-66.[16] Pang, M.F., C. Linder, and
levels, and two engineering facultymembers, JoAnn Panzardi with an MS in Civil Engineering and a PE license, and Karl Ewaldwith a PhD in Materials Science and over 15 years of industry engineering experience. Theprogram consisted of a Spring 2013 application process; Fall 2013 preparatory meetings; two-week abroad experience in Guatemala in January 2014; and Spring 2014 culmination meetings.Application ProcessSince so many engineering students at Cabrillo were interested in the program, there was anapplication process with interviews in spring 2013. Students were evaluated based on thefollowing criteria: • Engineering major • Completed ENGR 5 Engineering as a Profession and ENGR 25 Graphics and Design • Full-time student for
Engineering at Lipscomb University, the facultymathematics and physical sciences, sometimes the hardest have decided to redesign a freshman engineering course topart of a solution is including the human element. Around focus more heavily on an engineering design process. Thethe world, engineering programs emphasize problem-solving course to be redesigned originally concentrated on providingusing math, science, and engineering concepts, but many hands-on lab activities for students to experience differentunderstate the importance of humanities or social science disciplines within engineering in order to aid students in theirtopics that are imperative to understanding the human major
January 3, 2005.4. For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology, “FIRST Robotics Competition,” , accessed January 3, 2005.5. Junior Engineering Technical Society. “National Engineering Design Challenge,” , accessed September 17, 2004.6. Creative Competitions, Inc. “Odyssey of the Mind,” , accessed January 3, 2005.7. Hasbro, Inc. “Toy Challenge,” < http://www.toychallenge.com/ >, accessed January 3, 2005.8. Pols, Y. D. , C. B. Rogers, and I. N. Miaoulis, “Hands-On Aeronautics for Middle School Students,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 83, No. 3, 1994, pp. 243-247.9. Carroll, Douglas R., “Bridge Engineering for the Elementary Grades,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 86, No. 3, July
week-long intensive, statewide STEM professional development (PD) summer institute program forover 500 K-12 educators. During i-STEM, the K-12 educators were exposed to interactive plenarysessions in which keynote speakers walked the participants through the practices using authentic hands-onactivities and materials detailing the practices, and STEM professional development providers engagedthem in the practices in STEM topic specific “strands” (intensive 25 hour short courses based on themessuch as mining, energy, computer science, robotics, transportation, and etc). To determine the impact ofthe summer institute, we developed and administered an instrument to assess the participants’ knowledgeand engagement in teaching core STEM
those with higher prior knowledge on all three low-cost desktop learning modules.1.0 IntroductionIt is widely accepted that engineering students can improve conceptual understanding of materialwith active learning pedagogies compared to traditional lecture-based pedagogies (2). There aremany different active learning pedagogies that are implemented in classrooms including hands-on activities, demonstrations, labs, and peer led groups. These different pedagogies are allconsidered active learning; however, some may be more effective than others at keeping studentsengaged and teaching the material. A previous study found that interactive and constructivelearning activities lead to better scores than active and passive learning activities (5). This
th There is currently a national push towards moving STEM education away from the traditional silos of science, math and engineering and towards a more integrated model (Berland, 2013). This new model requires the design of new curriculum materials for all STEM curricular domains, including for Technology Education. The Robotics and Engineering Design Integrative STEM 8th grade curriculum was developed by a South Eastern University, with support from a Race to the Top award, to provide a thoroughly tested set of instructional materials designed to help attract more students, particularly
Paper ID #13838Find That Plane!: Evaluation of a High School Summer Science and Engi-neering Camp Introducing Robotics to Simulate the Search for MalaysianAirlines Flight 370 (Works in Progress)Dr. Ricky T Castles, East Carolina University Dr. Ricky Castles is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering at East Carolina Univer- sity. He is primarily affiliated with the ECU Electrical Engineering concentration. His research work focuses on the use of wireless sensor networks, microcontrollers, and physiological data collection for a variety of applications. His primary interest is in the area of adaptive tutorial
, Engineering Mechanics, and Forensic Engineering. Her research interests include evaluating crack age in construction materials, forensic engineering education, and STEM education pedagogy. She serves on the SJSU Academic Senate as the chair of the Instruction and Student Affairs committee and the Forensic Engineering Division of the American Society of Civil Engineers. Laura is the PI for the Department of Education’s First in the World Grant awarded to San Jos´e State University, in partnership with Cal Poly Pomona and California State University- Los Angeles.Prof. Liat Rosenfeld, San Jose State University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021
?Based on students’ responses, it is summarized that multiple submissions, instant feedback, Page 7.660.18spending more time and effort on homework, being able to learn from one’s mistakes, easy Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright©2002, American Society for Engineering Educationaccess to WebAssign anywhere at anytime, and precision in both submission and grading aresome of the distinguished features of WebAssign that students liked most compared to paperhomework collection and hand grading.Question 11. Compared to homework submitted and
Professor and Chair of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. She received a BS from Cornell University in Materials Science and Electrical Engineering (EE) and MS and PhD in EE from Stanford University. Her research focuses on the study and promotion of equity in engineering including student pathways and inclusive teaching. She has won best paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE Transactions on Education, and Education Sciences. Dr. Lord is a Fellow of the IEEE and ASEE and received the 2018 IEEE Undergraduate Teaching Award. She is a coauthor of The Borderlands of Education: Latinas in Engineering. She is a co-Director of the National Effective Teaching Institute (NETI).Scarleth
AC 2011-438: IMPLEMENTING ENGAGE STRATEGIES TO IMPROVERETENTION: FOCUS ON SPATIAL SKILLS - ENGINEERING SCHOOLSDISCUSS SUCCESSES AND CHALLENGESSusan Staffin Metz, Stevens Institute of Technology Susan Staffin Metz is Director of Special Projects in Engineering Education at Stevens Institute of Tech- nology. As a founder and president (1997 2002) of WEPAN, Women in Engineering Proactive Network, Susan has worked with over 200 colleges and universities to increase access and engagement of women in engineering and science through research, policy and program development. She is currently the prin- cipal investigator for ENGAGE, Engaging Students in Engineering, (www.engageengineering.org) a five year project funded by
Paper ID #9557Progress on the Engineering Ambassador Network: A Professional Develop-ment Organization with an Outreach MissionMr. Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Michael Alley is an associate professor of engineering communication at Pennsylvania State University. He is the author of The Craft of Scientific Presentations, 2nd edition, and was a cofounder of the Engi- neering Ambassador Network.Ms. Christine Haas, Engineering Ambassadors NetworkProf. Karen A. Thole, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Karen A. Thole holds a Bachelors of Science and Masters of Science in Mechanical
Paper ID #37944A Challenge-Based Specialization Diploma on Structural Health Monitoringfor Civil Engineering and Architecture ProgramsSaul E. Crespo, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico Bachelor in Civil Engineering with a Master of Science in Structural Engineering and PhD candidate in Structural Engineering. From April 2011 to July 2017 he served as Senior Researcher of the ”Structural Health Monitoring” group of the Mexican Institute of Transportation, directing and collaborating in mon- itoring and structural prognosis projects applied to special highway bridges, transportation infrastructure, historical monuments and
box and functional models before first sharing and iterating with their team members and then sharing and iterating as a class. During the course, students individually generate a black box and functional model for the course project as homework. Feedback is provided on their homework, and using the feedback, students then work as a team to arrive at revised black box and functional models for the course project. It is this revised team functional model that becomes the basis for morphological matrix based concept generation and function-based failure analysis. 20• Mechanics & Materials: In the mechanics and materials course, students taught from Materials: Engineering, Science, Processing and Design, 21 are