. Page 24.667.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 2014 ASEE Annual Conference Highlighting the Need for Engineering Education for Females in Saudi Arabia Although Saudi Arabia currently holds some of the leading academic institutions in the Middle East as proven by international rankings, particularly in the engineering and scientific disciplines, there is also almost an absence of major engineering specialties for females. This paper highlights the near nonexistence of engineering education for females in Saudi Arabia (with the exception of the newly-integrated single program in King Abdul-Aziz
need to be addressed. If administrators, developers, andtechnologists are more aware of faculty and student concerns with current online coursedelivery methods, then they can focus their efforts to develop and improve the mosteffective tools for online engineering courses. This is a key first step to expanding theimplementation of online education in engineering.Bibliography1 Parsad, B. and Lewis, L. (2008). "Distance Education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2006-2007. First Look." (NCES 2009-044).2 Allen, I. E. & Seaman, J. (2006). "Making the Grade: Online Education in the United States, 2006."3 Allen, I. E. & Seaman, J. (2008). "Staying the Course - Online Education in the United States 2008."4 Tabata, L
Education," in Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Lawrence, KS, 2010.2 Y. Mori and G. Yoshizawa, "Current Situation of Synthetic Biology in Japan," Journal of Disaster Research, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 476-481, 2011.3 T. A. Kolarovaa and I. D. Denev, "Integrating a Bioethics Course Into Undergraduate Biology Education," Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 2801-2810, 2012. 7 © American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 2015 ASEE Zone III Conference (Gulf
qualified for, and participated in, the International MATE Finals in Buzzard’s Bay Massachusetts. • P.E.A.K.: Partnering the Environment and Academics on the Keweenaw: The P.E.A.K. team from Hancock High School focuses on place-based education, service-learning, and stewardship. Students also receive one credit of elective science and one credit of language arts. They engage is a variety of community based projects, such as stream monitoring and home energy audits. • Underwater Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) Engineering: Traverse City Central High School students are designing, building, and testing ROVs and components for a variety of uses. The team has set goals to develop an ROV with deep water
Research, 1–28[38] R. E. Bernard and E. H. G. Cooperdock, “No progress on diversity in 40 years,” NatureGeoscience, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 292–295, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41561-018-0116-6.[39] Kim, A. Y., & Sinatra, G. M. (2018). Science identity development: An interactionistapproach. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(51). https://doi.org/10. 1186/s40594-018-0121-8[40] A. Godwin, G. Potvin, Z. Hazari, and R. M. Lock, “Identity, Critical Agency, andEngineering: an affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice,” Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 312–340, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1002/jee.20118.[41] Z. Hazari, G. Sonnert, P. M. Sadler, and M. Shanahan, “Connecting high school physicsexperiences, outcome
the ASEE Liberal Education / Engineering and Society Division; past Executive Council member of the Society for the History of Technology’s (SHOT); and Associate Editor of the international journal, Engineering Studies. His publications include Calculating a Natural World: Scientists, Engineers and Computers during the Rise of U.S. Cold War Research (MIT Press, 2006). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 WannABET? Historical and Organizational Perspectives on Governance in Engineering EducationAbstractThe recent round of proposed changes to the ABET engineering accreditation criteria has drawnsignificant attention from the engineering education community
industry 4.0: A state-of-the-art review,” vol. 149, p. 106868, 2020. [2] A. J. Magana, “Modeling and simulation in engineering education: A learning progression,” vol. 143, p. 04017008, 2017. [3] A. F. McKenna and A. R. Carberry, “Characterizing the role of modeling in innovation,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 263–269, 2012. [4] L. K. Miller, “Simulation-based engineering for industrial competitive advantage,” Computing in Science and Engineering, vol. 12, pp. 14–21, 2010. [5] R. Sinha, C. J. Paredis, V.-C. Liang, and P. K. Khosla, “Modeling and simulation methods for design of engineering systems,” J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 84–91, 2001. [6] D. W. Gao, C. Mi, and A
repeat the STATEMENT. Notethat three of the four Journal of Engineering Education articles cite Dale as the source of theSTATEMENT. Other engineering and computer education journals are not immune to thisphenomenon, for example, see 14,15,16. Table I shows that the number of ASEE conferencepapers with the STATEMENT is generally increasing over time. An illustration of how such anassertion propagates through the literature is shown in Figure 3. Many of the papers citing thesestatistics are proponents of multimedia based education.Of those ASEE conference papers which provide a reference, four cite Stice 3. But some authorsdo not provide a reference, and perhaps worse yet are those authors who erroneously cite EdgarDale 5 (e.g., see 11,13,17) or
field at large. By responding to these educational needs, universitiescan better prepare students for the challenges of the 21st-century technological landscape,ultimately contributing to their success and the advancement of the engineering profession. Theprojects and course modules being developed by California State University San Marcos and theUniversity of Utah serve as models for other institutions aiming to enhance their engineeringprograms and better serve their students and society.References[1] S. Neetesh, K. Vasilis, and K. Neeraj, “Cyber-physical smart grid security tool for educationand training purposes,” in International Workshops: Realigning Cyber Security Education, 2017[2] V. Gonzalez, O. Perez, and R. Romero, "Collaboration
. Page 11.296.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Building and Assessing Capacity in Engineering Education Research: The Bootstrapping ModelAbstractImprovements in engineering education will depend to a great extent on the availability of soundengineering education research. But how does a researcher, trained in engineering, begin to carryout education research, relying as it does upon non-engineering methodologies “borrowed” fromthe learning sciences? In response to these concerns, there have recently been initiatives indeveloping educational research expertise among engineering educators. In this paper wedescribe a multi-institutional, multi-national model (which we call Bootstrapping) designed
& Interfaces (CSI) and editor boards of International Journal of Data Mining, Modeling and Management (JDMMM) and American Journal of Industrial and Business Management (AJIBM). He is currently a Senior Member of Institute of Industrial Engineers, Society of Manufacturing Engineers and the Division Chair of Manufac- turing Division of American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE). He is also actively involved in several consortia activities.Mr. Md Fashiar Rahman, The University of Texas at El Paso Md Fashiar Rahman is currently a doctoral student at the University of Texas at El Paso in Computational Science Program (CPS). He earned a Master of Science in computational science at The University of Texas
examined how SVEs enact their military leadership training andexperiences in engineering education. An article on this topic appeared in the second issue of2019 in the International Journal of Engineering Education [10].Findings on LeadershipFrom: J. B. Main, M. M. Camacho, C. Mobley, C. Brawner, S. M. Lord, and H. Kesim,“Technically and Tactically Proficient:” How Military Leadership Training and Experiences areEnacted in Engineering Education. International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, no.2, pp. 446-457, 2019.Based on in-depth qualitative interviews with student veterans in the United States pursuingBachelor’s degrees in engineering across four institutions, we present findings relating militaryleadership and its application to
M.S. Degree Count Agronomy 1 Computer Science 5 Curriculum and Instructional Technology 1 Engineering 9 English Literature/English/American studies/TESOL 4 Environmental Economics 1 Information Systems and Education 1 Journalism 1 Learning Design & Technology 1 MBA International Business 1 Science and Mathematics
programs operating,compared to 67 in 2004.4 In considering the delivery of MSSE programs for SEC’s interns, neweducational sources may be enabled by anticipated increases in support from the NationalScience Foundation and the Department of Defense, among others. Should these trends in theaggregate prove to increase the proportion of SE graduates pursing MS degrees, thenorganizations like SEC, which focus on a graduate-level educated engineering workforce, couldbenefit in the long-term.A study sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense is articulating the anticipatedcontent of MSSE programs from which both the Department of Defense and private industry willbe recruiting graduates in the future.5 A draft of the recommendation articulates
Paper ID #9938Issues Surrounding a Heutagogical Approach in Global Engineering Educa-tionDr. Yakut Gazi, Texas A&M University In her 20 years of experience as an instructional designer, media specialist, IT consultant, faculty mem- ber, and technology leader, Dr. Yakut Gazi has worked at higher education institutions in the US, Qatar, Turkey, and Spain. Prior to joining TAMU Engineering as the Assistant Vice Chancellor for Engineering Remote Education in September 2013, she led the distributed learning and classroom technology oper- ations at Texas A&M University-Central Texas and worked at A&M’s branch
Electrical Engineering and a minor in Mathematics. Christina is currently working as an intern at General Atomics with the test-engineering department. She is also working on a senior design project sponsored by General Atomics and is a member of IEEE. Page 13.213.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Applying “Cultural Consensus Analysis” to a Subgroup of Engineering EducatorsAbstractIn this paper, we review the theoretical premises of cultural consensus analysis and offer adetailed description of its methodological components, including data collection and
, which is a methods-based paper published inthe International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, employed critical theory as a guidingframework. In this work, Mobley et. al. [73] employed Veteran Critical Theory [62] as an “organizingframework” to describe qualitative methods (key event timeline and the identity circle) used in researchwith military undergraduates in engineering to elicit rich narratives and counter narratives of experience.At the time of writing this manuscript, only one other publication, a doctoral dissertation in the field ofengineering education written by Sheppard [41], that employed critical theory could be found. In thispaper, Sheppard [41] employed the socio-educational justice framework FoK to a support a
Paper ID #19972A Case-Study Approach to Interlink Humanities with Engineering EducationDr. Ravi T. Shankar, Florida Atlantic University Ravi Shankar has a PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Wisconsin, Madi- son, WI, and an MBA from Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL. He is currently a senior professor with the Computer and Electrical Engineering and Computer Science department at Florida Atlantic Uni- versity. His current research interests are on K-12 education, engineering learning theories, and education data mining. He has been well funded by the high tech industry over the
. Kunz, M. Kostelnik, and B. Doll, “A model for mentoring new facultymembers,” in Mentoring, and Work–Life (Im)Balance: Educators (Re)Negotiate the Personal,Professional, and Political, K. Mansfield, A. Welton, P. Lee., Eds. Charlotte, NC: InformationAge Publishing, 2016, pp 239-252.[4] R. Norton, “Determining What to Teach,” International Vocational Education and TrainingAssociation (IVETA) Conference, 2000, Hong Kong. Retrieved fromhttp://repository.vtc.edu.hk/ive-adm-others-iveta/2000/standards/33 [Accessed Jan. 11, 2018].[5] O. Boev, N. Gruenwald, and G. Heitmann, Eds. Engineering Curriculum Design Alignedwith Accreditation Standards. Wismar, Germany: Hochschule Wismar, 2013.[6] ABET, “Continuous improvement: The heart of accreditation
- demic Affairs, and interim president of WMU. Dr. Litynski completed three years at the National Science Foundation as physics program director and acting division director for Undergraduate Education. He has served in numerous international technical and advisory capacities including member of the International Faculty of Engineering Advisory Committee at the Technical University of Lodz, Poland where he served as their first visiting professor. Brigadier General Litynski (Ret.) served with armor and ordnance units in Asia and Europe and with several Department of Defense research and development organizations. Dr. Litynski served in the Physics and the Electrical Engineering departments at the United States Military
. Schott, “Engineering Technology Undergraduate Students a Survey of Demographics and Mentoring,” in ASEE Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2019.[3] A. M. Lucietto, “Identity of an Engineering Technology Graduate,,” in 123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[4] C. A. Malgwi, M. A. Howe, and P. A. Burnaby, “Influences on students' choice of college major,” Journal of Education for Business, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 275-282, 2005.[5] J. S. Rolston, and E. Cox, "Engineering for the real world: Diversity, innovation and hands-on learning," International perspectives on engineering education, pp. 261-278: Springer, 2015.[6] A. Lucietto, M. Taleyarkhan, and E. Schott, “Engineering
education. In 1994, the Advisory Board created the vision of a World- Page 11.3.5class Engineer, which has become the guiding framework for educational reform in the College,anticipating by nearly ten years the current national attention on the issue of globalization. TheFaculty Advisory Board was formed in the mid-1990’s to assist the Director in setting andupdating the strategic goals for Center and to provide internal feedback on project proposals thatcome to the Center. It plays a second important role in the College as the coordinating group forABET-related assessment processes, a role that will be discussed more fully later in this article.The
, Engineering and social justice. in Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology, & Society. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2008. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-79940- 2.[14] N. Kellam and M. Jennings, “Uncovering Epistemologies and Values of Our Qualitative Engineering Education Research Community: Listening for Voices,” Studies in engineering education (Blacksburg, Va.), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 80-, 2021, doi: 10.21061/see.37.[15] A. L. Pawley, “Engineering faculty drawing the line: a taxonomy of boundary work in academic engineering,” Engineering Studies, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 145–169, Aug. 2012, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2012.687000.[16] D. Riley, “Power. Systems. Engineering. Traveling Lines of Resistance in Academic
and robotics, non-destructive evaluation, engineering/integrated STEM education and K-12 and higher education collaboration.Dr. Mohamed Ibrahim, Arkansas Tech University Mohamed Ibrahim, PhD Associate Professor of Curriculum and Instruction College of Education Arkansas Tech University (479) 964-0583 ext. 2452Dr. Nansong Wu, Arkansas Tech University Nansong Wu received M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA, in 2008 and 2012; and M.S. in Engineering Management in 2017. He is an assistant professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering, Arkansas Tech University. His research interests include embedded systems, image processing
-programs-2022-2023/.Ashford, Nicholas A. 2004. “Major Challenges to Engineering Education for Sustainable Development: What Has to Change to Make It Creative, Effective, and Acceptable to the Established Disciplines?” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 5 (3): 239–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370410546394.Bendanillo, Alan A., Shiela Marie N. Arcadio, Jan Marie A. Yongco, Redjie D. Arcadio, and Jon Redgie N. Arcadio. 2023. “Enhancing Technical Proficiency and Industry Readiness: A Comprehensive Diploma Program for Engineering Technology.” European Journal of Innovation in Nonformal Education 3 (7): 20–44.Blake Hylton, J., David Mikesell, John-David Yoder, and Heath LeBlanc. 2020
I Session 2242 ‘ Forging Links Between Engineering Education and Industry: The Research Connection Donald E. Strickland*, Nirmala Kannankutty**, and Robert P. Morgan** Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville*/Washington University, St. Louis**The mutual needs of society, industry and universities are creating opportunities for closer ties betweenindustry and academia. Many new, and old, forms of university-industry collaboration are
I .— Session 2547 MECOMTRONICS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY - EDUCATING TECHNICIANS FOR THE 21st CENTURY Jack L. Waintraub, P.E. Middlesex County College The New Jersey Center for Engineering Technology Education, NJCATE, is restructuringengineering technology education in order to produce engineering technicians who are equippedwith the capabilities needed to meet the demands of industry in the 21st Century. Central to thiseffort is the
Engineering Department at RHIT will pilot a set of similar CPR modules within a senior design sequence. Result from these field-tests will be widely disseminated. ≠ Assessing Student Achievement: The external evaluator will help project faculty develop CPR assessment instruments for their courses and will help to determine overall student achievement. These materials will be made available to a broad range of constituencies.WORKS CITED1. Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Doman. New York: Longmans-Green, 1956.2. Carlson, P. A., & Berry F. C. Using computer-mediated peer
Marine Engineering from Webb Institute. At ODU, Dr. Michaeli oversees the marine engineering curriculum, teaches courses in ship design and construction, and is actively involved in funded Navy research funded STEM initiatives to encourage students to pursue careers in naval engineering. For her contributions to ODU and Batten College of Engineering and Technology she was the College’s nomination for the Provost’s Award for Outstanding Faculty Research Mentor for 2014-2015 and is the University’s nominee for the State Council for Higher Education of Virginia (SCHEV) Rising Star award for 2016.Dr. Paul Moses c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016Developing a Distance Learning
process.AcknowledgementsFirst, we would like to thank Susan Arnold-Christian, assistant director for the Center for theEnhancement of Enginering Diversity (CEED), for her support of this project. In particular, wethank her for discussing each step in the benchmarking process with the lead author in detail. Wewould also like to thank Dr. Eileen Van Aken of the Virginia Tech Department of Industrial &Systems Engineering for her support during the initial phase of this study.References1. A. T. Jeffers, A. G. Safferman and S. I. Safferman, Understanding K-12 engineering outreach programs, Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice, 130(2), 2004, pp. 95-108.2. J. F. Sullivan, S. E. Davis, J. L. Degrazia and D. W. Carlson, Beyond