. 1IntroductionSociotechnical integration is a compelling framework for addressing the demands of educatingfuture engineers and similarly situated practitioners [1]. One of its most exciting opportunitiescomes when a new field is emerging and new educational programs can be designed from theground up. This paper analyzes UC Berkeley’s experience with sociotechnical integration in thecase of a new interdisciplinary undergraduate engineering discipline: data science. It reports onexperiments in collaborative curricular design and implementation by an interdisciplinary teamof instructors that currently achieves impact at the scale of several thousand students each year.Sociotechnical integration draws from the field of STS (science and technology studies) andrelated
inexpensive, personal digitalassistant (PDA) that supports database, spreadsheet, document viewing/editing, graphics,programming, personal organization, and web-browsing software. Through support from Palm, Inc [2], Palm PDA technology was introduced intoan introductory digital systems engineering course for 24 students in the fall of 2000 atPenn State Abington. The digital systems course covers topics in number systems, logicgates, Boolean algebra, combinational and sequential logic, state machines, memoryconcepts, and programmable logic devices. These engineering students evaluated anddeveloped handheld software tools for enhancing active learning and instruction in boththe lecture and laboratory components of the course. Databases, simple
the Journal of Engineering Education. He was selected as a Fellow of ASEE in 2008 and of ASME in 2012. He holds a B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from Penn State, an M.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering from RPI, and a Ph.D. in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering from Princeton. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Building a Community of Ethics Educators in Graduate Engineering Programs:Developing an Ethics Workshop Following a User-Oriented ApproachAbstractEthics education in undergraduate engineering programs tends to focus on ethical issuesthat arise in the professional context. By contrast, ethics education for graduate studentsin engineering often addresses different kinds of ethical
AC 2012-3438: DECENTRALIZED EXPERIENTIAL EDUCATION SER-VICES: ARE WE REINVENTING THE WHEEL OR PROVIDING SPE-CIALIZED SERVICES?Ms. Ilka M. Balk, University of Kentucky Ilka Balk has served as the Director of Cooperative Education and International Programs at the University of Kentucky’s College of Engineering since 2007. Before that, she served as an adviser in the co-op program for one and a half years. Balk has been a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) since 2006, and she is currently serving as the Chair of ASEE’s Cooperative and Experiential Education Division (CEED). She served as its secretary from 2010-2011, and as Chair-elect in 2011-2012. On campus at the University of Kentucky
engineering ed- ucational environment, and first-year engineering program development. Prof. Plouff has a Doctorate in Education from Eastern Michigan University, a Master’s degree in Environmental Engineering from Michigan Tech University, and is a registered Professional Engineer in Michigan.Dr. Nael Barakat, Grand Valley State University Dr. Nael Barakat is a professor of Mechanical Engineering (ME) at Grand Valley State University (GVSU), Grand Rapids, MI. He is a registered professional engineer in Ontario, Canada, and a fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). His areas of interest include Controls, Robotics, Automation, Systems dynamics and Integration, Metrology, NEMS, as well as Engineering
Tech is creating theIntegrated Research and Education in Advanced Networking program. This program is presentlyin a one-year “start-up” phase and will be fully operational in Fall 2001. The IREAN programenables faculty and Ph.D. students from computer engineering, electrical engineering, computerscience, industrial and systems engineering, economics, and business to work onmultidisciplinary research targeted at a vision of the future Internet as the common, ubiquitousand global communications infrastructure. The program’s research thrusts are broadbandwireless access, mobile access to Internet resources and applications, Internet appliances, qualityof service, heterogeneous network security, and management of large-scale networks. Of
they join the workforce.The authors believe that modern teaching facilities supported with digital simulation tools andwell equipped laboratories, have a great impact in the development of engineering technologyprograms in power systems and energy technologies. A good example of this perception is thefact that the EIET program at UNI has recently completed its first year of operation with greatsuccess and increased enrollment. Part of this achievement was due to the fact that the facultyuses advanced software and hardware tools to educate the students that choose the EIET major.This in turn allows for the continuous improvement of the curriculum so that it is always modernand attached to the trends of the ever-expanding electrical engineering
responsibility from leaving an engineering major (but thisrequires future study).AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation, specifically theREU program of the Division of Engineering Education and Centers, under Grant No. 1852161.Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] W. Katkin, “The Boyer Commission Report and its Impact on Undergraduate Research,” New Dir. Teach. Learn., vol. 2003, no. 93, pp. 19–38, 2003.[2] G. Kuh, "High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter," Association of
and leadership development experience with military, profit and nonprofit organizations. He has also designed and taught numerous leadership development seminars both nationally and internationally. Randy received his master’s degree in organizational design and effectiveness from the Fielding Institute in Santa Barbara, CA. Page 11.911.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Marketing Engineering through Open Mentoring®: A Web-based Pilot ProgramAbstractPaper OverviewThis paper provides an overview of the Open Mentoring® program in the College
weighted string, and (4) a tracked vehicle.Introduction Traditionally, computer-aided-design (CAD) related topics have been taught in coursesseparate from System Dynamics in a BSME program. CAD is often taught in one or morefreshman or sophomore courses and focuses largely on static geometric issues associated withparts, assemblies, and drawings. It is commonly paired with a track on drafting. SystemDynamics is often a sophomore or junior level mechanical engineering course and emphasizesapplied mathematical modeling of systems from different energy domains, incorporates suchsimulation software as MATLAB® and Simulink®, and could be enhanced by CAD. At theUniversity of St. Thomas, currently System Dynamics is not a required course in
Paper ID #73332013 State of Manufacturing EducationDr. Hugh Jack, Grand Valley State University Hugh Jack is a Professor of Product Design and Manufacturing Engineering at Grand Valley State Uni- versity in Grand Rapids, Michigan. His interests include manufacturing education, design, project man- agement, automation, and control systems. Page 23.19.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 The 2013 State of Manufacturing EducationAbstractThis paper presents
methodologies in engineering edu- cation, the professional formation of engineers, the role of empathy and reflection in engineering learning, and student development in interdisciplinary and interprofessional spaces. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Examining a Novel Theory-to-Practice Effort in Engineering Education through Multiple Theoretical Lenses of Systems and ChangeAbstractIn the past, the engineering education community has focused primarily on developing evidence-based best practices and fundamental theories of teaching and learning. An emerging focus,embodied in initiatives like the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) RevolutionizingEngineering Departments (RED) program, is
Paper ID #6251A Learning Outcomes Assessment Level Dashboard Based on Standard Ter-minologyDr. Khalid W Khawaja, American University in Dubai Dr. Khawaja is currently the associate dean of the School of Engineering and an associate professor of Computer Engineering at the American University in Dubai. In his tenure at AUD, he spearheaded ABET and UAE MOHESR accreditation of various graduate and undergraduate programs. He is an established expert on the use of Java technologies in enterprise applications. His research interest is in the area of Enterprise Computing and Architecture and its usage in Education Systems
is therefore important that theresearch experience includes collaboration with graduate students and post-doctoral researchersin engineering labs. Since the participants work directly with graduate students and post-doctoralfellows as well as faculty, they learn what graduate and post-graduate work entails, while beingexposed to multiple role models. The program has been mainly successful in meeting thesegoals. A detailed analysis of the program is given in the critique section of the paper.In its initial years, the SURP was funded by Lockheed Martin, the Hughes Network Systems,MERCK, Boeing and the Minority Engineering Program at UVa. Of these, Boeing hasconsistently provided generous financial support for students participating in the
surveys.Table 1 shows the EET PEOs. Table 1 Electrical Engineering Technology Program Educational Objectives 1PEO 1 Graduates of the program will be well prepared for their first position in the field. Graduates of the program will be successfully employed in a degree related job or pursing anPEO 2 additional degree. Employers will be satisfied with the performance of the program graduates, skills including:PEO 3 Effective teamwork and communication in a professional environment, and professional ethics. Graduates of the program will be satisfied with their education and show the ability toPEO 4 continuously improve their skills and professionally
Session 2513 Implementing an Integrated System for Program Assessment and Improvement Stephen J. Ressler, Thomas A. Lenox United States Military AcademyINTRODUCTIONCriterion 2 of the ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 requires that, to gain accreditation, anengineering program must have: (a) detailed published educational objectives that are consistent with the mission of the institution and [ABET] criteria, (b) a process based on the needs of the program’s various constituencies in which the objectives are determined and periodically
embarking on educational research [1]. The last hurdle inBorrego’s assessment (a very engineer-like construct) was to integrate social scientists intoengineering education research teams. Essentially, her description of this process implies that thesocial scientists will be consultants supporting the efforts of the engineering educators.However, what we found was that our scholarship was improved and our experience moresatisfying when we moved beyond an engineer-consultant relationship to an integratedpartnership. Our research process is similar to those strategies espoused in recent forums andreports on qualitative research in engineering education and the work of social scientists studyingengineering education. (Ref. such as [2-21]) We will share
AC 2007-568: USING MODEL SOLAR RACERS AS AN INTRODUCTION TOENGINEERINGAndrew Lau, Pennsylvania State University Page 12.1556.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Using Model Solar Racers as an Introduction to EngineeringAbstractThis engineering first-year seminar course was first offered in spring 2001 and is based on thesuccessful middle school program, the Junior Solar Sprint. Student teams compete to design,build and race small-scale photovoltaic (PV)-powered vehicles. This hands-on experience servesmany goals, most notably as a fun introduction to engineering design, analysis, and testing.Solar Racers makes a great topic because of the many relevant
for Engineering Education’s newest division startup, Community Engagement in Engineering Education. He is PI, or Co-PI, on several large projects assessing the impacts of learning through service on students, faculty, and communities around the world.Alexandra Archer, Michigan Technological University Alexandra Archer is an environmental engineering master’s student in the Peace Corps Masters Interna- tional program at Michigan Tech. She holds a master’s in biological systems engineering from Kansas State University. Her research interests include sustainable engineering and international community en- gagement
Technological University Dr. Jarvie-Eggart is a registered professional engineer with over a decade of experience as an environ- mental engineer. She lectures in the Engineering Fundamentals department at Michigan Technological University. Her research interests include online learning, active and collaborative learning, first year engineering programs, sustainability and diversity in engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Understanding First-Year Engineering Student Definitions of Systems EngineeringIntroductionThis work-in-progress paper examines first-year engineering students’ definitions of engineeringdisciplines. In this study, 178 second
Paper ID #9404Experiences of Using a Collaborative Programming Editor in a First-YearProgramming CourseProf. Troy Harding, Kansas State University Salina Professor Computer Systems Technology Engineering Technology Department Kansas State University Salina Page 24.573.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Experiences of Using a Collaborative Programming Editor in a First-Year Programming CourseAbstractRecent research has demonstrated that collaborative learning
College of Engineering & Science. She advises and supports students, helping to connect them to resources across campus. She also visits with prospective students and their families about the undergraduate engineering and science programs. She has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from LA Tech University and an M.S. in Educational Administration from Baylor University.James Nelson, Louisiana Tech University Page 12.1004.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 TechSTEP: Stem Talent Expansion ProgramIntroduction and BackgroundAccording to the National Science Board’s Science and
American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in progress: Freshman year initiative for a cohort of largely engineering minority students Abstract — The type of paper submission that is proposed here represents the category, Workin Progress. A first-year program, titled STRIDE, was developed and piloted at University ofHartford, a private university in the New England region of the United States, with the goal ofsupporting African-American/Black and Hispanic/Latino male students in achieving academicexcellence at the institution. During this time, the demographics of the institution includedbetween 10% and 20% self-identified African-American students, and between 10% and 20%self-identified
systems at the University of Arizona (UA) that engineering students with disabilitiesmay require to complete their educational goals. In addition, we identify challenges and potentialstrategies that universities and their engineering programs can leverage to better support students withdisabilitiesMethods We considered the availability and utilization of resources offered by three intramuralorganizations for students with disabilities: 1) the UA Disability Resource Center (DRC) which offersaccommodations, support structures, and community for all students with any temporary or permanentdisability, 2) the UA Strategic Alternative Learning Techniques (SALT) Center which offers tutoring,academic skills workshops, one-on-one learning
needs and future project objectives • Identify target performers and establish a baseline of data in data to define success • Determine possible causes of performance gaps • Recommend possible performance improvement solutions.The College of Technology Tutoring ProgramThe COT tutoring program offers students enrolled in technology core courses and prerequisitecourses such as math and physics, the opportunity to get additional academic support with theirstudies. Students can participate in one-on-one tutoring and/or tabletop sessions which are groupstudy sessions with a tutor present and drop-in sessions which are held one or two evenings aweek at a designated time and location, most often technical system and computer labs
students, and makerspace instructional design. Previously, she served as the Program Manager for Tinkering and Technology at the Museum of Life and Science in Durham, NC. She earned her master’s degree in Education Technology, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship from UNC-Chapel Hill in 2017. She lives in Durham, NC, with her husband and their two terrible cats. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comWork-In-Progress: Make It Count - Supporting Makerspace Course Outcomes WithBlended LearningIntroductionMakerspaces engage participants in hands-on, creative endeavors that promote ‘learning bydoing’ and the development of professional skills
articles, including high- lights in USA Today, Upscale, and TIME Magazine, as well as being named a MIT Technology Review top young innovator of 2003, receiving the Georgia-Tech Faculty women of distinction award in 2008, and recognized as NSBE educator of the year in 2009. From 1993-2005, Dr. Howard was at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. Following this, she joined Georgia Tech in July 2005 and founded the Human-Automation Systems Lab. Page 22.1050.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Measuring the Effectiveness of Robotics
facilitated faculty development initiatives, communi- ties and events in online course design, formative assessment, narrative techniques and 3-D technologies in undergraduate education. Since Fall 2016, in partnership with the College of Engineering and the LIFE team, Gemma designed and supported faculty development workshops in active learning pedago- gies, provided regular consultations and also joined the UM team at Olin College’s 2017 Collaboratory Summer Institute. Gemma is a recent graduate from the MSc Digital Education program at the University of Edinburgh.Dr. Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas, El Paso An Assistant Professor at The University of Texas at El Paso, Dr. Meagan R. Kendall is helping develop
, engineering and technological talents participating in the projectconstruction are the main force, and the cultivation of their interculturalcommunicative competence is particularly important. Relevant research has alsoattempted to explore, for example, in view of the long-term lack of engineering andscientific talent support in the countries along the “Belt and Road”, it is proposed todevelop a Chinese program of engineering education “going out” around the “Beltand Road”, deepen the social responsibility and global governance ability of collegesand universities. The fundamental basis for intercultural communication still relies onthe micro individuals within the Chinese engineering talent to achieve it in the actualengineering implementation
Paper ID #14612An Inexpensive Control System Experiment: Modeling, Simulation, and Lab-oratory Implementation of a PID Controller-Based SystemDr. Biswajit Ray, Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania Biswajit Ray received his B.E., M.Tech., and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from University of Calcutta (India), Indian Institute of Technology-Kanpur (India), and University of Toledo (Ohio), re- spectively. He is currently the coordinator, and a professor, of the Electronics Engineering Technology program at Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania. Previously, he taught at University of Puerto Rico- Mayaguez, and designed