the vice president of Purdue Billiards Club since 2015.Mr. Zhuofan LiMr. Yudi WuDr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Schools of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering and (by courtesy) Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue. Prior to this she was Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue where she was responsible for developing curriculum and assessment tools and overseeing the research efforts within EPICS. Her academic and research interests include the profes- sional formation of engineers, diversity and inclusion in engineering, human-centered
the department to foster its student leaderdevelopment. The student ambassadors are involved in recruitment efforts with the department,outreach to prospective and newly admitted students, and special projects that enhance thestudent services our department offers. Their personal growth is assessed through self-reflectionpieces, which also serves to guide improvements in the program. As a result, our department isable to meet with more prospective students, has increased on-campus recruiting efforts andprovides mentors for newly admitted students.IntroductionA common student outcome of engineering curricula is preparing the student to enter theworkforce as a leader and a professional. Mechanical engineering curricula attempt to ensure
. Civil engineering course content changes over time. [31] ABET is one of themost obvious influences on the curriculum and programs continue to make changes in responseto ABET changes. [32] The FE exam content serves as another influencing factor on curricularcontent in civil engineering programs. The civil engineering FE exam consists of 110 multiplechoice questions in eighteen subject areas. One of the subject areas, Ethics and ProfessionalPractice, includes licensure as one of six topics, but a student has less than a 1% chance ofencountering a licensure question on the exam. [33] Many programs use the FE exam for studentoutcome assessment, further connecting programs to the examination part of the licensureprocess. [12] Another critical
. 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Participation in study abroad is not uniform across majors. This was assessed by integratingacross several years to minimize the effect of variations in small sample sizes. Comparing thesum of students in each major who studied abroad in 2010-2015 to the number of graduates ineach major from 2011-2016 (their likely graduation years) reveals that computer engineeringmajors were the most likely to study abroad while chemical engineers and electrical engineersespecially were the least likely to study abroad. In fact, electrical engineers were about half aslikely to study abroad as all the remaining majors (biomedical engineering, civil engineering,computer science
from the University of South Carolina.Dr. Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Amelink is Director of Graduate Programs and Assessment in the College of Engineering, Virginia Tech. She is also an affiliate faculty member in the Departments of Engineering Education and Educa- tional Leadership and Policy Studies at Virginia Tech.Dr. Nicole Sanderlin, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Sanderlin serves as the Director of Global Engagement for Virginia Tech’s College of Engineer- ing. She provides leadership for international initiatives and works closely with engineering faculty to develop new institutional partnerships and international opportunities for
the culture of their home campus. Students alsoutilized digital portfolios in the course to complete reflections on class content related to eachGrand Challenge theme area. It should be noted that, ASU operates a well-established NAEGrand Challenge Scholars Program that enrols more than 100 students every year. Throughthe knowledge transfer initialized by the joint course, UNSW aims to gradually launch itsown Grand Challenges for Engineering program locally in Australia.This work provides information about the course and describes the outcomes of the course asrelated to the students’ experience, instructor’s experience, and comparison to other courses.Formal assessment of course effectiveness was not completed in this pilot effort. To
University. She worked in faculty development during her career with public schools, the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards, and in her current position. She is involved with the SPARCT Program as a member of the planning committee and she analyzes the qualitative data for program review and assessment purposes. Dr. Greene received her degrees from Kent State University and Florida Gulf Coast University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Development of a Training Workshop for Undergraduate Mentor TAs in an Introductory Engineering CourseAbstractOver the past three years, faculty at Florida Gulf Coast University have re-envisioned thefreshman-level
and assessment tools and overseeing the research efforts within EPICS. Her academic and research interests include the profes- sional formation of engineers, diversity and inclusion in engineering, human-centered design, engineering ethics, leadership, service-learning, and accessibility and assistive-technology.Prof. Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Patrice M. Buzzanell is a Distinguished Professor in the Brian Lamb School of Communication and the School of Engineering Education (courtesy) at Purdue University. She serves as the Butler Chair and Director of the Susan Bulkily Butler Center for Leadership Excellence. Editor of four books and author of over 175
. Students also learnabout admissions and financial aid.Students complete an evaluation at the end of the MITE Enrichment Program. Theevaluation assesses students’ desire to study engineering in college, which engineeringdiscipline they wish to pursue at UT Austin, the likelihood of applying to the university,and other learning outcomes. MITE participants are tracked for multiple years todetermine how many apply, receive acceptance, and enroll into the Cockrell School ofEngineering. Program evaluation considers data of the MITE Enrichment Program over aperiod of forty-four years and reviews recruitment trends related to underrepresentedstudents in engineering.Recruiting StrategiesThere is a lack of STEM awareness and programming in the K-12 pipeline
, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on an NSF faculty development program based on evidence-based teaching practices. The overall goal is to develop dis- ciplinary communities of practice across the college of engineering. The approach is being promoted through semester-long faculty workshops and then through a semester of supported implementation of faculty classroom innovations. Changes in faculty beliefs and classroom practice should positively im- pact
Quarterly, 57, 141-158.[24] Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385-407.[25] Ngambecki, I., Evangelou, D., Long, R., Ohland, M., & Ricco, G. (2010) Describing the path-ways of students continuing in and leaving engineering. Paper presented at the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education conference, Louisville, KY.[26] Ohland, M. W., Zhang, G., Thorndyke, B., & Anderson, T. J. (2004). Grade-point average, changes of major, and majors selected by students leaving engineering. Proceedings of the 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education conference, Salt Lake City, UT.[27] Litzler
of their abilities to perform on the engineering foundation course outcomes aswere established by ABET. In this quantitative assessment, the professors analyzed the Likert-scale data collected from 187 engineering students from multiple sections of an engineeringfoundation course.Research has shown that a person’s belief in their abilities is critical in translating theirconfidence into successful actions. Likewise, the engineering student’s belief in his or her abilityto perform foundational math, science, and analytical problem solving skills, as well as be aproductive member of a high achieving team, will increase the probability that the student willperform well academically, persist through engineering curricula successfully and become
learningoutcome of the course. The laboratory performance of the course is performed in teams of twostudents. This mode provides a platform for horizontal learning through active and engageddiscourse and discussion. Students are empowered to charter their learning and feed theircuriosity. The course culminates in a Final Project which is based on students own research froma set of selected topics of interest in the field of Electrical and Computer EngineeringTechnology. These projects were assessed based upon its comprehensiveness and originality.Students are required to master the soft skills of comprehensive report writing on a weekly basisand of Technical Project Report writing and project oral presentation based upon the Team’sFinal Project. These
Enthusiasm for Mathematics through RoboticsAbstractThis evidence-based practice paper describes the study of generating enthusiasm for mathematicsthrough robotics. A survey of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute undergraduate students taking theRobotics I course showed that, while many students have a great interest for mathematics, morethan 1 in 4 of those same students expressed that they were not adequately prepared for themathematics required. This is particularly concerning for those teaching engineering coursesbecause concepts of robotics and mathematics are very much intertwined. Therefore, thisinspired a study of younger middle school and high school students to i) assess preexistingnotions of mathematics and robotics, ii) introduce an
. Rickli received his B.S. and M.S. Degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Michigan Tech- nological University in 2006 and 2008 and received his Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech prior to joining Wayne State in 2013. At Wayne State, he has created the Manufacturing and Remanufacturing Systems Laboratory (MaRSLab). MaRSLab targets fundamental and applied research in manufacturing and remanufacturing processes and systems while encouraging considerations for sus- tainability and life-cycle thinking in design, manufacturing, use, and recovery. Specific research thrusts include: transforming manufacturing quality monitoring and remanufacturing core condition assessment via automated laser line
it isstraightforward to organize the information for the selection process.The selection of the students is conducted in a double-blind method. The student and schoolnames are first redacted from the documents. An initial committee makes an assessment of thestudent’s interest by reading their essay, and will assign them for possible selection to allrelevant mentors. Each mentor then receives a packet with student information, and makes theirselection of their top three candidates. The committee then places the selected student-fellowswith the corresponding mentor, trying as best they can to first place all the top candidates.Once this is accomplished, students are informed through e-mail of the status of their application,but for those
inside and outside theclassroom. In the TIED-UP model, the instructional delivery begins with the process of creating theconcept movie that involves subject research, protocol identification, script writing, animation, audio, aswell as video making, editing, and uploading to a web interface accessible to all the students before thesame concept is introduced in the class. Along this process, activities that are mandated for this concept arealso prepared in advance as a set of what we call TIED-UP sheets. TIED-UP sheets include short quizzesthat test conceptual knowledge, along with problems of varying level of complexity that enable theinstructor to assess the student’s knowledge. This follows in-class delivery of the concept, using the TIED-UP
UGA. She is engaged in mentoring early career faculty at her univer- sity and within the PEER National Collaborative. In 2013 she was selected to be a National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education Faculty Member.Dr. Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Julia M. Williams is Interim Dean of Cross-Cutting Programs and Emerging Opportunities and Pro- fessor of English, at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her research areas include technical commu- nication, assessment, accreditation, and the development of change management strategies for faculty and staff. Her articles have appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education, International Journal of En- gineering Education
2008included growth in all areas to include increased retention of students at all academic ranks.Unfortunately, the School of Engineering was experiencing marginal enrollments and reportingpoor retention numbers (on average 50-60% retaining to sophomore year).An assessment of engineering in fall 2011 highlighted the need for increased retention efforts. Asix-year strategic plan set goals for overall growth of the school to include the addition of newprograms. However, before adding programs and stressing the current system more, recruitmentand retention activities were initiated across all disciplines. As part of the emphasis on retention,multiple mentoring activities were developed. For engineering students, this helped themunderstand the relevance
data regarding students’ thoughts and perceptions abouttheir experiences using SEP-CyLE in their classes. One individual ten-minute student interviewwas also conducted.Study Participants in the 2017-2018 academic year consisted of 145 students who had completedboth learning objects in SEP-CyLE and knowledge assessment tests before and after the course.Study participants self-reported demographics information at the beginning of the semester.Overall, the participants were 65% male and 28% female, with 7% in another gender category orelecting to not report gender. The focus group participants were 56% male and 44% female. Ofthe 145 participating students, 32 students participated in the focus group sessions. Students whowere enrolled in CS1 in
Provide Early Interverntion for Students with Visualization and/or Design Intent Difficulties," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Montreal, 2002.[3] A. Garland, "GraderWorks," Garland Industries, LLC, [Online]. Available: https://garlandindustriesllc.com/index.php/pages/view/graderworks. [Accessed 14 August 2018].[4] H. K. Ault and A. Fraser, "A Comparison of Manual vs. Online Grading for Solid Models," in 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013, June.[5] S. J. Kirstukas, "Development and Evaluation of a Computer Program to Assess Student CAD Models," in Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[6] S. J. Kirstukas and J. Morris, "A Review of
. This is a topic I am very passionate about and am excited about the opportunity to develop our research further.Ms. Victoria Baltazar,Janie M Moore, Texas A&M University Dr. Janie McClurkin Moore is an Assistant Professor in the Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department at Texas A&M University in College Station. A native of Columbus, Ohio, she attended North Carolina A&T State University where she received a B.S. in Bio Environmental Engineering in 2006. She then began pursuing her graduate education at Purdue University in the Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, completing her Ph.D. in 2015. Her primary research areas include 1) mycotoxin risk assessment and treatment in stored
and demonstrated by the students are listed below: a. Digital Fan Control b. Adaptive Car Lighting c. Full Adder using Transistors d. Digitizing Signals from Electronic Stringed Equipment e. Auto Routing Car f. Home Alarm System g. Imitating FANUC Robotic ArmThis course is a study of the principles and applications of digital logic circuits including number systems;logic gates; counters; shift registers; sequential and combinational logic circuits; and laboratory experiencesthat consist of experimental problems. The Engineering Technology programs generally assess the criteriondescription—at least 80% of the students will perform at
create creativereal-world solutions that actually make them feel more like engineers.Limitations This study was conducted at a single research-intensive, engineering-intensive universityin the Midwest. Utilizing only one institution limits the ability for these finding to begeneralizable across all engineers or across all universities. Including more sites can allowresearchers to explore patterns among geographic locations, engineering sub-disciplines andinstitutions with more or less emphasis in the STEM disciplines. Finally, this study, which is partof a larger study, explores data provided by students during one interview. We call for researchdesigns that are more longitudinal to better assess how students’ engineering identity
Cristobal, G. Diaz, M. Castro, W. Kulesza, I. Gustavsson, K. Nillsson, A. Fidalgo, G. Alves, A. Marques, U. Hernandez-Jayo, J. Garcia-Zubia and C. Kreiter, "Experimenting in PILAR federation: A common path for the future," in 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), IEEE, 2018.[7] I. Gustavsson, K. Nilsson, J. Zackrisson, J. Garcia-Zubia, U. Hernandez-Jayo, A. Nafalski, Z. Nedic, O. Gol, J. Machotka, M. Pettersson, T. Lago and L. Hakansson, "On Objectives of Instructional Laboratories, Individual Assessment, and Use of Collaborative Remote Laboratories," IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 2, no. 4, 2009.[8] T. Olsson, L. Hakansson, J. Zackrisson, I. Gustavsson and H. Akesson, "A Remote
ASSESSMENTAt the completion of the ASSERT fellowship year, fellows were again interviewed individuallyby the PI and co-PI. In addition, information was gathered from the University Office ofSponsored Programs regarding their grant activity. The fellows also submitted a new NSFconflict of interest forms, and shared updated curriculum vitae. The time-stamped pre- and post-assessments have been collected. Comparative analysis indicates that ASSERT fellowssubmitted more grants, requested more funding, and were awarded more grants and funding(Table 1) and self-reported more research collaborators (Table 2). Three additional patents weremade. In 2017, fellows published 20 publications. In 2018, 19 were published and an additional19 were either in press or
data science andanalytics increased nearly six-fold from 35 to 241. By the end of 2018, the cumulative number ofmaster’s degrees awarded in these programs was approaching 20,000 [3].When new academic programs are created, libraries must determine how to assess faculty andstudent needs and provide support. In addition, libraries may need to acquire new resources anddevelop new services and tools specifically for those students. Determining how to meet theneeds of DSA is not an easy task; supporting these programs can be particularly challengingbecause of their trans-disciplinary nature and the varied subject content of the required courses.To be successful working with a DSA program, a library needs to ask questions of faculty andprogram
platforms), emerging economies development and the role of IT/communications technology, and methodologies for measurement and assessment frameworks c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Making the Case for Technical Communication Training in Ph.D. Engineering Curricula:focus on international studentsElizabeth Fife, University of Southern CaliforniaA substantial and identifiable need exists for Ph.D. engineering students to receive instruction inacademic communication genres. The importance of effective communication for individualresearchers, for the field, and for promoting the broader impact to society are all recognizedbenefits, yet opportunities for engineering students, particularly at the
universities in Nanjing. About 40% of the students came fromuniversities in other cities. In the end, 96 students completed all technical training and projectdevelopment work, and obtained a certificate of completion.To gain a deeper understanding of the impact of this Summer School, two anonymousquestionnaires were conducted. The survey given at the end of the technical training phase wasused to assess the specific content and effectiveness of particular instructors during this phaseand provide feedback for improvement. The second survey was given at the end of the closingceremony to assess the overall program. 75 students completed the final survey. Some keyresults are shown in Tables 2 and 3. Table 2 Student responses at end of
is that becausecomputational thinking processes can be viewed as goal-directed processes, it is possible to useself-regulated learning theory as a framework for assessing and enhancing computationalthinking. Secondary educators have minimal experience with teaching computational thinking inthe United States, so not only is a clear definition of computational thinking necessary in theNext Generation Science Standards, it is also necessary to have a learning theory from which tostructure this type of thinking. Finally, the study reviews growing role of computation inmathematics and science fields.Pedagogy is not solely an act of teaching, its performance embeds values, evidence,justifications, and characteristics of who we are. Teachers