Conference Session

Capstone/ET Projects III - Mechanical and Manufacturing Focus

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Wei Zhan, Texas A&M University; Byul Hur, Texas A&M University; Yonghui Wang, Prairie View A&M University; Suxia Cui, Prairie View A&M University; Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

listened to each project team’s presentation and demonstration. Bothinstructor reviewed projects and student peer reviews were conducted.Assessment The presentations at Mini-Maker events are typically more informal. The assessment ofcourse projects needs to be more rigorous. In addition to the instructor and peer review (by otherteams), peer reviews among each project team were added to the assessment. This provided away for teammates to identify the high and low performers. member 1 (name) member 2 (name) member 3 (name) evaluator (name)Team member's John Doe Your nameteam work spirit 10personal effort 8timeliness

Conference Session

Student Perceptions of Self-efficacy, Success, and Identity

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Juebei Chen, Aalborg University; Anette Kolmos, Aalborg University; Xiangyun Du, Qatar University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

ingroups and learning together, while more sensitive questions such as conflicts and difficulties instudents’ teamwork experiences are asked in individual interviews.Table 1 Sample questions of the interview protocol Descriptive questions Could you describe briefly how you collaborate with your team members to finish the projects? Questions in the dimension of performance What do you learn from this PBL and teamwork experience? How do you assess your team’s performance in completing the project? Questions in the dimension of recognition In which ways you consider yourself as a future engineer? In which ways your current study has

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University; Murat Kuzlu, Old Dominion University; Otilia Popescu, Old Dominion University; Abdul Rahman Badawi, Old Dominion University; Deborah Kay Marshall, Norfolk Public Schools; Salih Sarp, Old Dominion University; Spyridoula Tsouganatou, Old Dominion University; Petros J. Katsioloudis, Old Dominion University; Linda Vahala, Old Dominion University; Hongyi Michael Wu, Old Dominion University

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

. Department of Commerce (see Figure 1a). All high schoolsin the Norfolk Public School system have students who reside in qualified opportunity zones (theirattendance zones are given in Figure 1b). Figure 1: Qualified Opportunity Zones in Norfolk, VA [15]Norfolk Public Schools Activities in Career and Technical EducationThe work plan will develop, assess, and improve the course curriculum and hands-on activities inthe area of computer science principles with Norfolk High Schools, Old Dominion University, andindustry partners for the Career and Technical Education (CTE) program. Figure 2 illustrates theComputer Science and Cybersecurity Pathway for the CTE Logical Model. One of the ways toengage more underrepresented students in STEM

Conference Session

ECCD Technical Session 4: Energy and Analysis

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Arash Kialashaki, California State University, Chico

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

is required during the visitTo increase the effectiveness of the field trip, make sure students are attentive, and to let studentspractice report writing for an inspection, the author found it beneficial to recommend students towrite a two-page report for their trip. These reports were collected and graded as an extra-creditwork, and students were given feedback on their submitted report. VII. Assessment of Teaching EffectivenessStudents provided positive comments at the end of the semester through SET survey. A paper-based SET survey was conducted by CSU Chico Department of Institutional Research. Out of 27students enrolled in the course, 15 students participated in the SET. After gathering the student’sname and major, the survey captured

Conference Session

CPDD Session 1 - Generating Intellectual Excitement for Professional Learners

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Luke Fredette, Ohio State University; Emily Nutwell, Ohio State University; Scott Noll P.E., Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

context ofhydraulic anti-vibration products. In this case, the instructors tried to resolve the conceptdifficulty through the breaking down of emergent concepts into their constituent direct concepts.The remaining challenge was the ongoing assessment of how the individual students wereperceiving conceptual difficulty so as to be able to adapt to it, to make sure that a robustunderstanding has been achieved before moving on to emergent concepts which depend on it. Inparticular, observing the team’s internal discussions and processes working through solving theproblems was most helpful to identify any unforeseen concept difficulties, as well as offering theinformal opportunity to provide additional help.5. Reception and Response5.1 Evaluations and

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering in K-12 and the First Year

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Robert P. Hesketh, Rowan University; Martha Grover, Georgia Institute of Technology; David L. Silverstein P.E., University of Kentucky

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

expanded to chemical engineering graduates from other universities by postingweb links on sites such as Linked-In and Facebook. All of these communications contained alink to the Survey Monkey web site in which a series of questions were presented to chemicalengineers working in industry assessing their computing practices, which resulted in 413responses.The Survey Monkey software was used as the vehicle to collect and analyze the survey resultswhich allowed us to improve and update the original survey questions. For example, severalquestions were dropped that had little relevance to today’s use of computers. These includedquestions on the fraction of the day at the computer, computer usage for word processing, email,spreadsheet and presentation

Conference Session

Experimentation and Laboratory-oriented Studies Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jacob Robert Huene, Oral Roberts University; Michael Stephen Huene, Oral Roberts University; Esther Marie Spear, Oral Roberts University; Ezra Whitman Walblay, Oral Roberts University; Harley Craig, Oral Roberts University; John E Matsson, Oral Roberts University

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies

project report at the completion of the course for 15% of thegrade. The assessment of the final grade can be seen in Table 1. Table 1. Final grade assessment procedures. Section Evaluation Procedures Weekly written reports 10% Oral project defense 15% Off campus presentation 5% Draft written final report 10% Final written project report 15% Project progress 20% Individual

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: S-STEM 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Teresa J. Cutright, University of Akron; Rebecca Kuntz Willits, University of Akron

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Paper ID #28522Comparing Effectiveness of Peer Mentoring for Direct Admit andCollege-Ready FreshmenDr. Teresa J. Cutright, The University of Akron Dr. Cutright is a Professor of Civil Engineering at The University of Akron. She has a B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering with emphasis on environmental remediation techniques with over 20 years of experience conducting site assessments, soil characterizations and treatability studies for a variety of environmental contaminants. In addition she also conducts education research via an EPA education grant and a NSF Scholarships for STEM education. Most recently she

Conference Session

Curriculum Development in Technological Literacy

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

R. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

interested in engineering design education, engineering education policy, and the philosophy of engineering education.Prof. John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin John Heywood is professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College Dublin- The University of Dublin. he is a Fellow of ASEE and Life Fellow of IEEE. he is an Honorary Fellow of the Institution of Engineers Ireland. He has special interest in education for the professions and the role of professions in society. He is author of Engineering Education. Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction; The Assessment of Learning in Engineering Education; The Human Side of Engineering, and Empowering Professional Teaching in Engineering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Workforce Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma; Andrea L'Afflitto, Virginia Tech; Wei Sun, University of Oklahoma; Jiyoon Lee, Rose State College; Steven L. Fowler, Rose State College; Wayne Jones, Rose State College

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

, Tinker AFB, OK 1980 – 1991 Engineering Chief, Computer Resources Division, Tinker AFB, OK 1974 – 1980 Project Engineer (Boeing, Honeywell, Motorola) Wichita KS and Phoenix AZr PRODUCTS Jones, Wayne, 2009, Project Risk Assessment – Fuzzy Logic Approach, VDM Verlag Dr. Muller Aktiengesellschaft & Co. Jones, Wayne, 2001, PhD Dissertation, Identifying Cost, Schedule, and Performance Risks in Project Planning and Control – A Fuzzy Logic Approach, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma Jones, Wayne, 1977, MS Thesis, Honeywell Super Computer (H6000) Remote I/O Interface Design, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 1977 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020

Conference Session

Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jerry Lynn Dahlberg Jr, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Jae Hoon Lim, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Peter Thomas Tkacik, University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Military and Veterans

increasenon-veteran engineering students’ knowledge base and professional interest in military scienceand technology careers. This paper presents the successful outcomes of a three-year longcurriculum development and implementation undertaken by the team of engineering andeducation professors and student veterans. The class focuses on experiential learning to engagethe undergraduate engineering students for a wide variety of topics introduced in other classes.The topics for the class are presented here along with the course learning objectives, qualitativeand quantitative assessment methods and results.IntroductionThis paper discusses the development of a veteran friendly, “Military Technology andInstrumentation” Mechanical Engineering course. Higher

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 17

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Allison Antink-Meyer, Illinois State University; Ryan A. Brown, Illinois State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

illustration). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used with principal 6 4.054 components analysis (PCA) and the varimax orthogonal rotation method to determine whetherEducationGraduate student in STEM these scores loaded onto latent factors together. Although we wished to find that the features and 2 1.351discipline sub-features were correlated, the purpose of the study was to provide a rigorous assessment ofEngineer

Conference Session

The Best of First-year Programs Division

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Chao Wang, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

presentation and a live demonstration of their projectprototype.Methodology and Experimental SetupThe open-ended design projects were deployed in four Introduction to Engineering sections ofabout 40 students each in the fall semester of 2019. All four sections were taught by the sameinstructor. All course materials and assessment were kept the same for all sections except thateach section was given a different project theme. The goal is to see if the restrictions on scopeand/or materials would have any impact on student motivation. There were 140 students in totalwho consented to participate in the research study.To test different open-ended design projects with varying degree of autonomy, different projectthemes were created. The common requirement

Conference Session

Engagement in Practice: Engaging the Community through Educational Outreach

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mariam Manuel, University of Houston; Ricky P. Greer, University of Houston; Jerrod A Henderson, University of Houston (CoE & CoT); Virginia Snodgrass Rangel Rangel, University of Houston

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

Mentoring (SEM)Problem StatementThe declining levels of U.S. student achievement in mathematics and science were brought intofocus by the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, which stated that theU.S., especially at the elementary and secondary levels, is struggling to remain competitive withother nations in STEM education (PCAST, 2010). Furthermore, according to a report issued bythe National Assessment of Educational Progress (NCES, 2015), less than 30 percent of studentsenrolled in the U.S. are proficient in the areas of science or mathematics. The landscape becomesmore troubling when one considers mathematics and science performance among students whotraditionally are underrepresented (UR) in science, technology

Conference Session

Experiences in Manufacturing Engineering Education

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Muhammad Pervej Jahan, Miami University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

, explaining why the design is notergonomic, and offering possible solution(s) to make the design/part ergonomic. Besidesengaging the students, the assignments allowed the instructor to directly assess students’learning of the concepts from the theory lectures. The students found the assignmentsinteresting and were more engaged to the topic as those ergonomic examples relate totheir daily life. The enthusiasm and interests of the students in those exercises werereflected in the course evaluation as well. It can be concluded that the exercises engagedstudents more intensively in the course and helped them to understand the applications ofergonomics. Finally, the assignments and final term paper/case study helped to achieveseveral learning outcomes

Conference Session

Program Evaluation Studies

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ayman Ali; Yusuf A. Mehta, Rowan University; Shivani D Patel, New Jersey Department of Transportation

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

will be presented. To fulfillthese goals, faculty from the Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) department and Center forResearch and Education in Advanced Transportation Engineering Systems (CREATEs) at RowanUniversity prepared a comprehensive academic and enhancement curriculum. This curriculumincluded a variety of activities that aimed to introduce three modes of transportation (i.e., air, land, andwater) along with relevant safety concepts to high school students. To assess the degree to which thegoals of the program were achieved, several evaluation forms were prepared and distributed to theparticipating students on daily activities, field-trips, and end of the program evaluation. Based on theanalysis of the evaluation forms, it was

Conference Session

Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 2: Veteran Identity & Inclusion

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Douglas Moore Schutz, Tokyo University of Science; Yong-Young Kim P.E., Konkuk University; Dante Dionne, Korean Air

Tagged Divisions

Military and Veterans

support for hypotheses H1 and H2. This means that the number of online graduates,followed by the number of fulltime faculty, lead to higher student veteran enrollment. Thesefindings based on the testing of our research model can be applied by engineering schools forassessing their own online engineering program veteran student recruiting strategies. We nextdiscuss implications and future research.One outlier was removed and there is independence of residuals, as assessed by a Durbin-Watsonstatistic of 1.910. Partial regression plots show a linear relationship that is also homoscedastic.Correlation coefficients and Tolerance/VIF values revealed no model collinearity issues.The residuals are normally distributed as assessed by P-P Plot.Implications

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mourya Reddy Narasareddy Gari, North Dakota State University; Gursimran Singh Walia; Alex David Radermacher, North Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

Engineering. Asystematic literature review is a means of assessing and interpreting all the accessibleresearch applied to a specific research question, area of interest. The following steps wereimplemented in accordance with the guidelines for a systematic literature review establishedby Kitchenham and Charters [7].Step: 1: Research Questions:The aim of this paper is to identify and evaluate the usefulness of gamification elementsmost commonly used in CS and SE courses on student learning. To do this we formulatedthree research questions: RQ1: What are the most commonly used gamification elements in CS and SE courses? RQ2: What is the evidence for the benefits of these gamification elements on student learning? RQ3: How can answers to

Conference Session

Humanitarian and Sustainability in a Global Engineering Context

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael F MacCarthy, Mercer University; Holly F. Berns, Mercer University ; Ryan Monty, United Nations Humanitarian Response Depot; Mitzi Erin Brett; Zachary Lewis Martin; Pietro Sannipoli, United Nations Humanitarian Response Depot; Nicolas Jerome Messmer; Walid Ibrahim; Scott Schultz, Mercer University; Katelyn C.N. Dimopoulos, Mercer University

Tagged Divisions

International

allowed her to be involved in numerous lab projects while also acting as theliaison between other UNHRD staff and MUSE faculty and students for the development ofresearch and design projects. She was also instrumental in setting up future internships forMercer engineering students. Near the end of her 9-month internship, in June 2016, 3 Mercerfaculty members visited WFP headquarters in Rome and UNHRD-Brindisi (Figure 2) to workwith the lab team, assessing how the partnership had progressed and planning activities for theupcoming year.Figure 2: Mercer-UNHRD 2015-2016 intern leads Mercer faculty and UNHRD staff on a tour of humanitarian products displayed at UNHRD-Brindisi.2016-2017. The first MUSE-UNHRD Senior Design project officially

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division - Visualization and Mathematics

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ashish Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Moshe Kam P.E., New Jersey Institute of Technology; Edwin Hou, New Jersey Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs, Mathematics

next course in their mathematics sequence during the subsequent fall semester. In thethree years that the boot camp has been offered, a total of 91 students caught up in theirmathematics sequence by one course. Tables 4 and 5 show a further break-down of theperformance by each of the two pre-calculus courses. There is not much difference that separatesthe results for MATH108 and MATH110.In the summer of 2015 the Pre-Calculus Summer Boot Camp completed its first program cycle.An assessment plan was designed and students were tagged in order to carefully assess whetherand to what extent the boot camp was successful in helping students. In the 2015 program, 48students enrolled in one of the pre-calculus courses with 4 of those students later

Conference Session

Practice III: Multimedia Learning

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shamima Mithun, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis; Nancy Evans, Indiana University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

daily in-class processes. As a result, classroom time was utilized forprogramming activities instead of traditional theoretical lectures. Lectures were moved outside ofthe classroom through video lectures to be viewed prior to class attendance with a short recap ofthe video lectures provided in class before beginning the programming activities. Furthermore,students were also quizzed on the video lectures to promote watching the video lectures and for abaseline assessment of their understanding of content prior to class.In this project, the faculty member taught two sections of the introductory programming course(CIT 14000) in the Fall 2015 semester using a traditional lecture-based teaching approach and twosections of the same course in the

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division: Retention

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maryam Darbeheshti, University of Colorado, Denver; Dakota Ryan Edmonds, University of Colorado, Denver

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

: Various data and information were collected from the students to assess the program’soverall progress and success. The components assessed were course ratings, student enrollmentafter the first semester, student retention in engineering/ pre-engineering, and how the studentsdid in their math courses. The survey results for the FCQ Survey and the FYE Survey for the2016 ELC and the 2017 ELC are listed in Table 1. The FCQ values are ranked from a scale of 1to 6 and the FYE Surveys are on a 1 to 5 scale. An important consideration in looking at thesesurvey results is the change in the survey format from paper in 2016, to an online format in 2017.This greatly affected the response rate, which was significantly higher for the 2016 ELC. Theresponse

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohsen Sarraf, University of New Haven; Bijan Karimi, University of New Haven; Ali Golbazi, University of New Haven; Arthur Lizotte, Keysight Technologies, Inc.

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

summer a small group of graduate students, with the guidance of a senior faculty member,used the IoT board to assess its efficacy for less experienced engineering students. The board andthe associated experiments were found to be very useful and a good addition to the program. Theexperiments are also valuable for continuing education purposes for developing specific skills inthe development of IoT systems. The team created an updated and tailored user’s manual [3] tobetter serve the needs of the engineering students and to alleviate the initial frustration associatedwith setting up the system.Many institutions have already offered and are offering courses in the IoT field [4 – 7]. This isnot only because IoT is a rapidly growing field but also

Conference Session

Scaling class size and technology – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven S Holland, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Jennifer L Bonniwell, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Joshua David Carl, Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

and assessing outcomes.2.2 Instructor 1After finishing graduate school, I worked for two years at a not-for-profit Federally Funded Re-search and Development Center (FFRDC), performing applied research for several US governmentorganizations. In this position I kept a bound, handwritten logbook that was primarily of personaluse (was not required). Instead, most project documentation was done through electronic technicalreports. In 2013, I transitioned into engineering education and joined the electrical engineeringprogram at MSOE. This academic year marks my fifth year of teaching. For my first two yearsI primarily used bound paper logbooks in my courses. This was typical of most courses at thetime, and students were issued standard laptops

Conference Session

International Collaborations

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mitchell L. Springer, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

International

, Speer, Ekeocha, Byrn & Clase [1], previously documented many of theconsiderations for program content, duration, format and administration. A brief summary ofthis paper, predominantly focused on curriculum design and development is described below.The collaboration of the Purdue University Biotechnology Innovation and Regulatory Scienceprogram with the Kilimanjaro School of Pharmacy is helping to provide good regulatorypractices in Africa. This prompted the need to perform benchmarking activities comparing andcontrasting the University’s program to both domestic and international certifications anddegrees.The methodology employed to assess the potential list of resources was to make an exhaustivelist (as possible, since higher education is

Conference Session

College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Reg Recayi Pecen, Sam Houston State University; Faruk Yildiz, Sam Houston State University; Iftekhar Ibne Basith, Sam Houston State University; Matt Albrecht, Quanta Services

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships

course assessments and instructions were shared among SHSUcourse instructor and Quanta mentors. Some of the course details are summarized on Table 2below. Summer 2018 course format and highlights will be similar to Table 2 with the addition oftwo new QS OpU’s participating, Quanta Telecom Services, and MG Dyess Company. Table 2. Minimester course format and highlights (Summer I, 2017)Course Format Course Highlights • Classroom instruction • Co-led by a XYSU Professor and three Quanta • Hands-on and LQR activities Operating Unit Mentors from Dashiell, NHPL, and • Team case project based on real QS QPSE projects

Conference Session

Energy Conversion and Conservation Division Technical Session on Conservation and Optimization

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David C. Zietlow, Bradley University; John Sullivan

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

experiential learningbecause most of assignment 3 included material for which there was no experiential learning orvideo. A question on the final exam however showed that Joule’s experiment was wellunderstood with a score of 92% [n=9]. For assignment 7 the experiential learning included ademonstration of the components that were evaluated in the problems. For example a cut-awayof a compressor using a working piston and cylinder was presented and circulated among thestudents. Finally an assessment of student perceptions about the value of the demonstration of theair conditioning trainer was conducted in the Spring of 2018. Out of the 29 students whoresponded to the assessment:  93% agreed or strongly agreed that the trainer helped

Conference Session

Modeling, Inquiry, Engineering Literacy & Argumentation

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Wilson-Lopez, Utah State University; Christina Marie Sias, Utah State University; Ashley R. Strong; Jared W. Garlick, Utah State University; Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University; Jorge Americo Acosta Feliz, Utah State University; Sandra Weingart

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

, K. (2017). Using climate change scenarios to assess high school students’ argumentation skills. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35, 1-16.Downey, G. L. (1998). The machine in me: An anthropologist sits among computer engineers. New York: Routledge.Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers College Press.Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y., & Park, J.-Y. (2015). Research trends on argumentation in science education: A journal content analysis from 1998-2014. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(5), 1-12. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186%2Fs40594-015-0020-1.pdfGainsburg, J., Fox, J

Conference Session

International Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jiaojiao Fu, Beihang University; Deborah M. Grzybowski, Ohio State University; Qing Lei, Beihang University; Dongya Cheng, Tibet University

Tagged Divisions

International

, it was found that many variationsof honors programs have been developed for engineering students, including HonorsPrograms, Scholars Programs, and the Engineering Experimental Classes. These honorsprograms for engineering students are called “engineering honors education/programs” in thispaper.Previous research on the introduction, practice, experience and assessment of engineeringhonors programs has provided a foundation for this study. However, growing internationalcooperation and competition has increased the globalization of engineering. Students need tounderstand differences and similarities in the diversified engineering educational systems. Inaddition, administrators and faculty also need to understand these differences and

Conference Session

Educational & Professional Issues of Strategic Importance to the Civil Engineering Profession and ASCE II

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Horst Brandes P.E., University of Hawaii; Joe D. Manous Jr, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Kenneth J. Fridley, University of Alabama

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

of specific knowledge and skills outcomes, in terms of hierarchical levels ofachievements, which can be assessed consistently and effectively. Bloom’s taxonomy identifiesthree distinct domains: the cognitive domain, which emphasizes the recognition, recall andprocessing of cognitive knowledge; the affective domain, which relates to the way in whichindividuals react emotionally; and the psychomotor domain, which describes physical ability tomanipulate a tool or an instrument. A revised Bloom’s taxonomy was proposed more recently[16] with a somewhat more dynamic concept of classification. After research and deliberation,both civil engineering bodies of knowledge decided to stick with the original Bloom’s taxonomyfor reasons of continuity