engineering pan-engineering profession BOK Discipline-specific BOK effortsFigure 1. NSPE’s development of the EBOK was motivated by three forces. Page 24.945.3 2 Support NSPE’s Vision, Mission, and ValuesThe National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) EBOK initiative was undertakenin support of the Society’s vision, mission, and values. The Vision4 of the NSPE is to be“the recognized voice and advocate of licensed Professional Engineers.” In
. Considering how these specific negotiative practices play into the technical-artisticproduction of a performance, I found that the Dramatists engage in practices that challengetechnical rationality and make use of novel democratic organizational structures. Furthermore, I 2found that key contested figure at the site is that of in/authenticity in identities and practices. Inthis paper, I capture and substantiate these initial themes and present them as starting points forfurther study of queer students in STEM.The purpose of this pilot study is to give voice to queer students and their unique perspectives ontechnical work. It will serve as a basis for future research among queer engineering and
engineering academic advisor for the past ten years. He is currently finishing his dissertation in Curriculum and Instruction.Yan Wang, University of South Florida She is a doctoral student in the Educational Measurement and Research program at USF. Her research interests include the application of statistical methods to the analysis of educational data, test/instrument development, and psychometrics. She received her M.Ed. in Curriculum and Instruction at Boston Col- lege.Mrs. Michelle King, University of South Florida College of Engineering Michelle King has 15 years working in higher education. She is a user applications specialist, specializing in university student information systems and has been dubbed the College
AC 2009-1862: “ENGINEERS WHO HAPPEN TO BE GAY”: LESBIAN, GAY, ANDBISEXUAL STUDENTS’ EXPERIENCES IN ENGINEERINGErin Cech, University of California, San Diego Erin Cech is a doctoral student in Sociology at the University of California, San Diego and received bachelor's degrees in Electrical Engineering and Sociology from Montana State University. Her research examines the role of gender schemas in the reproduction of labor market gender inequality, the intersection of technology and social justice, and inequalities in science and engineering.Tom Waidzunas, University of California, San Diego Tom Waidzunas is a doctoral student in Sociology and Science Studies at the University of
Paper ID #37427Comparing labs before, during, and after COVID in aMeasurements and Analysis CourseBridget M. Smyser (Teaching Professor) Bridget Smyser is a Teaching Professor in the Mechanical & Industrial Engineering department at Northeastern University. She holds a BS in Chemistry from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Her research interests include capstone design and lab pedagogy, , effective methods to teach technical communication, and integrating diversity, equity, and inclusion concepts into engineering
can be applied to solving real-world problems. The importance ofthese experiences then stimulates the following questions: Why wait until the senior year to implementengineering design? Why not introduce design earlier in engineering curricula? These questions led to a major research thrust area within SUCCEED, an NSF-sponsored engineeringeducation coalition composed of eight state-supported universities in the Southeastern United States.SUCCEED’s mission is to develop “Curriculum 21,” a comprehensive redesign of undergraduate engineeringeducation for the 21st century. As one of four topical centers within SUCCEED, the Center for EngineeringPractice has a mission to “support engineering research and program activity that focuses on
Paper ID #17752Chemical Engineering Student Perceptions of Communication Developmentfrom Participation in Game-Based ActivitiesAbigail Jane Kulhanek Abigail Kulhanek is an undergraduate student studying Chemical Engineering at the University of Pitts- burgh.Dr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learn- ing techniques in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering
(focused) schools or are designated a STEM school. In SouthCarolina, a number of elementary and middle schools have been designated a STEM school.These schools seek out annual field trips to allow their students to have firsthand STEM Page 26.1395.2experiences such as laboratory experiences within college level courses, aquariums, architecturalfirms, research labs, and manufacturing companies to mention a few.Gifted and talented Fourth and Fifth Grade students from Richland School District 2 schoolshave been conducting a field study (ALERT)2 at The Citadel every other year. Recently, the offyear visit is with an architectural firm at the school and
Course Modification Team, chair for the LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee, supervisor of the LTU Thermo-Fluids Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, and faculty advisor of the LTU SAE Aero Design Team.Dr. Donald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University Donald D. Carpenter, PhD, PE, LEED AP is Professor of Civil Engineering at Lawrence Technological University where he teaches courses on ethics/professionalism and water resources. Dr. Carpenter has served as the University Director of Assessment and the founding Director of the Center for Teaching and Learning. He conducts funded pedagogical research and development projects, has published numerous engineering education
-technical audiences are too significant to ignore. In this time of ongoing discord betweenscientists, policymakers, and the public, the ways in which scientists communicate with thoseoutside of their profession is critical to improving scientific literacy [14], [15]. As Chan [16]argues, “In order for the lay public to shape an informed opinion of scientific discoveries andcontroversial developments, it is critical that scientists can communicate about research and theimplications of that research to promote awareness, clarity, as well as to respond to publicconcerns. These are the abilities that are lacking amongst many new science graduates.”Currently, there is a dearth of research regarding undergraduate students’ creative explanationsin their
Sun is an associate professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at University of Massachusetts Lowell (UML). He graduated with a Ph. D. from Institute of Engineering Thermophysics at Chinese Academy of Science in 1998. Prior to joining UML in 2005, he worked as a postdoctoral researcher at University of Rhode Island (URI) and later a research scientist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). His research interests are in the areas of Power Microelectromechanical systems Page 23.80.1 (Power MEMS), MEMS acoustic sensors, and microscale cooling systems. His other interests are in micro/nano
to help the freshman cope with academic failure. This paper discusses anapproach to address the emotional issues that the freshmen students endure due to theiracademic failure. It was determined through this research that the freshmen engineeringstudents must adjust their unrealistic, preconceived academic expectations transferred from highschool, as well as accept academic failure and learn to react in a positive manner to theirclassroom performance.Index Terms ℵ Freshman Retention, Academic failure.INTRODUCTIONNumerous studies document the importance of educating new students about their new academicsetting [1 - 5]. Indeed, helping students anticipate and understand life changes can help theuniversity realize a significantly higher first
sabbaticals (2001-2002 and 2008-2009) with the Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM and has served as consultant to Sandia’s Microsystems Science, Technology & Components Division since 2001. His major research interest in the oil and gas industry is telemetry of borehole sensor data to the surface during drilling, com- pletions, and production. Dr. Stalford’s broad area of research is in microsystems and nanotechnology, seeking new and novel solutions to challenging oil and gas problems. His work with Sandia has focusing on designing, fabricating, testing and characterizing various micro/nanotechnology systems that includes Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), tunable MEMS devices, RF nanotechnology
students, the objectives provide a logical and coherent framework for the course and helps attract those that desire to enroll in it.(15) 2) The Course Syllabus: The syllabus should provide, step by step detailed information, on how to achieve course instructional objectives. It should clearly communicate the course goals, list the subject matter to be covered in an orderly fashion with time allotted for each heading, list the textbook(s) and supplementary reference material, spell out the applicable grading policy, and address other course matters such as: lab work, recitation, field trips, and research papers. It should also list the instructor’s contact information and office hours, and should also provide
of success. ASEE Prism, 7: 24-29, 1997.Olina, Z., Sullivan, H.J. Effects of classroom evaluation strategies on student achievement and attitudes.Educational Technol. Research a Develop. 50(3): 61-75 2002. Page 8.1033.13Proctor, S., Seagrave, D. Re-Engineering Engineering Education: Chemical Engineering and ABET EC 2000.Chemical Engineering Education 33(2): 104-115, 1999.“Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”Wolf, A, Cumming, JJ, “The inside story: the reality of developing an assessment instrument
AC 2011-2252: A PEN-BASED STATICS TUTORING SYSTEMChia-Keng Lee, University of California at Riverside Chia-Keng Lee received his Bachelor’s in Computer Science at the University of Texas at Austin in 2005. He is currently a Master’s student in Mechanical Engineering at the University of California at Riverside.Thomas Stahovich, University of California, Riverside Dr. Stahovich received his B.S in Mechanical Engineering from UC Berkeley in 1988. He received his S.M. and Ph.D. from MIT in 1990 and 1995 respectively. He conducted his doctoral research at the MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab. After serving as an Assistant and Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, PA
learning environment. Where is the future researcher nurtured initially? - In theclassroom. The professor constantly must consider the intellectual and emotional objectives thatcan be accomplished in class.15 Table 3. Schedule Course In Proper Classroom Peer Self Student • Big room (+) allows for • I like at least 10 black • I like when we work in demonstrations and lab board sections (no small groups in class exercises to be set up erasing) to cover most (by circling up desks). right in the back of the material in a lesson. room. • I want a place in
Session 2793 Active/Cooperative Learning: A Discipline-Specific Resource for Engineering Education Susan Ledlow, Janel White-Taylor, and D. L. Evans Arizona State University Center for Learning and Teaching Excellence/Center for Research on Education in Science, Math, Engineering and TechnologyIntroductionWhile general information on the use of active/cooperative learning (A/CL) in higher educationis increasing, discipline-specific resources, especially materials for science, technology
without Borders. Professor Lamancusa received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering, with a minor in electrical and computer engineering, from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1982. Dr. Lamancusa earned his B.S. in mechanical engineering from the Uni- versity of Dayton in 1978. Professor Lamancusa is a past Vice President of the Board of Directors for the American Society of Engineering Education, a Research Fellow of the Humboldt Foundation and a registered professional engineer. He was awarded the 2006 Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering Education by the National Academy of Engineering, and the Joel Spira Outstanding Educator Award by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. He is a Fellow of the
. Camba, Purdue University Jorge D. Camba is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Technology at Purdue University in West Lafayette, IN.Angshuman Mazumdar, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Angshuman Mazumdar is a current Ph.D. student in the department of Computer Graphics Technology, at Purdue University (West Lafayette, IN). His research focus is on agent-based simulation, video game simulation and design, and virtual reality simulation and design. He obtained his M.S. in Computer Graphics from Purdue University, and has a Bachelor of Technology in Electronics Engineering from Vellore Institute of Technology, India.John Koellisch, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI
Session 1739 INCLUSIVE LEARNING COMMUNITIES: THE EXPERIENCE OF THE NSF FOUNDATION COALITION M. Carolyn Clark, Jackie Revuelto, Dianne Kraft, and Paulette Beatty Texas A&M UniversityIn 1993, the National Science Foundation (NSF) Engineering Education Coalitionsprogram funded the fifth engineering education coalition nationally, the FoundationCoalition (FC). Within the broad mandate of the NSF program, this new coalition ofhigher education institutions was to explore, experiment with, and initiate a series ofbroad-based reforms within their undergraduate programs, to change the complexion ofengineering
Paper ID #16428Help Me Help You: Educational Value, Perceived Usefulness, and Creativityof Student-generated Course Review MaterialLt. Col. Jakob C Bruhl P.E., U.S. Military Academy Lieutenant Colonel Jakob Bruhl is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, NY. He received his B.S. from Rose- Hulman Institute of Technology, M.S. Degrees from the University of Missouri at Rolla and the University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign, and Ph.D. from Purdue University. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Missouri. His research interests
Assistant Professor in the Department of Bioengineering at Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU). She earned a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) in 2004 with the Rensselaer Medal award and as a member of the inaugural class of Gates Mil- lennium Scholars. In 2011, she earned a Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Rice University. Before joining FGCU in 2015, she was a visiting Assistant Professor of Biotechnology in the Division of Science and Technology at the United International College (UIC) in Zhuhai China. She has been exploring and applying evidence-based strategies for instruction since her training with ASCE’s Excellence in Civil En- gineering Education (ExCEEd) initiative in 2016
worksheets completed inclass with instructor initials indicating completion (designated worksheets are submitted forevaluation), simulation, and laboratory reports. The in-class worksheets form a crucialcomponent of student learning. These worksheets are filled out live as the lecture and classactivities progress. It involves both individual work and group participation requiring students tosketch, calculate, troubleshoot scenarios, research prompts online, update diagrams, and expressideas graphically as well as textually. This active engagement in the learning process allowsstudents to develop "muscle memory" allowing the sketching of network systems, performhousekeeping tasks regarding router and switch setup using the
. This can be done as a percentage of the target or as a percentage of thedifference between the target and an initial baseline.One of the critical results obtained from the Objective Evaluation Matrix is the overall evaluationlevel. Column seven shows the objective evaluation level, which is the sum of the products of theevaluation level and the method importance for each objective. While the evaluation levelrecords how well the particular metric is attained, the objective evaluation level records howclose we are to achieving each objective on a percentage basis. The last row of the matrix,entitled “Total Evaluation,” shows the total evaluation for all of the objectives. This is the sumof the products of the individual objective evaluation
AC 2012-3554: CONTINUED ASSESSMENT OF INFORMATION TECH-NOLOGY SOFTWARE INTEGRATION IN A CIVIL ENGINEERING PRO-GRAMMajor Jason Allen Toth, U.S. Military Academy Jason Toth is an Instructor in the Civil Engineering Department at the United States Military Academy, West Point, NY. He received his B.S. from the U.S. Military Academy; M.S. from University of Missouri, Rolla, MO and M.S. from Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA. He is an active member of ASEE and is a registered Professional Engineer in Missouri. His research interests include engineering education, development of social responsibility in engineers through Learning Through Service opportunities, and developing world infrastructure assessment and design
AC 2012-4827: REVAMPING DELTA DESIGN FOR INTRODUCTORY ME-CHANICSMs. Michelle Marie Grau, Stanford Univeristy Michelle Grau is a junior in mechanical engineering at Stanford University, and was one of the students in the first revision of ENGR 14, Introduction to Solid Mechanics. Her research interests include engineering education, robotics in space applications, and using robots to introduce engineering to middle school students. She is passionate about the FIRST Robotics program, in which she coaches teams and volunteers at competitions. She also does wushu and gymnastics.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of mechanical engineering at Stanford University. Besides
is to be left in what to be leftout; why the traditionalist’s first question in response to your proposal to integrate designexercises into the engineering mechanics course is “...what are you going to leave out?” Not tosay that something is not left out; it is a matter of objectives and priorities. Nick Salamon reportshow in order to make room for design in their mechanics course at Penn State, faculty decided toleave out Mohr’s circle for strain and energy methods.In an open exercise, where student initiative is encouraged, indeed, required, what is important tothe task is not clear from the start; it is the responsibility of the student, in part, to figure out whatis important, what is significant, what can be neglected, what analysis
Paper ID #44277Connecting Machine Design Concepts via an Undergraduate Forensic EngineeringActivityDr. Amanda Sterling, Auburn University Dr. Amanda Sterling is a mechanical engineer at Auburn University who specializes in engineering design, additive manufacturing, and biomechanics through research, teaching, and innovation. She has published articles on the microstructure and fatigue of additive metals, providing insights into advanced engineering materials. Her research leverages additive manufacturing to design corrective quadruped orthotics, blending art and mechanical design. ©American
deficiencies and fulfill our roles as engineering design educators? In this paper, we answer these questions based upon a new approach for teachingengineering design methods [43], that of product evolution or redesign. As with any designproblem, redesign includes the process steps of understanding customer needs, specificationplanning and development, benchmarking, concept generation, product embodiment, design formanufacturing, prototype construction and testing, and production. Yet, redesign also focuses onan additional and critical step, referred to here as reverse engineering [43; 53]. Reverseengineering initiates the redesign process wherein a product is predicted, observed, disassembled,analyzed, tested, “experienced,” and documented in