achieve carbon structural adjustment. Page 25.202.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Applying Threshold Learning Theory to teach Sustainable Business Practice in Post-Graduate Engineering EducationAbstractThis paper presents the results of a qualitative action-research inquiry into how a highlydiverse cohort of post-graduate students could develop significant capacity in sustainabledevelopment within a single unit (course), in this case a compulsory component of four builtenvironment masters programs. The method comprised applying threshold learning theorywithin the technical
instructional design – “hybrid” in the sensethat students are provided with both depth and breadth learning experiences – can capitalize onthe strengths of both approaches to provide students an optimal design education experience.This paper will report the effectiveness of this instructional design in students internalizing andsubsequently owning key concepts and practices of the engineering design process. The class isorganized in two parts: a “design boot camp” in which students are involved in designchallenges from the first day of class for the first half of the semester, and an in-depth challengeduring the second half. The design boot camp is structured along the lines of the engineeringdesign process; student teams iterate through the cycle of
build on students' knowledge ofscientific phenomena and direct it toward its use in engineering applications. In this research, teachingand learning materials and activities have been remodeled by use of feedback from assessment resultson a regular basis in order to enhance students' conceptual change for more effective learning. Here,we report on the research question, "How can instructional materials be modified and adjusted topromote conceptual change by using formative and summative assessment in an introductory materialsclass?" A socio-constructivist pedagogy with learning by conceptual change frames the discussion andanalysis of results of this research-to-practice teaching and learning paper. Information from amaterials concept inventory
American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Strategies and Tools for Engaging and Assessing Students with Cyber Learning by Interactive Frequent Formative Feedback (CLIFF) in Core Materials ClassesAbstractIn this paper we are first reporting on the effects on student attitude, learning, and persistence ofan active learning project, Just-in-Time-Teaching with Interactive Learning (JiTTIL). We willthen discuss how the associated strategies and tools used in the JiTTIL project will be adapted toan interactive cyber-enabled web environment. In the web environment real-time data on studentunderstanding can be collected in the classroom followed by fast formative feedback to studentsto
Session 3220 Engineering Theory and Practice via a Web-Link C. Gregory Jensen, E. Max Raisor Mechanical Engineering Brigham Young University Provo, UtahAbstractMaintaining ABET accredited engineering programs requires hands-on laboratory experiences inaddition to course instruction and theory. This paper presents some essential points to consider,and some “traps” to avoid, as digital (Semester on Line and Independent Study--DistanceLearning) courseware is developed with laboratory elements that require
department-supported teaching methodologies, and for reviewing theprocess itself on a regularly scheduled basis.Phase IV - Action Planning - A schedule was produced for planning and tracking the process.The purpose of this paper is to give a step-by-step explanation of the process that was followedand examples that clearly illustrate the results. As other institutions over the next six yearsembark on their journey to address the same issues, this paper could become a helpful reference.II. IME Department QFD ProjectPhase I – The Voice of the Customer - The Industrial and Manufacturing EngineeringDepartment recognizes a number of constituencies or “customers” that need to be considered inall curriculum, scheduling, and program related decisions
with the submission, grading, distribution of help, and management of theactivity in the classroom creates problems for both students and instructors. In response to thesedifficulties, we have designed and developed the Reflective Learner, an electronic environmentthat supports and facilitates the learning essay writing activity. Students write their essays in theenvironment. The environment keeps track of the essays as well as provide several forms ofsupport designed to address the student problems. Instructors can define essay assignments andgrade submitted essays in the environment. In this paper, we describe the environment andpresent some findings from a formative evaluation during the 1996-1997 academic year.1. THE ROLE OF REFLECTION AND
Session 2263 A Multimedia Application for Teaching Design for Manufacturing Brian Riggs*, Corrado Poli*, and Beverly Woolf** *Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering **Department of Computer Science University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst, MA 01003 {poli}@ecs.umass.edu, bev@cs.umass.edu AbstractThis paper describes the development process and requirements of a multimedia engineeringtutor as well as the specific development of a multimedia
Session 3257 Planning for Curriculum Renewal and Accreditation Under ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 Michael S. Leonard, Donald E. Beasley, Katherine E. Scales, Clemson University and D. Jack Elzinga University of FloridaAbstractThis paper presents a set of integrated methodologies for the enhancement of engineeringacademic programs and for preparation for accreditation review under ABET EngineeringCriteria 2000. The Curriculum Renewal Methodology builds on a
Paper ID #44230Board 214: Building an Understanding of Black Families’ Engineering, Design,and Inventive PracticesEmmanuella Obiageli Ejichukwu, University of Michigan, DearbornDeLean Tolbert Smith, University of Michigan, Dearborn DeLean Tolbert Smith is an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering at the University of Michigan-Dearborn. Her work intersects research on Black families, design research, and informal learning settings.Hanadi Matar, University of Michigan, Dearborn ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Building an Understanding of Black
Paper ID #43876Transfer Students’ Experiences, Identity Development, and Outcomes in EngineeringTechnology Programs: A ReviewMs. Ibarre Araojo, Wayne State University Ibarre Araojo is a dedicated Graduate Research Assistant with a specialized focus in Sociology, emphasizing the exploration of the nexus between student performance, retention rates, experiences, and goals, particularly among minority groups. Leveraging a rich background in Information Technology and Education, Araojo undertakes extensive literature reviews to deepen our understanding of these pivotal areas. Armed with a Bachelor of Science in Information
Paper ID #43282Students’ Use of The Engineering Design Process to Learn Science (Fundamental)Mr. Diallo Wallace, Purdue University Diallo Wallace is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Purdue University focusing on the benefits of integration of physics first and engineering curriculums for student self-efficacy in engineering. Diallo holds a Bachelor of Science in Electronics Engineering and a Bachelor of Arts in Mathematics from the University of Illinois. At the graduate level, he has attained a Master of Science in Astronautical Engineering from the Naval Postgraduate School and a Master of Project
A New Approach for an Undergraduate Mechanics of Materials Course that Integrates Theory, Analysis, Verification and Design Joseph J. Rencis, Hartley T. Grandin, Jr. Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Arkansas/Worcester Polytechnic InstituteAbstract This paper presents a description of a first undergraduate course in mechanics ofmaterials. Although many of the features of this course have been used by other faculty andpresented formally in textbooks, the authors believe they have united them in a way thatproduces a course that is unique and innovative. The title of the paper includes Theory,Analysis, Verification and Design to
Paper ID #44537Comparative Study of Digital Electronics Learning: Using PCB versus TraditionalMethods in an Experiment-Centered Pedagogy (ECP) Approach for EngineeringStudentsMr. Ojonugwa Oluwafemi Ejiga Peter, Morgan State University Ejiga Peter Ojonugwa Oluwafemi, currently thriving as a Graduate Assistant at Morgan State University, Baltimore, is deeply engaged in the innovative ”Experiment Centered Pedagogy Project” within the Department of Engineering. His academic journey began at the Federal University of Technology, Minna, where he earned a Bachelor of Technology in Computer Science, laying a solid foundation for his
intuition and they can recall andapply the principles using little or no reference material. The focus of this paper is on the L3exam, which is a multiple choice exam covering 18 of the Level-3 competencies. The paper willspecifically discuss the exam results since inception and the associated evaluation and feedbackto the program. Page 15.1036.4L3 Competency ExamThe exam became a mandatory requirement for graduation beginning in 2002 after a pilotprogram in 2001 and was originally administered on paper. The exam fulfills several importantpurposes. First, it validates the technical training of every graduate by demonstrating mastery ofthe Level-3
implemented, the possible pitfalls in the implementation of PBL, and the design ofproblems using Lego System in an Engineering Measurements course. This paper gives a brief introduction to PBL and describes assessment comparisons among threedifferent types of instructional methods. The three methods are: 1) fully traditional content-based learning, 2) a combination of lecture-type instruction and PBL instruction, and 3) full PBLinstructional methodology with a partial use of Lego RCX System. The assessment resultsindicated that, without compromising students’ exam performance, the PBL method (when usedpartially or fully) significantly improved important skills in analyzing and solving open-ended,real-world problems, working cooperatively in teams
competence on theseparticipants. This paper reports on the camp activities, describes the survey results as well asanecdotal observations, and analyzes outcomes from the survey and the overall program. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 2024 ASEE Southeast Section ConferenceBackgroundSTEMTank was inspired by the Shark Tank television show. The camp, curriculum, genesis, andgoals are described in detail elsewhere [8]. In summary, STEMTank challenges participants todesign, build, and test an engineered prototype that addresses or solves an open-ended, real-world(often community-based) technical problem. College student mentors from SF and UF supporthigh school participants, evoking
. Page 22.565.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Energy Harvesting for Engineering EducatorsAbstract Engineering education should include preparing and developing students not only forcareers in industry and research currently in demand, but also for those fields and technologicalareas that are emerging in the near, moderate, and long-term future. This paper serves to providea cornerstone for engineering educators concerning the emerging and exciting field of energyharvesting such that the subject may be introduced to students who will soon enter industry oracademia. An example of its use with senior-level engineering students is then presented. Thiseffort supports, but
, gender issues, existential phenomenology, and Lagomorph physiology.Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette Matthew W. Ohland is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has de- grees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by over $11.4 million from the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received the William Elgin Wickenden Award for the Best Paper in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008 and multiple conference Best Paper awards
to determine if the choice of introductoryprogramming language has any measurable effect on the learning ability of a typical student inthe introductory programming course taught at a typical engineering school. Initial analysisindicates that students learning Pascal or C++ (without the use of objects) for the first timeperformed marginally better than students that learned ADA95 or C. However, student surveysindicate that several constructs used in ADA95 and C caused these introductory students to havemore difficulty. By adjusting the presentation of these topics, the instructor can teach effectivelyin any of the four programming languages. This paper outlines the design and the results of theexperiment, and future work that can extend
student's skills through laboratory and design experience,use of computers, oral and written communication, qualifications and teaching load of academicstaff, facilities and their availability, administration procedures, information system andcounseling, admission procedures, internationalization of the curriculum, student performance,competence of graduates, and internal quality assurance procedures.There are, however, some features of the system of study, namely, diversity and flexibility,which - in our opinion - have an essential impact on the quality of education, but are rather rarelybrought into discussions on quality assessment. In this paper, we define diversity and flexibilityof the system of study and show a strong relationship between
Paper ID #10969The Attitudes of Elementary Teachers towards Elementary Engineering (re-search to practice)Dr. Cathy P. Lachapelle, Museum of Science Dr. Cathy Lachapelle is the director of research and evaluation for EiE. She leads the assessment efforts for the EiE curriculum, designing assessment instruments, pilot and field testing them, and conducting research on how children use the EiE materials. She has worked on a number of research and evaluation projects related to K-16 STEM education, including the Women’s Experiences in College Engineering (WECE) study of factors influencing the persistence of undergraduate
Paper ID #49714Enhancing Clinical Immersion Experience with Peer-Mentoring SupportTiffany Marie Chan, University of California, Davis Tiffany Chan is a 4th-year undergraduate student in biomedical engineering at UC Davis and the recipient of the 2024 ASEE-PSW Section Undergraduate Student Award. She actively contributes to the cube3 Lab, where her interests lie in community building and inclusive practices. Tiffany is involved in various DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) research initiatives within the lab, including organizing student-faculty lunches and participating in the gender equity first-year seminar program
to conceptualize, create, and refine their designs.Additionally, the course equips students with essential skills in computer-aided design, simulation,technical writing, oral presentations, and project management, ensuring they are well-prepared forfuture academic and professional pursuits.In this WIP paper, we propose a study to quantitatively assess the success of the cross-disciplinarycourse in motivating students at NJIT to persist in engineering, relative to the discipline-specificcourses. In particular, the study aims to answer the following hypotheses: 1. Students who complete the cross-disciplinary course are more likely to persist in their engineering studies than their peers who enrolled in a discipline-specific course. 2
viable.For us, this starts with developing a community of support to give faculty the confidence toeffectively introduce wicked problems into their existing courses. Through this community,faculty may leverage one another’s expertise in order to expose students to real-world wickedproblems. In the spirit of holistic engineering education, our hope is to enable instructors toconfidently develop their students’ non-technical skills which are integral for generatingsustainability-minded leaders of the future.5,6Research MethodsIn this paper, our primary research objective was to develop a valid and reliable psychometricinstrument that measures a series of sustainability-related learning objectives that are central toWPSI. Our second objective was to
Paper ID #34949Identifying Signature Pedagogies in a Multidisciplinary EngineeringProgramDr. Kimia Moozeh, University of Toronto Kimia Moozeh has a PhD in Engineering Education from University of Toronto. She received her Hon. B.Sc. in 2013, and her Master’s degree in Chemistry in 2014. Her dissertation explored improving the learning outcomes of undergraduate engineering laboratories by bridging the learning from a larger context to the underlying fundamentals, using digital learning objects.Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto Lisa Romkey serves as Associate Professor, Teaching Stream and Associate Chair, Curriculum
Paper ID #22448Learning in Laboratories: How Undergraduates Participate in EngineeringResearchDr. Caitlin Donahue Wylie, University of Virginia Caitlin D. Wylie is an assistant professor of Science, Technology and Society in the University of Vir- ginia’s School of Engineering and Applied Science.Dr. Michael E. Gorman, University of Virginia c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Learning in Laboratories: How Undergraduates Participate in Engineering ResearchABSTRACT: Survey studies find benefits for undergraduate students who participate in scienceand
principles of mechanical engineeringAbstractThe paper describes how a video game is used to teach numerical methods to mechanical engi-neering undergraduates. The video game provides an authentic and engaging context in which tolearn computational techniques and concepts that are often dry and uninspiring. After outlining astudy demonstrating that students in the video game-based course learn more deeply than studentsin more traditional textbook-based courses, we describe how learning outcomes are integrated intothe game-play. We contrast the game-based assignments to typical textbook problems.1 IntroductionFor the past two years, we have been experimenting with a new way of teaching a numericalmethods course to our
engineering education at the 2009ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition in Austin, TX. To do this, the Division is sponsoringa panel session on Best Practices in K-12 and university partnerships. Submissions chosen forparticipation in this session demonstrate a true partnership between a K-12 school (or schools)and an engineering school/college at a university.Selected partnerships have proven success in the classroom and demonstrate engineeringengagement and knowledge acquisition by K-12 students through age appropriate activities andlessons. Best Practices Partnership Panel winners' papers are authored collaboratively betweenengineering and technology education faculty and K-12 teachers. Details on the partnership'sstructure and goals and the
Carl Perkins Vocational and Technical Educations Acts, in particular, in recent years related to the Laser and Fiber Optics Academy. Dr. Engelberg recently retired as Professor of Physics at Queensborough Community College after 38 years of service, during six of which he served as departmental chairperson.Cheryl Bluestone, Queensborough Community College Dr. Cheryl Bluestone holds a B. A. degree from the City College of New York and M. A. and Ph. D. degrees in psychology from New York University. She serves as the inside evaluator for the project. She developed several questionnaires and administered a variety of instruments to evaluate the project. Dr. Bluestone is Professor of Psychology