English do not have the Englishlanguage communication abilities (and corresponding TOEFL scores) required by the institutionto which they have applied. In such cases students are sometimes required to enroll in intensivelanguage courses to prepare them for eventual admission to the university. The focus of anIntensive English Program (IEP) is to increase student proficiency in English speaking, reading,and writing, and ultimately, to help the student develop the communication skills (and TOEFLscore) required for matriculation at the university as a degree-seeking student. IEPs are generallyadministered by the university that students wish to enroll in following their intensive Englishstudies. Coursework taken by students during their time in IEP
hindsight interpretation of thecourse as a story of institutional change as lived through students, instructors, and administrators,and as seen through curriculum, structures, and policies. Lessons learned from this story willassist decision-making for Year 3 of the pilot course, while also offering insights into powerdynamics and consequences of policy decisions for engineering educators interested in effectingmeaningful and long lasting change within any institution.IntroductionThe Wright State Model (WSM) for Engineering Mathematics Education has been implementedin some form at more than twenty American engineering institutions, significantly expanding itsnationwide reach over the last decade. The WSM is a meaningful shift from the
], students are rarely taught how to formulate their owncreative explanations to educate their present and future audiences in academia and industry.Anecdotally, this type of explicit instruction occurs most often in designated writing courses (e.g.[12]) rather than in technical subjects, yet the latter may expect students to produce original textsinvolving complex science and technology for audiences with varying levels of expertise.Similarly, professional engineers are expected to communicate orally with non-technicalaudiences in a variety of rhetorical situations, which requires the translation of engineeringconcepts, data, and developments [13].Beyond professional expectations, the societal implications of how experts communicate withnon
. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2018 American Society for Engineering Education Session ETD 506ReviewA fundamental development in analytic theory was the idea of Descartes that the graph of acurve could be constructed from an equation in two variables, say x and y. The variable x wouldbe plotted along one axis and the variable y could be plotted along a perpendicular axis. A glanceat the graph would indicate at each point, x, whether the value of y was positive or negative andalso whether y was near or far from the horizontal axis. The glance would also indicate if y risesas x increases
Session 1566 AN ASSESSMENT PROCESS FOR A CAPSTONE COURSE: DESIGN OF FLUID THERMAL SYSTEMS William S. Janna, John I. Hochstein Herff College of Engineering The University of Memphis Memphis TN 38152Extended AbstractAn assessment process has been developed in order to measure how well a capstone designcourse, Design of Fluid Thermal Systems, meets the needs of the students with regard to processeducational goals and educational objectives. The ultimate purpose of the process
within a curriculum. Adelman (op cit) reports that among men and women who indicatedengineering/architecture as their intended field, 54.3% of men and 21.3% of women earnedbachelor’s degrees in their intended field. He also shows that engineering attracts a relativelyhigh percentage of students who have a constant vision of their career goals and a low percentageof students who have a constantly changing vision.Kroc, et al4 considered graduation rates across university curricula using data for 130,000students from 44 universities. They considered graduation rates as a function of major, notingtrends in transfers between majors, considering in-migrants, or those who transfer intoengineering from another field and out-migrants, engineering
Office suite, which is a collection of web-browser basedapplications which mimic members of its office suite. Its spreadsheet equivalent, however, iscurrently not intended as a calculation tool.1MathWorks. MATLAB, one of the most common math packages in use in chemical engineeringdepartments, does not offer integrated collaborative functionality. However, since it is modeledafter traditional development software, it does interface with industry standard source controlsoftware provided from other vendors. This is a library management approach with somerevision tracking handled by the server.2PTC. Mathcad offers user the capability to share worksheets including an edit-protected modeof “live” worksheets, but does not allow multiple users to edit a
among students toward the subject matter [9].Undergraduate education faces substantial challenges, notably observed in expansive universitylecture classes [10, 11]. These challenges stem from increasing class sizes that make itprogressively arduous for college instructors to motivate students for class preparation andparticipation in discussions. To address this issue, integrating student-led group lecture deliveriesinto the curriculum has been proposed as a potential solution in this study. The importance ofstudent engagement, especially within group interactions, is instrumental in cultivating essentialskills crucial for academic success and holistic development [10]. This emphasis on activestudent involvement spurred further investigation
RegressionStepwise logistic regression models were developed to predict probability of dropout within sixyears using five-fold cross validation. A significance level of 0.05 was used as the criteria forvariables both entering and staying in the model. Three types of prediction models were builtusing the variables indicated by the Phase 3 column in Table A.1. Prediction model 1 includes allthe Phase 3 variables recorded for the first term (first-year fall or fall 2014). Prediction model 2includes all the variables from regression model 1 plus those same variables recorded for thesecond term (first-year spring or spring 2015). Likewise, Prediction model 3 includes all thevariables from the first-year fall and first-year spring terms plus those variables
credit hours required is 128,”5 and “… these requirements continue to be Page 26.1721.3 reduced steadily by various universities and legislatures. How can engineers continue to do more with essentially less education?”6The curriculum is textbook-centered, and most of the information students need is given to themin class. The majority of their work consists of weekly problem sets, and there is little time forreading, writing, or information-seeking. The result is that the natural connections that studentsin other disciplines would make with the library and librarians are less likely to happen.Faculty, who were educated in the same
home to an oilrefinery and a chocolate factory. In addition to the outreach performed by the companies, thenumber of engineers in the area is likely to provide several engineering role models, which mayhelp to attract and retain students in the STEM pipeline. The second factor is the educationalopportunities for K-12 students. The Robinson school district provides some courses forpreparing for the challenging engineering curriculum, including calculus, physics, and twochemistry courses 28. Although less than 1% of students take AP classes, Robinson High Schoolstudents may take dual credit courses offered through Lincoln Trail College located in Robinson.Other schools in rural areas may not be able to follow Robinson’s example if they lack
demonstrations and experiments are writtenprovides useful tips on securing supplies and construction of devices. Topics include Structure,Testing & Evaluation, Metals, Polymers, Ceramics, Composites, Electronic & Optical Materials,as well as ideas for Materials Curriculum development.1. Background - Annual NEW:Updates & PublicationsThe National Educators’ Workshop (NEW:Update) series of workshops has been in existencesince 1986. NEW:Update workshops focus on strengthening materials education throughtechnical updates and publication of laboratory experiments and demonstrations for materialsscience, engineering and technology, involving new and traditional content in the field.The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the
Multiple Choice and Constructed Response Exams for Engineering Students with and without Learning Difficulties." CSEDU (1). 2021.[9] R. M. Kaipa, "Multiple choice questions and essay questions in curriculum." Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education 13.1 (2021): 16-32.[10] C. A. Melovitz Vasan et al. "Analysis of testing with multiple choice versus open‐ended questions: Outcome‐based observations in an anatomy course." Anatomical sciences education 11.3 (2018): 254-261.[11] W. L. Kuechler and M. G. Simkin. "Why is performance on multiple‐choice tests and constructed‐response tests not more closely related? Theory and an empirical test." Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 8.1 (2010
a Faculty lecturer in the department of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Waterloo. Dr. Al-Hammoud has a passion for teaching where she continuously seeks new technologies to involve students in their learning process. She is actively involved in the Ideas Clinic, a major experiential learning initiative at the University of Waterloo. She is also responsible for developing a process and assessing graduate attributes at the department to target areas for improvement in the curriculum. This resulted in several publications in this educational research areas. Dr. Al-Hammoud won the "Ameet and Meena Chakma award for exceptional teaching by a student” in 2014 and the "Engineering Society Teaching
provide a uniquely creative and accessible hands-on experience to students,is vital to further enhance engineering curriculums [6, 7]. The analysis done here seeks toquantitatively establish the social demographics of the space to further understanding barriersand mitigate their effects, as well as further understanding the tools that can aid in introducingstudents to the space.Results of a survey on student makerspace participation suggest that students who were self-motivated and participated in the space outside of the required class times showed higherconfidence in their work for design tasks [6, 8-10]. The work highlights the importance ofinvolving students in the space early, allowing for growth and experimentation with different
Colorado Denver, and curriculum lead at Inworks, an interdisciplinary innovation lab. Her research focuses on transformative experiences in engineering education. She is currently division chair of the Technological and Engineering Literacy - Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE). American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Comparing Student Outcomes from Four Iterations of an Engineering Learning CommunityAbstractThis Complete Evidence-based Practice paper evaluates the impact of learning communities onthe academic success of first-year engineering students. The Engineering Learning Community(ELC) at a large urban university is
in students’ lab report writingability as observed in subsequent lab courses.MotivationAs a faculty member in the Materials Science and Engineering Department at the University ofAlabama at Birmingham, over the past ten years I have been responsible for teaching MSE 281(Physical Materials I) nine times. Although this is the second required materials course in theundergraduate curriculum, it is the first taken solely by materials majors, and the first with alaboratory component. The course is taken primarily by students during spring semester of theirsophomore year, but a smaller section is also taught during summer semester. During this timeperiod, I taught primarily the spring version (20-30 students each class) but also the summerversion
of Engineering Dr. Anne-Marie Nickel is a Professor of Chemistry at the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). In 2002, she earned her Ph.D. in Inorganic Chemistry from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She earned her B.A. in Chemistry at Lawrence University in Appleton, Wisconsin in 1997. Dr. Nickel is a member of the ASEE and the American Chemical Society (ACS). e-mail:nickel@msoe.edu c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 How Study of Chocolate as a Material Can Be Used to Enhance Engineering EducationChocolate is a material that is typically not associated within a engineering curriculum. Yet whenviewed as a material that has
from Stanford University in 1984 and a Ph.D. in Structural Engineering from Kansas State University in 1993. Prior to his coming to FGCU he was a Professor of Engineering at Roger Williams University and an Associate Professor and Director of the Civil Engineering Analysis Group at the United States Military Academy. Dr. O’ Neill is a retired Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. He has been active at the national level with ASCE’s Technical Council on Computing and Information Technology (TCCIT), Committee on Faculty Development (CFD) and Excellence in Civil Engineering Education (ExCEEd) initiative. Dr. O’Neill is a licensed Professional Engineer in California, Florida, Nevada and Virginia. He is a
. Page 12.303.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Being Dr. Evil: Engaging Students with Humorous Project PremisesAbstractDesign projects or open-ended problems are assigned throughout the engineering curriculum atthe University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB). In senior design courses, assigning real-world design projects is imperative to prepare the students for the job they may be performingthe following year. In the basic engineering science courses, however, finding design projectsthat engage the students, that demonstrate the real-world applications of the basic engineeringscience, and that do not seem like “busy-work” to the students requires imagination. Over thepast four years, humorous projects, based on the Austin
vocational environments in addition to transfers fromvarious two-year community colleges. Evening students, for the most part, have traditionallybeen comprised of a compendium of students who have already entered the work force and arelooking to start or continue their education allowing them to move vertically within theirrespective companies. The quality, maturity, and behavior of these groups of students aremarkedly different. This paper discusses some of the differences as observed from these groupsover the past several years and makes some suggestions as to how to equalize the playing field asfar as curriculum is concerned due to these differences. Cooperative education programs alsoplay a large role in molding day students’ attitudes with
; Calculator; Matlab;Excel; TI calculators; Casio; CalculusIntroductionDaily engineering challenges do not only require well-developed engineering practice but alsorequire a good knowledge of mathematics and the use of right technology. Choosing the righttechnology to determine a solution to a problem matters from many perspectives includingaccuracy, practicality, and right approach to the solution. Many technologies such as TexasInstruments (TI) and Casio calculators; programming languages such as Matlab, Microsoft Excel,Java, and C++; web based resources such as Wolfram Alpha are widely used by students who areeither required to use these technologies by their instructors. Calculators such as TI and Casio arewidely used in the United States
Education, Vol. 94, No. 1, 2005, 121-130.[2] Lin, C. and Tsai, C. “The relationships between students’ conceptions of learning engineering and theirpreferences for classroom and laboratory learning environments”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 98, No. 2,2009, 193-204.[3] Roppel, T.A., Hung, J.Y., Wentworth, S.W. and Scottedward Hodel, A. “An interdisciplinary laboratorysequence in electrical and computer engineering: curriculum design and assessment”, IEEE Transactions onEducation, Vol. 43, No.2, May 2000, 143-152.[4] May, W.W., Morgan, B.J., Lemke, J.C., Karst, G.M. and Stone, H.L. “Model for ability-based assessment inphysical therapy education”, Journal of Physical Therapy Education, Vol. 9, No. 1, Spring 1995, 3-6.[5] Swanson, D.B
Engineering Education, 2017 Implementing Design Thinking into Summer Camp Experience for High School Women in Materials EngineeringAbstractAlthough women make up a significant portion of the college educated population, there remainsa sizable gap between the number of men and women pursuing degrees and careers in science,technology, engineering and math (STEM) fields. The gender gap begins at middle school andwidens considerably in later high school years. One major factor for this gap is the lack ofbelonging women can feel towards engineering. As one approach to developing and improvingthis sense of belonging, we focused on improving students’ comprehension of engineering topicsduring a weeklong materials science and
Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA, he was an Adjunct Professor in the Computer Science Electrical Engineering department at the University of Missouri – Kansas City. Before beginning his academic career, he spent 31 years in industry as a manager and software developer and consultant.Dr. Molly A. McVey, University of Kansas Dr. Molly A. McVey is a post-doctoral teaching fellow at the University of Kansas School of Engineering where she works with faculty to incorporate evidence-based and student-centered teaching methods, and to research the impacts of changes made to teaching on student learning and success. Dr. McVey earned her Ph.D in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Kansas.Christopher Patrick
Paper ID #28585Effect of Mastery-graded Exams on Student Outcomes in Statics andMechanics of Solids CourseDr. Hadas Ritz, Cornell University Hadas Ritz is a senior lecturer in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, and a Faculty Teaching Fellow at the James McCormick Family Teaching Excellence Institute (MTEI) at Cornell University, where she received her PhD in Mechanical Engineering in 2008. Since then she has taught required and elective courses covering a wide range of topics in the undergraduate Mechanical Engineering curriculum. In her work with MTEI she co-leads teaching workshops for new faculty and assists with other
in engineering courses is not new. 2D drivingsimulators are commonly utilized in vehicle dynamics courses for motion simulation. Likewise,flight simulators are favorably used in most aerodynamics courses. Advances in technology haveempowered pilot test program producers to create effective and real-time simulation based FlightTraining Devices (FTDs) [6]. Flight simulators draw attention as a training resource in aerospaceengineering curriculum. Several studies have been conducted on finding the most effective way ofexploiting flight simulators in courses. Meta-analysis was investigated to find effectivenesscharacteristics of flight simulators [7]. Huet et al. studied the performance of feedback in a fixed-base flight simulator [8,9]. In a
person had developed their own uniqueopinions about how to apply grading procedures to a structural design class.University A University A is a small, public, liberal arts school in the south-Atlantic region (CarnegieClassification, Baccalaureate Colleges: Arts & Sciences Focus). The school only hasundergraduate engineering programs, approximately one fourth of the student population majorsin engineering, and the civil engineering graduating class averages approximately 60 students peryear. The civil engineering degree is a general degree, which means that all students are requiredto take courses in at least seven different subareas of civil engineering. Within this structure,reinforced concrete design is a required course. The
Setting and Student PopulationAn introductory, algebra-based, first-level general education physics course at AmericanUniversity provides the setting for the current study. This course covers the traditionalmechanics curriculum in most first-level introductory physics courses. The course also includesa lab component and students are required to write a formal lab report each week. The course issimilarly structured to the introductory, calculus-based course required of physics andengineering students. The only significant difference between the two courses is the level ofmathematics used to explain the concepts covered. The level of rigor between the algebra- andcalculus-based courses is comparable. Students in the general education physics course
, including various IT management roles and as an educator in IT, security and digital forensics. He is familiar with the design and management of online learning in corporate and academic environments. In the past, Firasat has served as the PI on a Federal Scholarship for Service grant for Metropolitan State University and DHS grant to establish and manage an institute for Computer Security and Forensics and Minneapolis Community and Technical College. In addition to formal role as faculty member teaching security-related curriculum, Firasat has also been a trainer for law enforcement and criminal justice professionals delivering security and forensics education (SAFE) workshops. c American