courses. As the number of enrollments is increasing in programming courses, the use of these tests to gather data can take an instructor significant time to process. By the time a helpful prediction is indicated, it might be too late for a student to withdraw from the course or for an instructor to intervene and provide tailored support. The student traits such as cognitive, psychological, behavioral, or demographic may be helpful indicators of performance in other domains, but they take time to assess and are not directly related to the general programming behavior of a student. Therefore, new predictors of performance need to be explored in the programming domain that are not based upon indirect
pairs were not statistically significant. This means that education, even directly related Page 7.1014.5 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationengineering graphics and CAD training, may not significantly improve spatial visualization skills,at least not in the short term. This result confirmed research by Yue and Chen 18. In their study,the PSVT-R test was conducted at the beginning and end of CAD classes and showed nosignificant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores for student
First-Year Programs (FPD) and Computers in Education (CoED) divisions, and with the Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional Cooperation, Interdivisional Town Hall Planning Committee, ASEE Active, and the Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Estell has received multiple ASEE Annual Conference Best Paper awards from the Computers in Education, First-Year Programs, and Design in Engineering Education Divisions. He has also been recognized by ASEE as the recipient of the 2005 Merl K. Miller Award and by the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) with the 2018 ASEE Best Card Award. Estell received the First-Year Programs Division’s Distinguished Service Award in 2019 and the 2022 Computers in Education
system while at the same time maintaining high rates ofcustomer responsiveness in terms of the order to ship cycle. It is important to mention here thatthese graphs relate to the roller cone drill bit manufacturing process of three SKUs. Similarstudies can be conducted for other manufacturing processes and systems, using hybrid push-pullconcepts for product differentiation, and utilizing the LMM example through system design andoptimization of similar computer-based simulation tools. Page 9.53.9 Proceedings of the 2004 American society for Engineering Annual Conference & Exposition
byfour different constructs: attainment, intrinsic, utility, and cost values [25], [32]. In education,attainment value refers to how important students’ courses or other aspects of their education areto their identity. A student who identifies as an athlete will set attainment goals related to sportswhile a student who identifies as an engineer will ascribe value to skills, such as soldering orprogramming, which align with their chosen engineering discipline. While attainment valueemerges from a student’s internal identity, intrinsic value expresses students’ internal enjoymentin the pursuit of goals or tasks. Students who pursue engineering because they enjoy buildingthings, like programming, or are drawn to opportunities to serve society with
motivationAbstractIn 2008, Gannon University was awarded a National Science Foundation S-STEM grant, knownas SEECS (Scholars of Excellence in Engineering and Computer Science) which providedscholarship funding for academically talented students having financial need. Since then, thegrant has been funded twice more; the current award period started in 2017 and will run until2021. As a requirement for the SEECS program, all students must participate in a community-based design project, undertaken for a non-profit entity in the local region. This project isnominally a two-year effort, though some projects have taken longer to complete. Recently, aproject has experienced several significant setbacks: 1) the original project sponsor decommittedat the end of the
," HBCUs accountedfor only 4% of all 4-year U.S. colleges and universities and 21% of all African-Americancollegians, but awarded 28% of all baccalaureate degrees to African Americans. Whenconsidering degrees in science and engineering, this percentage jumped to 31%. This same studycited three reasons that African Americans continue to attend HBCUs: 1) Significantly lowercost of living, tuition, and more generous financial aid packages. 2) Higher retention rates. 3)More likely to enter a program in sciences, engineering, and business.Benefits of increasing the number of college graduatesIncreasing the number of African American college graduates would provide many tangibleeconomic and social benefits to the nation and the individuals involved
program is un-structured, but,students are required to have some type of “construction related experience” for entry into theprofessional side of the program.Bloom’s TaxonomyBlooms taxonomy is widely used in educational environments to categorize the levels of learningstudents acquire while engaged in particular curriculum. Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) arecommonly used to define specific elements students will learn that are tied to an outcomes-basedassessment process. These SLOs are important because the define the skills and abilities studentsacquire while learning their specific educational elements that are achieved for deeper learningand the transfer of knowledge within a curriculum. It has been noted that the most common useof Bloom’s
AC 2007-359: REMOTELY ACCESSIBLE LABORATORY FOR RAPIDPROTOTYPINGIsmail Fidan, Tennessee Tech University Dr. Ismail Fidan is an Associate Professor of Manufacturing and Industrial Technology at TTU. Dr. Fidan is the founder of the NSF-CCLI-AI funded RP lab at TTU and is the recipient of many prestigious national and university-level awards. He is very active as an ABET and NAIT program evaluator and is a leading expert in the field of electronics manufacturing, rapid prototyping and CAD/CAM. Dr. Fidan received his PhD degree in mechanical engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic University, Troy, NY.Nasir Ghani, Tennessee Tech University Dr. Nasir Ghani is an Associate Professor
prototyping system into the curriculum was toenhance several CAD related courses. This goal is presently being accomplished in theTG 110 and MET 328 courses. It is expected that further use of the system will be madein courses like the MET 414 class previously mentioned as well as independent projectcourses and several other courses outside the MET student’s curriculum. In addition,demonstration of the equipment during open house events and the school’s summerMinority Engineering Advancement Program have generally met with a high level ofexcitement. During events like these, it is much easier for the general public toappreciate a CAD model if they can hold a physical prototype as they are observing animage on the CRT.References:1 3D Systems, Inc
, c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #16374 NASA, NSF, FAA, DOE, and private companies. Currently, he and his students at the Advanced Tech- nology Systems Laboratory are pursuing cutting-edge research on the role of visualization and virtual reality in aviation maintenance, hybrid inspection and job-aiding, technology to support STEM education and, more practically, to address information technology and process design issues related to delivering quality health care. As the Department Chair, he has been involved in the initiation of programmatic initiatives that have resulted in significant
are realized (Hansen 2006). Engineering collaboration within team settings must “movebeyond the divide and conquer” approach (commonly observed) and instead operate in a dynamicand integrative mode that resembles actual industry (Richter and Paretti 2009). In order to encourage positive team development and performance, many factors need to beevaluated from the students’ perspective when formulating and structuring team related items(Mohammed and Mathieu 2002). An industrial and organizational psychology approach to de-signing teams, team projects, and team evaluations within documented engineering educationliterature has been limitedly established (Borrego et al. 2013). Implementing these theoreticalconstructs can take a group approach
inengineering education. In fact, as we define the skills-check, there seem to be no examples.Given the less critical nature of engineering practice (i.e. it is not as often that engineers need toapply skills in life-altering situations) this is perhaps not surprising.The studies which are reported in literature can be collected into a few general groups,understood in the context of the ABET program outcomes18. Some studies focus on assessmentof ABET “technical skills”19-22 some on professional skills”23-24, and one on both25. It is the firstgroup that is most relevant to this work. Of that group, the studies more closely related to thecurrent are Suits et al and Salim et al who describe assessing students’ laboratory skill at the endof the semester
in K-12 outreach through sev- eral venues including Summer Ventures, high school STEM day, the N.C. Science Olympiad, a Math Science Partnership grant, volunteer work with a local literacy camp, Boy Scouts Robotics Merit Badge counseling, and teaching the science portion of VBS and children’s Sunday School at his local church. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Flipping the Microprocessors Classroom: A comparative assessmentAbstractAt East Carolina University (ECU), undergraduate students in an electrical engineeringconcentration within a general engineering program are required to complete a microprocessorscourse. This course has been
and a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Penn State, where he has been on the faculty since 1985. His work in engineering education involves curricular reform, teaching and learning innovations, faculty development, and assessment. He teaches and conducts research in the areas of combustion and thermal sciences. He can be contacted at tal2@psu.edu.Peggy Van Meter, Pennsylvania State University Peggy Van Meter is an Associate Professor of Education within the Educational Psychology program at Penn State where she has been on the faculty since 1996. Her research includes studies of the strategic and meta-cognitive processes that learners use to integrate multiple representations and acquire
academia and industry, including ten years of manufacturing experience at Delphi Automotive.Prof. Autar Kaw, University of South Florida Autar Kaw is a professor of mechanical engineering at the University of South Florida. He is a recipient of the 2012 U.S. Professor of the Year Award from the Council for Advancement and Support of Edu- cation and Carnegie Foundation for Advancement of Teaching. The award is the only national program to recognize excellence in undergraduate education. Professor Kaw received his BE Honors degree in Mechanical Engineering from Birla Institute of Technology and Science (BITS) India in 1981, and his degrees of Ph.D. in 1987 and M.S. in 1984, both in Engineering Mechanics from Clemson
engineers, who are available to serve as reviewers. When difficult technicalissues arise, S3FL has submitted questions to Lockheed Martin, where they are circulated amonga group of experienced engineers. Advice from these engineers, with their wealth of practicalexperience, is invaluable to S3FL project teams.The Michigan Space Grant Consortium (MSGC), which fosters awareness of, education in, andresearch on space-related technology in Michigan, supports the work of individual S3FL studentsvia undergraduate and graduate research fellowships. In addition, MSGC has also undertakenlarger initiatives to assist S3FL efforts. In 2004, MSGC administered the Space EngineeringExperience Diversity (SEED) Scholars Program, which provided funding for a group
realistic experience in these topics throughintegration with real engineering projects and/or participation in “role-playing” case studies.Assignments will include tasks such as developing and maintaining timelines and developing andmaintaining requirement tracking documents for the projects. To support these tasks, studentslearn various PM theories and tools (such as work breakdown structures). Students also gainexperience using commercial software packages used in industry. In-class discussion ofchallenges experienced during projects is used to facilitate peer-to-peer learning between groups.This course was developed to fit into a newly created Professional Skills category in theMechanical Engineering program. This course meets this requirement
Session 2433 Energy Management Monitoring of a Geothermal System at Northwest Tennessee Correctional Facility J. Douglas Sterrett, Keith Coleman, Travis Harrington, and Robert LeMaster Department of Engineering College of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Tennessee at MartinIntroductionThe Center for Energy Management is located in the College of Engineering and NaturalSciences at the University of Tennessee at Martin. This center was created in the summer of2000 to provide energy-related services to regional government and
purposeof this ASHRAE’s program is to fund equipment for undergraduate engineering senior projectson ASHRAE-related topics. Obtaining these types of grants to support the design, developmentand construction of instructional laboratory apparatus would greatly help the normally stresseddepartment’s equipment budget. In addition, it would provide the students with quality and reallife design projects to work on.The task to design, develop and construct an instructional laboratory apparatus to demonstrateheat transfer principles and the concept of thermo-siphon heat recovery system began with anapplication to the ASHRAE Undergraduate Senior Project Program. Subsequent to the awardingof the project grant in the amount of $3155.00 from ASHRAE, a student
corresponding handouts, worksheets and URLs used in this simulation.At the end of the simulation, the instructor facilitates a discussion comparing the varyingstrategies of the groups and where each company started and ended in terms of pollutantemissions and expenditures. The students then go online to the EPA website14 that documentsthe results of recent auctions to research the current price of an allowance and follow-up onfurther questions regarding the cap and trade program. A guided discussion of the costs andbenefits of the cap and trade program serves to wrap up the Air Resources unit and often endswith the discussion of issues of environmental and social justice in regulation and managementof air resources and the roles of engineers and
semester course, as well as to supplementmaterials presented in the course textbook. The energy system and conversion course,which covers renewable and non-renewable energy sources, as well as energy conversiondevices, is part of the core curriculum at Penn State University – Harrisburg. The EnergyCalculator program was conceived to help students compare and contrast a range ofenergy units introduced in the textbook. The Energy Database offers students an avenueto access new information on energy issues hosted on the Internet as the typical coursetextbooks are unable to keep up with the deluge of new developments. The EnergyJeopardy game creatively combines energy system concepts with a popular Americanpastime that many students could relate to
project sizes and requirements for the students to achieve in a reasonable labtime.Keywords: BIM education, Computer lab education, project-based learningIntroductionAs Building Information Modeling (BIM) has been identified as a new paradigm which couldsignificantly improve productivities and efficiencies in the architecture, engineering andconstruction industry, many construction related programs started to integrate BIM componentsinto their curriculums[1]. According to the results from a survey distributed to members of theAssociated Schools of Construction (ASC), as of 2008 less than 1% of the construction programshad a stand-alone BIM course, while 9% incorporated BIM as a component of their existingcourses[2]. By 2013, 54 % of construction
weregraduating seniors. The most common feedback from the students centered on skillsets gained byteam work and their increased knowledge of building systems and instrumentation. Two of theelectronics major and design minor students showed an interest in extending the project toovercome some of the issues they faced during the study. Two students are enrolled in anindependent study course to work on this project during the spring 2015 semester. Fordemonstration purposes, this project is being demonstrated in instrumentation & interfacing,industrial electronics, and renewable-energy related classes offered in the program as examples.This type project produces hands-on activities and demonstration modules for the studentsenrolled in the classes. For
held fellowships in Ethics of AI and Technology & Society organizations.James N. Magarian, Massachusetts Institute of Technology James Magarian, PhD, is a Sr. Lecturer and Associate Academic Director with the Gordon-MIT En- gineering Leadership (GEL) Program. He joined MIT and GEL after nearly a decade in industry as a mechanical engineer and engineering manager in aerospace/defense. His research focuses on engineering workforce formation and the education-careers transition.Dr. Alison Olechowski, University of Toronto Alison Olechowski is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineer- ing and the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice (ISTEP
Session 1526 MECHATRONICS/PROCESS CONTROL REMOTE LABORATORY Hong Wong, Vikram Kapila, and Anthony Tzes Department of Mechanical Engineering Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NYAbstract Under an NSF—DUE sponsored laboratory development program, we have developed amultidisciplinary mechatronics/process control remote laboratory (MPCRL) consisting of anarray of experiments, which expose students to elements of aerospace, mechanical, electrical,civil, and chemical engineering. A new laboratory curriculum and manual have been developedto introduce students to PC-based
Paper ID #25533Improving Students’ Understanding of Electromagnetic Principles with anAlternator Design-Build-Test ProjectDr. Matthew R. Aldeman, Illinois State University Matt Aldeman is an Assistant Professor of Technology at Illinois State University, where he teaches in the Renewable Energy and Engineering Technology programs. Matt joined the Technology department faculty after working at the Illinois State University Center for Renewable Energy for over five years. Previously, he worked at General Electric as a wind site manager at the Grand Ridge and Rail Splitter wind projects. Matt’s experience also includes service
educational leadership from the University of California, Santa Bar- bara. His research interests include the areas of educational facilities, decision-making, housing, and education. Page 25.761.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Incorporating NAHB Professional Designations into a University Residential Construction Management Specialization This paper presents the incorporation of professional designations from the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) into the Residential Construction Management Specialization program at a major university. Incorporating
. Page 15.30.7Evaluation Overview The evaluation plan for the Buffalo State College 2007 Engineers of the Futureprogram was based upon four evaluation questions. All four of these evaluationquestions implied that a measurable change would occur. The four evaluation questionswere: 1. Did partnering schools implement rigorous pre-engineering curricula? 2. Did partnering schools teach mathematics, science, and technology through hands-on experiences in engineering-related content? 3. Did participating teachers gain subject matter expertise? 4. Did partnering schools offer engineering-related career paths awareness? Evaluation of the program was performed in a fashion similar to a classic pre/postdesign. Data was
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationthis globalization initiative, the department received an internal university grant to help developthis program. After three years of significant travel and discussion, departmental faculty decidedin addition to integration of global topics into the curriculum, a cultural experience of some sortwas a desirable addition to the degree program. The faculty decided to approach the problem byemploying creative methods of enculturation.When asked to prioritize the different activities that members of the Aviation Technology IndustryAdvisory Committee and faculty felt would benefit our students