elicitingfeedback from a GSI’s students. Furthermore, EGSMs consult on general graduate studentissues such as advisor-advisee relationships and time management strategies. EGSMs work inteams to develop and facilitate well-attended workshops of interest to all graduate students.Workshops focus on academic as well as professional themes, and are aimed at helpingparticipants define and accomplish their goals through graduate school.In this paper, we discuss the training that EGSMs receive as teaching consultants and mentors totheir fellow graduate students. In particular, we describe the training curriculum that has beendeveloped to help prepare EGSMs for their roles. Topic areas covered in the curriculum and theformat in which the training is delivered are
. Page 14.941.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Participation in a Research Experience for Teachers Program: Impact on Perceptions and Efficacy to Teach EngineeringKeywords: Teacher efficacy, Self-efficacy, Research Experiences for Teachers, K-12teachersAbstractThis paper utilizes social cognitive theory to investigate the impact of a National ScienceFoundation-sponsored Research Experiences for Teachers program on participants’ knowledgeabout and perceptions of the field of engineering, as well as efficacy for teaching engineeringtopics. Eleven middle and high school teachers participating in the summer 2008 programcompleted pre-program and post-program surveys and took part in individual semi
engineering majors.Over the years, several modules on electronic navigation, communications systems, computernetworks and the Internet had been added in attempts to keep abreast of the latest technology.Five hands-on labs covering electrical circuits, signal processing, fiber optics and motors &generators reinforced topics covered in class. To support writing across the curriculum and theneed for well spoken officers, a research assignment on a current technology coupled with aformal paper and classroom presentation, were also required. Since circuits and machines hadbeen the primary focus for so long no matter what other material was added, these topicsremained. With each additional topic, there was less time to cover the material. The result
Paper ID #22439Flipped Classroom and Emotional Learning in an Engineering LeadershipDevelopment CourseDr. Dean H. Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Lang is the Associate Director of the Engineering Leadership Research Program at Penn State Uni- versity. She holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering from West Virginia University, an MBA from Johns Hopkins University, and a PhD in Kinesiology with a focus on Biomechanics from Penn State University. Dr. Lang’s previous professional experiences and research interests range from mechanical engineering facilities design to research that applied engineering
measurability of learning outcomes, which arenecessitated by the fluid transfer of students across institutions under the 3+2 model. Other majorfeatures of the Bologna, including the technical workforce issues that animate the process and Page 26.975.2the subtle variations in its implementation, have drawn even less attention.In this paper, we explore a more nuanced understanding of the Bologna Process for engineeringeducators in the U.S. Drawing examples from engineering education in Denmark, we describehow a European country interprets and responds to the Bologna Process according to its nationalpolitical tradition, economic priorities, and workforce
the student design team and is now transitioned to the other side of theclassroom as a new instructor teaching Dynamics to mechanical engineer students. These twofindings in this paper have directly helped the lead author approach engineering education andhis specific classes with a more balanced mindset by replacing individual students with personas.Replacing individual students and their learning styles, struggles, and goals with personas allowsthe instructor team to serve proper justice to the technically challenging material while alsobuilding personnel connections with the students without compromising either. The author teambelieves this mirrors the broader application of these findings into all engineering courses,especially capstone
Paper ID #7721Factors influencing students’ choice of engineering majorDr. Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven Maria-Isabel Carnasciali is Assistant Professor of mechanical engineering at the Tagliatela School of En- gineering, University of New Haven, CT. She obtained her Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Georgia Tech in 2008. Her undergraduate degree is from MIT from the Mechanical Engineering Department, received in 2000. Current engineering education research focuses on understanding the nontraditional student experiences, motivations, and identity development. Other research interests involve
Paper ID #6597K-8 Teachers’ Responses to Their First Professional Development Experiencein EngineeringDr. So Yoon Yoon, INSPIRE, Purdue University, West Lafayette So Yoon Yoon, is an INSPIRE post-doctoral research associate at Purdue University. She received her Ph.D. and M.S.Ed. in Educational Psychology with specialties in Gifted Education and Research Meth- ods & Measurement, respectively, from Purdue University. She also holds a M.S. in Astronomy & Astro- physics and a B.S. in Astronomy and Meteorology from Kyungpook National University in South Korea. Her work centers on the development and validation of
see each new problem through the lens ofscientific concepts and they develop a meaningful interpretation, a process that cognitivepsychologists call creating an internal representation. The process of representation alsoinvolves finding and evaluating information—what is relevant and what is not relevant, and thedegree to which this information is reliable (Matlin7). Attendant with the process of creating aninternal representation (a visualization within one’s head) is the process of transferring thisinternal imagery onto paper, thereby creating an external representation. Externalrepresentations provide an effective means to deal with the limitations of short-term memory.Experts use external representations to keep track of the quantity of
AC 2010-1621: THE USE OF CONFERENCE PREPARATORY PRINCIPLES ANDPRACTICES (WRITING AND PRESENTATION SKILLS) TO TEACHINTERDISCIPLINARY LABORATORY COURSESEstefania Alvarez, Clemson UniversitySteven Saville, Clemson UniversityO. Thompson Mefford, Clemson UniversityJohn DesJardins, Clemson University Page 15.1259.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 The Use Of Conference Preparatory Principles And Practices (Writing And Presentation Skills) To Teach Interdisciplinary Laboratory CoursesAbstract This paper examines the application of conference preparatory principles and practices toteach materials science through the
help in achievingthis balance. The importance of integrating both globalization and social needs into theengineering curriculum is acknowledged by the ABET criteria. Human need is also a clearpriority of engineering as a profession and of major world religions. It is not surprising,therefore, that faith-based institutions place a high value on such projects. This paper presentsthe methods and conclusions of design projects from four faith-based institutions that exemplifythe successful integration of both globalization and humanitarian interests. The presentationfocus is a model for conducting such projects. Particular results, within the context of theseprojects, include specific characteristics and insights for designing, selecting, and
Session 2522Integrating Distance Learning with Traditional Delivery in a Graduate Certificate Program for IT Professionals Vijay Kanabar, Tanya Zlateva, Eric Braude, Rumen Stainov Computer Science Department, Metropolitan College, Boston UniversityAbstractIn this paper we compare our experience with two distance education models forteaching professional graduate students. The first is a synchronous video conferencingdelivery model and the second is a blended Web-based and traditional learning model.The former was used for beaming out graduate courses to the Foxboro Company, and thelatter was within the context of a graduate
AC 2012-5561: ASSESSMENT OF DISCOVERY APPROACHDr. Mysore Narayanan, Miami University Mysore Narayanan obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool, England in the area of electrical and electronic engineering. He joined Miami University in 1980 and teaches a wide variety of electrical, electronic, and mechanical engineering courses. He has been invited to contribute articles to several ency- clopedias and has published and presented dozens of papers at local, regional, national, and international conferences. He has also designed, developed, organized, and chaired several conferences for Miami University and conference sessions for a variety of organizations. He is a Senior Member of IEEE and is a member
school teachers who develop, design and implement new curricula that align tothe 2016 Massachusetts science, technology and engineering (STE) curriculum frameworks [1].This paper focuses on a specific sub-set of research data collected during the author’s doctoraldissertation that have not yet been published.The acronym STEAM (science, technology, engineering, art and mathematics) has emerged as amore inclusive approach to STEM education because it incorporates the arts [2]. STEAMeducation includes the study of art, drama, music, media and design, which is increasinglybecoming more technical with the development of computer-aided software for musicians,architects, graphic artists and artists using almost any media. In this study, STEAM
Paper ID #41173Engineering Technology Students and Faculty—Bridging PerspectivesDr. Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue University Dr. Lucietto has focused her research in engineering technology education and the understanding of engineering technology students. She teaches in an active learning style, engaging and developing practical skills in the students. Currently, she is exploring underrepresented student participation in engineering technology programs.Dyane Roesel, Purdue University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Engineering Technology Students and Faculty - Bridging
Paper ID #44028Considering Professional Diversity as a Factor in a Consensus Building Methodfor Expert Crowdsourcing of Curriculum TopicsMr. Brian Khoa Ngac, George Mason University Brian K. Ngac is an Instructional Faculty Member and Dean’s Teaching Fellow at George Mason University’s School of Business. Moreover, he is a PhD Candidate (ABD) at George Mason University’s College of Engineering & Computing. He holds 12 internationally recognized cyber security and management certifications including the C|CISO, CISSP, ISSMP, CISM, and PMP. His areas of expertise are in cyber security, digital engineering (RDT&E), and
,engineering and mathematics education, are still relatively rare. A frequent comment fromengineering faculty who don’t use active/cooperative learning is that they don’t understand howthis form of pedagogy and classroom management strategies can apply to their subject or to theirclassroom. Too often these strategies are brushed off with comments about them only applyingto the “softer” subjects taught on the “other side of campus” – but certainly not to the rigorousand complex technical subjects of engineering.Reported in this paper is information on Active/Cooperative Learning: Best Practices inEngineering Education, an online repository of engineering-specific ideas, testimonials, andteaching strategies to stimulate and aid faculty in trying and
that is imperative for the critical analysis, creativity, andinnovation demands that will be placed on the engineering community of the future?We have begun work to bring about a cultural shift by addressing the needs of current and future facultyto engage instructional strategies for innovation by developing a workshop that supports conceptual andphilosophical development, provides instructional strategies and scaffolding, and is based on soundpedagogical theory. Our ongoing experiences with the workshop are providing us with insightsregarding unleashing innovation in experiential learning, and those experiences are informing ourcurrent and future work toward supporting a culture of innovation in engineering education.In this paper, we
Paper ID #10677Maybe I am Interested in Engineering, Does that Matter?Dr. Cheryl Carrico P.E., Virginia TechDr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Holly Matusovich (co-PI) is an Assistant Professor in Virginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. Her expertise includes motivation and related frameworks, using these frameworks broadly to study student engagement in learning, student recruitment into and retention within engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching
with creative ways to continue to provide high quality education to more studentswith fewer resources.TerminologyThe field of online and blended educational practices is still so new that terminology andnomenclature have not yet solidified. In this study and this paper, the term “hybrid” or “blended”is used to describe courses where the full amount of instruction in the classroom was augmentedby multiple technical and procedural innovations. This type of course is often elsewhere termed“web-assisted,” was not used since the introduction and evaluation of the online work of bothstudents and instructors in this study have led to a situation where it is indeed feasible for theuniversity to decrease the classroom time and replace that with online
Paper ID #6464The Impact of Role-Playing Simulations on Global Competency in an OnlineTransnational Engineering CourseMs. Kari Wold, University of Virginia Kari Wold is a doctorate student at the University of Virginia focusing on instructional technology in engineering education. She has published in and has presented on engineering education, international education, writing for English language learners, blended learning, and online learning. Wold’s primary interests focus on global education and methods of online instruction. She has degrees in journalism and economics from the University of Minnesota as well as a
Paper ID #7390Use of Multimedia Case Studies in an Introductory Engineering Course atTwo Southeastern Universities: A Qualitative Evaluation StudyMs. Kimberly C. Huett, University of West Georgia Kim C. Huett is an instructor of technology integration at the University of West Georgia in Carrollton, Georgia. She holds an Ed.S. in Instructional Technology, an M.S. in Secondary Education, and B.A. degrees in English and Spanish from the University of Texas at Austin. Currently a doctoral student in School Improvement, Kim’s research interests include the design of distance learning environments, teacher education, and STEM
Paper ID #42207To Record or Not to Record? Collaborating through ConflictEmily Ris¨e Crum, Columbia UniversityKristin Leigh Bennett, University of WashingtonProf. Stuart Adler, University of Washington Stuart B Adler is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. His research focuses primarily on energy-related materials and electrochemical energy conversion. Over the last 15 years he has also led changes inProf. David S Bergsman, University of Washington David Bergsman (he/him) is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Washington
Paper ID #49211BOARD # 55: Senior capstone case study: measuring outcomes with enhancedindustry mentoringDr. Kevin Quinn Walsh PE, SE, University of Notre Dame Dr. Walsh is an Associate Teaching Professor in the University of Notre Dame Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering & Earth Sciences. He is concurrently a Principal at Frost Engineering & Consulting in Mishawaka, Indiana. He is a registered Professional Engineer (PE) or Structural Engineer (SE) in 23 states. He completed his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. He was a recipient of the 2023 Rev. Edmund P
Paper ID #38045STEM students leading cultural change: How agency and capacity forcollective action are cultivated within a distributed networkMr. Robert P. Dalka, University of Maryland, College Park Robert Dalka is a graduate student in the Physics department at the University of Maryland, College Park. He is a part of the Physics Education Research Group, along with his advisor, Dr. Chandra Turpen. His research interests are in student leadership and organizational change.Dr. Chandra Anne Turpen, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Chandra Turpen is a Research Assistant Professor in the Department of Physics at the
Paper ID #17622Modernizing the Current Afghan Engineering Education System: Challengesand OpportunitiesMr. Khalilullah Mayar, Kabul Polytechnic University, Kabul -Afghanistan Khalilullah Mayar is a faculty of civil engineering at Kabul Polytechnic University where he teaches, introduction to engineering, construction materials and methods, construction contracts, and engineering mechanics courses to the undergrad students. He also leads the Polytechnic University International Relation and Partnership Office and has been actively involved in the university academic programs- quality assurance efforts as well. Mr. Mayar was a
Paper ID #34426Lab Every Day!! Lab Every Day?? *&%#ing Lab Every Day!? ExaminingStudent Attitudes in a Core Engineering Course Using Hands-on LearningEvery Day of ClassDr. Erin A. Henslee, Wake Forest University Dr. Erin Henslee is a Founding Faculty and Assistant Professor of Engineering at Wake Forest University. Her research spans biomedical engineering, e-sports, and STEM education. Prior to joining Wake Forest she was a Researcher Development Officer at the University of Surrey where she supported Early Career Researchers. She received her BS degrees in Engineering Science and Mechanics and Mathematics from Virginia
Paper ID #12344Virtual Peer Teams: Connecting Students with the Online Work Environ-mentDr. Thalia Anagnos, San Jose State University Dr. Thalia Anagnos is a professor in the General Engineering Department at San Jose State University, where she has taught since 1984. From 2009 to 2014 she served as co-Leader of Education, Outreach, and Training (EOT) for the George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES), a consortium of 14 large-scale earthquake engineering experimental facilities. As co-Leader of NEES EOT she also served on the leadership team for the NEES REU program.Ms. Alicia L Lyman-Holt
academic environment (Anderson and Boud, 1996) ≠ improved student perseverance and retention (Tinto, 2000) Many of the above mentioned benefits are also of relevance to the peer tutorsthemselves. In addition, the tutoring experience can lead to the development oforganisational, communication and critical thinking skills associated with the teachingprocess, as well as improved knowledge and technical skills through greater attentionto and motivation for the subject matter, i.e. learning by teaching (see Hartman (1990)and the discussions of Topping (1996)). Furthermore, the experience may yieldmotivational and professional-development benefits through greater engagement andidentity with academic staff. Although much research evidence
. Currently, he is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering Department. During the last 20 years, he has been working in the areas of hierarchical multiprocessors, hierarchical networks, performance analysis of computer systems, digital signal processing, embedded systems, in-vehicle networking, performance analysis of networking protocols, secure wireless communications, and privacy protected vehicle-to-vehicle communications and simulation techniques. He has supervised a number of projects from Ford Motor Company and other local industries. He also served as a Co-PI on two NSF funded projects. He has published over 100 peer-reviewed journal and conference proceeding papers. He