the nine credits ofrequired CAD classes to further their knowledge of the latest technology. This course wouldalso introduce students to aesthetic and ergonomic design issues, which, while touched upon intraditional design courses, have never been a major factor in the overall design process. Overtime this course has evolved to one that also covers advanced surface modeling CAD strategiesfor geometry creation, both additive and subtractive methods for rapid prototyping and differentmethods of reverse engineering existing products. In addition, the acquisition of this technologyand equipment has come to benefit both students in other courses and departments within theCollege. It has also become a resource for faculty doing research and local
—into an existing advanced computer architecture course taught to both undergraduate and graduate students in a way that required them to have no prior knowledge of formal methods. The first project was on design and formal verification of a 5-stage pipelined DLX processor, implementing the six basic instruction types—register-register-ALU, register- immediate-ALU, store, load, jump, and branch. The second project was on extending the processor from project one with ALU exceptions, a return-from-exception instruction, and branch prediction; each of the resulting models was formally verified. The third project was on design and formal ver- ification of a dual-issue superscalar version of the DLX from
AC 2008-1477: A NEW ENGINEERING COMMUNICATIONS COURSE BASEDON A PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATIONS PROCESSLeslie Potter, Iowa State University Leslie Potter is a Lecturer in the department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering at Iowa State University. She has extensive professional engineering experience, including seven years with Deere & Company in various engineering and supervision capacities. She received her M.S. in Industrial Engineering from Penn State University prior to joining the IMSE department at ISU. She is currently teaching her eighth year of the IE capstone design course. Her research interests include capstone design course effectiveness, engineering and
AC 2009-1398: A TABLET-PC-BASED ELECTRONIC GRADING SYSTEM IN ALARGE FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING COURSERicky Castles, Virginia Tech RICKY T. CASTLES is a computer engineering PhD student in the Bradley Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Virginia Tech. He received a masters of science degree in computer engineering in 2006 and a masters of science degree in industrial and systems engineering (human factors option) in 2008. He is currently a co-coordinator for hands-on workshops in a first-year engineering course. His research interests include knowledge representation, physiological data monitoring, artificial intelligence, and expert systems.Eric Scott, Virginia Tech Eric Scott
permission to be in the study by sharing theirlearning outcomes from the online platform.The survey contained 38 questions, of which 6 were relevant to the research objectives of thispaper and are listed in Table 3 along with the number of student responses to the question. Theselect all that apply questions were quantified based on the number of responses for each selectionoption. These responses were then graphed and analyzed. The student answers from the openresponse questions were categorized into common themes and evaluated based on their content. Table 3: Questions from the student survey that are relevant to the research discussed in this paper. The entire survey consisted of a variety of open response, select all that apply, and Likert Scale
create apartnership that would answer two primary research questions: 1. Would CDC students in the US and South Africa benefit from working together during the development of STEM tools? 2. Would US and South African K-12 students benefit from utilization of the STEM tools in the classroom?In order to understand the differences between the two CDC programs, the instructors firstshared class schedule details, and information regarding design methodologies and processes.Prior to commencing the collaborative design of a STEM tool, the UAH CDC instructor sharedpedagogic information regarding the use of quantitative evaluation matrices by studentengineering design teams. Evaluation matrices are commonly used trade study tools that
AC 2012-3975: AN ALTERNATIVE MODEL FOR COMPUTER NETWORKSEDUCATION IN COMPUTING DISCIPLINESDr. Jorge Crichigno, Northern New Mexico College Jorge Crichigno received a B.Sc. degree in electrical engineering from the Catholic University of Asun- cion, Paraguay, in 2004, and M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in computer engineering from the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, in 2008 and 2009, respectively. He is currently an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Department at Northern New Mexico College, Espanola, N.M. His current research inter- ests include wireless and optical networks, graph theory, mathematical optimization, and undergraduate STEM education. He has served as reviewer and TPC member of journals and
Director of Undergraduate Studies, and an Associate Teaching Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Notre Dame. He is the faculty advisor ND’s student chapter of AICJacqueline Gartner Ph.D., Campbell University Jacqueline Gartner is founding faculty of Campbell University’s hands-on, project based chemical engineering program. She both teaches chemical engineering for the middle years and conducts research on how to create interventions to help engineering students succeed and persist to graduation. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 How We Teach: Transport Phenomena and ApplicationsAbstractThe AIChE Education Division
(AWMA) air pollution control and waste minimization research award, the graduate and professional students association (ASU) teaching excellence award in recognition of outstanding teaching associates amongst other notable awardsEmily Erin Henderson Emily Henderson is a graduate student at Northern Arizona University (NAU) , where she is pursuing her master's degree in Environmental Engineering. Emily will also be working as a Graduate Teaching Assistant at NAU for the 2022-2023 school year and is currently working as an intern within the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality's (ADEQ) Air Quality Division.Fethiye Ozis (Assistant Teaching Professor) Dr. Fethiye Ozis is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the
, Texas, Madison, Wisconsin, Salt Lake City, Utah, Salem, Oregon and Walla Walla, Washington. He was commissioned in the U.S. Air Force in 1969 and served five years on active duty in the Air Weather Service before joining the NWS in 1976. He continued in the USAF Reserves and retired in 1996 at the rank of Colonel. He received two Meritorious Service Medals, and is a graduate of the Air War College. Bill graduated with a BA in Mathematics from Washington State University in 1969, and received a MS in Meteorology from the University of Wisconsin – Madison in 1977. He has additional graduate work in Accounting and Business Administration from Texas Tech University and a minor Computer
AC 2012-3421: STUDENT-CREATED WATER QUALITY SENSORSMs. Liesl Hotaling, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg Liesl Hotaling is a Senior Research Engineering with the College of Marine Sciences, University of South Florida. She holds a B.A. in marine science, a M.A.T. in science teaching, and a M.S. in maritime systems (ocean engineering). She is a partner in Centers for Ocean Science Education Excellence - Networked Ocean World (COSEE-NOW) and specializes in real time data education projects and hands-on STEM educational projects supporting environmental observing networks.Dr. Susan Lowes, Columbia University Susan Lowes, Ph.D., is Director of Research and Evaluation at the Institute for Learning Technologies
sanitation, as well as sustainability solutions, through interdisciplinary approaches. Since joining the Olin College faculty she has also dived into the field of engineering education with an emphasis on integration of arts, humanities, and STEM. Her love of learning was first fostered by an unusual elementary school education that was deeply inter- disciplinary with a substantial arts curriculum. After graduating from Harvard University with a B.A. in Dramatic Literature, she worked professionally in theater and wrote and recorded two musical albums. She then returned to school to study engineering, earning a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Rutgers Uni- versity in 2011. While completing her degree at Rutgers, she wrote
design processbegins with understanding the needs of the stakeholders and involves them throughout the designprocess. It is iterative and advocates the use of prototypes and empirical evaluation to makedesign decisions. It also includes attention to the delivery, service, and maintenance aspects ofthe project. [17]The overall philosophy of EPICS is guided by the core values that balance student learning andpreparation for life after graduation with community partnerships and impact. EPICS isacademically a design course that is done within the context of community engagement whichoffers rich opportunities for authentic design projects and opportunities for broad learning andimpact on people, communities, and the environment. A model that
-based, and thematerial is being taught to students having concentrations mechanical, electrical, civil, andindustrial engineering, which is not unique, but certainly is a challenge in that it must be broad.Placement of course in UT Martin curriculumThe sophomore or junior year of study is typically where a first course in engineeringexperimentation is placed in four-year engineering curricula. At UT Martin, students typicallyhave had basic coursework common to all concentrations by the start of their junior year:Graphics, English Composition I and II, Calculus I, II, and III, Differential Equations, ChemistryI, Physics I and II, Engineering Economy, Electronics I, Strength of Materials, Statics, andDynamics. The junior year is when students
moreappropriate strategy of introducing engineering courses than classical lectures.1. IntroductionFluid mechanics, as most other university courses, is usually presented in the form of lectureswhere the students listen to the “professor” as he delivers his lecture. The students in classwould probably get a good deal of knowledge and would, hopefully, be convinced with theformulas through their derivation that takes place in the classroom.1.1 The Quest for Change Page 11.170.2Apart from the amount of knowledge that the students grasp, such mechanism of “knowledgedelivery” lacks capturing the students’ interest in science. Therefore, graduates from
to which program outcomes or educational objectives are being achieved; or(b) result in decisions and actions taken to improve the program.Multiple constituencies are to be involved in the process, as the TAC/ABET Technology Criteria2000 (TC2K) stipulate use of multiple assessment tools and measures for (a) the programoutcomes, i.e., knowledge and capabilities of students at the time of graduation and (b) theprogram objectives, i.e., the expected accomplishments of graduates during the first few yearsafter graduation. Effective assessment tools provide the information needed to measure outcomesand objectives, so necessary improvements can be implemented.The focus of this paper is on assessment of program outcomes. The primary assessment
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 A new motivation and perspective on teaching simulation and design: The development of a dynamic process model in conjunction with an operator training simulator (OTS)IntroductionDuring the past five years, the author was involved, as part of a team of researchers anddevelopers, in building an Operator Training Simulator (OTS) for an Integrated GasificationCombined Cycle (IGCC) power plant. In a companion project, a 3-D fully Immersive TrainingSystem (ITS) was developed for the same IGCC power plant OTS. During this process, theeducational potential of both the OTS and ITS became evident and provides the motivation forthis paper.Traditional process/plant
different grading process than thosethat have an easily defined solution. This paper explains how, through the use of a blendedcriteria and norm based assessment and evaluation process, to clearly communicate standardsand outcomes, fairly grade dissimilar designs, and effectively encourage continuousimprovement of design products. Evidence of these outcomes will be assessed through thestatistical analysis of student feedback from the United States Military Academy.Introduction United States Military Academy (USMA) civil engineering majors are required tocomplete a one-semester capstone design project as a requirement for graduation. The capstonedesign provides the best integrated experience to assess student performance on the USMA
Session 16601. IntroductionKanazawa Institute of Technology (KIT) is a private engineering college of approximately seventyfive hundred undergraduate students and five hundred graduate students. It is the first universityto have introduced engineering design education (EDE) in Japan. This is a part of the effort toreform the Japanese educational system since 1991. The aim of this reform was to promote theintegration and application of knowledge-based learning and skill training. It was proposed inorder to enhance the creativity of KIT graduates and to cultivate flexibility as engineeringprofessionals.2. How the Program StartedEDE started in 1996 with the assistance of American professors from Rose-Hulman Institute ofTechnology, a sister school of
, view the Computer Science and Engineering laboratories, and meet the science and engineering faculty / staff. Studies have shown that there is a high probability that the United States will have asignificant shortage of scientists and engineers within the next ten years and beyond. In the state Page 9.1029.1of Utah, Governor Leavitt has declared an Engineering Initiative whereby a goal was established Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationto double the number of engineering
alumni, The University of Tennessee College of Engineering is wellunderway in a major renovation / reconstruction of its Freshman Engineering program. Thiseffort is an integrated approach to the Freshman curriculum, with a 6-semester hour first-semester course emphasizing problem-solving, teamwork, design concepts, and computer tools(engineering graphics and computer programming), all based around the study of low-levelintroductory physics material. The second thrust is a second-semester 6-hour course integratingstatics and dynamics, while assuming and using mastery of the material from the first semester.Following the lead of educational theorists, the effort is trying to include as many different formsof learning opportunities as possible. The
advances toscience itself, generating a vicious circle. At the same time, as consequence, social,environmental, economical, and political problems have come along, bringing up crisis andinstability to the social order.Presently, one of the greatest challenges to researchers in social areas is to understand thecomplex imbrications/overlaps amongst the variables of this historical process and to find outways to allow “harmonious solutions”. However, what do “harmonious solutions” mean to eachone? Would be there a general consensus about that? The definition of what means a“harmonious solution” will depend on the ideological aspects of the people involved in theanalysis of problems.In the last years, aiming to give some perspectives of solution to
designmethodology and process elements include problem definition and creativity). Page 14.1229.3Outcome 23: Lifelong learning – “Plan and execute the acquisition of required expertiseappropriate for professional practice”. Civil engineering graduates must “demonstrate the abilityfor self-directed learning, and develop their own learning plan”. “Self-directed learning is amode of lifelong learning because it is the ability to learn on one’s own with the aid of formaleducation”.In addition, the BOK2’s guidance for students and engineer interns requires them able tounderstand the vision for civil engineering, develop horizontal thinking, self-direct life
Paper ID #12417Work in Progress: Rubric Development for Year-long Civil Engineering Cap-stone ProjectsDr. Nirmala Gnanapragasam, Seattle University Dr. Nirmala Gnanapragasam is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Seattle University. She also serves as the Design Coordinator for the department’s capstone program. She is a licensed professional engineer and her areas of interests are geotechnical engineering, professional practice and pedagogy.Dr. Nathan E Canney PE, Seattle University Dr. Canney teaches civil engineering at Seattle University. His research focuses on
Copyright © 2010, American Society for Engineering Education 104Why Teach the Holocaust?While from a pragmatic point of view, such instruction can help engineering educators addressABET outcomes that deal with professionalism, ethics, and the societal/global impact ofengineering, a deeper reason for studying this historical period involves the maintenance ofcivilized society in general. According to the Task Force for International Cooperation onHolocaust Education, Remembrance, and Research, founded in 1998 by Göran Persson, theSwedish prime minister, the Holocaust warrants continued study because ―it fundamentallychallenged the foundations
Paper ID #39710Improving Student Perceptions of Learning through Collaborative TestingDr. Brian P. Helmke, University of Virginia Brian Helmke (he/him/his) is currently Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Virginia. He received the B.S.E. in bioengineering from the University of Pennsylvania, the B.S.Econ. from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, and the Ph.D in bioengineering from the University of California, San Diego. Brian’s research interests include cardiovascular physiology, cellu- lar mechanobiology, and nanotechnology-based biomaterials. He is also interested in
] discuss risks and risk management in a graduate level SoftwareEngineering project course. Design issues, technical knowledge gaps, COTS issues, and time andbudget constraints had the highest frequency of occurrence.Vanhanen and Lehtinen [1] studied 11 capstone projects to understand the types of problems thatoccurred. The top failures were that the teams fell short of their goals (both in features andquality), communications broke down, and students didn’t “take responsibility.” In thediscussion, the authors referred to poor quality estimation, high learning needs, and poormotivation. Student motivation becomes a problem when heroic effort is the only option forsuccess.More recently, Makiaho and Poranen [4] compared the risks identified up front
Paper ID #40807WIP: Utilizing MATLAB in Combination with Lego Mindstorm EV3 Kits foraFirst-year Engineering CourseChristopher Daniel Winfrey I am an instructor and current Ph.D. candidate at Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU) studying computational science. I also received both Bachelor of Science in Engineering Technology and Master of Science in Professional Science degrees from MTSU. My primary research focuses on the application of machine learning and simulation software to analyze traffic within the state of Tennessee, identify problematic areas, and propose intelligent solutions such as signal retiming via
code, an increased media publicitythat has brought more students and sponsors, and the expansion of the tutoring team from aprofessor and assistant to laboratory personnel and graduate students.American UniversityThe product design and development course at the American University started in the early1990s in the larger context of addressing the dwindling competitiveness of US manufacturingthroughout the 1980s. An ambitious project between the American University’s EngineeringDepartment and Business School and major American manufacturing companies aimed ateducating future leaders in the manufacturing area and to conduct research on manufacturingprocesses. Product development was soon determined as a principal driver of
The numerical engineering class was designed for juniors to first year graduate students.The class is designed to be delivered both in a distance and local classroom setting sinceapproximately 25 percent of the class is made up of engineers obtaining their Master’s degree Page 12.314.2off-site. To pique student interest, all numerical lab exercises and homework were derived fromnumerical examples taken from the authors’ research experience and the engineering textbook.The terminal learning objectives were that students would have sufficient programmingknowledge to: (1) develop code to numerically solve problems that would be