; entrepreneurshipBACKGROUNDExamining faculty development in practice, it is natural to look at it logically. Important questions related tothe logic are why, how, and who. Why it is being conducted? What is the aim of the development activity?How is it being conducted? Do the means of faculty development suit the objective, and is there evidencethat the means is effective? Who is doing the developing, and who is being developed? Is it being drivenby faculty themselves, or by peers, older faculty, or administrators? Are the people engaged in facultydevelopment even aware that this is what they or doing, or does it happen so naturally that they areunaware?Engineering education literature on faculty development reveals that often its purpose is the adoption ofpedagogical
research and evaluation of programs to improve human services, as well as developing evaluation methods that can be embedded within programs. Dr. Giancola’s current work focuses on developing methodological processes to embed evaluation into human services programs, such that program development can be driven by reliable and valid information and impact findings can be properly interpreted. Much of her work employs theory-based methods, not to replace rigorous research designs, but rather to supplement, in order to better understand implementation and effectiveness. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 ADVANCE Women’s Leadership at the University of Delaware
given the freedom to design as you would like, just as you must stick within the constraints of the essay topic, length and page headers, but are given the freedom to write however you would like.The transition from writing essays in English to engaging in an engineering OEMP highlights theinterdisciplinary nature of learning. The second author uses his prior experience with loose essayprompts in English class to navigate the ill-defined nature of the OEMP. The first authordiscusses a similar idea while responding to a confidence-related prompt, again reaffirming theinterconnectedness between freedom, confidence, and each student’s unique reliance oninterdisciplinary skills. She contrasts her assurance in making decisions during
been published in several conferences, including the IEEE Computer Science, IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR), IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things: Systems, Management and Se- curity (IoTSMS), IEEE Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud), IEEE International Conference on Smart Innovations (SCI).Mrs. Rachida Satio Constance Kone, Morgan State University Rachida is a PhD candidate in embedded systems at Morgan State University. After earning a Master’s degree in electrical and energy engineering, Rachida worked as a Software Engineer before joining the PhD program at Morgan State University. As a project supervisor at the Cybersecurity Assurance and Pol- icy (CAP
] performed a similar experiment, studying the shear properties of ABS(Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene) and Polycarbonate parts as related to print orientation, Hanon Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2022, American Society for Engineering Education 2et al [5] analyzed its effect on the properties of a bronze composite, and Alharbi et al [1] studiedthe effect on SLA (Stereolithography Apparatus) printed material. Seung-hyun Kim et al [8]created an undergraduate laboratory module on the topic of 3D printing, and Elliott et al [4]described a work-in-progress of a detailed
spring of 2009-2010, an introductory environmental engineeringcourse was re-designed to include four new environmental laboratory modules that use aninquiry-based “open” experiment for enhanced student learning. This research was fundedthrough the NSF Innovations in Engineering Education (IEECI) program to develop modulesutilizing the pedagogy of problem-based learning and case studies to teach new environmentalsustainable design concepts. Problem based learning (PBL) and case studies are novelapproaches for laboratory modules. In PBL and case studies, students are assigned real-worldproblems to discuss, research, and solve as teams. This method diverges from the traditional“step-by-step” method currently used in laboratory courses and provides
? 4. Are you alive. 5. Are you allive?By comparing the answers to the first and second questions, the student gains clues into the Page 9.1183.5randomness of the answers. Comparing the first and third questions provides information as to Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright À 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationhow the program deals with word order. The fourth question investigates the importance ofpunctuation and the fifth question explores the chatterbot’s ability to deal with misspellings thata human could easily
. Page 22.929.4III. Student Training and DevelopmentOver 50 undergraduate students, 15 graduate students, and several other researchers haveworked on classroom and/or funded research projects led by the authors. They have receivedtraining/exposure to research equipments such as PLD, sputtering, thermal evaporation, X-raydiffraction (XRD), atomic force microscopy (AFM), SEM, transmission electron microscopy(TEM), thickness profilometer, physical property measurement system (PPMS), vibratingsample magnetometer (VSM), four probe method, etc. We have also developed two newcourses in the Department of Mechanical Engineering that are related to nanoscience andnanoengineering. These courses are: (i) MEEN 685-Fundamentals of Nanoscience andEngineering
2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference Stronger Student Engagement in the Undergraduate Heat Transfer Course through a Numerical Project Dani Fadda, Ph.D., P.E. Mechanical Engineering Department The Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science (The Jonsson School) The University of Texas at DallasAbstractA numerical heat transfer project was used to complement a conventional heat transfer lecturecourse and its corresponding heat transfer lab. The numerical project helped students relate to theheat transfer course material and improved their
understanding. Results from thepast 5 years will be presented to give a better understanding of how to appropriately use TLMs inDigital Systems and other similar courses.IntroductionThe University of Arkansas – Fort Smith (UAFS) is an open admission institution with strongties to local industry; it supports many technology related programs. UAFS in conjunction withthe University of Arkansas - Fayetteville (UAF) offers bachelor degrees in Electrical andMechanical Engineering. The Fort Smith campus is responsible for the first two years of thedegree and additional interactions with senior design students. One of the sophomore coursesregularly instructed by University of Arkansas – Fort Smith is Digital Systems. In order tocomply with the Arkansas
represents an exploration tounderstand the ways in which women, a group notoriously underrepresented in Engineering, feelconnected to others in their Engineering classes, how this is related to their feelings of belonging,and how feelings of belonging are related to their academic outcomes.Specifically, we examined the ways in which students understand, find, and utilize study partnersas supports for feelings of belonging and for learning engineering content. Survey results fromstudents in three large undergraduate Engineering courses (N = 157) suggest that obstacles tofinding study partners may adversely affect sense of belonging, participation, and learningoutcomes.This investigation provides insights into these equity challenges and the results
university are: 1. Maintain good relations with industry that may hire its graduates 2. Expose students to the real world 3. Industry personnel may recommend the program to prospective students 4. Industry personnel may recommend their employees take classes at the university to keep up-to-dateThe benefits to the industry are: 1. Maintain contact with the university and the engineering program 2. Evaluate students before considering them for jobs 3. Have an independent analysis of a project with possibly new ways of looking at the project 4. May be able to provide recommendations for the university to include in the engineering programWith this class, it is a win-win situation for everyone
getting thestudents to start using a powerful tool they already have on their computer, without having toteach a separate course on using spreadsheets, and at the same time enhancing the learning ofmaterials science. If successful, we will see students using spreadsheets in the same way thatyears ago we used pocket calculators, without thinking twice about it, and to do interesting newthings.Why Spreadsheets?Why, when powerful software such as Mathematica, MathCad, HiQ and other programs areavailable, should the use of spreadsheets in engineering course be considered? Many of theanswers are obvious: “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition 2003
*decision support* - some support ** - strong support Page 7.1302.10 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Expos ition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationNotes: 1. Subscription and notification service. 2. NetMeeting announces incoming calls. 3. These capabilities are available with the more powerful SharePoint Portal Server. 4. Synchronous group editing is possible using a shared program like a wordprocessor in NetMeeting. 5. Microsoft Project has many task scheduling and tracking capabilities. 6. Group
AC 2010-1128: A SYSTEMS VIEW OF TECHNOLOGY CURRICULAJohn Robertson, Arizona State University John Robertson is a Professor in the Engineering Technology Department at Arizona State University Polytechnic. He was formerly an executive with Motorola and now participates in many senior technical training programs with the JACMET consortium. He is also a consultant to MATEC for the ESYST program to introduce a system-focused curriculum for Community Colleges.Louis Frenzel, Electronic Design Magazine Lou Frenzel has been a Technology Editor for Electronic Design Magazine for seven years. Formerly, he was professor and department head at Austin Community College and he still teaches at
currently working toward the B.CS degree in honours computer ecience (Bioinformatics Option) at the University of Waterloo. He is interested in pursuing research at the graduate level in bioinformatics or other related fields of applied computer science. He is also a Captain of the University of Waterloo Varsity Men’s Track and Field team.Dr. Manoj Sachdev P.Eng., University of Waterloo Page 25.1336.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The Road to Success for STEM Student-AthletesAbstractVarsity athletics and university science, technology, engineering, and
Paper ID #12045Changing Attitudes in Cross Cultural Diversity through International SeniorCapstone ProjectsDr. Phillip Albert Sanger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Phillip A. Sanger is a professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology in the College of Technology at Purdue University. At Purdue, Dr. Sanger spearheads the multidisciplinary senior capstone program where students solve real problems for industry. Prior to joining Purdue he was the Director of the Center for Rapid Product Realization (the Rapid Center) at Western Carolina University where he worked with hundreds of companies from the
is a good one and should be continued for thesole purpose that it enhances our communicative skills. Case in point, the explanations we haveto give on the Quant printouts. We have to explain them in a manner where the average personwho doesn't know a thing about goal programming can understand. This is the Achilles heel ofmany engineers, they can explain in great technical details to their peers but when it comes toexplaining an idea or concept to a non-technical group or individual they do not know how torelate. The portfolio also helps to improve on our organizational skills. Once organized I feelthat in the future if I ever have a question on goal programming I can go to my portfolio and findan answer to that question."Because portfolios
problems, definition problems, numerical problems, and someequation solutions in engineering. Some engineering solutions require that students creatediagrams/graphs that are the solution being submitted. Many learning management systems(LMS) are not able to provide automated try-again feedback on these types of solutions andtherefore the effectiveness of try-again feedback is minimized for graphical solutions. Graphicaluser interfaces (GUIs) are interfaces where a computer allows a student to interact with graphicscontrolled by the user through underlying code. GUIs can be programmed in many computerlanguages. This work uses Matlab GUIs to present students with shear and moment diagramproblems that are interactive with the graphical solutions. A
covered in the course by integrating experiencesusing a FE analysis program, b) provide students with a basic understanding of FE theory, c)provide students with the skill set needed to model and analyze combined load problems using aFE analysis program; and d) provide students with an understanding of how element type, meshsize, support conditions, and other modeling decisions may impact FE analysis results.Previous studies have sought to incorporate FE modeling and analysis content as early as thefreshman year into the engineering curriculum. However, implementing these approaches inStrength of Materials courses often requires students to spend considerable time learning FEtheory before being able to use commercial FEA programs. A few studies
the coding schemes described already, which skew towards beingless interpretive based on their deductive origins, this study is also limited based on severalfactors, not least of which is my own choice to ground it in a very specific model of knowledgetransfer (Nokes & Belenky, 2011) that matches my own thoughts about the process. Furtherlimitations in particular relate to the study lacking prolonged engagement with participants orpersistent observation in which the knowledge transfer process might be examined in differentcontexts within engineering. There is also a lack of triangulation of data as multiple types of dataare not currently used - in the future I would like to correlate findings with quantitative indicatorsof student ability
institutions?3. Methods3.1 Participants and data collectionTo address our research question, we conducted a multi-case study [27], collecting interviewdata from 59 undergraduate students in two engineering departments, Electrical and ComputerEngineering (ECE) and Industrial and Systems Engineering (ISE), in six universities across theU.S. Each department (or discipline/institution pair) is considered a case. For example, ECE atUniversity 1, represented by U1ECE, is one case and ISE at University 2, represented by U2ISE,is a separate case. Participants within each case are identified by their university followed bytheir program (ECE or ISE) and a number indicating the order in which they were interviewed.For example, U2ISE3 is the third ISE student
enrolled in first-year engineering design; and (ii) 52 graduate engineers enrolled in amaster’s level systems engineering course. Our results showed 41 common correlated pairsbetween these two samples, all at the p<0.05 level of significance. The implications of thesecorrelations for engineering educators are discussed, along with potential directions for futureresearch to expand this area of study.1. IntroductionThe use of concept maps in engineering education research is growing, with applications in theassessment of knowledge mastery and integration within courses, programs, and across multipledisciplines2,7,12,13,14,19,21. Concept maps are also being used to assess the effectiveness of theearly stages of engineering problem solving and
system. Some labs may have to be cancelled in the Springsemester for the bad weather. 1 © American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 2015 ASEE Northeast Section Conference In order to facilitate the power electronics development and solar energy education, asystem is needed to simulate the output from a PV module and the output from this systemshould follow the typical current-voltage curves of a PV module. In this paper, a simulator isdeveloped with a programmable DC power source, which is controlled by the programs. Theinputs to the simulator are zip code, date, and time. The
, Fundamentals of Space Flight Systems, Astronomy, and Sr. Capstone Sequence. He enjoys mentoring undergraduate students in aerospace, sensors, and energy-related research projects. Some of the research areas include spacecraft nano-satellite technologies, satellite payload instrumenta- tion, High Altitude research Platform (HARP) experiments, wave particle interactions in space, space- flight X-ray imagers, construction and renewable energy engineering and architecture, and philosophy of science. Dr. Voss has worked as PI on many NASA, Air Force, Navy, NSF, and DOE research grants and has published over 120 scientific papers. hnvoss@taylor.edu, Phone 765 998 4843 or 765 618 3813Prof. Jeff F Dailey Mr. Jeff Dailey
the NCIIA. Besterfield-Sacre’s current research focuses on three distinct but highly correlated areas pf innovative design, entrepreneurship, and modeling. She is an Associate Editor for the AEE Journal.Dr. Natasa S. Vidic, University of PittsburghDr. Karen M. Bursic, University of Pittsburgh Karen M. Bursic is an Assistant Professor and the Undergraduate Program Director for industrial en- gineering at the University of Pittsburgh. She received her B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in industrial engineering from the University of Pittsburgh. Prior to joining the department, she worked as a Senior Consultant for Ernst and Young and as an Industrial Engineer for General Motors Corporation. She teaches undergraduate
learning the procedural approach to C. The wisdom of thisapproach applies equally well to persons wishing to develop code for embedded systems.Electrical engineering students traditionally have a C++? or Java course, plus a microprocessorscourse covering an assembler language. None of these languages are ideal for small embeddedsystems, which require the reliability provided by object-oriented programming without theoverhead of a high-level language (such as Java). A more universal, relatively low-level,portable language such as C is more useful for small embedded system applications.The crash course is designed to cover small embedded systems (devices without an operatingsystem) plus programming techniques applicable to these systems, for both
mission within the Electrical Engineering Department atthe United States Air Force Academy is to educate cadets on the fundamentals of digital systems.The division provides a digital systems curriculum to computer science and electrical engineeringmajors. Additionally, we teach the fundamentals of microcomputer programming to all electricalengineering majors. Over the last four years we have implemented a variety of in-househardware and software teaching tools to enhance our educational mission while emphasizing anexciting, hands-on approach to computer education. In this paper we will detail theseinnovations and describe how they fit together for a cohesive educational experience.BACKGROUND The digital systems curriculum at the United
NationalScience Foundation to create an “Information Assurance Educational Support Program.” Facultymembers from universities in the Midwest participate in an intensive workshop on informationassurance and security education, with the goal of introducing security concepts into courses intheir academic departments. Participants were given access to streaming media version of thelectures from four of our core security classes. They also received support material to helpintegrate the subject material into their existing courses. Our target audience includes facultymembers who are teaching computer science, computer engineering, information systems, orrelated fields, and are committed to initiating education or research efforts in security in theirown
Paper ID #11236Application of Life Cycle Analysis with Systems in an Introductory MaterialsCourseDr. Craig Johnson P.E., Central Washington University Dr. Johnson is the coordinator of the MET Program at Central Washington University. He is also the Foundry Educational Foundation Key Professor and coordinates the Cast Metals Program. This will be is second year as the Chair of the Pacific Northwest Section.Prof. Charles Pringle, Central Washington University Charles Pringle is a professor in the Mechanical Engineering Technology program at Central Washington University. Charles teaches upper division courses including the