the emergingscience of product development, such as 1 and 2. As ABET has increased emphasis ondesign in the curriculum, university faculties in all the engineering disciplines have beenforced to move the status of design instruction from a neglected stepchild of engineeringscience to the most prominent place in the curriculum—at the minimum as one of thecapstone classes taught in a course of study.Yet the reality that the author has experienced is that engineering faculty as a whole arenot well-versed in the general area of synthesis. Most were educated in analysis, usingadvanced tools of engineering science to achieve the Ph.D. degree. Further, once out oftheir graduate program and into a teaching/research position at a leading university
Education. Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright @2003, American Society of Engineering Education* The project described in this paper is funded through a Advanced Technology Education Grant by theNational Science Foundation award # DUE-0202444 The Williams Air Force Base conversion to a college campus has opened numerousopportunities to develop a unique partnership between two-year and four-yearinstitutions. ASU and Maricopa Community Colleges both received substantial portionsof the Williams facilities because of base closure. The wide range of high qualityfacilities that were made available made it possible to create a peerless coterie. [1]ASU relocated the College of Technology and Applied Sciences and its programs,laboratories, faculty
measurement error.Rather than ranking or selection based on test scores, assessment now emphasizes understandingthinking, as well as the nature, consistency, and quality of performance in a variety of contexts.The move toward new ways of assessing (e.g. performance, authentic, portfolio) necessitate newways of judging performance that rely more on qualitative than quantitative techniques1, 2.The National Research Council, operating agency of both the National Academy of Science andthe National Academy of Engineering, supports new approaches to assessment and greater use ofqualitative data. In Classroom Assessment and the National Science Education Standards, theCouncil recommends less emphasis on “Assessing what is easily measured, Assessing
in active projects in their major,providing mentorship from faculty, and enhancing their professional development by offeringspecific workshops targeted toward their research experience and to facilitate their transitioninto an existing minority program or internship. Specific objectives of the program are toincrease: Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2014, American Society for Engineering Education 1421. Each student’s ability to apply content and skills learned in the classroom to research2. Their understanding of the research process3. The
Academy, the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the United States Page 9.1193.1Government. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationare a few recent examples where PDAs have been introduced to support university-leveleducation:1 • The University of South Dakota has required that all students purchase a PDA since 2000. • Penn State Abington has provided PDAs to students in selected courses since 1999. • At Central Carolina Technical
has been p providing g Universityy research laboratories with state-of-the-art test and measurement equipment for many years• Agilent already offers education promotions and discount programs for Universities, but is now providing assistance in the area of grant applications – Provide recommendations in defining equipment specifications to ensure you have the electronic test and measurement systems that best meet your program requirements – Provide access to key equipment to collect critical supporting data for technical proposals – Prepare grant support letters to demonstrate industry/academia collaboration – Promote programs of interest to
Center5. The Intercollege Relations Commission Handbook 2004 (latest revision: Spring 2016), The Washington Council for High School-College Relations, Inc.6. Snapshot Report – Persistence and Retention, National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, 20167. The Role of Community Colleges in Postsecondary Success, Community Colleges Outcomes Report, National Student Clearinghouse Research Center8. John R. Hills, Transfer Shock: The Academic Performance of the Junior College Transfer, The Journal of Experimental Education, Vol. 33, No. 3 (Spring, 1965), pp. 201-2159. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Barriers and Opportunities for 2-Year and 4-Year STEM Degrees: Systemic Change to Support Diverse Student
definitely more difference between the 80 and 89 students than the 89versus 90 students. 5. Some universities that have not inflated grades have added the student’s percentile ranking inthe class to the transcript in an attempt to offset the disadvantage of a lower GPA. This can showhow the student compared to others in his/her class.Grade inflation is a real problem for students, educators, and employers. Since grade inflationhas progressed more rapidly in non-science based curriculums, many students avoid the sciencesand choose grade-inflated majors to graduate with higher GPA’s. This has major implicationsfor engineering programs in attracting and maintaining students. However, we do not want tolower our standards and quality of education as we
Support for Cooperative Teams: Applications in ConcurrentDesign.” Proc. Of IEE Colloquium on Current Developments in ConcurrentEngineering—Methodologies and Tools, Jun 2, 1994, pp.8/1-8/8.14 Merabti, M., & Carew, M., (1994) “A Distributed Support Environment for ConcurrentEngineering.” Proc. 2nd Biennial European Conference on Engineering Systems Design andAnalysis, Vol.64, No.5, pp.97-102.15. Hailey, M. B., Jorgensen, J. E., Fridley, J. L., & Heim, J. A., (1999) “Web-Based DesignExperiences in Undergraduate Education.” Proc. IEEE, Ostrava Prague, August 1999.16. Baecker, R., (1993) “Readings in Groupware and Computer Supported CollaborativeWork.” Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.17. Turns, J., Guzdial M., Mistree F., Allen J.K., &
AC 2012-5344: DETERMINING THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE AUDI-ENCEDr. Mary R. Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University Mary Anderson-Rowland is the PI of an NSF STEP grant to work with five non-metropolitan community colleges to produce more engineers, especially female and underrepresented minority engineers. She also directs two academic scholarship programs, including one for transfer students. An Associate Profes- sor in computing, informatics, and systems design engineering, she was the Associate Dean of Student Affairs in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at ASU from 1993-2004. Anderson-Rowland was named a top 5% teacher in the Fulton Schools of Engineering for 2009-2010. She received the WEPAN Engineering
women in engineering degree programs and effective pedagogy in undergraduate engineering curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Session W1A Adopting Evidence-based Instruction through Video-Annotated Peer Review James J. Pembridge, Lisa K. Davids Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, pembridj@erau.edu, david10b@erau.eduAbstract – When implemented as a community of to face observations involve the colleagues to meet prior topractice, classroom observations have the potential to
., Koenig, K., Hannigan, T., “Keeping Students Engaged: An Overview of Three IntroductoryCourses in Aerospace Engineering”, Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Nashville,TN, June 2003.5. Hannigan, T., Koenig, K., Austin, V., Okoro, E., “Shelving the Hardware: Developing Virtual LaboratoryExperiments”, Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR, June 2005.6. WebCT – web based classroom technology, http://www.webct.com7. Hannigan, T., Koenig, K., Gassaway, B., Austin, V., “Revision and Translation of Existing Programs as a Toolfor Teaching Computer Data Acquisition and Control Systems Design and Implementation”, Proceedings of the2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake
-second year retention at both SCC and WSU, as wellas articulation of STEM majors from SCC to WSU. While STEM attrition is a problemthroughout the 4-6 years of college study, the first-year experience (FYE) is most critical toretention of students in STEM disciplines. Thus, a focus on promoting success in the first yearwill help to ensure that students remain in STEM disciplines, as opposed to switching majors ordropping out. The primary barrier to success in Engineering/Technology is the mathematics“gateway” calculus sequence; the barrier to success in Science/Mathematics is generalinnumeracy and scientific illiteracy. Prior NSF support of WSU’s National Model forEngineering Mathematics Education has shown that the introduction of EGR 101
components in support of student outcomes. To differentiate the discipline, Program Criteria may add specificity for program curricula. The curriculum must include the following: • Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration 14 • Copyright ©2019 American Society for Engineering Education Session ETD 535 Criterion 5 – CurriculumPrevious
Success! Using a NSF ERC to Build UniversityWide Collaborations David R. Shaw, Vice President for Research and Economic Development In the Beginning: The NSF Engineering Research Center for Computational Field SimulationFunding for a New Building: NSF Engineering Research Center for Computational Field Simulation (19902001) MISSION: To reduce the time and cost of complex field simulations for engineering analysis and design.CrossDisciplinary Research Team with aCommon Focused Mission Science & Engineering Faculty; ASE, CE, CS, ECE, MA, ME, PHMission Related Educational Programs Computational Engineering MS & PhD Program Related CME, ASE
Success! Using a NSF ERC to Build UniversityWide Collaborations David R. Shaw, Vice President for Research and Economic Development In the Beginning: The NSF Engineering Research Center for Computational Field SimulationFunding for a New Building: NSF Engineering Research Center for Computational Field Simulation (19902001) MISSION: To reduce the time and cost of complex field simulations for engineering analysis and design.CrossDisciplinary Research Team with aCommon Focused Mission Science & Engineering Faculty; ASE, CE, CS, ECE, MA, ME, PHMission Related Educational Programs Computational Engineering MS & PhD Program Related CME, ASE
wasshown that the median tutored student performed at the 66 th percentile of the untutored students9.Bloom discovered that the average one-on-one tutored student performed two standarddeviations higher than students in normal elementary school classroom environments. Studiesspecifically concerning machine tutoring systems have long followed suit. Woolf reports a one-sigma improvement by students learning via tutoring systems23. Parallel results have been Page 7.152.2“Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for
– Fort Smith (UAFS) is an open admission institution with strongties to local industry; it supports many technology related programs. UAFS in conjunctionwith the University of Arkansas - Fayetteville (UAF) offers bachelor degrees in Electricaland Mechanical Engineering. The Fort Smith campus is responsible for the first two years ofthe degree and additional interactions with senior design students. In this arrangement,UAFS faculty members predominantly teach freshman and sophomore courses which canbring the trappings of monotony and deterioration of instructor’s cutting edge knowledge. Tohelp combat this issue, a sabbatical leave can be used to keep one’s knowledge up to date andbring new perspective to the classroom for both the instructor and
illustrate Page 7.1275.2how the fundamentals our students have learned thus far including differential equations,Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Session 3430thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, computational techniques and graphics all can beapplied in the design of thermal systems. Unfortunately, other than simple one-dimensional, steady-state conduction problems, many topics, which we must cover inheat transfer, involve mathematics that is
solutions in the developing world. Mark has experiences as a teacher, researcher, engineer, social entrepreneur, and in higher education program management. He earned his PhD in Engineering Education at ASU and also has a BS/MS in Biomedical Engineering. Mark’s research interests revolve around developing engineers capable of leading and enacting positive change on their communities. His research explores the topics of entrepreneurial mindset, innovation, well-being, leadership, interpersonal skills, and other 21st century competencies. Mark has experiences in teaching and mentoring engineering students in human-centered design, social entrepreneurship, hu- manitarian engineering, leadership, and mindfulness
in 1979, and the Ph.D. inElectrical Engineering from Texas A&M University in 1983. He currently is Professor in the Electrical andComputer Engineering Department at Kansas State University, where he served as Interim Head from 2004 to 2007.JAN WIERSEMA is a lecturer in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Iowa State University,leader of special projects for Project LEA/RN™, and co-facilitator of the leadership development component of theNSF SFS Cyber Corps program. Her research focus is student growth and development as responsible learners andproductive team members.BARB LICKLIDER is a Professor of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, Director of Project LEA/RN anda co-facilitator for the leadership component
Building Network points out that “Local government, Page 12.95.3communities and NGOs are the main clients [of capacity building], but central government andthe private commercial sector also need support.” Counterpart International pointed out that“Another essential mechanism for capacity building is partnership development.” A rapid scanof a variety of data bases comes up with the term associated with projects as far ranging as urbandevelopment, elementary education, information technology, toxic pollution, non-profitmanagement, politics in Africa, service learning, justice systems, psychology, financingstrategies, welfare reform, food security
. Page 15.730.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Industry Collaboration through a Technical and Leadership Lecture Series within a Construction ManagementAbstractStudents in construction management programs benefit from the expertise of industry expertswho relate real life experiences to technical theory taught in the classroom. The lack of apurposeful series of offerings to the students can result in a haphazard approach to providingtimely and topical information at appropriate levels of education. Industry advisory boardsconsistently encourage universities to provide students with current technical and applicationinformation. A coordinated series of lectures conducted by non-faculty subject matter
' distinct needs (Pascarella et al., 2004). Engineering education, in particular, should consider these challenges because the field demands not only academic rigor but also the development of a strong professional identity and self-efficacy—areas where first-generation students may experience additional hurdles (Strayhorn, 2012).Research shows that first-generation students are less likely to persist in STEM fields, includingengineering, compared to their continuing-generation peers (Chen, 2013). This disparity is oftenattributed to lower levels of social and academic integration, fewer support systems, and a lackof role models in STEM (Terenzini et al., 1996). These factors highlight the need for targetedsupport programming
was“Career Management – Lifelong Learning.” Over the years there have been a number of studiesto investigate the types of activities involved in lifelong learning, their frequency of use, thetypes of support systems required for lifelong learning, barriers to lifelong learning, and impactof lifelong learning for individual engineers. Many of these studies are summarized in a 1985report by an NRC panel [2].Lifelong learning is an issue of importance for engineers around the world. UNESCO sponsoredseveral significant studies including “Advances in the continuing education of engineers” [3].The report resulting from this study summarizes practices in continuing education in a numberof countries, both developed and developing, and also delivery
,managers). For example, Campion, Medsker, and Higgs6 published a scale used tomeasure team characteristics as they pertained to industry. Several of the instrument’ssub-domains (e.g., social support, interdependence) and items (e.g., everyone on myteam does their fair share of work6) were applicable to the skills targeted by EPICS.Further, published measures demonstrate how thoroughly the construct (e.g., socialresponsibility) was operationalized and measured. Such information can be used toevaluate the scale’s psychometric properties. Selected scales are listed in Table 1 forfurther reference. Adapting pre-existing measures is another way engineering educators can useself-report instruments to assess program outcomes. For instance, the
University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Implementing Industrial Engineering statistical tools to enhance students' understanding of heattransfer for a Chemical Engineering Unit Operations Laboratory module on heat exchangersIntroduction and Background As engineers, it is important to have statistics as part of the tools we use to solve problems ofinterest to society. Statistics support the creative process by collecting, analyzing and using data to makedecisions, solve problems, and design processes and products. Specifically, for Chemical Engineeringgraduates, statistics are applied in a wide array of fields to determine process variables to make processesmore energy and economically
different level groups were formed: one elementary group, three pre-intermediate groups, and one intermediate group. The on-line tests of Education First were used [4]. The total number of faculty who studied English during the academic year was 59. The faculty, who participated in the program, came from different structural subdivisions of the university representing diverse background and expertise: • Rubber and Elastomer Technology and Processing (FRETP) • Petroleum and Petrochemistry (FPPC) • Nanomaterials and Nanotechnologies (FNNT) • Chemical Technologies (FCT) • Mechanical (MF) • Power Engineering and Technological Equipment (FPETE) • Design and Software Engineering (FDSE) • Light Industry Technology and
document student learning.Whether it is solving new problems or finding new solutions to old problems, design is at thecore of engineering. Despite this, engineering education moved from engineering design to en-gineering science in the years following World War II, only to begin to ebb back toward a designemphasis in the early 1980s. The movement back to design began slowly, but soon gained mo-mentum with the addition of capstone design courses in many programs. By the late 1980s, cap-stone courses had become common and it had become clear to engineering educators that designeducation could not begin during students’ senior year. Today most programs have some kind of
Indianapolis. Previously,he held a manufacturing engineering position at Allison Transmission, Division of General Motors. He received hisMaster of Science Degree and Bachelor of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University atIndianapolis. He also coordinates internship and cooperative education programs for the School of Engineering andTechnology.MARVIN NEEDLERMarvin Needler is a Professor of Electrical Engineering Technology and Electrical Engineering and Chairman ofElectrical Engineering Technology, Purdue School of Engineering & Technology, IUPUI, He earned his B.S.E.E.and M.S.E.E. at Purdue University and his Ph.D. in Systems Science/Electrical Engineering, Michigan StateUniversity. He has consulted with over twenty