Paper ID #25920Board 137: Persistence of Women of Color in Undergraduate EngineeringProgramsCourtney S. Green P.E., University of North Carolina in Charlotte Courtney S. Green, P.E. is a lecturer and academic advisor for the Office of Student Success and Develop- ment within Williams States Lee College of Engineering at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. She holds a Master of Science in Engineering with a structural engineering concentration from University of North Carolina at Charlotte in 2008. She graduated Magna Cum Laude with a Bachelor of Science in Mathematics at Marshall University in 2004. Prior to
Paper ID #14571The Effectiveness of Weekly Supervised Homework Sessions in an AerospaceStructural Mechanics CourseMr. Waterloo Tsutsui, Purdue University - West Lafayette Waterloo Tsutsui is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Aeronautics and Astronautics at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. Prior to attending Purdue University, he was an engineer in the automotive industry for 10 years. In the most recent industrial position, he was a senior mechanical engineer at Johnson Controls, Inc. in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. He is a licensed Professional Engineer in the states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Indiana.Dr. Michael
Paper ID #14367Safety training system design for student teamsMr. Daniel van Lanen, University of Waterloo University of Waterloo Daniel van Lanen has a bachelor of applied science in chemical engineering with an option in international studies in engineering and is currently a masters student in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Waterloo. His primary research interest is the integration of small and large scale stationary grid storage to encourage the growth and sustainability of clean energy. This research includes examining the market viability of such projects by examining market mechanisms
Paper ID #11773Sources of Self-Efficacy in Undergraduate EngineeringDr. Ellen L Usher, University of Kentucky Ellen L. Usher is an associate professor of Educational Psychology at the University of Kentucky. She received her PhD in educational studies from Emory University in 2007. Her research has focused on the sources and effects of personal efficacy beliefs. She is the director of the P20 Motivation and Learning Lab.Dr. Natasha Aniceto Mamaril, University of Illinois Natasha Mamaril is currently the Coordinator of Undergraduate Research in the College of Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana
Paper ID #11175Students’ Perspective on the Effectiveness of Design-Based Curriculum dur-ing an International Design ProjectMs. Keilah Maria Tablante Bias, University of Prince Edward Island Keilah Bias, a natural-born Filipino, is a third year Industrial Engineering Student, completing her degree with a cooperative education designation at Dalhousie University in Halifax Nova Scotia, Canada. She completed courses at Polytechnic University of the Philippines Civil Engineering Department, before she completed her Diploma in Engineering at University of Prince Edward Island in 2014. She has worked as a Teaching Assistant
Paper ID #13952Concentrated Solar, Dual Axis-Tracking, Multi-junction GaAs Cell Photo-voltaic System Design for Efficient Solar Energy ConversionDr. Mustafa G. Guvench, University of Southern Maine Dr. Guvench received M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering and Applied Physics from Case Western Reserve University. He is currently a full professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Southern Maine. Prior to joining U.S.M. he served on the faculties of the University of Pittsburgh and M.E.T.U., Ankara, Turkey. His research interests and publications span the field of microelectronics including I.C
Paper ID #15279Understanding ”Failure” is an OptionDr. Hansel Burley, Texas Tech University Dr. Burley is a professor of educational psychology. His research focus includes college access, diversity, and resilience in youth. Recently he has served as the evaluator for multiple STEM projects.Mr. Casey Michael Williams, Texas Tech University I am currently a second year PhD student in educational psychology. I spent 2 years teaching environ- mental science, chemistry and biology to high school students in Kansas City through Teach For America. My interests lie with designing educational initiatives that highlight the
Paper ID #18395A Framework for an Engineering Reasoning Test and Preliminary Results.Dr. John Krupczak Jr, Hope College Professor of Engineering, Hope College, Holland, Michigan. Former Chair of the ASEE Technological Literacy Division; Former Chair of the ASEE Liberal Education Division; Senior Fellow CASEE, Na- tional Academy of Engineering, 2008-2010; Program Officer, National Science Foundation, Division of Undergraduate Education 2013-2016.Dr. Mani Mina, Iowa State University Mani Mina is with the department of Industrial Design and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Iowa State University. He has been
Paper ID #24383Investigation of Pre-Service Teacher Self-Efficacy for Teaching EngineeringMiss Jessica Lauren Sargent, Purdue University, West Lafayette Jessica Sargent was born in Atlanta, Georgia. She received her B.S. in Polymer & Fiber Engineering from Auburn University and her M.S. in Chemical Engineering from Purdue University. Jessica is currently a graduate student at Purdue University working with the Women in Engineering Program and pursuing a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering.Dr. Beth M. Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette Beth Holloway is the Assistant Dean for Diversity and Engagement and the Leah H
Paper ID #28780Student practices developing needs statements for design problemsMr. Robert P. Loweth, University of Michigan Robert P. Loweth is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. He earned a B.S. in Engineering Sciences from Yale University, with a double major in East Asian Studies. He also holds a Graduate Certificate in Chinese and American Studies, jointly awarded by Johns Hopkins University and Nanjing University in China. His research focuses on how undergraduate engineering students solicit information from stakeholders and use this information to assess
changingdemographics in the United States point to the need for revolutionary changes in thepreparation of engineers (Jamieson & Lohmann, 2012; McGee & Bentley, 2017; NationalScience Foundation, 2014). Engineering education researchers have argued the educationalbenefits of deductive or student centered learning strategies (Felder, Brent, & Prince, 2011;Prince & Felder, 2006). In this paper, we describe one college’s attempts to enhance facultypreparation and pedagogical practices with the goals of improving student engagement andpromoting deeper learning. We offer three specific examples of alternative teaching strategiesas evidence for those who wish to consider moving away from the traditional technical lecture.Problem-Based Learning in
an increasingly common and important feature of the moderncommunication landscape.Normally, there is an assumed correspondence between the representation and the representedobject; representations usually refer to objects that are “real” somewhere. The reader may or Page 11.1081.3may not actually have first hand experience with the “real” object. If there is no first-handexperience, the reader may or may not be able to accurately mentally “reconstruct” the originalrepresented object.The objective of this paper is to point out that while representation per se plays a very importantrole in science and technology, it is not without its pitfalls
; health and safety; social; and political”. Furthermore, specificProgram Outcomes require an ability to function on a multi-disciplinary team.In this paper we will describe how we solved these two challenges by updating ourmicroprocessor laboratory facilities on a limited budget using student engineers. This highlysuccessful program provided state-of-the-art computer engineering laboratory equipment usingstudent designed, fabricated, and tested laboratory equipment. Furthermore, the students werecompletely responsible for developing all of the supporting courseware such as laboratoryassignments for the new equipment.From the department’s point of view, state-of-art, custom laboratory equipment based on the68HC12 microcontroller was obtained at a
programming 6, 7. They have found that pairprogramming improved retention rates and performance on programming assignments. Theresults of this work warranted further examination of paired programming in undergraduateinstruction. Of particular interest was its impact in introductory computer science (CS1) coursestaken by both computer science majors and engineering students. This paper reports on anongoing study 8 at North Carolina State University (NCSU) during 2001-2002.II. The StudyThe study was conducted in the CS1 course, Introduction to Computing – Java at NCSU. Todate, this study has covered three semesters: Fall 2001, Spring 2002, and Fall 2002. The course isa service course with a majority of the students coming from the College of
concepts, this will generate a lotof course content. Student who do not understand the questions will be able to access the explanationsprovided by other students. Students can also rank explanations, creating an individual profile for eachstudent that can be used to customize the explanations provided in the future. Instructors can use ExplaNetto assess student answers and trace the flow of information throughout the class. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes related work in the area of on-line quizzing and assessment and collaborative filtering. Section 3 describes ExplaNet in detail. Next, inSection 4, we describe preliminary experiments with ExplaNet and the results. We conclude in Section 5with a
STEM facultybecause of gaps in their rationale. For instance, leaks in the pipes are random in terms of what“bits” of water drip out, and leaks imply water only flowing “out” of the pipe. But women’sexperiences of choosing to leave (if temporarily) their scientific careers are rarely random in thisway, and the outward leaking does not model many women’s choices to re-enter a faculty careerlater in life.Our goal with this overall research project is to develop new, more accurate models tounderstand women’s career experiences. In this paper, we demonstrate the methodologicalpower of oral histories and participatory research to better understand women’s pathways intoSTEM faculty careers and examine the extent to which they follow chilly climate
technical or administrative challenges, identify research material needs, visit possible field research sites and determining course end products. (3) Inaugural Course Meeting - At the beginning of the course, the CWRU professor will travel to the PUI to help the home institution professor meet with enrolled students and present a framework plan for the research course to its students. This will help reinforce the idea that the both professors have formed a team to offer the course, and help establish lines of communication between the students and the CWRU professor. This will improve the effectiveness of the upcoming research residency. (4) Research Residency - Midway through the course (as
Paper ID #10244Engineering and Science Student Preparedness for Research: Exploring theConnections Between Student Identity and Readiness for ResearchMs. Erin J. McCave, Clemson University Erin McCave is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Bioengineering at Clemson University and completed a certificate in Engineering and Science Education from the Department of Engineering and Science Education in 2012. She completed her B.S in Biomedical Engineering from Michigan Techno- logical University in 2003.Mr. Jordon Gilmore, Clemson UniversityDr. Karen Burg, Clemson University
Paper ID #10427Forestry Robot DesignDr. Muhittin Yilmaz, Texas A&M University-Kingsville (TAMUK) Dr. Muhittin Yilmaz received the B.S. degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering from Gazi Univer- sity, Ankara, Turkey, and the M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA. He has been an Associate Professor with the Electrical Engineer- ing and Computer Science Department, Texas A&M University-Kingsville (TAMUK) since 2013. His research interests include robust and intelligent control systems, convex optimization, robotics, computer
Paper ID #8863Analysis of Student Perceptions and Behaviors in a Flipped Classroom Un-dergraduate Information Technology CourseMr. Rob Elliott, Purdue University School of Engineering and Technology, Indiana University Purdue Univer-sity at Indianapolis Rob Elliott is a Lecturer of Computer and Information Technology at Indiana University Purdue Univer- sity at Indianapolis. As a web and mobile application developer with nearly two decades of experience, he creates solutions for organizations of all sizes. Rob attempts to integrate his real-world experiences (both good and bad) into the classroom environment whenever
Session 3461 An Objectives-Based Approach to Assessment of General Education Lori J. Bechtel, Suzanne Light Cross, Renata S. Engel, Ronald L. Filippelli, Arthur L. Glenn, John T. Harwood, Robert N. Pangborn, and Barbara L. Welshofer Schreyer Institute for Teaching Excellence, The Pennsylvania State UniversityAbstractThis paper describes the development of an innovative strategy to assess how students andfaculty perceive and accomplish the objectives of general education at Penn State. TheUniversity’s general education curriculum is intended to achieve a number of educational goals,including
SocietiesEngineering Professional Organization Web linkAAAI American Association for Artificial Intelligence http://www.aaai.orgAAES American Association of Engineering Societies http://www.aaes.orgABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology http://www.abet.orgACEC American Consulting Engineers Council http://www.acec.org/ACM Association for Computing Machinery http://www.acm.org/ACTE Association for Career and Technical Education http://www.acteonline.org/AEE Association of Energy Engineers http://www.aeecenter.org/AEG Association of Engineering Geologists http://www.umr.edu/~aeg
the host and the separate controllers is the knowledge of a primitive setof communications instructions understood by the RSAIDS unit. This unit has been designed andconstructed for around $100.00. This paper elaborates the design, construction, and applicationof RSAIDS in details including hardware and software requirements in details.Communications with Robot Arm Controllers There are two main methods for input and output of information to most robotic controllers.There exists a serial channel associated with the controllers, which allows data input and output,to and from a host computer2. This can be a viable alternative to communication andsynchronization with these systems. However, this requires a substantial amount ofprogramming by
Session 1620 Design Methodology Suitable for Team-based Embedded Systems Education J.W. Bruce Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762-9571 jwbruce@ece.msstate.eduAbstractThis paper describes a design methodology useful for team-based (cooperative) and problem-based embedded systems education. The design methodology includes a detailed design conven-tion and formalized hardware and code design reviews where the quantity and nature of
go on to buildsubstantial depth in some of the foundation areas, while other topics may not be furtherdeveloped, depending on their chosen discipline. Thus the foundation courses serve both as thebasis for depth in disciplinary study and as part of the broad multidisciplinary background.This paper will discuss the design and pedagogical philosophy of the MultidisciplinaryEngineering Foundation Spiral and describe several of the novel courses in the program. Page 9.439.1 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright ©2004 American Society for
Session 1692 Gender Equity Professional Development for Teachers in a Summer Camp Setting Marion Usselman, Donna Whiting Georgia Institute of TechnologyThe attitudes and classroom behaviors of K-12 teachers can have a substantial impact on whethergirls perceive technical careers as appropriate and available to them. It is well documented thatelementary girls are enthusiastic in their pursuit of math and science knowledge, but thisenthusiasm often declines as the girls reach middle school1. Studies of classroom dynamicsreveal that teachers often
courses for first-year engineering fundamentals to a framework that involves two coursesequences with tightly coupled courses. Engineering orientation, engineering graphics, andengineering problem solving with computer programming are now offered in each of two coursesequences,1 one called the Fundamentals of Engineering and the other the Fundamentals ofEngineering for Honors. These course sequences retain part of the traditional material but nowinclude hands-on laboratory experiences that lead to design/build projects.2 Teamwork, projectmanagement, report writing, and oral presentations have assumed important roles in bothsequences. This paper describes the administrative and teaching experiences with a design/buildproject course in the
that of their peers moves the evaluation responsibility off the shoulders ofthe instructor and on to the students'.The third dimension of the first step in building SDL is to identify the basic learning skillsrequired for academic survival. These include time management and effective learning skills -the ability to take notes, read a technical book, prepare for an examination and produce logical,intelligible homework. A desirable adjunct to this is to help the students assess their preferredlearning styles, both understanding how they absorb information and how they interact with Page 5.417.3instructors and other students. Stage Two of our SDL
), begins with a hands-on design exercise, and culminateswith the participants preparing and presenting lesson plans to be used at their own schools. Theworkshop utilizes materials from HMC’s first course in engineering, Introduction to EngineeringDesign (known as “E4”) [1], and is taught in a studio mode [2]. This paper presents somebackground material on PEPS, including the program’s goals, the current structure of PEPS, adiscussion of the assessment procedures used, and some reflections on future directions. Page 7.916.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
and mustdesignate either UT-Arlington or UT-Dallas as their home institution. Students receive thedegree from the home institution but take courses from both. The program was conceived in thespring of 1999, and course development began in the fall of that year. The first courses wereavailable online in fall 2000 with the full complement of 24 courses planned for the 2002academic year. US News and World Report 1 recently selected CS/EE Online as one of the bestonline graduate programs in engineering.The following two sections will provide the context in which the program was conceived anddeveloped and program details, respectively. Course development related issues are thendiscussed. The final two sections of the paper describe administrative