Paper ID #13709Sometimes, Faculty Matter: The Contribution of Faculty Support to FutureEngagementDr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and other non- cognitive aspects of the student experience on engagement, success, and persistence.Prof. Diane Carlson Jones Ph.D, University of WashingtonProf. Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the
Paper ID #11773Sources of Self-Efficacy in Undergraduate EngineeringDr. Ellen L Usher, University of Kentucky Ellen L. Usher is an associate professor of Educational Psychology at the University of Kentucky. She received her PhD in educational studies from Emory University in 2007. Her research has focused on the sources and effects of personal efficacy beliefs. She is the director of the P20 Motivation and Learning Lab.Dr. Natasha Aniceto Mamaril, University of Illinois Natasha Mamaril is currently the Coordinator of Undergraduate Research in the College of Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana
Paper ID #12497Strategy, Task Performance, and Behavioral Themes from Students Solving2-D and 3-D Force Equilibrium ProblemsMr. Benjamin James Call, Utah State University - Engineering Education Benjamin Call graduated with his Masters of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering (Aerospace Em- phasis) in 2006 from Utah State University. After working nearly eight years for NAVAIR, he has returned to pursue at PhD in Engineering Education at Utah State University where he received the Presidential Doctoral Research Fellowship to support his studies. His research interests range from sophomore-level engineering curricula to
the scholarship of teaching and learning.Dr. Adeel Khalid, Southern Polytechnic College of Engineering & Engineering Technology Adeel Khalid, Ph.D. Associate Professor Systems Engineering Office: 678-915-7241Dr. Daniel R Ferreira, Southern Polytechnic State University Dr. Dan Ferreira is an assistant professor of environmental science at Southern Polytechnic State Univer- sity in Marietta, GA. He is a passionate science educator who believes in giving his students a practical, real-world oriented learning experience. Dr. Ferreira’s research focuses on adsorption and ion-exchange reactions of cations at the soil mineral/water interface.Dr. Jeanne Law Bohannon, Southern Polytechnic State UniversityDr. Beth Stutzmann
Paper ID #11686Student Experiences in a Structural Engineering Course: Responses of Viola-tion and Grief When a Novice Instructor Implements Project-Based LearningMs. Jillian Seniuk Cicek, University of Manitoba Jillian Seniuk Cicek is a PhD Candidate in Engineering Education in the Department of Biosystems En- gineering, Faculty of Engineering at the University of Manitoba, in Winnipeg, Canada. She is a research assistant for the Centre for Engineering Professional Practice and Engineering Education in the Faculty of Engineering. Her research areas include outcomes-based teaching and assessment, and student-centered
Paper ID #12371Student Perceptions on the Impact of Formative Peer Team Member Effec-tiveness Evaluation in an Introductory Design CourseProf. Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nathan Mentzer is an assistant professor in the College of Technology with a joint appointment in the College of Education at Purdue University. Hired as a part of the strategic P12 STEM initiative, he prepares Engineering/Technology candidates for teacher licensure. Dr. Mentzer’s educational efforts in pedagogical content knowledge are guided by a research theme centered in student learning of engineer- ing design thinking on the
Paper ID #12528Are Solution Manuals Detrimental to Student Learning?Dr. Mohammad Habibi P.E., University of Wisconsin-PlattevilleAnnelise Shirley Roti Roti, University of Wisconsin - PlattevilleMotahareh Alaei, Minnesota State University, Mankato Page 26.231.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Are Solution Manuals Detrimental to Student Learning?AbstractHomework has traditionally been the essential part of student learning, especially in engineeringeducation. However, the availability of solution
Paper ID #11960Assessing the Impact of Game Based Pedagogy on the Development of Com-munication Skills for EngineersMs. Katharine Mary EichelmanDr. Renee M Clark, University of Pittsburgh Renee Clark serves as the Director of Assessment for the Swanson School of Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. She received her PhD from the Department of Industrial Engineering, where she also completed her post-doctoral studies. Her research has primarily focused on the application of data analysis techniques to engineering education research studies as well as industrial accidents. She has over 20 years of experience in
Paper ID #13659Assessment of Inverted Classroom Success Based on Felder’s Index of Learn-ing StylesDr. Deborah M. Grzybowski, Ohio State University Dr. Grzybowski is a Professor of Practice in the Engineering Education Innovation Center and the Depart- ment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at The Ohio State University. She received her Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering and her B.S. and M.S. in Chemical Engineering from The Ohio State Univer- sity. Prior to becoming focused on student success in inverted classrooms in engineering education, her research interests included regulation of intracranial pressure and
course size either does or does not affect course grades, the researchers leftthis question unanswered in the literature. In order to address this question, we opened thequestion to present the answers to the community at large. While the topic of engineering grades remains an important one to our community,[2-9] itcould be easily argued that the subject of the effect of class size on grades is even moreuniversally debated – both outside [10-13] and within the sphere of higher education.[14, 15] Somestudies actually shirk the question of the effect of class size on grades altogether and opt to probeclass size’s effect on teacher evaluations![16] More general and historically-minded reviews of thesubject in higher education are beyond the
Paper ID #13862CASCaded Mentoring and Design Experiences (CASCADE)Dr. MARIE ANNE L MUNDY, Texas A&M Kingsville My education includes a Master of Science in Research & Evaluation and a Doctor of Philosophy in Education with an emphasis in Higher Education and cognates in Research & Evaluation, and Psychology from the University of Southern Mississippi. I have held positions as assessment and research coordinator at the university level. I served as an M&E (Measurement and Evaluation) consultant for a non-profit company that worked in hurricane disaster zones in Mississippi and Louisiana for 8 years. In
Paper ID #12212Changes in Motivational Beliefs Among First-year Engineering Students: Re-lations to Academic Achievement and Retention StatusMs. Yu-Yun Liu, University of Louisville Yu-Yun Liu is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Educational and Counseling Psychology, Coun- seling, and College Student Personnel at the University of Louisville. Her research interests include motivational beliefs, achievement, and college student mental health issues.Dr. Kate E. Snyder, University of Louisville Kate E. Snyder is an assistant professor in the Department of Educational and Counseling Psychology, Counseling, and
pedagogy that help to improve student engagement and understanding.Dr. Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford UniversityDr. Helen L. Chen, Stanford University Helen L. Chen is a research scientist in the Designing Education Lab in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Director of ePortfolio Initiatives in the Office of the Registrar at Stanford University. She is also a member of the research team in the National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter). Helen earned her undergraduate degree from UCLA and her PhD in Communication with a minor in Psychology from Stanford University in 1998. Her current research interests include: 1) engineering and entrepreneurship education; 2) the pedagogy of
Construction Engineering, 211 Kearney Hall, 1491 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, OR 97331 Phone: 509-499-5187 Email: bornasaf@onid.oregonstate.eduDr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is an associate professor in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2010 and is working on a study to characterize practicing engineers’ understand- ings of core engineering concepts. Page 26.391.1 c American Society for Engineering Education
Paper ID #12114Connections between Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Problem SolvingStrategies and Perceptions of Engineering ProblemsCatherine D. McGough, Clemson University Catherine McGough is currently a graduate research assistant in Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. She obtained her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Clemson University in 2014. Her research interests are in undergraduate engineering student motivations and undergraduate engineer- ing problem solving skill development and strategies.Adam Kirn, Univeristy of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Assistant Professor of Engineering
Paper ID #13107Constructing ”calculus readiness”: Struggling for legitimacy in a diversity-promoting undergraduate engineering programKevin O’Connor, University of Colorado Boulder Kevin O’Connor is assistant professor of educational psychology. His scholarship focuses on human ac- tion, communication, and learning as socioculturally organized phenomena. One major strand of research has explored the varied trajectories taken by students as they attempt to enter professional disciplines such as engineering, and focuses on the dilemmas encountered by students as they move through these institutionalized trajectories
—such as “the concept of force” in physics (FCI1);the area of “statics” (CATS2); or “digital logic” in computer science (DLCI3). The questions arefrequently based on science and engineering education research, including research onmisconceptions and common student errors.CIs often have substantial research guiding their development. Nevertheless, validating anassessment involves explicating the proposed uses and interpretation of test scores andmarshaling evidence to support the acceptability and plausibility of particular claims about themeaning of those scores.4 As part of a larger research project we have developed an analyticframework to assess the validity of classroom assessments such as CIs.5 In developing thisframework we have conducted
as a program manager for a small medical research center and most recently as Director of Access and Recruiting for the College of Engineering and Applied Science. Her interests are in quantitative and qualitative research and data analysis.Kevin O’Connor, University of Colorado Boulder Kevin O’Connor is assistant professor of Educational Psychology and Learning Sciences at the University of Colorado Boulder. His scholarship focuses on human action, communication, and learning as socio- culturally organized phenomena. A major strand of his research explores the varied trajectories taken by students as they attempt to enter professional disciplines such as engineering, and focuses on the dilem- mas encountered by
include engineering problem solving, computer simulation, web-based immersive learning environments, and data acquisition and control.Ms. Enruo Guo Enruo Guo is a Ph.D. candidate in computer science, co-majoring in human computer interaction at Iowa State University. Before that, she got her M.S. degree in computer science and chemistry. Her research interests include AI in education, educational data mining and human computer interaction.Dr. Gloria Starns, Iowa State University Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University Ph.D., Iowa State University, 1996Dr. LeAnn E Faidley, Wartburg College Dr. LeAnn Faidley is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Science at Wartburg College in Waverly
atthe University of Washington12,13).Due to their ability to measure procedural knowledge, researchers studying engineering designknowledge rely heavily on ethnography and VPA. Design educators, however, would not gainenough value from performing such studies on students in their classes to warrant the intenseamount of time required; educators need more efficient means to assess learning. Hence, thepurpose of this study is to evaluate two streamlined approaches – each taking no more than 10minutes of class time (for the whole class) and 1 minute of coding per response – with respect totheir effectiveness in measuring procedural knowledge. While each approach aims to assessprocedural knowledge, they both do so by asking students to declare their
completion. The twotools were tested in various engineering courses and mixed results were found: While both toolswere adoptable, only the exam wrapper appeared to be efficacious in this study.Introduction Metacognition, which has as its simplest definition thinking about one’s thinking, is themodern term used to capture the processes that learners use to reflect upon and take actions toimprove their learning. The psychologist John Flavell1 introduced the term in the 1970’s whileadvancing research on the topic, but ideas about the usefulness of reflection in improvinglearning began much earlier, starting with John Dewey2. Both Piaget and Vygotsky – bothrecognized widely for their theories in education – wrote of the role of metacognition in
Paper ID #15322First Generation Students Identification with and Feelings of Belongingnessin EngineeringHank Boone, University of Nevada, Reno Hank Boone is a Graduate Research Assistant and Masters Student at the University of Nevada, Reno. His research focuses on First Generation engineering college students’ engineering identity, belonging- ness, and how they perceive their college experience.He is also on a National Science Foundation project looking at non-normative engineering students and how they may have differing paths to success. His education includes a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Nevada
in the Robotics laboratory at Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India. He worked as a post-doc at University of Pennsylvania in the area of Haptics and Virtual Reality. His research interests are in the areas of unmanned vehicles particularly flapping flight, mechatronics, robotics, MEMS, virtual reality and haptics, and teaching with technology. He has ongoing research in flapping flight, Frisbee flight dynamics, lift in porous material and brain injury He is an active member of ASEE and ASME and reviewer for several ASME, IEEE and ASEE, FIE conferences and journals. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Fluids Friday! A Method for Improving Student Attentiveness
Paper ID #16989From Assessment to Intervention: Conceptual Understanding of Rate andAccumulation ProcessesMs. Carli Denyse Flynn, Syracuse University Carli Flynn is a PhD candidate in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Syracuse Uni- versity. She has a MS degree from Carnegie Mellon University and a BS degree from Cornell University. Her engineering research interests include studying green infrastructure adoption for stormwater manage- ment in U.S. municipalities. Her education research interests extend to understanding how learners make sense of complex problems that require coordinating knowledge from
interdisciplinary research with the goal of improving engineering programs at the undergraduate level. Her research interests include cognitive theories, memory, problem solving, theories of the mind, and the role of identity and motivation in education.Mariaf´e Taev´ı Panizo, James Madison University Mariaf´e Panizo is a first year graduate student in JMU’s Graduate Psychology Doctoral program. She has been working on engineering education research projects for two and a half years, focusing on non- cognitive factors that impact engineering student academic success.Dr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University Olga Pierrakos is a Founding Faculty and Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison
Paper ID #15223Future Time Perspective and Self-Regulated Learning: Multiple Case Stud-ies in Industrial EngineeringMs. Justine Chasmar, Clemson University Justine Chasmar is a coordinator in the Academic Success Center and a PhD candidate in the Engineering and Science Education Department at Clemson University. She holds a B.S. and M.S. in Mathematical Sciences from Clemson University.Dr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is an Associate Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, with a joint appointment in Bioengineering. Her research focuses on the interactions between student
Paper ID #16568The Role of Shared Physical Space in Affording the Creation of Shared Con-ceptual Spaces in Design Project TeamsDr. Penny Kinnear, University of Toronto Penny Kinnear currently works with the Engineering Communication Program at the University of Toronto where she focuses on the development and delivery of Professional Language support for a highly student body. She has a background in applied linguistics, second language and bilingual education and writing education. She is co-author of the book, ”Sociocultural Theory in Second Language Education: An in- troduction through narratives.” Her current research
Paper ID #15277Work in Progress: Measuring Dispositions Toward Teaching Strategies andTheir Reported UseDr. Eugene Judson, Arizona State University Eugene Judson is an Associate Professor of for the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University. His past experiences include having been a middle school science teacher, Director of Aca- demic and Instructional Support for the Arizona Department of Education, a research scientist for the Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand
Paper ID #16688Working in the Weeds: How do Instructors Sort Engineering Students fromNon-Engineering Students in a First-Year Pre-Calculus Course?Kevin O’Connor, University of Colorado, Boulder Kevin O’Connor is assistant professor of Educational Psychology and Learning Sciences at the University of Colorado Boulder. His scholarship focuses on human action, communication, and learning as socio- culturally organized phenomena. A major strand of his research explores the varied trajectories taken by students as they attempt to enter professional disciplines such as engineering, and focuses on the dilem- mas encountered by
Analysis and Optimization: An Exploratory Study (Evidence-based Practice)Background and MotivationThere is a long-standing interest and focus in educational research on electricity-related concepts, due totwo essential reasons: (a) electricity is one of the central areas of science, technology, and engineeringcurricula at all levels of education, and (b) its concepts are particularly difficult to teach and learn becausethey are abstract and complex 1. Therefore, both educators and students face several challengesthroughout the learning process 2. Students often develop their own conceptions of electricity, which maybe in conflict with the formal science perspectives 3. When these students’ interpretations of