energy. In the private sector, he developed an extensive experience training junior engineers just coming out of college. More recently, he has been involved in supervising graduate students and coordinating group based senior projects.Dr. Andrew Davol, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoMiss Huy Anh Duong, Mechanical Engineering Department Cal PolyTrent Hamilton c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Development of a Multidisciplinary Renewable Energy Laboratory for Research and Education Dr. Jacques J. Belanger, Dr. Andrew Davol, Huy Duong, Trent Hamilton California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
skills are essential for career development. However, in typicaluniversity settings, undergraduate students take different courses and work on different projects indifferent teams each semester. As a result, students lack opportunities to work on multi-yearprojects and develop the skills essential for long-term planning. To remedy this situation, ourdepartment has created elective courses that allow students from all years (first-year students tograduate students) to work on research projects under the supervision of faculty members and thementorship of senior graduate students. These projects provide the opportunities for students tolearn many skills essential in workplace, such as (1) understanding how projects are designed andmanaged; (2
AC 2007-2315: DEVELOPMENT OF AN INNOVATIVE STRUCTURAL TESTINGLABORATORY TO ENHANCE EXPERIENTIAL LEARNINGManar Shami, University of the Pacific Manar Shami, Ph.D., PMP., is a Faculty at the School of Engineering and Computer Science, University of the Pacific, Stockton, California. Professor Shami received M.Sc., M.Eng., and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of California, Berkeley. He did extensive research and consulting in project management in the U.S. and internationally. He was a Faculty at the University of Cincinnati. He was also a senior aviation engineer with ATAC Corporation in Sunnyvale, California working on NASA and DOD projects. He provided executive project
data from both thestudents and peer faculty members will be presented.II Lab Activities Development A. Wind and solar energy labThe objective of the lab activities has two fold. First, students will have hands-on experience ofhow energy conversion occurs from wind to electricity and from solar to electricity. Secondlyand most importantly, the lab should be designed to emphasize on how electrical engineeringcontributes to the renewable energy harvesting and how to integrate different types of renewableenergy into electrical power systems. Most of the labs are open-ended. Page 24.427.3 Figure 2 wind energy
surveys from other institutions and consultation with faculty from ourcampus with survey expertise, a five-part alumni survey was developed (See Appendix). Eachpart is described briefly in the following paragraphs.Part I. Educational Outcomes – General: This segment focused on the ABET EC2000 Criterion 3Program Outcomes and Assessment. Alumni were asked to rate twenty-five skills, abilities andattributes generally expected of an engineering graduate in two ways. First, they were askedhow important each has been relative to their needs and employment experience sincegraduation. Second, they were asked to rate each item relative to their abilities. Response forImportance was divided into a five segment Lickert scale. For scoring they were weighted
and development ofother abilities such as teamwork skills, communication skills and research skills. Students’performance increased as a result of the use of the Tablet PC in select classes at The NationalHispanic University and San Jose State University. The appropriate software for the Tablet PCand the willingness of faculty to adopt the Tablet PC technology in their teaching is another leapin improving the teaching/learning process and also to reduce the divide gap especially amongminority students.AcknowledgementsThis project was possible thanks to a HP Technology for Teaching grant awarded in 2007.Thanks to professors from the computer science department and math/science department fromThe National Hispanic University for their
Engineer® competencies. As the number of attendees grew afterthe first two years, the conference shifted to having fewer tours, more workshop sessions, andmore industry involvement. Unfortunately, we did not host the conference in 2021 due toCOVID-19 restrictions, and the decision was made to also not host the conference in 2022. Inaddition to the conference, our college advising and career development staff provided guidanceand coaching within the framework of the Complete Engineer®. This important one-on-onework is foundational to the program and continues to this day.The GroundworkAs the support for the Complete Engineer® within the college grew, the decision was made toform a committee of faculty and staff that was dedicated to continuous
AC 2007-251: DEVELOPMENT OF NDE LABORATORY FOR AET STUDENTSAND CERTIFICATION PROGRAMVladimir Genis, Drexel University Dr. Vladimir Genis, Associate Professor and Program Director of Applied Engineering Technology in the Goodwin College, Drexel University, taught and developed graduate and undergraduate courses in physics, electronics, biomedical engineering, and acoustics. His research interests include ultrasound wave propagation and scattering, ultrasound imaging, electronic instrumentation, piezoelectric transducers, and engineering education. He serves as a member of the Drexel’s Faculty Senate.David Spang, Burlington County College Dr. David I. Spang, the Dean of Science
researchtraining program in geophysics. The development of such a research training program includes1 This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under the Grants HRD-9909058, GEO- Page 8.890.10224522 and DMS-0207126, and by the U.S. Department of Education under an institutional MSEIP Grant. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright©2003, American Society for Engineering Educationbuilding up research infrastructure in geosciences, defining a unified and coherent researchprogram, engaging undergraduate students into faculty
currently available to help him develop and teach hiscourse. Professor Shull exhibits the need for a resource to guide the development of a course inwhich the faculty member may not have formal training, which is a large motivating factor forthis research.This need for a resource to guide teachers has been highlighted in a number of papers and studieshighlighting how doctoral graduates are unprepared for teaching. As Wankat and Oreovicz13glumly note, "new faculty are … almost totally at sea when it comes to the day-to-dayrequirements of teaching." This may be because it can be difficult for new faculty members toget the information they need on a range of issues, including teaching10.ASEE recently surveyed engineering assistant professors in the
ofacademic majors, abilities, etc. Each section responds, as a class, to a faculty preparedstatement-of-work (SOW). The SOW specifies requirements for a system the cadets mustdesign and build without mention of how to meet those requirements. Each section generally hasits own project, i.e., there is not a course-wide SOW. Cadets in one particular section of Engr410 were tasked to develop a teaching aid on the operation of an automatic transmission for apopular senior-level engineering course, MechEngr 490--Automotive Systems Analysis. Thefaculty provided the section of Engr 410 two fully assembled 42LE transmissions donated byDaimler Chrysler. The transmission is of course a major subsystem of the automobile and is apart of the MechEngr 490 syllabus
Paper ID #21704The Influence of an Externship on BME Predoctoral Students’ Career Devel-opmentMs. Julia N. Savoy, University of Wisconsin-Madison Julia N. Savoy, M.S., is an Assistant Researcher in the Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Univer- sity of Wisconsin-Madison. One aspect of her research examines the effects of professional development participation on the career pathways of doctoral students, postdoctoral scholars, and early-career faculty.Prof. Mia K. Markey, The University of Texas at Austin Dr. Mia K. Markey is a Professor of Biomedical Engineering and Engineering Foundation Endowed Faculty Fellow in
Engineers for over 24 years including eleven years on the faculty at the United States Military Academy.Dr. Keith Plemmons PE, PMP, The Citadel Dr. Keith Plemmons is a project management and education professional. Currently, Keith is an Asso- ciate Professor in The Citadel’s School of Engineering and the CEO of VAB Group, LLC, a sole-proprietor business services company. Keith is a registered Professional Engineer in South Carolina, with 30 years of multi-disciplinary engineering, management and higher education experience across public and pri- vate sectors in the United States and Japan. His credentials include a B.S. in Civil Engineering from The Citadel, and a M.S. and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from Clemson
assist new businesses, with additional modules and featuresadded in the future. Another innovative aspect of CPIC is that it involves students fromparticipating universities to work with faculty experts assigned to each module. Students,especially those majored in entrepreneurial fields will gain valuable practical experience in thisprocess. In this article, we present the development of this unique virtual center in details.IntroductionIt is estimated that nearly 90% of all new businesses fail within the first five years. Althoughthere are a great number of reasons for these failures, if examined more closely they can becontributed to a relatively short list of mistakes. Some of the main reasons for failure are asfollows [1
. Learning objectives of the well-establishedSchool of Engineering and Computer Science co-operative education program were used as abasis for the learning objectives specifically developed for engineering participants in thesummer fellowship program. Post-internship written reports prepared by all fellows were used toassess how well each student’s experience met the Program’s learning objectives.Based on feedback from students and their supervisors and discussion among faculty and GlobalCenter staff after that first experience, application and selection processes were refined, thecultural training component was expanded, and program objectives were formalized. The
Engineering at Mercer University. He worked for the oilfield services giant Schlumberger for 14 years before. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeast Section Conference Development of a Joint Cybersecurity Graduate Program at Mercer University Donald U. Ekong and Stephen Hill School of Engineering, Mercer UniversityAbstractThis paper discusses the development of a new MS in Cybersecurity program at MercerUniversity. This is a joint program between the School of Engineering, the Computer Scienceprogram (in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences), and the School
with ascenario-based assessment. Currently, the assessment is the same for all badge earners. During2023, the final year of project funding, the project team plans to develop additional assessmentquestions that can be included on a rotating basis, in order to reduce the chance that a solutionkey could be developed and circulated online.The badge is named Cyber4RAM, where RAM is robotics/automation/mechatronics. Most ofthe content for the modules was pulled together and/or developed by a faculty member from oneof the TRACKS-CN member institutions. This faculty member created the 11 modules using thestandards from the Quality Matters Higher Education Rubric [5]. Each module begins with anoverview and then moves into explaining a topic that
from the University of Texas at San Antonio. The scope of his research ranges from developing new techniques in the areas of digital signal processing with pattern recognition applications to building innovative Internet of Things (IoT) and big data analytics frameworks to be implemented in real-time. Prior to joining UIW, Dr. Caglayan worked as an engineering consultant in the Applied Power Division at Southwest Research Institute. In addition, he was a lecturer in the Department of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Texas at San Antonio teaching Engineering Physics with emphasis on electromagnetism, mechanics and optical science. American c
Business Excellence, the contribution of theromanian part being sensible increased. A PBC training model wasworked-out. Management Training for Privatization (MTP) have beena major part of the WSU/PUB Center for Business Excellenceactivities. The major financial effort was still supported by theamerican part. A separate building and a seminar/training roomfor CBE were arranged. The counseling activities were developed,the number of counseling sessions increased, both in the CBE andat companies. The formation of PBC was extended to include thetraining of faculty from other universities in the country. 3. In the third step, starting approximately at the end of1994 and now in progress, the CBE had to become self-sustained.On one hand, a matching
Session 1620Evaluation of Tablet PCs for engineering content development and instruction Jeff Frolik and J. Brooks Zurn University of VermontIntroduction Over the past decade, there has been a great deal of activity across disciplines attemptingto incorporate computing into the classroom environment. The now near ubiquitous nature ofmultimedia enhanced classrooms is indicative of the perceived benefits of this technology. Interms of instruction, these enhanced classrooms have enabled faculty to replace or augmentchalk/whiteboard lectures with a variety of new pedagogy
the College of Engineering at NC A&T State University. As a faculty member, he played a significant role in the implementation of a PhD in Industrial & Systems Engineering. Dr. Ram served as the PI for a cross-disciplinary Research Experience for Undergraduates site sponsored by NSF. He is currently the PI for an NSF project on Innovation in Graduate Education. Dr. Ram is an evaluator for the Engineering Accreditation Commission of ABET.Dr. Stephanie Teixeira-Poit American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Towards the Development of a Research Engineer Identity ScaleThis paper reports on research that is part of a broader
initial courses was budgeted in therange of $35,000 to $50,000 for development of online materials as well as the actualdelivery of the course. These amounts included teaching fellow salaries and benefits(advanced graduate students who would assist in teaching the new version of the course) and200 hours of videographer and editor time at $90 per hour, as well as funds for a teachingassistant who would focus on assessment issues across all the courses. Each course also hadits regular assignment of one or more teaching assistants, which were not part of this budget.The faculty involved did not receive extra compensation or release time, even though eachspent 200-300 hours or more on course development. (This lack of an incentive may changein the
continuity is essential because the majority of thefaculty rotate back to an operational assignment in the Army after three years at the Academy.These rotating military faculty generally attend graduate school at a civilian university aftercompleting seven to nine years of successful military service. While at graduate school therotating faculty pursue a Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering and then proceed toUSMA where they participate in a six-week summer teaching workshop preparing them for athree-year tour as an instructor. Although these junior officers may not have a wealth ofacademic experience, they are essential to cadet development because they are excellent rolemodels of successful Army officers.Classroom Environment
and the instructorto engage the material in a reflective manner. Developers are asked to provide 30-45 minutesof discussion material that directly related to the module in the form of a lesson plan. Thiscould include new material to be covered by the instructor, but most importantly included ashort classroom activity (ideally hands-on) to allow the instructor time to help students digestmaterials covered in the readings, A/V modules, and homework assignments.There has been much discourse among faculty on how to integrate the differing material intoone cohesive and integrated course. The result has been to create a semester long project thatintegrated the course material, and involved field trips, case studies, and practical, appliedcontent
Paper ID #31356Work In Progress: Large Scale Development and Deployment of ConceptQuestions in StaticsProf. Carisa H Ramming P.E., Oklahoma State University Carisa Ramming is a graduate of Oklahoma State University where she obtained degrees in Architectural Engineering and Civil Engineering Construction Management. She worked in industry for six years as licensed engineer and structural consultant in Tulsa, OK before returning to Oklahoma State as a visiting faculty member in the School of Architecture. In 2009, Professor Ramming joined the faculty full time as an assistant professor of architectural engineering
leaders until they develop personal and leadership skills.Therefore, we, as instructors, must provide the environment, incentives, and knowledge for ourstudents to adopt and affirm appropriate engineering behaviors and attitudes.Seven Habits of Highly Effective … Civil Engineers?We found several articles that cover how to teach teamwork skills (e.g., Seat and Lord, 1999;Downing, 2001) but decided that focusing on teamwork skills without also focusing on personalskills would be fruitless. Many of the faculty in the department are former practitioners, andreflection on what makes a practitioner successful helped us recognize the same skills andattitudes increase our students’ success in their course work. In fact, those skills and attitudesenhance
each library’s facilities. This traininghas included the use of computerized search engines, accessing of on-line journals, and programsfor developing lists of references. Students are asked to identify a topic of interest innanotechnology or assigned a topic related to their research project. A working session iscommitted where the research librarian and faculty help the student learn to use the searchengines and to determine which citation data bases are appropriate for the information sought.These sessions are effectively the same initial training given to the graduate students in using thelibraries. Students are informed that librarians can assist when they perform literature searches.Library training is scheduled during the second week of
& computer engineering technology). Theteam leader (faculty advisor) set up meetings to organize working schedules, progress reports,and the implementation was conducted as part of the initial project. All necessary constructionand production tools are located at the production lab building; therefore, this location was usedto construct the training unit. The computer models of the system were designed using ComputerAided Design and Drafting software tools by the Design and Development Majors in the Designand Drafting Lab. The Electronics Majors used equipment in the electronics laboratory for theelectrical part of the structure and for testing the system. The determination of the systemreliability and safety was tested with detailed
explain the basics of computing or computer science (CS)? Most computing experts have no problem talking to their peers about CS, but can they teach novices? Teaching and interacting with students without any prior scaffolding or exposure to CS concepts is outside the expertise area of most CS content experts and STEM faculty. This work highlights the need for, and current gap in K-12 computer science manipulatives. It focuses on the development and implementation of a solution that mitigates the traditional ‘experts teaching novices’ problem. The result, ‘A Block of Code’ allows students to visualize, manipulate and experiment with computer science concepts using a physical medium. This
will be developed. This will identify criticalstakeholders including students, faculty, administration, and employers. A means will beestablished to include stakeholder’s views in determining the structure of a minor program ingeneral and on a specific campus.In developing the structure of minors, it will be necessary to establish common goals andpotential measures of those goals. A critical determination is whether the minor should focus onstudent knowledge and skills or specific courses.It is currently anticipated that the structure for a minor will be based on objectives and outcomesrather than a prescribed set of courses. These outcomes will be similar to the ABET a-koutcomes that are used for engineering degrees but will be focused on