engineering students be taught in their college programs? This is aquestion raised by many, and which can lead to spirited debates. To provide some guidance,ABET provides some general guidance from professional engineering societies through theirrequired “Student Outcomes” [1]. To be educated to be a practicing engineer, students mustlearn the technical details of subjects important in their discipline. But ABET also recognizesthe need for students to learn non-technical subjects, as graduates should be able to so suchthings as include non-technical components such as cultural factors in their designs, and makeengineering judgements based on societal contexts. Various authors have also discussed theimportance of bringing more non-technical subjects
grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and she is PI or co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication, teamwork, design, identity, and inclusion in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her research explores examines the ways in which engineering education supports students’ professional development in a range of contexts across multiple dimensions of identity.Denise Rutledge Simmons (Associate Professor) Denise R. Simmons, Ph.D., PE, PMP, LEED-AP is a tenured Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering in the Engineering School of Sustainable Infrastructure and Environment (ESSIE) at the
college wifi since they have no high speed internet at home. ● Colleges unable to find qualified instructors for popular dual enrollment and early college programs (particularly for math and physics) ● Colleges unable to find and retain adjunct and full-time staff across various STEM fields, such as computer science, physics, and engineering. ● A myriad of challenges with distance learning and online/hybrid courses, including colleges having unreliable and antiquated IT infrastructure due to financial constraints and limited access to experienced IT personnel, families having no or limited broadband access, and colleges having a lack of expertise in designing on-line courses that lead to
from Texas A&M University in College Station, TX; M.A. in Liberal Studies from Dartmouth College in Hanover, NH; and Ph.D. in Mathematics Education from Illinois State University in Normal, IL.Prof. Jianzhong Su, The University of Texas, Arlington Dr. Jianzhong Su is professor and chair of Mathematics at the Department of Mathematics, University of Texas at Arlington (UTA). He received his Ph.D. in 1990 from University of Minnesota under Professor Hans Weinberger and he has been in higher education for over 29 years. He is an applied mathematician with research areas in partial differential equations and dynamical systems, with a particular interest in problems from computational neuroscience. He is an
testing metrics preferred by current admissions processes. The studentsunderwent a pre-selection process to determine their eligibility. The overall experience wasdesigned to enhance student connectivity within the collegiate environment. The Gallup-PurdueIndex (2014) found that feeling supported and having learning experiences that illustratedlearned principles produced a graduate who would be engaged in their work. The Rising Scholar(RS) program utilized a prescribed path through college designed to enhance these features.These positive experiences are exemplified by the Purdue Agricultural and BiologicalEngineering (ABE) department and how they approach the overall educational process. Facultyare motivated in their teaching, research, and
course is centered onrealistic contractual conditions and project deliverables (i.e., medical ventilators) to a medicalsupplier, whereas the team is assumed to emulate a global automotive manufacturer. Theprojects are organized into student teams for realistic implementation and to meet a societalneed. The course underpins students with exposure to concepts of acquiring intellectualproperty, from the design of an embedded system including the human machine interface (HMI),to testing and validation. An in-depth study of assembly lines, lean manufacturing,determination of production capacity, sequential operations, and economic calculations arepresented. Students are presented with urgent societal needs and learn to address designrequirements and
that mentors and mentees encounter limit successful outcomes of the RIEF grant?Cognitive Apprenticeship Model. The guiding framework for the research component of thisproject is the cognitive apprenticeship model (CAM), which consists of strategies used to trainnovices to develop expertise in their thinking. Unlike typical apprenticeship models, which maydescribe the relationship between mentors and mentees, or which may describe mentorship formore mechanical skills, CAM theorizes the ways in which novices come to think about a subjectwith expertise. This process is characterized by situated learning and social support provided byan expert and its processes are metacognitive [5]. While cognitive apprenticeship models arecurrently
skills of utilizing all the mechanical engineering principles todesign and manufacture new mechanisms and mechanical systems. Thus, the quality andbroadness of mechanical design courses directly influences the ME education and students’career development. 44 The ME Department at North Dakota State University (NDSU) offers four required coremechanical design courses at the junior and senior levels, i.e., two introductory machine designcourses (ME 442/443 Machine Design I & II), followed by two design project courses (ME461/462 Design Project I & II). The ME 442/443 courses are instructed by conventionallecturing along with one or two semester course projects, through which students learn
Management, Co-op, Internship, Students, Work ExperienceIntroductionIn construction management education, integrating classroom and laboratory learning knowledgewith practical experience from real construction projects is widely recognized as important.Reports from the construction industry often stress that any deficiency in students' skills wouldnegatively impact their early career learning curve and students are more exposed to theoreticalas opposed to practical knowledge.1 This concern from construction industry representatives isreasonable as construction management is regarded as an applied discipline. One way of closingthe expectation gap between industry and academics is by offering internship programs that willstrengthen students’ practical
campuses around the world.While this trend began in the United States, it has rapidly spread internationally with a growingnumber of higher education institutions adding these facilities to create communities whereparticipants learn, fabricate, and share knowledge. As more institutions add these spaces to theirinfrastructure, there is a greater need to identify and share best practices in this growing field ofengineering education. As one example, the 1st International Symposium on AcademicMakerspaces was held in Cambridge, Massachusetts in November, 2016 and drew 300participants from 115 universities, 20 companies, and 6 continents. The symposium included 19sessions of papers and workshops with presenters from Austria, Brazil, Bolivia, China
learning with academic programs. Students work in E-teamsand write NCIIA proposals to commercialize innovative product or university/research labdeveloped technology.This paper describes a unique course series in Systems Engineering (SE) Entrepreneurship.Innovation in product/service design and commercialization that enables entrepreneurship can besuccessfully leveraged by applying SE principles/ techniques which parallel entrepreneurshipsteps such as Customer Requirements Engineering and opportunity recognition; Project/QualityEngineering, Decision/Risk Analysis, Systems Modeling, Engineering Economics and businessplanning, Systems Integration and business plan development, Systems Launch considerationsand product/business launch, etc. Concepts
Systems Engineering coursesoffered by the Department of Engineering Systems at Florida Tech have greatly enriched thestudents’ educational experience, broadened their perspectives, served as community outreachforums and integrated experiential learning with academic programs. Students work in E-teamsand write NCIIA proposals to commercialize innovative product or university/research labdeveloped technology.This paper describes a unique course series in Systems Engineering (SE) Entrepreneurship.Innovation in product/service design and commercialization that enables entrepreneurship can besuccessfully leveraged by applying SE principles/ techniques which parallel entrepreneurshipsteps such as Customer Requirements Engineering and opportunity
, situations or recurring themes from the previous week. Thepeer mentoring program is voluntary; students who begin the peer mentoring program can opt-out at any time.Both mentors and mentees benefit from this program. Mentees gain individual recognition,confidence and self esteem; receive encouragement and support; learn perspective alternativesolutions to their problems. Mentees are challenged to achieve new goals; to remain focused onschool while still balancing their work and social life; and to make friends and network. Duringtheir training, mentors learn about the services offered on campus, and then use these servicesthemselves. They also improve their interpersonal skills by mentoring, feel an even greater
and the resources available to them, and to betteracquaint students with the skills necessary to succeed in industry.Topics for the course include development of career goals, resume creation, marketing strategies,professional correspondence, job search strategies, interviewing skills, business etiquette,multicultural experiences, graduate school options, professional topics, and lifelong learning. Asa part of the course, students attended two different career fairs: the Fall Career Fair at ThePennsylvania State University in University Park, PA, and the Business and Engineering CareerFair at Penn State Altoona.The course was offered in fall of 2006 to eleven senior-level students in the EMET program.Students were surveyed during the first
AC 2007-1617: EFFECTS OF CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING, MATH ANDVISUALIZATION SKILLS ON PROBLEM-SOLVING IN STATICSKelli Higley, Pennsylvania State University Kelli Higley is a PhD student in Educational Psychology at Penn State. Before working on her PhD, she taught high school mathematics for 3 years. She has worked on diverse projects about learning, including research about discourse, reading, statistics, algebra, and now Statics. Her primary research focus remains improving the quality of mathematics teaching. She can be contacted at kjh262@psu.edu.Thomas Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University Tom Litzinger is Director of the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education
AC 2008-2535: TEACHERS’ NOTICING ENGINEERING IN EVERYDAYOBJECTS AND PROCESSESSean Brophy, Purdue University Sean P. Brophy, PhD. is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Brophy is a learning scientist and engineer; his research focuses on the development of learners’ ability to solve complex problems in engineering, mathematics and science contexts. As a research scholar with INSPIRE he has been investigating teacher and students cognition of engineering problem solving and perceptions of engineering.Gemma Mann, Purdue University Gemma E. Mann is a research associate with INSPIRE in Purdue University’s department of Engineering Education. She received her
’ educational experience, broadened their perspectives, served as community outreachforums and integrated experiential learning with academic programs. Students work in E-teamsand write NCIIA proposals to commercialize innovative product or university/research labdeveloped technology.This paper describes a unique course series in Systems Engineering (SE) Entrepreneurship.Innovation in product/service design and commercialization that enables entrepreneurship can besuccessfully leveraged by applying SE principles/ techniques which parallel entrepreneurshipsteps such as Customer Requirements Engineering and opportunity recognition; Project/QualityEngineering, Decision/Risk Analysis, Systems Modeling, Engineering Economics and businessplanning, Systems
Engineering Systems at Florida Tech have greatly enriched thestudents’ educational experience, broadened their perspectives, served as community outreachforums and integrated experiential learning with academic programs. Students work in E-teamsand write NCIIA proposals to commercialize innovative product or university/research labdeveloped technology.This paper describes a unique course series in Systems Engineering (SE) Entrepreneurship.Innovation in product/service design and commercialization that enables entrepreneurship can besuccessfully leveraged by applying SE principles/ techniques which parallel entrepreneurshipsteps such as Customer Requirements Engineering and opportunity recognition; Project/QualityEngineering, Decision/Risk Analysis
broader impacts of research for the benefit of society. Partnerships withinstitutional programs such as Upward Bound, regional community organizations such as theBoys and Girls Clubs and the municipal partnerships with corporations and school districts haveenabled innovative programs. Activities across these partnerships increased 200% over a periodof three years. Program assessments align with results reported by the Iowa Governor’s STEMAdvisory Council, which has revealed increased STEM learning and STEM interest among avariety of K-12 participants. Efforts to continue the collaboration culture of researchers, diversityprofessionals, corporations and community organizations continue. The result has been acommunity of scholars willing to “share
Paper ID #29651Complete Evidence- Based Practice Paper: The Impact of InformationLiteracy Instruction on the Synthesis Level of First-Year EngineeringStudentsDr. Jessica Ohanian Perez, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Jessica Ohanian Perez is an assistant professor in Electromechanical Engineering Technology at Califor- nia State Polytechnic University, Pomona with a focus on STEM pedagogy. Jessica earned her doctorate in education, teaching, learning and culture from Claremont Graduate University. Her research focuses on broadening participation of marginalized group in engineering and investigating alternate
Society for Engineering Education. Dr. Springer received his Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Purdue University, his MBA and Doctorate in Adult and Community Education with a Cognate in Executive Development from Ball State University. He is certified as a Project Management Professional (PMP), Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR & SHRM-SCP), in Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR), and, in civil and domestic mediation. Dr. Springer is a State of Indiana Registered domestic mediator. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 After Action Review of a U.S.-Based M.S. Degree Program Delivered in Kilimanjaro, Africa: Challenges and Opportunities
interests include multimedia learning, design education and empathic design. Address: Virginia Tech Engineering Education (MC 0218) 345 Goodwin Hall, 635 Prices Fork Rd, Blacksburg, VA 24061.Dr. Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Tech Diana Bairaktarova is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and the Director of the Abilities, Creativity, and Ethics in Design [ACE(D)] Lab.Prof. Tamara Knott, Virginia Tech Tamara Knott is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her primary responsibil- ity centers on teaching in the First Year Program. Her interests include assessment and pedagogy. Within ASEE, she is a member of the First-year Programs Division, the Women
PhD in Civil Engineering from Clemson University in South Carolina, and her BS in Engineering from Harvey Mudd College.Dr. Odesma Onika Dalrymple, University of San Diego Dr. Odesma Dalrymple is an Assistant Professor in the Shiley Marcos School of Engineering at University of San Diego. She conducts research on tools and techniques that can be readily applied in real engineer- ing learning environments to improve student learning and teaching. In this respect her two prominent research contributions are with: 1) artefact-inspired discovery–based pedagogy, i.e., learning activities where students’ exploration of STEM knowledge is self-directed and motivated by interactions or manip- ulations of artefacts; and 2
as a 3D printer. The students learn to choose a strategy, generate concepts for the design, perform analysis on their concept, and then design and assemble the individual components. These designs are tested and verified before a competition at the undergraduate symposium every semester. A similar competitiontype project is given in ME350, Design and Manufacturing II . This is the junior level course, where the emphasis is on the modelbased design of mechanical and mechatronic systems. The students learn the design of mechanisms, the design of mechanical elements for strength, and mechatronics. Mechatronics is the synergistic integration of mechanics, electronics, control theory, and computer science within product design and
the creation ofthe syllabus and homework assignments, to lecture preparation and grading, its goal is to create aworkable structure for the instructor. The second approach compares the actual weeklyassignment and exam load across seven classes for students with when those assignments andexams need to be graded by the instructor. This method looks at the work that needs to beaccomplished and sets up a structure to help insure the success of the student learning, and theinstructor’s ability to actually grade the work in a balanced format. Included in the paper are theactual grading workload counts for each method. The paper also challenges the reader to reviewhis or her own instructional planning methods for possible improvements in outcomes
undergraduate students to learn through research, and in developing active and place-based teaching methods for environmental engineering courses.Dr. Michael Robinson P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Michael Robinson is an Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.Dr. Jennifer Mueller Price PE P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Page 26.484.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Developing a Course-based Master of Environmental Engineering Degree
students to give them basic kinematic concepts while gainingexperience with ROS. We have added additional material for advanced students interested inrobotics. In this paper we present enough kinematic theory to give the reader a good idea ofwhat kinematic concepts are presented in the lab. In the detailed descriptions of the labs we also Page 26.1024.2covered how we used ROS to learn kinematics. The pre-lab materials and labs are available asfree open source for readers who wish to know more.The topics covered for the Kinematic Labs are depicted in Figure 1. Euler angles tend to beintuitive to describe robot motion but have issues when angles
educational philosophy advanced.There are hopeful, though limited examples of larger understanding on education, such asenumerated in the book How Learning Works 6 . But these systems thinking principlesneed to be applied in the current process. Delineation of cause and effect of particulartopics discussed would add deeper thought and more weight to the outcomes. Page 26.1627.5 5. A generalized lack of awareness of what the participants implicitly believe about the process of engineering education, in spite of data and case studies, (or lack thereof) and how their perspectives modify their opinions.There are reasons why academics and industry
solutionmethods.In addition to the above, student learning can be improved in through scaffolding questions [22]which involves increasing the difficulty level of a problem steadily until a student becomesproficient at solving problems in the topic being taught. This, however, can be a challenging taskfor an instructor as students in the classroom may learn at different rates and require differentneeds at different times. In addition, instructor expertise may interfere with their ability to predictstudent performance [23]. One potential way to scaffold problems in mechanics is to useComputer Adaptive Testing [24] where software to chooses the next question for the studentbased on their success in solving the previous question. In order for a computer to
Human-Computer Interaction from Iowa State University. Dr. Faas graduated from Bucknell University with her M.S. in Mechanical Engineering and joint B.S./B.A. in Mechanical Engineering and International Relations. Dr. Faas is currently a re- search affiliate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at MIT. Her research focuses on developing low cost immersive Virtual Reality applications for products and systems, early stage design process and methodology and engineering education. Research interests: virtual reality (VR) applications in mechanical design, design methodology and engi- neering education.Emily Ferrier, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering c American Society for