Paper ID #15210The Changing Role of Professional Societies for AcademicsDr. Gretchen L. Hein, Michigan Technological University Gretchen Hein is a senior lecturer in Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Tech. She have been teaching ENG3200, Thermo-Fluids since 2005. She also teaches first-tear engineering classes. She has been active in incorporating innovative instructional methods into all course she teaches. Her research areas also include why students persist in STEM programs and underrepresented groups in engineering.Dr. Daniela Faas, Harvard University Dr. Faas is currently the Senior Preceptor in Design Instruction
to everyone else on the list. (Dickerson 34-41) This errorcan be easily avoided if the users had regular training on sending out mass emails on companywide email system. Of course, we don’t know if the person who sends the email was beingsupervised or the manager just left the task to a staff member. If the latter scenario was the case,then the manager is at fault. Such important task must be handled by a manager who’stechnically savvy and will be able to evaluate all possibilities for error in advance.Inappropriate Access privileges for users In regard to access privilege sometimes certain ordinary users may have extra ordinaryprivilege on a network. This is extremely dangerous. According to CERT and US Secreteservice, 87% of insider
approaches to engineering education integrate empathyas a core skill and orientation to engineering practice, placing the other people involved in theengineering design process at the center [5]-[6]. This human-centered approach has the potentialto strengthen engineering practices while also offering more welcoming invitations into the fieldfor groups of learners, particularly women, who have historically been underrepresented inengineering courses and careers. Research has found that the dominant view of engineering asprimarily about “working with things” rather than “working with people” leads many youngwomen to the conclusion that engineering is not for them [7]-[9]. These conceptions ofengineering begin to form in elementary and middle school
curriculum and instruction in engineering education, motivation and preparation of under served pop- ulations of students and teachers and in assessing the impact of operationalizing culturally responsive teaching in the STEM classroom. As executive director of the LBJ Institute for STEM Education and Research, she collaborates on various state and national STEM education programs and is PI on major grant initiatives through NASA MUREP and NSF Improving Undergraduate STEM Education and NSF DUE . Araceli holds Engineering degrees from The University of Michigan and Kettering University. She holds a Masters degree in Education from Michigan State and a PhD in Engineering Education from Tufts University.Dr. Michael A Soltys
in the Engineering Education realm working with faculty motivation for change and re-design of Material Science courses for more active pedagogies.Dr. Beena Sukumaran, Rowan University Beena Sukumaran has been on the faculty at Rowan University since 1998 and is Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering. She is currently serving as Vice President for Research. Her area of expertise is in micro-geomechanics and she has published over 100 peer reviewed conference and journal papers including several papers on engineering education and the unique undergraduate curriculum at Rowan University, especially the Engineering Clinics. She has been involved in various outreach activities to recruit more women and
, finding solutions and making5 Since the Maternal Wall bias is focused on gender based bias, we would not elaborate on the regressioncoefficients of the race variables. Model 5 does show Latino/Latina reported lower level agreement with thestatement. We do not have enough data in this study to offer an explanation to this result.improvements are what researchers and practitioners should focus on next. Various attemptshave been made or are in the making. For instance, a group of graduate students and faculty atthe Purdue University Engineering Education program published a report with proposedsolutions to improve African-American women’s presence in engineering (Fletcher et al 2016).The Center for WorkLife law at U. C. Hastings are working on
InteractionsAbstractThis exploratory study addresses the need to increase the numbers of traditionallyunderrepresented minority (URM) students in engineering careers through an investigation of therole of research mentoring in recruiting and retaining URM students in engineering. Mentoringstudents in engineering and science research has long been acknowledged as an effective way toengage undergraduates in engineering majors, and is also an essential component of the doctoraldegrees that represent the gateway to careers in engineering research. This study was guided bythe following questions: 1) What can we identify as best practices in mentoring and supervisingURM students as they conduct engineering research? 2) How is the effectiveness of thesepractices
Paper ID #37189A Qualitative Study of Undergraduate Women in Engineering Project TeamsDr. Grace J. LiangDr. Rick Evans, Cornell University Sociolinguist and Director of the Engineering Communications Program in the College of Engineering at Cornell UniversityMojdeh AsadollahipajouhDr. Stacey E. Kulesza, P.E., Kansas State University Dr. Stacey Kulesza is an associate professor in the civil engineering department at Texas State University. Dr. Kulesza is a graduate of the American Society of Civil Engineers Excellence in Civil Engineering Education (ExCEED). She teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in geotechnical
, working with indigenous youth, or promoting inclusivity from the perspective of neurodiversity.” [A1]For the focus usage group, neurodiv* played a central role in the paper. In more traditionalstudies, this meant that the research question(s) included neurodiv*. In other articles, the authorsproposed a framework or other strategies for curricular reform where the primary motivation wasto increase course accessibility to neurodivergent students. These articles only introducedstrategies; they did not report results of their application. However, this is not to say that thefocus usage group excludes all articles that present results of applying curricular reformstrategies. Such articles could have been included if they discussed outcomes for
these students were struggling within the course, andwhether their negative experiences throughout the whole process could lead to ineffectivelearning experiences. Then our research team could see if there was a possibility for this negativeexperience to be interrupted with an intervention. If this was effective our hope would be tonormalize this outside intervention as a standard practice in engineering education.In an effort to keep the benefits and potentially eliminate the drawbacks of the drag-and-dropquestion format, we want to change the format of the survey instrument to a series of drop downmenus for future implementations. There will be multiple drop down menus in a row, all with thesame bank of words as options. This format allows
, and gender and 2) engineering education, with a focus on socioeconomic class and social responsibility. She is currently completing a book manuscript on the intersection of engineering and corporate social responsibility. She is the author of Mining Coal and Un- dermining Gender: Rhythms of Work and Family in the American West (Rutgers University Press, 2014), which was funded by the National Science Foundation and National Endowment for the Humanities. In 2016 the National Academy of Engineering recognized her Corporate Social Responsibility course as a national exemplar in teaching engineering ethics. Professor Smith holds a PhD in Anthropology and a certificate in Women’s Studies from the University of Michigan
, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton (2003) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Edu- cation from Purdue University (2008). Her research focuses on strategies for design innovations through divergent and convergent thinking as well as through deep needs and community assessments using design ethnography, and translating those strategies to design tools and education. She teaches design and en- trepreneurship courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels, focusing on front-end design processes. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020
attitudes.Ghada Salama, Texas A&M University at Qatar Ghada Salama is an Instructional Associate Professor at Texas A&M in the Chemical Engineering Pro- gram at Qatar. She teaches freshman Engineering introductory courses, and chemical engineering courses of different levels . She is a strong advocate and believer of student engagement and conducting interac- tive classes to support and encourage the learning process. She has published and presented in numerous conferences sharing her experiences in engineering education.Emilio Ocampo Eibenschutz, Texas A&M University at Qatar Emilio Ocampo Eibenschutz is a Research Associate at the Liberal Arts Program at Texas A&M Univer- sity at Qatar. His research areas
], few studies portray how engineering undergraduates engage inethical reasoning, particularly as it unfolds and shifts throughout the course of the designprocess. Even fewer have examined ethical reasoning when situated within authentic designcontexts, particularly those in which students must navigate the messy interconnections betweenend-user needs, design constraints, team dynamics, technical problems, and ethical dilemmas. Toprepare engineers capable of grappling with these ethical complexities, engineering educatorsneed a richer understanding of students’ situated, daily ethical decision-making. Drawing on acase study of 13 students in an undergraduate service learning engineering course, this studyapplies reflexive principlism as an
center on exploring the ex- periences of marginalized engineering students, with a particular focus on their hidden identity, mental health, and wellbeing. Her work aims to enhance inclusivity and diversity in engineering education, con- tributing to the larger body of research in the field.Dr. Stephen Secules, Florida International University Stephen is an Assistant Professor Engineering and Computing Education at Florida International Univer- sity. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught several courses on design, sociotechnical contexts, and engineer- ing education. He runs the Equity Research Group which incorporates
funds of knowledge into their teaching without sometimes beingaware of it. However, there were certain institutional barriers that prevented its fullimplementation in the curriculum. These results indicate that although teachers see thesignificance of funds of knowledge in engineering, the teachers and teaching practices are stillembedded in a deficit-oriented educational structure that may prevent some of these changesfrom occurring.IntroductionWith the emergence of the Next Generation Science Standards [1], middle school teachershave been called to integrate engineering into their classes. However, there has been littlediscussion on how middle school teachers can be supported to effectively adopt instructionalpractices that combine both asset
, Kuwait University Received her B.Sc. in computer engineering from Kuwait University, and currently preparing her M.S. in computing information systems. Her research interests include cloud computing, software engineering and information security management . She is currently working as a software engineer and information security auditor. She managed lot of projects to improve the quality of the working environment.Dr. Joshua Levi Weese, Kansas State University Dr. Josh Weese is a Teaching Assistant Professor at Kansas State University in the department of Com- puter Science. Dr. Weese joined K-State as faculty in the Fall of 2017. He has expertise in data science, software engineering, web technologies, computer
evaluation for supplemental pro- grams, with a focus on the impact of intervention programs and other support systems on the retention of underrepresented students. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Race, Gender and Persistence in Engineering and Computing: A Qualitative Analysis of Female Student Experiences at a Minority Serving Institution (MSI) Abstract— Within engineering and computer science programs at a southeast-based minority serving institution (MSI),efforts have been made to help improve the participation in and success of female students within the fields. This has beendone by partnering with external
ofcreative ideas within the EERB. A makerspace provides a location for students to explore ideas,complete class projects, or pursue an entrepreneurial innovation. As a general concept,university makerspaces present both formal and informal learning opportunities to students.From an educational perspective, makerspaces espouse constructivism and constructionism aslearning philosophies, incorporating collaborative and problem-based activities. Essentially, theexpertise and tools provided in makerspace facilities foster a hands-on approach to learningbased upon individual interests, building upon intrinsic motivation (Kurti, Kurti, & Fleming,2014) [1]. Whether a student wants to learn a new skill to improve classroom performance orparticipate just
learning environment for all students in the class. Instructorsshould avoid stopping a lecture to confront a student, and should try to speak one-on-one with theoffending student to enforce classroom policies.Criticism often demotivates students. Humor in the class can easily backfire. Raising one’s voicecan be interpreted as yelling. Even if an instructor has good intentions, some actions can bemisinterpreted by students. Criticism may be intended to improve learning, and it may help somestudents, but it can have the opposite effect on other students. Some students may find a jokefunny, while others are offended. A raised voice may not bother some, and may be helpful atgaining student attention, but it may be offensive to some. Instructors should
studentparticipant and faculty mentor in the student‟s evaluation of the program. To the extent thatstudents felt that the program could be improved, much of that upside potential lay with facultymembers who students wished had spent more time with them and especially time devoted tounderstanding the “bigger picture” as it related to their specific research tasks. Previous REUcohorts at this site have expressed similar sentiments -- that although they enjoy the freedom toadvance their REU projects, they yearn for the type and regularity of feedback that theyexperience in their engineering courses, which for many is their only point of evaluativereference. If a future REU program returns to this university site, the PIs plan to institute anapplication for
. Senkpeil, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Ryan Senkpeil is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University who’s research is focused on non-cognitive factors that impact engineering student performance and developing interventions to improve students’ non-cognitive factors.Ms. Julianna Sun Ge, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Julianna Ge is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. At Purdue, she created and currently teaches a novel course for undergraduate engineering students to explore the intersections of wellbeing, leadership, diversity and inclusion. As an NSF Graduate Research Fellow, her research interests
. Zastavker, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Yevgeniya V. Zastavker, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Physics at Franklin W. Olin College of En- gineering. She earned her B.S. degree in Physics from Yale University in 1995 and her Ph. D. degree in Biological Physics from MIT in 2001. Dr. Zastavker’s research interests lie in the field of STEM educa- tion with specific emphasis on innovative pedagogical and curricular practices at the intersection with the issues of gender and diversity. Dr. Zastavker is currently working with Dr. Stolk on an NSF-supported project to understand students’ motivational attitudes in a variety of educational environments with the goal of improving learning opportunities for students
: Anupperclassmen Physics course in a rural high school, two sophomore honors chemistryclasses in an all male parochial school and two freshmen general science classes in anurban charter school. Reduced/free lunch data were not available from administration forthese schools. All the teachers participated in a NSF RET-Nano summer program and thegraduate student was a NSF REU Sensors mentor and the undergraduate was her NSFREU Sensors student.The RET-Nano teachers and REU students/mentors worked together to develop lessonplans and activities to scaffold the high school student’s learning experience. The REUstudent and mentor designed, built, and tested the experimental hardware for theelectrospinning traveling kit shown in Figure 1 (a-d). And the graduate
have becomedominated by exculpatory and risk shifting clauses that not only fail to reflect the intent of theparties but often place one party at a greater risk than they had anticipated. These writings oftenreflect a set of conditions that the offeree will accept as a matter of business expediency. Thisacceptance of unfamiliar provisions creates an agreement that represents a disconnect inexpectations between the two parties. This is in contrast with the meeting of the minds that wasonce required for actual contract formation. As these provisions have become more commonthey have been legitimized by what is referred to as custom and usage: the conduct has beendone repeatedly in the course of business and so it becomes acceptable business
wereexplored further in focus groups: balance of work-life and work-load, leadership and careerdevelopment, and equal opportunity.Through our survey, town hall meeting, and focus groups, we found that the evolution of ourcomprehensive institution from a primarily teaching university to an institution where a researchprogram is expected has placed considerable pressure on our faculty, especially those at mid-career. Our heavy teaching responsibilities (inflexible lab schedules, research withundergraduates, course innovation, mentoring/advising), and service commitments constraintime to such an extent that many faculty feel that their research programs suffer or becomesecond jobs. CST women serve on more committees, perform much of the more time
University. Abimelec received his Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez (UPRM) in 2016. After working in the aerospace industry, he returned to the UPRM for his MS in Mechanical Engineering in 2017, where he pursued ways to tailor ideation methods to interdisciplinary teams as part of his thesis work, and had the opportunity to teach undergraduate ME courses. His previous efforts and experiences in engineering education helped shape his overall goal of fostering human-centered education systems, which led him to pursue his PhD at ASU.Dr. Mayra S Artiles, Arizona State University Mayra S. Artiles is an assistant professor in engineering at the Polytechnic School of the
introductory engineering design course in collaboration with institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean as part of his effort to contribute to the formation of world class engineers for the Americas. He is actively involved in the Latin American and Caribbean Consortium of Engineering Institution (LACCEI) as a regional Vice-President, and in the International and Minority Divisions of ASEE. Page 12.1069.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 MIND Links 2007: Resources to Motivate Minorities to Study and Stay In EngineeringAbstractMIND is the acronym for the
Fellows have improved theirpublic speaking skills, felt more prepared for their careers, and felt that they were makinga difference simply by being positive role models. In addition, by working with OSTclubs, the undergraduate Fellows work directly with the graduate Fellow who exposesthem to new areas of research, helps strengthen their math and science skills and providesan opportunity to discuss their post-undergraduate plans. Among the NCSU Fellows amuch higher percentage of undergraduate Fellows plan to attend graduate or professionalschool, as compared to similar statistics for the entire university undergraduatepopulation. The graduate Fellow benefits in much the same way and additionallydevelops managerial and administrative skills.Out-of
because theyrepresent the future. Given projected demographic changes and the shift toward a globaleconomy, it is more important that future engineering faculty learn to teach effectively intomorrow’s classrooms. Graduate students are entering a community in which diversity is morethan a question in an interview or a sub-topic in a grant proposal, it will be a daily concern.III. Our WorkIn this section, we discuss work focused on helping future engineering educators integratediversity and teaching. Our work is premised on a belief that in order to prepare engineeringeducators to work with students of the future and meet future demands for engineers, we need toprovide carefully designed opportunities to engage the topic of diversity in teaching