experiences (Eliot &Turns, 2011). Reflection activities may enable students to do things such as consolidate theirlearning and think critically about how their current course material can be applied to futurework in the real world. Moreover, armed with insights from student responses to reflectionactivities, educators may be able to do things such as better attune to areas of student confusionand adjust their teaching style to help improve students’ understanding of course material.However, there is little data on how students experience reflection activities and even less dataon how educators perceive such activities. How do we go about broadly appreciating theknowledge gains that can and do result from engagement in reflection activities?We
course of theircareers. For this reason, we now turn our attention to the literature on engineers’ career paths.Part 2: Engineers’ career pathsMost studies on engineers’ career paths are premised on a dual track model attributed to humanresource managers in the 1950s who were motivated to institutionalize a technical incentivestructure to improve the retention of high performing engineers [2, 4-6, 43, 44]. Stated simply,this model proposes that engineers can either: 1) ascend a traditional management hierarchy,gaining authority over larger numbers of employees with each step (management ladder), or 2)move through successive technical titles associated with salary increases, higher status, greaterresponsibility, and increased autonomy (technical
of different concepts, and whether they described alternative metaphors.Results and discussionWe outline our current analysis of the stories of these 14 participants through discussion of howeffective or not effective the pipeline metaphor is at understanding their lives. Each direct quotefrom a participant is labeled with a unique four-digit number that refers to our internalrecordkeeping. In general, “[...]” is used to excerpt out interviewer interjections of understanding(such as “okay” or “uh-huh”), to excerpt out something that might identify the participant, or tootherwise improve readability.How does the metaphor highlight particular lived experiences of women?Many of our participants agreed that the metaphor of pipeline “sounds
were identified using qualitative data analysis. They were broadly organized for this paperinto dominant themes that included a) interviewees’ characterizations of “the public,” b)experiences that shaped interviewees’ views of “the public,” c) interviewees’ understandingsabout their role in society, d) interviewees’ understandings about the role of “the public” inengineering decision making, and e) interviewees’ perceptions of risks and benefits associatedwith interacting with “the public.”IntroductionAt the forefront of the engineering code of ethics is the mandate to “hold paramount the safety,health and welfare of the public”1. The National Academy of Engineering (NAE) refers toengineers as “a key force in the improvement of our economic
with MIDFIELD. Address: 3504 Corin Court, Raleigh, NC, 27612-4100. Telephone: (+1) 919.782.4427. Email: rtecinc@bellsouth.netSusan M. Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford Univer- sity. She is currently Professor and Coordinator of Electrical Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her teaching and research interests include electronics, optoelectronics, materials science, first year engi- neering courses, feminist and liberative pedagogies, and student autonomy. Dr. Lord served as General Co-Chair of the 2006 Frontiers in Education Conference. She has been awarded NSF CAREER and ILI grants. She is currently working on a
picked up enough useful phrases and terms for independence.The students reported volunteering for this project for a variety of reasons. Expecting to learnmore about their research project, they also hoped to try out and improve their Chinese languageskills, explore the Chinese culture, and build their resume. Several of them welcomed an excuseto learn more about the land of their family’s heritage. Most acknowledged the lure of beingpaid to (a) do research and (b) travel to China.All participants were made explicitly aware that they were the subjects in a funded researchproject studying the effects of their participation in CURE. They signed IRB-approved consentforms as acknowledgement of their understanding and agreement to participate as well
two different forms, both of whichare supported by the satisfaction of the basic psychological needs. First, employees become moreintrinsically motivated when basic psychological needs are met, pursuing their daily workactivities out of a sense of enjoyment and interest in those activities. Second, employees who areautonomously motivated internalize extrinsic motivations, such as the values of the organizationor of their own workgroup [5]. Both types of autonomous motivation are responsible forimproved intentions and behaviors associated with boosting physical health and safety [11], aswell as increased persistence, greater satisfaction, and improvements in overall well-being[12][13]. Further Olafsen et al. [14] demonstrated that the
demonstrating the role ofchemistry in life with a valid influence on students’ judgment and attitude.The effectiveness of this approach has been demonstrated by the dramatically diminished gapbetween teaching and learning. Long lasting learning was verified by using this approach onstudents who chose Chemistry at University level. The atmosphere in the classroom waspleasant and friendly. The knowledge of the language of Chemistry acquired before enteringthe study of chemistry improved the ability to comprehend the subject matter.In conclusion, the teaching-learning process implemented on the knowledge of the languageof chemical formulae to which the content of chemical processes adds, together with a closeattention given to matching chemistry processes
Paper ID #38106Thinking Critically about Critical Research with MilitaryUndergraduates in Engineering EducationAngela Minichiello (Assistant Professor) Angela (Angie) Minichiello, Ph.D., P. E., is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education and Adjunct Faculty in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Utah State University. Her research employs asset-based frameworks to improve access, participation, and inclusivity across all levels of engineering education. Angie engages with qualitative, mixed-method, and multi-method approaches to better understand student experience for the ultimate purpose of
engineering students teaching math and science through robotics,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(1): p. 59-73.10. Chambers, J.M. and M. Carbonaro, (2003) “Designing, developing, and implementing a course on LEGO robotics for technology teacher education,” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(2): p. 209-241.11. Kim, C., et al., (2015) “Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching,” Computers and Education, 91: p. 14-31.12. Jaipal-Jamani, K. and C. Angeli, (2017) “Effect of robotics on elementary preservice teachers’ self- efficacy, science learning, and computational thinking,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(2
laboratory projects in the middle years [27]–[29].Engineering teams offer a mode for interdisciplinarity and task delegation so students can finishlarge and complicated projects within the span of a course. What is not often taught, however,are the various skills necessary in the social processes that make teaming effective:communication, delegation, and conflict resolution, to name a few [30]–[32]. The socialcircumstances in which these skills become relevant can reveal hidden epistemologies that guidethe teaming process, especially when gender differences and dynamics are considered [21].Within engineering, these epistemologies are woven into the culture of engineering learningenvironments and often the engineering field itself [18]. Therefore, we
Gül E. Okudan is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Design at The Pennsylvania State University. She received her Ph.D. from University of Missouri-Rolla. Her research interests include intelligent shop floor control, manufacturing strategy modeling and measurement, solid modeling, product design, and product design teams. Her published work appears in journals such as Journal of Engineering Design, Design Studies, Journal of Engineering Education, European Journal of Engineering Education and Technovation. She is a member of ASEE and ASME. She is also a National Research Council-US AFRL Summer Faculty Fellow of the Human Effectiveness Directorate for 2002, 2003 and 2004
University there were a couple of men that I worked with who recognized they could actually provide some useful help to me.Our participants did not necessarily seek out women for their mentoring networks, as would beconsistent with previous literature. This pattern may have occurred in part because there were notmany women in the department, as Ellie said, “Because there are so few women in engineering,particularly so few senior women, having men be effective mentors of young women faculty issomething that we need to look at.” Additionally, our participants noted that simply having afemale mentor would not guarantee that they would receive effective mentoring (admittingimplicitly that the gender stereotype of women being more nurturing and
● Volunteer Programs ● ●Professional. Professional organizations are spaces that are utilized in a manner that supports thedevelopment of a professional engineering identity. This support comes in many different formsincluding but not limited to academic support, leadership opportunities, and networking. Inmajoritarian contexts, these sorts of organizations are leveraged by students in order to gainopportunities or develop skills to make themselves more marketable; however, professionalcounterspaces for Black graduate students have the added effect of also affirming their uniqueidentities within engineering, falling under the value category of agency and identity formation.One example of this was provided by
Paper ID #23819Re-envisioning the Role of the Engineering Education Chapter at a Research-I Institution: Lessons from a Cross-disciplinary ModelBeau Vezino, University of Arizona Beau R. Vezino is a Ph.D. student at the University of Arizona’s College of Education. His focus is engineering and science education. Beau currently teaches the science/engineering methods course for pre-service teachers and works on several related research projects. Beau is certified K-12 teacher and holds a MS in Education in Curriculum and Instruction (2009) and a BS in Mechanical Engineering (2005). Beau’s research focus is on teaching
social responsibility, as defined by the PSRDM, in engineering students. The coreof the EPRA tool, the 50 Likert-items, focus on student attitudes at the time in which the studentis taking the survey, not asking about previous views or future views. The intended uses for thistool are to assess students’ current attitudes with respect to social responsibility and, possibly, toassess changes in student views surrounding a specific course or intervention, or over theduration of their college career. It is believed that attitudes toward social responsibility developand change slowly, so the intention is that this tool would be more successful at assessingchanges over longer periods of time9.Results from this tool may be interpreted in different ways
; Safety of AM Materials. 5. Advancements in the study of the Impacts of student participation in Campus Sustainability. 6. Development & Implementation of Campus Sustainability Best Practices – CAU 7. Design, Development & Implementation of LEED Labo- ratories - a multidisciplinary immersion course that utilizes the built environment to educate and prepare students to become green building leaders and sustainability-focused citizens. 8. Design & Testing of Nozzles & Diffusers-Applications in AM Metal Powder Fed Systems. 9. Design of Experiments for NDT for AM Metal Components. 10. Design of Experiments for Surface Finish Evaluation of 3D AM Metal Components. SELECTED CONFERENCE SEMINARS &
Institute of Technology in 2000. Currently, she serves on the Editorial Board of the Springer Wireless Networks Journal and formerly on the editorial boards of IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing and Elsevier Ad Hoc Networks Journal. Her engineering education research interests are the status of under- represented minority groups and women in engineering as well as the impact of online learning on student proficiency in engineering laboratory courses. Page 26.862.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 How the Pathway to Engineering Affects Diversity in the
, Mentoring, and ManipulativesThe track 1 project was titled M3: Motivation, Mentoring, and Manipulatives, andfocused on the topical area of Automotive Technology Education. Graduate studentswho were studying such topics as fuel cells, hybrid-electric vehicles, batteries, and otherautomotive-related topics were involved in the project. So the mentoring of teachers andstudents in the classroom was comprised of transportation related topics. At the time,instruction in appropriate communication skills were provided for the graduate studentsand feedback on delivery helped to improve their teaching of the manipulatives in theclassroom. All were motivated by the program to teach and learn from the experienceand through the various manipulatives developed
more totalitarianand less effective than the old central power which had been replaced. Local departments ofeducation have a tendency to become very dependent on regional administrators whose primaryconcerns center on budget cuts and who may make incompetent decisions concerning curricula(pp. 75-101).Russia s future, like all other nations, depends on being able to create a well educated electorate.Education played an important part in Soviet society as literacy was always highly regarded. But,the challenges facing Russian society today will not be met by depending on the educationalpractices of the past. It must move forward and reorganize the educational system just to meetthe demands of the present. By so doing Russian will be able to lay a
3.385.4what is needed to make a vehicle, she might start rattling off a list of familiar components "tires,steering wheel, doors, horn," etc. that belong to a car. What is often useful in design, however, isto think of vehicular functions (means of motion, means of changing direction of motion, etc.) inorder to brainstorm all of the possibilities and not get locked into one way of thinking. This iswhat is often called top-down design. Bottom-up (or concrete to abstract) design is also useful insystems engineering. When designing a rocket for example, it is more cost effective to choosebetween existing rocket engines (highly complex pieces of machinery) then to design one fromscratch. The term "off-the-shelf" is often used to describe a component that
Paper ID #43201Formula for Success for Interdisciplinary InitiativesDr. Paul Cameron Hungler P.Eng., Dr. Paul Hungler is an assistant professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Ingenuity Labs at Queenˆa C™s University. Prior to starting his current position, Major (Retired) Hungler served in the Royal Canadian Airforce. His research is now focDr. Kimia Moozeh, Queen’s University Kimia Moozeh is a research associate at Queen’s university in Engineering Education. Her PhD dissertation at University of Toronto explored improving the learning outcomes of undergraduate laboratories. Her research interests are lab
.” 18Since this technology is so easy and accessible to use, Arduinos have seen extensive use in bothgeneral education and in technical development courses.24, 32 Researchers Barbero, Demo &Vaschetto found Arduinos are popular in Italian technical schools because “Arduino activitiescombine informatics and robotics allowing students to come in contact with several of thedisciplines offered to them a specialization from the third year.” 2They go on to say: The interest in Arduino is because, as we said, we consider important that students experience concrete programming, that they can see the immediate result of their code and verify what it is going on from the formal specification of a program to its effects on
prospective students [10]. Rose further recommended that universities provide departmentswith resources to develop and communicate their requirements and requisite learning objectives[10]. Rose also recommended that universities could provide a process for mediating requests foraccommodation that would take program-specific requirements into consideration [10]. Irecommend that departments, colleges, graduate schools, and SDSOs work together to identifyconflicts and gaps in each of their expectations. Additionally, I would suggest that these groupsengage student unions and societies as well as alumni, professional organizations, and disabilityrights groups to evaluate and provide feedback on the accessibility and effective communicationof their
identify the desirableskills/competencies, traits, or dimensions of leadership that are deemed essential for graduatingengineers, from the perspectives of industry recruiters and managers [6]–[9].Broadly, industry-engaged research has found socio-emotional intelligence as well as skills andpersonality traits such as persuasion, (adaptive) communication, teamwork, initiative,confidence, humility, sociability, optimism, and integrity to be associated with effectiveengineering leadership [7], [9]–[11]. Of note, findings have been mixed on the associationbetween effective engineering leadership and technical mastery or mathematical-logicalintelligence, the assumed requirements to the practice of engineering [9], [10]. This by no meanscorroborates the
Objectives Strategies Recruitment / Recruit and retain female faculty in the Dual Career Services Retention STEM disciplines Retention / Advance female faculty through the rank Research Initiation Awards Advancement and tenure process Retention / Prepare female faculty to hold effective Leadership Developments Advancement leadership positions o Leadership Series /Leadership o Chairs, Program Directors, Recruitment / Educate deans, department chairs, and Administrators Series Retention / faculty leaders about issues affecting o One-day leadership seminar
Bouchet Honor Society in 2017. Sreyoshi is passionate about improving belonging among women in Engineering. She serves as Senator at SWE (Society of Women Engineers) - the world’s largest advocate and catalyst for change for women in engineering and technology with over 42,000 global members. She also champions and serves as advisor at Sisters in STEM - a not-for-profit led by school students, aimed at increasing interest, engagement, and allyship in STEM. Learn more about her work at - www.ThatStatsGirl.com. This work was carried out independent of author’s current employment at Amazon. Views expressed in this paper are the author’s own and do not represent those of the organization she works at.Dr. Lauren Thomas
the standards,ISTE-E Standard #1: Teacher as Learner and ISTE-E Standard #6: Teacher as Facilitator. TheTeacher as Learner standard calls for teachers to “continually improve their practice by learningfrom and with others and exploring proven and promising practices that leverage technology toimprove student learning.” [4]. This standard also asks teachers to participate in learningnetworks such as the one we have attempted to establish with this RET, between local teachersand computer science researchers. The Teacher as Facilitator standard calls for teachers to“facilitate learning with technology to support student achievement of the ISTE Standards forStudents,” including “fostering a culture where students take ownership of their learning
junior high level and one at the high school level are open enrollment programs. One of thetargeted minority programs is a two-week residential Bridge Program for entering freshmen thatgreatly improves college retention for its participants.20, 21, 22WISE participates in additional outreach activities such as presentations to high schools and“Bring Your Daughter to Work Day” at the university and in industry. Recently WISE had a Page 8.1310.6 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationbooth at
roles and responsibilitiesas were being asked by engineering educators. Technology programs are experiencing many ofthe same pressures at the beginning of the 21st century as the nascent engineering educationprograms did at the beginning of the 20th century; how do we get people to take us seriously, asprofessionals? How do we best serve our students and the industries into which they are hired?How do we best prepare people to go directly to work versus preparing to enter advancededucation or research? What courses are important to what makes the graduate successful?Research indicates that engineering educators’ answers to these questions lead to the knowledgegap that was filled by technology programs. Now that technology educators are asking