.Armed with this wealth of information, the faculty ultimately had to determine the specifics ofhow to assess the outcomes considering some specific issues surrounding the WKU CivilEngineering program, including the following: 1. The CE faculty consists of only 4 people, therefore, the assessment workload cannot be burdensome, 2. The WKU Engineering programs are project based which the faculty must be evident in the outcomes assessment process, 3. The programs are going through their first EAC of ABET accreditation, therefore the opinion was that the Criterion 3 requirements must not only be met, but comfortably exceeded to avoid any possibility of a deficiency in this area.Based on the necessary background information
Committee on Faculty Development to define who should teachthe body of knowledge. Discussion focuses on faculty credentials, methods of content delivery,and venue of programs, e.g., in-residence versus distance education programs.Introduction Since the mid 1990s ASCE leadership has supported the notion that formal education ofcivil engineers beyond the baccalaureate degree was required as a prerequisite for professionalregistration. This concept was initially proposed in 1998 with the moniker “Master’s as the FirstProfessional Degree.” This notion of increased formal education met with some negativereaction from the rank and file membership of ASCE.1 and as a result the ASCE Board ofDirection formed the Task Committee for the First
methods andprocesses, and the outcomes of the assessment, will not conflict with the demands of the otherassessment ingredients in the cooking pot. This may be explained further by using an analogywith a 2-lane ‘A’ road through higher education leading to a predetermined learning outcome.The 2 lane ‘A’ road, as illustrated below, represents, in the one lane, the ‘student learning’ and, inthe other, the ‘assessment of student learning’. It is proposed that this is the ‘traditional’ modelwhereby the assessment of student learning runs parallel with the learning itself and complementsthe learning. There should be no diversions or obstructions on this road. There are always factorswhich impinge on and distract this process, but more and more, the
that werecovered with the greatest frequency and include mathematics, chemistry, fluid mechanics,mechanics of materials, and statics. This information is presented in Tables 3 through 7.Performance criteria are defined as the minimum levels of competency expected for a measuredoutcome. Three performance criteria based on the FE were established as general standards forall graduates, since all OUCE students are required to take the FE Exam. First, there is anexpectation that the overall percentage of students receiving a passing grade will exceed thenational average for the CE discipline. Second, regardless of the national average, it is expectedthat 80% of all students taking the FE will receive a passing grade. Third, for specific
design anddesign-related courses is repeatedly emphasized by ABET during accreditation visits and byother engineering organizations, such as ASEE, in conferences and through relevantpublications. Thus, directions for proper merging of professional experience with engineeringscience in design courses are a concern that comes up often in educational forums. How bestcould such “a merging scenario” be planned and implemented, depends on: faculty foresight,available resources, and the commitment-on the part of the faculty and the administration-to themission.The paper reports on a success story of such a merger in a geotechnical/foundation class. Thesuccess achieved was attributed, in large measure, to the proper coordination that precededcourse
Session XX60 “Let’s Go Folks!”: A K-12 Special Program Beyond Social Parameters Claudio da Rocha Brito, Melany M. Ciampi COPEC – Council of Researches in Education and SciencesAbstract“Let’s go Folks!” This is the appealing name of a project which main goal is to help students ofK-12 to develop the necessary skills to choose careers like engineering that for many reasons isso necessary for the development of a country. São Vicente City Hall present administration hasdecided to implement a special program for K-12 in public schools of the city, which resulted inthis
be ready at any time for accreditation visits, such as ABETor Regional Accreditation Boards, for example. The topics presented regarding web-basedassessment tools are particularly pertinent to others who work in higher education. This paperoffers creative web-based solutions to a problem that is common to colleges and universities.Background and MotivationEducational institutions are expected to have a program of continuous improvement todemonstrate how well they are accomplishing their teaching, learning, and research missions.Assessment methods and tools allow schools to accomplish this goal and to continually renewtheir commitment toward building better learning environments.Instructors constantly assess student learning through
. American Youth Policy Forum, Helping youth succeed through out-of-school time programs. 2006, American Youth Policy Forum: Washington, DC.20. Z. Redd, et al., Academic achievement programs and youth development: A synthesis. 2002, Child Trends: Washington, DC.21. R. Chaskin and S. Baker, Negotiating among opportunity and constraint: The participation of young people in out-of-school-time activities. 2006, Chapin Hall Center for Children: Chicago.22. K. Moore and J. Zaff, Building a better teenager. 2002, Child Trends: Washington, DC.23. S. Lauver, P. Little, and H. Weiss, Moving beyond the barriers: Attracting and sustaining youth participation in out-of-school time programs (Issues and Opportunities in Out-of-School
Paper ID #18013Industrial Engineering Beyond Numbers: Optimizing under EthicsDr. Alejandro Salado, Virginia Tech Dr. Alejandro Salado is an assistant professor of systems science and systems engineering with the Grado Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech. His research focuses on unveiling the scientific foundations of systems engineering and using them to improve systems engineering practice. Before joining academia, Alejandro spent over ten years as a systems engineer in the space industry. He is a recipient of the Fabrycky-Blanchard Award for Systems Engineering Research and the Fulbright
AC 2007-6: ENGINEERING: BEYOND EARS IN PRE-COLLEGE YEARSUchechukwu Ofoegbu, Speech Processing Lab, Temple UniversityAnanth Iyer, Speech Processing Lab, Temple UniversityJohn Helferty, College of Engineering, Temple UniversityJoseph Fischgrund, The Pennsylvania School for the Deaf Page 12.659.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Engineering: Beyond Ears in Pre-College YearsAbstract A 12-week program was developed in which electrical engineering concepts, in form of roboticsprojects, are taught to students at a secondary educational institution for the deaf and hearingimpaired. The robotics course was originally designed for, and has been
Session 1526 Engineering Education, Beyond the Books Laura Guedelhoefer, Jim Jones, Leah Jamieson, Ed Coyle, Patricia Davies Purdue UniversityAbstractThis paper will focus on the process and benefits students receive through practical manufacturingexperience. Included in the paper are two examples of small projects that can be completed in 1-2hours, yet still provide a valuable introduction to the machining process. The Purdue hammer project,which is produced in a sophomore introduction to mechanical design course, is a brass hammer with awood handle. Using hexagonal brass stock, the
algorithms to the omission of important topics and key theoretical ideas.Langley’s findings provide a rationale for integrating discussions and ideas commonly in the realm of thehumanities and social sciences into AI course design for engineering education [31]. Their study found that“problem areas like qualitative reasoning, analogy, and creativity are ignored in favor of ones that are more easilyformalized” [31]. Promoting critical thinking and creativity through interdisciplinary approaches to problem-solvingcan set the basis for qualitative reasoning beyond quantitative analyses. It also allows for deeper reasoning on theinterplays between society and technology.These findings echo Mishra and Siy, who warned that “a Computer Science centric
Paper ID #25219Beyond Likert Scales: Exploring Designers’ Perceptions through Visual Re-flection ActivitiesDr. Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Kathryn Jablokow is a Professor of Engineering Design and Mechanical Engineering at Penn State University. A graduate of Ohio State University (Ph.D., Electrical Engineering), Dr. Jablokow’s cur- rent teaching and research interests include design cognition, high performance teams, creativity in sci- ence/engineering, and mobile robotics. In addition to her membership in ASEE, she is a Senior Member of IEEE and a Fellow of ASME.Aditya Vora, Pennsylvania State
Paper ID #16350Privatization of Public Education: Lessons from New Orleans for Engineer-ing Education in K-12 and BeyondDr. Donna M. Riley, Virginia Tech Donna Riley is Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech.Mrs. Janice L. Hall, Virginia Tech I am a doctoral student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. I have B.S. and M.S. degrees in biolog- ical and bio-medical engineering respectively. It was through my participation in extracurricular activities and my experience as a graduate teaching assistant I found my passion for engineering education. My research interests include broadening participation and
early, Beyond Blackboards addresses the currentnational challenge to improve K-12 education to increase career and college readiness, and toenhance the STEM labor force by eliminating stereotypes and diversifying the field’sdemographics. IntroductionThe National Importance of STEMDeveloping the STEM workforce is an essential component of the United States’ efforts toreform its economy to meet the demands of an increasingly competitive and global market. It isestimated that half of the economic growth in the United States since World War II is a result oftechnological innovation, including advances in business, healthcare, travel, and entertainment.Still, just 6% of undergraduates in the U.S. are
Internships: Lessons learned beyond the classroom. David Laxman, Michael Bright, Stephen Renshaw Information Technology, Brigham Young University1. IntroductionThis paper describes ways in which our internship taught us to use project development models,learn new technology, and communicate our ideas effectively with management. We provide alist of ten guidelines to effectively communicate as interns and describe how businesses canbenefit from internships.Our internship, provided by Central Utah Water Conservancy District (CUWCD), has helped usapply our IT education, gain real-world IT experience, and learn to communicate withmanagement. CUWCD hired us to produce a web-based
dedicated to supporting the campus and Colorado Springs community in economic development through technology innovation. He also currently serves as interim director for the Center of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education, which serves to connect the University with the K-12 community. Professor Haefner has been recognized with a National Security Agency Young Investigator Award, a research fellowship from the Universidad de Murcia in Spain, and numerous research contracts with the National Security Agency, the University of Colorado and the University of Tennessee. In 1998, Dr. Haefner won the inaugural Innovations in Teaching with Technology award from
rather than simply watching the instructor. The ‘flipped’ classroom [9] is an excellentexample of where students are mentored through solving problems rather than being ‘shown’how to work problems. Repeatedly showing students a solution method leads to rotememorization of the steps and little understanding of what each step accomplishes. Havingstudents answer their own how-to questions amongst themselves leads to more experimentationand results in greater understanding. They begin looking beyond the equations and into thebehaviors.Today’s technology enables lightning fast, precise calculations. Students need to learn how toexploit the incredible computational power available to them without becoming dependent onit. Using spreadsheets to do
different from many other invention competitions in that teamwork isstrongly encouraged and the teacher is a vital part of facilitating the process. When studentsparticipate in the InVenture Challenge, they do not work alone at home; rather, they arecollaborating with up to two other student peers and their teacher is guiding them through anengineering design process. As a result, the InVenture Challenge is inclusive and diverse—abouthalf of K-12 participants are female and nearly 40% are underrepresented minorities.The contributions of this paper are two-fold. First, a model is provided for a K-12 innovationprogram housed at a university that is aimed at empowering underrepresented groups in STEMdisciplines by looking further down the pipeline
, epistemology, and science and engineering learning. Greg is a member of the National Academy of Education and a fellow of the American Educational Research Association. He received the research awards including the Dr. John J. Gumperz Memorial Award for Distinguished Lifetime Scholarship from the American Educa- tional Research Association and the Distinguished Contributions to Science Education through Research Award from National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Greg has a B.S. in physics from the State University of New York at Albany and a Ph.D. in Education from Cornell University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 K-8 Computational Thinking in and through
President of the Milwaukee area Association of Health Care Executives, as a Board of Exam- iners for the Wisconsin Forward Award and as President of ALPs (Accelerated Learning Programs) in Oshkosh. Among her current volunteer activities, she serves as a quality consultant for Oshkosh Public Schools, as a leadership consultant to Christine Ann Domestic Abuse Services and is on the Advisory Board for the VNA (Visiting Nurse Association) of Wisconsin. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Cultures of Collaboration in Emergency Remote Teaching and BeyondIntroductionWe pride ourselves on teaching through hands-on learning and being available to students
Paper ID #17938Promoting Entreprenuerially Minded Learning through Online DiscussionsDr. Lisa Bosman, Marquette University Dr. Lisa Bosman holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee. Her research interests include solar energy performance modeling, entrepreneurial minded learning, and STEM education.Dr. Brooke K. Mayer, Marquette UniversityProf. Patrick McNamara, Marquette University Dr. McNamara is beginning his 4th year as an assistant professor at Marquette University. His research group focuses on understanding how consumer product chemicals impact microbes and antibiotic resis
Paper ID #35153Can online summer camps work? Evidence from adapting a high schoolhands-on water quality module for online deliveryMary Elizabeth Foltz, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Mary E. Foltz is a PhD candidate in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Her research focuses on denitrification in agricultural systems and ways to decrease nitrous oxide emissions from denitrification. She has developed and taught five high school science courses and been involved in engineering outreach programs through the university and community. After
is no meaning outside of a person’s perception. Weconstruct our understanding of the world through our own realities: “[K]nowledge refers toconceptual structures that epistemic agents, given the range of present experience withintheir tradition of thought and language, consider viable” (Von Glasersfeld, 1989, p. 124;italics in original). Thus, knowledge is contextual, contingent, and subject to interpretation.Constructivism informs the thematic analysis of this study by considering the statements ofthe research participant to be their own construction of what diversity means and how itimpacts education. During the analysis I made efforts to ensure the authentic voice of theparticipant.Constructivism also has implications for data analysis
Teaching Robot Design: Locomotion Beyond Differential Drive Bradley E. Bishop United States Naval Academy Systems Engineering 105 Maryland Ave (Stop 14a) Annapolis, MD 21401 bishop@usna.eduAbstract: In this paper, we present a novel design challenge for a mobile robotics course,focusing on locomotive methodologies and mechanism design. This exercise requires that thestudents design a robot for locomotion over complex and challenging terrain. This exercisedemonstrates the difficulties associated with
, innovation and creativity, andglobalization. It concludes with Exam #2, which is in a take-home format.TEACHING APPROACHWe all learn in a number of different ways and the learning process can be facilitated through theuse of variety of viewpoints and media. Thus to reach everyone, a variety of instructionalmethods is used, including: lectures, class discussion and teamwork on projects inside andoutside of the class, in class demonstration exercises, guest presentations and films. The “cone ofexperience”7 indicates that people generally remember: • 10% of what they read. • 20% of what they hear (lecture). • 30% of what they see (demonstrations, movies). • 50% of what they see and hear (discussion groups). • 70% of what they say or
majors as well as at NAU since 2012. Before that, her own career path has been dotted with many exciting and rewarding ventures, some of which include 7 years as a high school science teacher (2 of which were at an international school in Mongolia), and 6 years in logistics and other science support for NSF grantees in the Antarctic. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 To Infinity and Beyond: Boosting URM Students’ Career Trajectories Through Professional Experiences Abstract It is hard to deny the impact of experiential learning through internships on
thedefinition of a team and discuss the features of successful teams. Students often want to be inteams with peers they are comfortable working. In the real world, however, teams undergo the‘forming’ stage with members whose skills are necessary to complete the project [8]. Therefore,team members may not be familiar with each other. After getting to know each other, membersusually move to the ‘storming’ stage, where they engage in project work and challenge eachother’s boundaries and expectations [8]. At this stage, they start to understand each other bydiscovering their skills, weaknesses, and personalities. Teams can only move to the ‘norming’and ‘performing’ stages after successfully going through the ‘storming’ stage. [8]. However,student teams
Teaching & Beyond: A Case StudyAbstractThis research paper addresses the adaptations that instructors at colleges and universities aroundthe world made following the abrupt March 2020 transition from in-person teaching to remoteteaching. An in-depth understanding about how teaching instructors chose to adapt their courseswhen under duress to do so provides insight into how to support future change efforts. Thepurpose of this case study is to examine how one engineering faculty member responded to thechange in teaching format through a lens of adaptability.Data was collected from engineering instructors at an R1 institution via online surveys andinterviews across the Spring 2020, Fall 2020, and Spring 2021 semesters. The interview data wascoded
AC 2003-22: BEYOND SOLUTION FIXATION: A SHORT COURSE ONENGINEERING AND BUSINESS CONCEPTSJustin Cone,Kathy Schmidt, The University of Texas at AustinOfodike Ezekoye,Tushar Patil, Page 8.266.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2003 Session 3554 Beyond Solution Fixation: A Short Course on Engineering and Business Concepts Ofodike A. Ezekoye, Kathy J. Schmidt, Justin Cone, and Tushar Patil The University of Texas at AustinAbstractWhile most graduating