, entitled Innovation Space, and the Entrepreneurial Program Office. In September Page 25.254.112004, the Fulton Schools created The Entrepreneurial Programs Office to coordinate curriculumat both the undergraduate and graduate levels. The introductory course in entrepreneurshipenrolls more than 100 students per year, and students may also find specialized entrepreneurial-focused classes within their home departments. Innovation Space is a smaller, specializedprogram in which a multidisciplinary team of students from business, design, and engineeringwork together for a year to develop a product prototype. The focus on entrepreneurship at ASUpermeates
Paper ID #281052018 BEST OVERALL ZONE PAPER, Best Zone I Paper: Assessment ofProgressive Learning of Ethics in Engineering Students Based on the Modelof Domain LearningDr. Sadan Kulturel-Konak, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus Sadan KulturelKonak is a Professor of Management Information Systems at Penn State Berks where she is also the Coordinator of Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ENTI) Minor and the Director of the Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Development (CEED). She received her Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Auburn University. Her research interests are in modeling and
Paper ID #281062018 Best Zone II Paper: Comparison of Student and Faculty Perceptions ofIntent and Effectiveness of Course Evaluations in an Engineering Curricu-lumDr. Thomas P. James P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Tom James is presently a Professor of Entrepreneurship at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. His major interests are new product development and global business ventures. He currently teaches courses in accounting, finance, and entrepreneurial studies. In addition to teaching, Dr. James directs the ES- CALATE program, a living-learning community focused on integrating entrepreneurship and technical
field experiences, andreceive in-the-moment pedagogical coaching within the pedagogy course.Critical and constructive reflection on teaching practice, which we assume is needed to helpstabilize student-centered instructional approaches, is scaffolded through course assignments andin-class activities. LAs regularly reflected on (and wrote about) how course readings connect totheir to own experiences both as a student and as a peer educator within the ENES100. Throughboth field note assignments and in-class video analysis sessions, LAs were encouraged to (1)develop detailed descriptive accounts of classroom events, (2) generate multiple plausibleinterpretations of classroom events, and (3) assess the affordances of instructional moves inrelation
Paper ID #281332018 BEST DIVERSITY PAPER: Effects of Research and Internship Expe-riences on Engineering Task SelfEfficacy on Engineering Students Throughan Intersectional LensAbisola Coretta Kusimo, Stanford University Abisola Kusimo received her bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering with minors in Rhetoric, Lead- ership, and Entrepreneurship from the University of Maryland, College Park in 2015. She is currently pursuing a Ph.D. at Stanford with a focus on Design Methodology and Design for Manufacturing under the advisement of Professor Sheri Sheppard. Abisola currently holds a year-long teaching assistant posi
, and Dentsu, among many others. David holds a Ph.D. (Cum Laude) in Applied Economics, Entrepreneurship and Strategy, from Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, a Ph.D., in Sociology from the University of Bucharest, a Master of Arts in Liberal Studies from DePaul University, and a Bachelor of Business Administration, in Marketing and Economics from Western Michigan University. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Reimagining Engineering Education: Does Industry 4.0 need Education 4.0?AbstractIndustry 4.0 is a commonly used term to refer to the fourth industrial revolution that is currentlyunderway. The