Paper ID #24960What Would You Do or Say? Interrupting Bias in Academic SettingsDr. Gretchen Achenbach, University of Virginia Gretchen Achenbach is a research scientist in the Department of Engineering and Society at the Uni- versity of Virginia, and at the National Center for Women and Information Technology (NCWIT). She earned her Ph.D. in Psychology from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Her interests focus on science communication and gender issues in computing and technology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 20191The National Center for Women and Information Technology (NCWIT) is
andeducational activities focused on computational science and high-performance computing. Visitingfaculty and students are recruited from a variety of institutions including minority serving, women’s,liberal arts, community colleges and other educational institutions. Selected qualified faculty applicantsattend a matching workshop in which both, faculty and Laboratory researchers briefly present theirwork, learn about potential research collaborations, engage in one-on-one discussions, and developcollaborative research proposals. Faculty who are matched to Laboratory researchers engage in anintensive summer research experience at the Laboratory with a few of their students or in some casessend students to engage in a summer Laboratory research
Paper ID #24761Overview of Policies and Programs to Retain Black Students in EngineeringDr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is President of Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in Educational Research and Policy Analysis from NC State University in 1996. She also has an MBA from Indiana University (Bloomington) and a bachelor’s degree from Duke University. She specializes in eval- uation and research in engineering education and computer science education. Dr. Brawner is a founding member and former treasurer of Research Triangle Park
. Sharon A. Caraballo, George Mason University Sharon Caraballo is Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs in George Mason University’s Volge- nau School of Engineering. The school’s approximately 6,100 undergraduate students have a choice of 11 majors in the areas of engineering, computer science, information technology, and statistics. Her lead- ership in the development of the school’s undergraduate programs draws from her extensive study and experience in forward-thinking higher education programs. She served as Clare Boothe Luce Professor of Computer Science at Georgetown University before joining the faculty of George Mason University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
to learn from accomplished profes- sors. Periodically, she works for UW-Madison as a Visiting Instructor. Her previous research explored biofilms and biological production of fuel chemicals at the Center for Biofilm Engineering.Dr. Susannah C. Davis, Oregon State University Susannah C. Davis is a postdoctoral research associate in the School of Chemical, Biological and Envi- ronmental Engineering at Oregon State University. She received her Ph.D. and M.Ed. from the University of Washington, and her B.A. from Smith College. She is currently working on the NSF-funded REvolu- tionizing engineering and computer science Departments (RED) project at OSU. Her research focuses on organizational learning and change
Safe Zone trainings for engineering faculty and staff who wish to learn more about how to create inclusive environments within engineering for LGBTQ+ individuals. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Safe Zone LGBTQ+Ally TrainingTrans AllyshipCollaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity diversity@asee.org(CoNECD) 2019April 14-17, 2019 in Crystal City, Virginia lgbtq.asee.orgIntroductions Name Pronouns Affiliation What brought you here? 2Today’s Facilitators 3Session Overview Inclusive Environments Concepts Safe Zone Training Sex and Gender Becoming an Ally Trans Experiences
personal desire to broaden partici- pation of women and other underrepresented students, including students in rural areas and those who learn differently, in STEM education from pre-K through graduate studies. Her current work focuses on supporting and evaluating the construction of collaborative communities and building evaluation capacity within organizations and large-scale programs. In all efforts Adrienne works to (a) truly understand the purpose and needs for the evaluation or research undertaking, (b) develop feedback cycles that support continuous program improvement, (c) make implementation and impact data available and interpretable for program implementers, and (d) select the most rigorous, yet feasible
Physics and Astronomy and Director of the CASTLE Center for Advancing STEM Teaching, Learning & Evaluation at Rochester Institute of Technology. His educa- tion research includes projects on the development of identity and affiliation in physics majors throughout their undergraduate career, and, separately, how physicists express conceptual meaning in mathemati- cal formalism. He has co-directed the PEER faculty development program for four years, integrating emerging research projects into ongoing programmatic activities that seek to improve the retention of first-generation and deaf/hard-of hearing students in STEM disciplines. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Improving
American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Leaders Like Me Kyle F Trenshaw Nir Aish Elif Eda Miskioǧlu Philip Asare Center for Excellence in College of Management Department of Chemical Department of Electrical and Teaching and Learning Bucknell University Engineering Computer Engineering University of Rochester Lewisburg, PA, USA Bucknell University Bucknell University Rochester, NY, USA na010@bucknell.edu Lewisburg, PA, USA
a third of the participants were from underrepresented racial or ethnicgroups. UD ADVANCE covered program registration, hotel, and meals costs for all participants.The program consisted of two sessions. The first was a two-day overnight residency off campus whereparticipants built community, networked, and learned new skills, such as leadership vision, motivatingothers, and having difficult conversations. Participants then completed individual assignments beforereconvening a month later for the second session, where they learned more skills and heard from a panelof women leaders from UD.Assessment data of the program were overwhelmingly positive. For example, despite the large timecommitment required of participants, 100% agreed that the
, intersectionality, theory, classroom intervention, reflectionIntroduction“Diversity” has become an important watchword in engineering education practice and research,a requisite for funding, research programs, and essential for publications. However, embeddedconcepts of race, class, and gender, have been undertheorized within engineering educationresearch and pedagogy, though such a theorization could greatly affect the work being done inthe field. This paper describes a course intended to help participants explore existing explicittheories of race, class, and gender, introduce participants to alternative social theories on theseconcepts in educational contexts, and help them learn to apply such theories to engineeringeducation research and engineering
sanitation, as well as sustainability solutions, through interdisciplinary approaches. Since joining the Olin College faculty she has also dived into the field of engineering education with an emphasis on integration of arts, humanities, and STEM. Her love of learning was first fostered by an unusual elementary school education that was deeply inter- disciplinary with a substantial arts curriculum. After graduating from Harvard University with a B.A. in Dramatic Literature, she worked professionally in theater and wrote and recorded two musical albums. She then returned to school to study engineering, earning a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Rutgers Uni- versity in 2011. While completing her degree at Rutgers, she wrote