Paper ID #16115Systematic Review of the Funds of Knowledge Framework in STEM Educa-tionDina Verdin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dina Verd´ın is an Engineering Education graduate student at Purdue University. She completed her under- graduate degree in Industrial and Systems Engineering at San Jos´e State University. Her research interest focuses on the first-generation college student population, which includes changing the perspective of this population from a deficit base approach to an asset base approach.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of
for Engineering Education, 2017 Culture and Attitude: A scholarship,mentoring and professional development program to increase the number of women graduating with engineering degrees.AbstractIndustry, media, and academia desire a more diverse engineering workforce. In response to thoseneeds, faculty at South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (SD Mines) established theCulture and Attitude (C&A) program in fall 2010 with the support of a National ScienceFoundation S-STEM award. The program provides scholarships for academically bright andfinancially needy women, and also recognizes the need to change the fundamental paradigm(culture) for recruiting, and retaining students, particularly women, in engineering. To that end
early career and recently tenured faculty and research staff primarily evaluated based on their engineering education research productivity. She can be contacted by email at apawley@purdue.edu.Dr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego Dr. Joel Alejandro (Alex) Mejia is an assistant professor of General Engineering at the University of San Diego. His current research investigates the funds of knowledge of Latinx adolescents, and how they use these funds of knowledge to solve engineering problems in their communities. Dr. Mejia is particularly interested in how Latinx adolescents bring forth unique ways of knowing, doing, and being that provide them with particular ways of framing, approaching, and solving
solving engineering problems. Dr. Mejia’s primary research interests lie at the intersection of engineering education, literacy, and social justice. He is particularly interested in engineering critical literacies, Chicanx Cultural Studies frameworks and pedagogies in engineering education, and critical consciousness in engineering through social justice.Dr. Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego Dr. Diana A. Chen is an Assistant Professor of General Engineering at the University of San Diego. She joined the Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering in 2016. Her research interests are in areas of sustainable design, including biomimicry and adaptability in structural, city, and regional applications. She earned her MS and
newpedagogical theories, to assess instructor training procedures, to incorporate new technologiesinto instruction— there is long-standing attention to identifying, analyzing, and remediatingeducational problems. Responses to educational problems can take different forms, from thetheoretical (why is the problem occurring) to the practical (how can it be ameliorated). Forexample: educational problems of K-12 academic inequity and school failure motivate researchand policy such as No Child Left Behind. In higher education, identification and analysis ofproblems facing first-generation college students leads to developing “bridging programs.” In abroad sense, this strand of research and remediation tends to be born foremost out of a deepconcern of all of
in engineering. She has developed and taught a wide variety of engineering courses in First Year Engineering and Mechanical En- gineering at Ohio State. She has received four teaching awards in the last three years at both the College and the Departmental level at OSU.Suzanne Grassel Shoger, The Ohio State University Suzanne Shoger, M.A., is a Ph.D. student in Higher Education and Student Affairs at The Ohio State University. Her areas of expertise include strategic planning, gender equity and women’s leadership development, and social justice education. Her research focus is centered on gender equity among under- graduate and graduate engineering students, specifically related to ways men as a majority population
Paper ID #15413How do Male and Female Faculty Members View and Use Classroom Strate-gies?Lydia Ross, Arizona State University Lydia Ross is a doctoral student and graduate research assistant at Arizona State University. She is a first year student in the Educational Policy and Evaluation program.Dr. Eugene Judson, Arizona State University Eugene Judson is an Associate Professor of for the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University. His past experiences include having been a middle school science teacher, Director of Aca- demic and Instructional Support for the Arizona Department of Education, a research
Center dedicated to engineering education related initiatives and research focused on building diversity and enhancing the educational experience for all engineering students. Dr. Shehab teaches undergraduate and graduate level courses in ergonomics, work methods, experimental design, and statistical analysis. Her current research is with the Research Institute for STEM Education, a multi-disciplinary research group investigating factors related to equity and diversity in engineering student populations.Dr. Deborah A. Trytten, University of Oklahoma Dr. Deborah A. Trytten is a President’s Associates Presidential Professor and Associate Professor of Computer Science and Womens’ and Gender Studies at the University of
well as psychology in engineering education. She plans to enter the workforce following graduation to pursue engineering planning.Dr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University Olga Pierrakos is a Founding Faculty and Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison University. She is currently a Program Director at the National Science Foundation in the Divi- sion of Undergraduate Education. Her expertise and interests focus on diversity and inclusion, engineer identity, PBL, innovative learning-centered pedagogies, assessment of student learning, engineering de- sign, capstone design, etc. She also conducts research in cardiovascular fluid mechanics and sustainable energy technologies. She holds
Paper ID #14811Dialogues Toward Gender Equity: Engaging Engineering Faculty to Promotean Inclusive Department ClimateJ. Kasi Jackson, West Virginia University Dr. J. Kasi Jackson is an Associate Professor of Women’s and Gender Studies at West Virginia University. Her research covers supporting women faculty in STEM, STEM education, gendered impacts on animal behavior research, and the representation of science in popular culture. She completed her PhD in biology, with a focus on animal behavior, and graduate certificate in women’s studies at the University of Kentucky. She is a Co-Investigator on a National Science
diversity, particularly the recruitment of womento that particular program. Aligning with the goal, the following objectives were developed.Objective 1: Increase the enrollment and retention of the female engineering students.Objective 2: Improve female students’ attitudes and perceptions toward careers in engineeringfields.Objective 3: Enhance female students’ self-efficacy in the learning of engineering.Objective 4: Increase the six-year graduation rate of female students (currently at 53% for theuniversity). The department placed an emphasis on increasing the general graduation rate of allwomen students as opposed to just women engineering students to be aligned with theuniversity's strategic goals.In alignment with these objectives, from 2011
persistence of various groups ofstudents in civil engineering education and careers, this paper describes findings from a surveytaken by 223 undergraduate (165) and graduate students (58) in civil engineering. The surveyaims to address the following questions:• What are the factors that affect why women and minorities choose to pursue education in civil engineering?• What aspects of the civil engineering curriculum and course work do students find particularly motivating and interesting? Do students feel that they have a mentor? What kind of work experience and internships have students had? Are they members of student/professional engineering organizations? Do the answers to this question depend on the gender or ethnic/racial
integrated into existingprogrammatic structures for female engineering students, including Living-LearningCommunities and mentoring programs. This preliminary analysis, to set the stage for futureresearch, details the incorporation and impact of coaching in a seminar course while also layinggroundwork for addressing multiple research gaps in these areas: gender and coaching,13application of coaching in higher education,20 development of self-confidence withinprofessional roles and how educational programs can foster this,8 and preparing femaleengineering students for the transition to the workforce/graduate school with the aim ofincreasing their retention in said professions. As a means of identifying future possibleframeworks for further study of
anannual, standing award recognized at the same monetary and visibility level as all other nationalBest Paper Awards. In anticipation of topics covering a variety of topics, such as ethnicity,gender, first generation status, international, and socio-economic diversity, the rubric wasdesigned to be broad and not emphasize one dimension of diversity over another.Beginning in January, 2015, the ADC widely distributed a call to all divisions, sections andzones, asking them to nominate a “Best Diversity Paper.” The motivation of the award is toenhance the visibility and sustainment of actions in support of diversity, and to identify highlyimpactful efforts by ASEE authors that broaden participation in engineering and influence theinclusive, diverse
or excludingteammates: He’s like, “I’m a guy. I should be the top of the food chain and I’m the one doing construction. You could do your own paper” I stepped down from that position and went to a lower position than him but still I had more experience and I was more smarter than he was in the topic but he still treated me like I was below him. (Asian female, public low research university, lower achiever) I joined last fall this group called Ecooperative…There was this one guy who, he seems like he knows everything. I thought he was a senior ready to graduate and he had been doing this for awhile. Turns out he was just a freshman who knew his stuff, but was really trying to take this team to
Immediate Past-President of WEPAN, was PI on Tech’s NSF ADVANCE grant, a member of the mathematical and statistical so- cieties Joint Committee on Women, and advises a variety of women and girl-serving STEM projects and organizations. She is a past Vice President of ASEE and current Chair of the ASEE Long Range Planning Committee.Dr. Kim LaScola Needy P.E., University of Arkansas Kim LaScola Needy is Dean of the Graduate School and International Education at the University of Arkansas. Prior to this appointment she was Department Head and 21st Century Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas. She received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Industrial Engi- neering from the University of Pittsburgh
Paper ID #14814The Development of a Measure of Engineering IdentityDr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. She is the recipient of
resources, listen, and in particular relate to their protégés, and that this was of value inencouraging persistence.13There are a number of different efforts to promote retention of engineering faculty, initiatedthrough a variety of different organizations. Some of these organizations are Institute ofElectrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and Women in Engineering Programs & AdvocatesNetwork (WEPAN), both of which hold webinars for new faculty members. IEEE has hostedfive virtual events of varying in length from a few hours to multi-day conferences for earlycareer faculty.14 Topics of these events have ranged from broad topics like launching asuccessful academic career to specific topics like standards education and student assessment.WEPAN
Research Seminar Series was tointroduce and highlight Louisiana Tech’s research programs and expertise to the localcommunity. The University is located in a small community of ~22,000 people that centerson the University. Being the only nationally-ranked university within a 200 mile radius it isimportant that it serve as a resource and educate members of the community on scientificadvances and educational opportunities. To that end, all seminars are open to the public,advertised in the local paper, and there are at least 1 or 2 seminars each year that are designedspecifically for a more general audience. In addition, all seminars are recorded (withpermission from the speaker) and made available through various links on Louisiana Tech’swebsites and
another as well as relate to how their discipline is practiced [2]. Students who are not able todevelop an alignment in a given discipline in higher education may change majors or drop out toseek a sense of belonging elsewhere.Diversity is one of the greatest challenges to the engineering profession today. Manyengineering schools struggle to attract and retain a student population that reflects the diversityof the general population. One of the key reasons cited for students leaving STEM is theperception of a chilly climate, especially by those who are members of underrepresented groups[3]. Furthermore, there is compelling evidence that diversity among students and faculty iscrucially important to the intellectual and social development of both
over 165 adjunctfaculty. Since the academic year 2010-2011, the University has added 15 new undergraduateand graduate majors or programs and 12 new full-time faculty positions while growing totalenrollment by over 8%. The academic structure is organized into three colleges: the College ofHumanities, Education and Social Sciences (CHESS); the Morosky College of HealthProfessions and Sciences (MCHPS); and the College of Engineering and Business (CEB).Tenure-track/tenured faculty teach 24 credits per academic year and carry significant advisingloads as expected in this student-centered environment.Before 2003, tenure and promotions decisions were based on excellence in teaching and onservice to the University, community, and professional
Technology. She is a co-PI for RIT’s ADVANCE grant, where her focus is on structural changes that can improve the climate for women faculty in STEM.Prof. Sharon Patricia Mason, Rochester Institute of Technology Professor Sharon Mason is an Associate Professor in the Department of Information Sciences and Tech- nology at RIT where she has served on the faculty since 1997. Sharon has been involved in computing security education at RIT since its inception. She is the PI of for the Department of Defense (DoD) In- formation Assurance Scholarship Program (IASP) awards to RIT. These scholarships enable students to study and do research in graduate programs in security, forensics and information assurance. To date
Institute and State University Cynthia Hampton is a doctoral student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech.Ms. Amy L Hermundstad, Virginia Tech Amy Hermundstad is a doctoral student and Graduate Research Assistant at Virginia Tech. She received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Colorado State University and is currently pursuing an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. Her research interests include the professional development of engineering students through out-of-class activities.Dr. Walter C. Lee, Virginia Tech Dr. Walter Lee is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education and the Assistant Di- rector for Research in the Center for the Enhancement of
, General Motors Corporation, and Chrysler Corporation. At Stanford she has served a chair of the faculty senate, and recently served as Associate Vice Provost for Graduate Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Climate Survey in a Mid-Sized Research University Mechanical Engineering Department: ReportAbstractThis study was inspired by the restructuring of a mid-sized private research university’smechanical engineering undergraduate major. This restructuring consists of offering major“concentrations” in several different areas which were developed based on student and alumnifeedback, and redesigning academic advising for mechanical engineering majors.This
Dina Verd´ın is a Ph.D. Candidate in Engineering Education and M.S. student in Industrial Engineering at Purdue University. She completed her undergraduate degree in Industrial and Systems Engineering at San Jos´e State University. Dina is a 2016 National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow and a 2016 Ford Foundation Honorable Mention. Her research interest focuses on first-generation college students focusing on engineering identity development, negotiating multiple identities, and ultimately changing deficit base paradigms by providing asset base perspectives for understanding this community.Rachel Ann BakerDr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of
research in engineering education.Aim and objectives / research questionsWe seek understanding of the lived experience of female, Middle Eastern students becausewe believe this group faces unique barriers when studying STEM subjects in a Westerncountry. We wanted to identify aspects that we and other educators might be overlookingand to help us all do a better job supporting this sub-set of students. We let the findingsarise from the interview data provided by students, rather than starting with a pre-determined theory or framework. This is consistent with phenomenologicalmethodologies—research questions take final form as the data are interpreted and betterunderstood. During interviews, participants were encouraged to raise topics. We
recruiting participants for this study. Undergraduate students were recruitedfrom an engineering living learning community (LLC), with invitations to participate in the studydistributed via email by LLC leadership. Graduate students were recruited by graduate programdirectors, who also sent email invitations to all students enrolled in their graduate engineeringprograms. A total of 182 students completed the survey via Qualtrics, an online survey platform.Participant demographics are shown in Tables 2-5. Importantly, our sample is not representativeof the institutional population, particularly as it relates to academic status (i.e., we havepredominantly first year and graduate students). Our intention is not to generalize across allstudents. All
fellow, he is developing topics on broadening participation at the intersection between science and policy. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Career Arcs that Blend Industry, Government and Military Service with Faculty Experiences to Increase Diversity in the Engineering ProfessoriateAbstractThis paper presents a new model of academic careers that allows for more inclusive hiring,tenure and promotion practices across the long arc of individual careers. The traditional modelof a faculty career implies and requires a leaky pipeline, where participants who choose careersoutside of academia are left behind and are never allowed re-entry. Our new career
on AY17-18 high school seniors in public, private, and charter schools2 based on University reported demographics3 approximately 2.5% of students are international4 based on AY15-16 graduation data from ASEE Engineering Data Management System Previous institutional research on underrepresentation in engineering has used focusgroups or one-on-one interviews, surveys, and ethnography [1, 3, 5-6, 14]. Most recent reviewson the underrepresentation of women and racial minority groups in engineering or STEM haveexplored 20 years of research studies on these topics, and the majority of the research studiesexamined underrepresentation in engineering or STEM broadly, but not by specific disciplines[1,7]. However, researchers have found
Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She is also Managing Director of SKG Analysis, a research consulting firm. Her expertise and interests focus on education and workforce development in engineering and science fields. Previous and current clients include the American Chemical Society, the Anita Borg Institute for Women and Technology, California Institute of Technology, the College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics at California State University Fullerton, the Office of the Vice Provost for Graduate Education at Stanford University, the School of Medicine at Stanford University, and the School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University