contemporarytheories of change as frameworks for the basis of their assertions.Course Design and DescriptionAlice, instructor: I designed this course for more senior graduate students in or with interest inengineering education research and related fields, and who are interested in developing a moretheorized understanding of the concepts of race, class, gender, diversity, and other topics relatedto broadening participation in engineering education. This is the second time I have offered thecourse.Learning ObjectivesThese learning objectives are the ones I am anticipating for the next iteration of the course, asthey have changed over the course as I discovered my own blind spots. For example, eventhough I had committed one class period to discuss Whiteness and
can be difficult to internalizeand discuss in an open forum, the course builds towards these topics, starting out withrelatively easier topics (e.g. Mindset and Bloom’s Taxonomy) and moving towards issues ofbelonging and identity by the end of the 15-week semester.An important aspect of the course is that it is incorporated into the students’ general educationrequirements and is not an extra burden of credits taken in addition to required program andgeneral education coursework. RIT requires students to take a course that addressesidentification of ethical questions, and the Metacognition course addresses the outcomes andhas assessments that examine students’ ability to identify and address ethical scientificquestions through case study
structures, and the analysis of dynamic systems. More recently, He has mentored numerous midshipmen through independent research projects and has directed two Tri- dent Scholars, the Naval Academy’s flagship research program. He has published over 50 journal and conference articles on these topics. Dr. Barton is actively involved in curriculum development and program assessment. He chairs ASME Committee on Engineering Accreditation. He serves a Commissioner for Engineering Accreditation Com- mission of ABET, Inc. and was a program evaluator for 6 six years prior to joining the commission. Dr. Barton holds a professional engineering license in the State Maryland. He is a member of the Board of Education, ASME.Dr
steering committees for the Department of Energy (DOE) Compu-tational Science Graduate Fellowship (CSGF) program, Silvia has tirelessly worked on the mission todiversify the list of awardees to include more women and people from underrepresented groups. Shebelieves that progress in science will come from the rich combination of ideas that only a highly diversecommunity can create and that the current generation has the responsibility to provide the means to opendoors to individuals from all walks of society. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Sustainable Research Pathways: Building Connections across Communities to Diversify the NationalLaboratory WorkforceDavid L Brown, Silvia Crivelli, Lawrence Berkeley
Paper ID #25004High Risk, (with Hope for) High Reward: Lessons Learned from Planningand Hosting an UnconferenceAdam Stark Masters, Virginia Tech Adam S. Masters is a doctoral student and Graduate Research Assistant at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. They received a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Delaware and are currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Adam’s research interests include access, equity and social justice in engineering.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa D. McNair is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also
membershipon the COE Change Team and our PLC ensured synergy across the groups’ efforts.Changes to Programmatic AccreditationAt the same time, ABET has undergone revision to their accreditation criteria, in particular thoseconcerning criterion 3, or student learning outcomes (Sussman, Brackin, & Rajala, 2016).Instead of the 11 outcomes specified by a-k in EC 2000, ABET has condensed and reformulatedrequirements around 7 student outcomes. By and large, the changes have involved areorganization of how and where learning outcomes are specified. But some changes havesparked debates surrounding the kinds of skills engineers ought to have after graduation as wellas the role of ABET in engineering education and programmatic assessment (Matos, Riley, &
analytic designs that are tailored to the unique needs of each program context. She has published in scholarly and practitioner-focused jour- nals on topics including evaluation design, instrument validation, and the effectiveness of policy change. After graduating from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with a B.S. in Psychology Adrienne completed a Masters of Education in Curriculum and Instruction at UNC Greensboro. She taught third grade before returning to UNC Chapel Hill to complete a PhD in Education. In addition to her evaluation work Adrienne has worked on multiple research projects, taught doctoral- level research methods and statistic courses, and mentored undergraduate and graduate students.Dr
beyond our departmental context extend to the accepted methods foreducating and preparing Generation Z students for a modern workforce that embraces diversity.Our results suggest that college students may view a group of peers with diverse identities asmore normal/expected than a group of peers with diverse academic and operational strengths.When educators begin from the assumption that interacting with diverse others is new oruncomfortable for students, the default orientation is to use what may prove to be antiquatedmethods on teaching interaction and diversity to today’s college students. A looming question that remains is whether this result can be replicated in engineeringdepartments and classrooms with a less diverse student body
Paper ID #24863ADVANCE Women’s Leadership at The University of DelawareDr. Heather Doty, University of Delaware Heather Doty is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at the University of Delaware (UD). Dr. Doty teaches undergraduate courses in thermodynamics, statics, dynamics, and technical communication and conducts research on gender in the academic STEM workforce. She is co-PI on UD’s NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation grant, which aims to recruit, retain, and advance women STEM faculty at UD. Dr. Doty is faculty advisor to UD’s Women in Engineering Graduate Student Steering Committee.Dr. Shawna Vican