changed successive offerings of the new course.Finally, students were selected for one-on-one interviews to describe their experiences withcourse evaluations or their perceptions of what a course evaluation is used for in the case offreshman that have never completed a course evaluation. These interviews specifically probedthe issue of what students think faculty do with their course evaluations, and to gather primarydata on what students think are the pros and cons of the existing online course evaluation system.SurveyMonkey.com ® was used was to electronically distribute the survey to students andfaculty. The response data was exported from SurveyMonkey and imported into Microsoft Excel®, where it was treated as ordinal data and analyzed
background outside of engineeringand teaches ethics to computer science and biomedical engineering students noted, the problem is that at least at my institution, this is an R1, most of these faculty have never been in industry so maybe the ethical issue they’ve faced is running a lab…. But by in large, most of them have no experience in industry to be able to talk about the kinds of things that most of our students are going to experience because they’re going into industry so that’s a problem from the get-go.Without experience of their own, engineering educators can have difficulty contextualizingethical and social concerns and not feel comfortable covering issues that students willencounter in practice. Furthermore, for many engineering
. Troy, R. R. Essig, B. K. Jesiek, J. Boyd, and N. M. Trellinger, "Writing to Learn Engineering: Identifying Effective Techniques for the Integration of Written Communication into Engineering Classes and Curricula (NSF RIGEE project)," presented at the ASEE, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014.[17] M. R. Kuhn and K. Vaught ‐ Alexander, "Context for Writing in Engineering Curriculum," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 120, pp. 392-400, 1994.[18] N. M. Trellinger, B. K. Jesiek, C. Troy, J. Boyd, and R. R. Essig, "Engineering Faculty on Writing: What They Think and What They Want," New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016.[19] N. B. Barr, "Extending WID to Train Mechanical Engineering
of the NJIT Enterprise Development Center(EDC), which is the largest and oldest business incubator in the United States. Each of theincubator’s tenants benefits from university-related services supportive of new business growth.In particular, the EDC is a prime example of the recent trend among many American universitiesto facilitate the technology transfer of ideas originating not so much from its own faculty as fromscientists, engineers and researchers who are unaffiliated with the host university. To maximizethe potential for success of all tenants and to overcome growth gaps typical of start-ups, the EDCmanagement team provides tenants with an array of support services. These include: (1) trainingin state, federal, commercial and private
implementationcosts and multiple advantages for both students and faculty. Along with the obvious benefit ofdeveloping team problem solving and discussion skills, students receive fast feedback on theirperformance, the instructor spends less time reviewing the exam (in class and with individuals),and the classroom environment benefits from the added value placed on collaboration andreciprocal learning. This paper describes a number of variations on the team testing idea anddiscusses how factors in the course affect the type of team test to develop.In a team test, the students complete an individual test paper as well as a group test paper. Theindividual component enforces individual accountability and allows the instructor to askquestions in formats that do
AC 2012-5598: BEST PAPER PIC III: SERVICE-LEARNING VS. LEARN-ING SERVICE IN FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING: IF WE CANNOT CON-DUCT FIRST-HAND SERVICE PROJECTS, IS IT STILL OF VALUE?Dr. Susan F. Freeman, Northeastern University Page 25.255.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012AC 2011-1285: SERVICE-LEARNING VS. LEARNING SERVICE IN FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING: IF WE CANNOT CONDUCT FIRST-HAND SER-VICE PROJECTS, IS IT STILL OF VALUE?Susan F Freeman, Northeastern University Susan Freeman, Stanley Forman, Beverly Jaeger, and Richard Whalen are members of Northeastern Uni- versity’s Gateway Team, a group of teaching faculty expressly
Achievement Award in 2015, DARPA Young Faculty Award (YFA) in 2015, ACM SIGDA Outstanding New Faculty Award in 2016, YFA Director’s Fellowship in 2017, Monkowsky Career Development Award in 2018, Lutron Spira Teaching Excellence Award in 2018 and Dean’s Certificate of Excellence in 2019. He is a Senior member of the IEEE and the National Academy of Inventors (NAI), and, Associate member of Sigma Xi. He serves as a Distinguished Speaker of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) for a 3 year term (2019-2022).Dr. Kathleen M. Hill, Pennsylvania State UniversityDr. Annmarie Ward American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Hands-On Knowledge on
skill. One other very important practical difficulty occurs due tothis linear learning process. The time gap between when a concept is learned and when thelearner gets to use it is so long that the learner forgets a lot of the material and therefore is unableto connect the learned material with its application.Review of recent publications that have discussed the need for a new paradigm in education, andespecially STEM education, provides some guidelines of what needs to change. In 2015, theWorld Economic Forum published a report on the pressing issue of 21st-century skills gap andways to address it through technology (New Vision for Education: Unlocking the Potential ofTechnology). In this report, the authors defined a set of 16 crucial
activities that engage students in authentic engineering experiences. Content isdelivered using a variety of formats similar to those used in many existing online and hybridengineering courses5,19-24.Although the CALSTEP project aims to develop a comprehensive lower-division curriculum thatis delivered completely online, the focus of this paper is the development of the course materialsfor the online Graphics course, the results of the implementation of the course at Cañada Collegein Fall 2016, and a comparison of these results with those of the pilot implementation in Fall2015 as described in a previous paper14.2. Developing an Online Engineering Graphics CourseAmong the issues and concerns identified by faculty when designing and implementing
Paper ID #281012018 Best PIC II Paper: Systems Engineering Division: Development of aSurvey Instrument to Evaluate Student Systems Engineering AbilityMrs. Diane Constance Aloisio, Indiana-Purdue University Diane Aloisio is a PhD candidate in the School of Aeronautics and Astronautics at Purdue University. Her research concentrates on taking a systems approach to finding the common causes of systems engineering accidents and project failures. Diane received a dual BS degree in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering from University at Buffalo in New York. c American Society for Engineering Education
the standalone technical communication courses in the Departments ofChemical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Civil and Environmental Engineering at theUniversity of Texas at Austin [3]. Finally, rather than using a standalone course to teach writing,a number of engineering departments try to interweave the teaching of writing into a sequence ofengineering courses. Such a course sequence occurs with two upper-level laboratory courses inthe Mechanical Engineering Department of Virginia Tech [4]. However, with recent increases in engineering undergraduate enrollments [5], many suchcourses are stretched. Faculty are asked to teach greater loads, often without additional resources.One such example is Pennsylvania State University