) expectation of success, and (3) perceivedimplementation costs (e.g., time, materials).Responses were collected from 286 engineering faculty members (207 male, 79 female) from 19institutions. Responses indicated frequency of use, perceptions of value, expectation of success,and cost (e.g., use of TA’s, materials) for these classroom strategies: 1. Formative feedback loops 2. Real-world applications 3. Facilitating student-to-student discussionsControlling for course enrollment and years of experience, several significant differences werefound. Gender did not differentiate reported use of the strategies, but there were significantdifferences (p < .05) related to the expectation of success when integrating formative
cooperatives in which they developed case studies in atopic of their choosing, pertaining to the study-abroad portion of the course. Although theexperience was brief, anecdotal evidence leads us to believe the international travel componentsuccessfully enhanced the course’s learning objectives, while additionally contributing to astudent’s broad understanding of the international components impacting many contemporaryeconomic factors, providing a unique experience with case studies while in the field using realdata for real-world applications within the confines of cultural awareness and globalperspectives.IntroductionMcLennan Community College’s engineering program has experienced strong, steadfast growthsince its reboot in 2009. This sustainable
Analysis of Disruptions on the Mississippi River: An Engineering Economy Educational Case StudyAbstractStudent ability and understanding of engineering economy is promoted through real worldapplication. As engineering and engineering technology educators, we are encouraged to educateour students in contemporary issues related to engineering education. This paper providesengineering economy instructors with a real world educational case study based on maritimelogistics. An instructor’s solutions manual is available from the authors.OverviewReal-world application of engineering concepts motivates and engages students in engineeringeconomy coursework. We present an educational case study that has real-world application in themaritime
36% responding “very satisfied” and 50% responding“satisfied”. These numbers were consistent across subgroups of respondents. We also askedstudents to describe the factors that would make their engineering education more satisfying,with the findings summarized in Table 6. Respondents reported that they would like theireducation to include more of: internship and work experiences, discussion of real worldapplications, choice of courses, and opportunities to study abroad. These factors are the sameacross different subgroups of students.The desire for more real world applications and better connections between industry anduniversities was also mentioned in the open-ended responses on the survey. One student wrote, “Iwould love to see more
Paper ID #22897Proactive Inclusion of Neurodiverse Learning Styles in Project-based Learn-ing: A Call for ActionProf. Jeff Dusek, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Dr. Dusek joined Olin in 2017 from Harvard where he served as a postdoctoral fellow in the Self- Organizing Systems Research Group at Harvard’s John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences under faculty supervisor Professor Radhika Nagpal developing miniature underwater vehicles for marine swarm applications. Prior to joining Harvard, he held several teaching and research roles at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and the
. Preliminary analysis of interviews revealed that 1) all coordinatorsbelieved inclusion of empathy was important for students to understand STEM’s application tothe real world, 2) all coordinators were enthusiastic about the lessons and believed that thelessons were empathy-based, 3) classroom coordinators believed they scaffolded empathy in theclassroom but the post-doc did not, and 4) none of the coordinators were certain the studentsgrasped the empathy concept well. The coordinators said, to different degrees, that they thoughtthe students understood the design process and empathy but that the students could not describewell or convey quickly the process or what empathy meant to engineering design.When asked about empathy in the lessons, Ms
new engineering education strategies as well as the technologies to support the 21st century classroom (online and face to face). He also has assisted both the campus as well as the local community in developing technology programs that highlight student skills development in ways that engage and attract individuals towards STEAM and STEM fields by showcasing how those skills impact the current project in real-world ways that people can understand and be involved in. As part of a university that is focused on supporting the 21st century student demographic he continues to innovate and research on how we can design new methods of learning to educate both our students and communities on how STEM and STEAM make up
(PWIs) and Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs). We note some limitations ofthe color-blind racism theory as we have applied it, offer some practical applications of thetheory to consider, and issue a call to action for both engineering education researchers andengineering instructors.IntroductionThis position paper aims to prompt engineering education researchers and engineeringinstructors to think about how engineering as a profession, and engineering education, have beenstructured as a predominantly White discipline, and how it maintains this demographicimbalance despite decades of calls and work to diversify it. As many researchers and federalreports have noted [1-3], women and men of color and White women participate in much lowerrates in
address program goals, WiSE staff has designed activities for 2016 to promote theinteractions between students, faculty, and industry mentors. Here is an example of thissemester’s programming:WiSE Coffee Talk Speaker Series: Dr. PritchardDescription: Passive or Polite: how to say what you mean to get what you want. You’ll leavewith a caffeine high and insights about how your gender may be influencing yourcommunication.WiSE ForumDescription: Get the scoop on life in the real world. Ask questions at our panel discussionfeaturing women from Boeing, Caterpillar Inc., Maptek, National Guard, and the Black HillsSurgical Hospital.WiSE Snowshoeing & S’moresDescription: WiSE mentors and mentees will head to the Outdoor Campus for a guidedsnowshoeing
, and the types of faculty support and othercollege resources that successful students sought out and used. Perna and colleagues (2010)studied other underrepresented students in STEM with a similar, anti-deficit approach. Theirstudy documents the benefits from, for instance, paid summer internships that help students tosecure financial resources to pay for college, and at the same time, to overcome themarginalization that students can experience in their college settings as they integrate themselvesinto the STEM professional world. These types of positive, asset-building approaches used bysuccessful students are among those that the BOLD Center implements. Thus, the anti-deficitframework provides useful guidance as we steer students towards
the course. A future conference submission will cover the courseitself as a model using the “Four Frames” framework.One approach upon which to overlay the recommendations above for helping female engineeringstudents to transition beyond the bachelor’s degree is coaching. Coaching in the business arenahas long been shown to improve work performance, time management, and team effectiveness inindividuals and organizations. Coaching clients also note greater self-confidence, enhancedrelationships, more effective communications skills, better work-life balance, and improvedwellness.14-19. Drawing parallels between executive or corporate coaching and applications inhigher education, a coaching approach can likewise empower faculty, professional
been widelyapplied in K-12 research broadly, there is little known about the application of this frameworkspecifically in STEM contexts. As a first step in understanding this topic to direct future research,we focused on systematically understanding the application of this framework within STEMcontexts in secondary and post-secondary education.To answer this question, we first conducted a literature search on funds of knowledge generally.Results from multiple electronic databases, including Education Full Text (EBSCO) and Scopus,found one prior systematic review conducted on the framework. Hogg15 stated that, “the reviewwas informed by both systematic and narrative approaches to reviewing literature” (p. 668), andadded that making a
[28] highlighted key attributes the engineers of2020 are expected to hold, i.e., strong analytical skills, practical ingenuity, creativity,professionalism, and leadership. These skills have been echoed in the work of Godfrey andParker [29] who collected data from engineering faculty and students of ways of thinking andknowing relevant to engineering. Their work found that both faculty and students described waysof thinking as its applicability to real-world problems (e.g., “engineers aren’t interested in thingsfor only academic interest”), communicating through mathematics (e.g., “we use math like alanguage—a language to express ideas”), and innovative/creative ways of problem solvingthrough design (e.g., “engineer’s role in developing
solving engineering problems. Dr. Mejia’s primary research interests lie at the intersection of engineering education, literacy, and social justice. He is particularly interested in engineering critical literacies, Chicanx Cultural Studies frameworks and pedagogies in engineering education, and critical consciousness in engineering through social justice.Dr. Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego Dr. Diana A. Chen is an Assistant Professor of General Engineering at the University of San Diego. She joined the Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering in 2016. Her research interests are in areas of sustainable design, including biomimicry and adaptability in structural, city, and regional applications. She earned her MS and
ofimprovement, many upper-division students wished the curriculum was presented in a morehands-on fashion, included more labs to complement the courses, involved more collaboration,and exposed them to more real-world applications of the material covered in class.Both upper- and lower-division students commented on the need to expose people to engineeringearlier in school and in life. Both upper- and lower-division students also commented on the lackof diversity, leaving comments such as “Engineering, as is, is a profession that attempts to beexclusionary discipline [sic]. An attempt should be made to expose underrepresentedcommunities to engineering on a personal level and portray engineering as less of a difficultscience but a fun one
provide real world stories and connections for students who are more likely toenter industry than to enter academia. Diverse work experiences, as well as other forms ofdiversity, all contribute to positive experiences for engineering students.For individuals, this model allows pathways that can include more lucrative options, addressingthe issue that student loan debt affects underrepresented graduates at a higher rate.30 The modelcreates a more robust pathway for current engineers to have enriching and satisfying careers, thataddresses and respects the needs of a diverse population of engineers, potentially enticingexcellent candidates into faculty positions. This model makes explicit alternate pathways toachieving personal goals with respect to
independence and their pursuit of higher education.Enjoyment of maths and of practical, hands-on learning encouraged participants toconsider engineering. Selecting an appropriate sub-field of engineering was an importantconcern—during secondary school and even earlier. They perceived engineering was agood career for women and that engineering jobs in their country would be plentiful.Having good job opportunities was crucial to their decision-making. Participants saw theirgovernments encouraging high school graduates to pursue engineering. With regard tofuture employment, they anticipated working in teams with men as well as women, andwith people from many parts of the world. They envisioned their work would be conductedin English and that they would
provost.IntroductionNegotiation is a task we encounter on a nearly daily basis. We readily and easily negotiate withour friends about our next recreation event – what we will do (ski, dine, hike, etc.), where wewill do it, who will bring what dish, who will drive. We routinely negotiate with partners andformer partners, sometimes on very difficult matters – budget, time, childcare, and much more.We negotiate with our children, with vendors and with our students. There is no doubt we havesome substantial expertise in handling ourselves as negotiators in a wide variety of settings.However, the area where we have the least opportunity for gaining experience in negotiationsurrounds our professional world, particularly as it relates to our own professional advancement.While