their establishment, the diversity programs initiated recruitment and yield efforts to increase the diversity within the college. With the college focusing on recruitment of high achieving students, the diversity programs would target the underrepresented populations needing attention in engineering. Efforts were made independently from each other and therefore each program would host their own recruitment events without significant collaboration. With the continued research and attention on the theory of intersectionality, two years ago, the two diversity programs collaborated to create an event that recognized the different identities that our prospective students could hold. The event formed to be “You Belong Here: Women of Color Weekend
the inherent nature of computational modeling.1.0 importance of undergraduate research for diverse students:Table 1 presents data from American Society of Engineering Education’s annual reporton engineering education data for 2018 from U.S. institutions. Tables 1(a) - (d) presentthe 10-year trend of B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. graduates, and tenured and tenured faculty.There have been several initiatives, both sponsored and unsponsored, that have had thegoal of addressing diversity and inclusion in various facets of engineering education.The data in these tables for the two largest underrepresented groups: African-Americansand Hispanics is revealing. As a percentage, the range of degrees awarded inengineering at the B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. levels has
Paper ID #32173Women in Engineering Multi-Mode Mentoring and Undergraduate Research:Semester 1Dr. Kristina Rigden, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Dr. Rigden is the Director of Outreach Programs and the Women in Engineering Program for the College of Engineering at Cal Poly Pomona. In her position, she secures funding and provides several different outreach programming events to engage K-12 female students to pursue STEM majors and/or careers. Dr. Rigden’s research focus is the STEM pipeline from K-12 to college and career for underrepresented mi- norities. Her teaching and scholarship are grounded in the
publishing in the EERcommunity have a platform for bringing about social change through our respective roles as editors,authors and reviewers.Background:Journal editors and members of editorial boards are in some ways the vanguards of engineeringeducation research and publishing as they set guidelines for authors and reviewers, coordinatemessages about the vision and mission of their respective journals and publishers, and guide newresearch through the publication process. However, academic journals do not always provide specificmessaging about how to write, review, edit, and publish research with diversity, equity and inclusivity atthe forefront (Coley, Simmons & Lord, 2021). Some initiatives have been undertaken by EER journals toaddress this
associated with the Collegeof Engineering and the College of Science. This investment has helped faculty by providingresources for travel, joint publications, reciprocal visits to teach and offer guest lectures, andprovide access to Virginia Tech facilities to the HBCUs/MSIs faculty as well as exposingstudents to increased research and education opportunities at both institutions.We initiated a study with the motivation of developing strategies to evaluate the outcomes of theresearch collaborations resulting from this seed funding program that focuses on the process-oriented illustration of inter-institutional collaboration and explores the nature/quality of thecollaborations (Jalali et al. 2019). The study’s focus was then shifted and narrowed to
all students involved, feedback from the students have indicated that this amount perweek is the appropriate range of time students can commit to during the week incombination with their other scheduled responsibilities. The graduate student isresponsible for scoping out an appropriate research project and training their mentees,which is a tremendous experience for those considering becoming a professor. 7Saturday sessions throughout the program have changed in each iteration. Even thoughthey initially started with programming just for high school students, the second and thirditeration has increased programing for professional development for each
- generation college students in the Southern United States. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The HBCU/MSI Research Summit: Building Relationships and Exploring the Process of Inter-Institutional Partnership Between a PWI and HBCUs and MSIs1. IntroductionThe HBCU/MSI Research Summit is a collaborative effort initiated in 2016 to facilitate inter-institutional partnerships between Virginia Tech, a Predominantly White Institution (PWI), andHistorically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and other Minority-Serving Institutions(MSIs). Each year, students and faculty from HBCUs and MSIs are invited to Virginia Tech for atwo-day program. The major objectives of the
Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the American Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Exten- sion Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engi- neering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and
models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and LSAMP programs.Dr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a variety of consulting firms, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including the Rand Corporation, the American Association of Retired Persons, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Since 2004, she been a member of the NSF-funded MIDFIELD research project on engineering education; she has served as a Co-PI on three research projects, including one on transfer students and another on
background will first introduce the audience to conceptualizations of genderinformed by contemporary queer theory which defines gender as a fluid and dynamicsocial system beyond biological binaries. Next, we will introduce feminist researchmethodologies that place the subject community as the experts on their livedexperiences.Next, we will introduce our study’s protocol and design as an example of how thesetheories and research methods can be integrated into a transdisciplinary engineering 2education study on gender.We end by sharing the most densely coded themes from the 300 nationalparticipants in our initial community outreach questionnaire. This final
#28352Dr. John J. Lesko, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Jack serves as the Associate Dean for Research & Graduate Studies in VT’s College of Engineering, Professor of Engineering Mechanics, and is a cofounder of PowerHub Systems. Through this startup experience, Jack has initiated problem based learning pilot programs enabled through interdisciplinary experiences, in engineering education and entrepreneurial training (e.g. The StartUp Class). Jack is also a Co-PI for the NSF I-Corps Mid Atlantic Regional Node (DC I-Corps) and is an instructor for both the Na- tional and Regional training programs guiding technical professionals through the Lean Startup approach. Jack serves on the Executive
received her B.S. in Engineering Science from the University of Virginia in 2014.Cynthia Hampton, Virginia Tech Cynthia Hampton is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. While at Virginia Tech, Cynthia has directed summer bridge programs, led peer support initiatives for un- derrepresented groups, and served on various commissions, committees, and research groups focused on student support, organizational change, graduate student policy, and culturally responsive evaluation. Her research interests include organizational behavior and change as it pertains to engineering education and broadening participation, faculty change agents, and complex system dynamics. Her research
social responsibility, and patterns of consumer behavior in energy consumption in the emerging era of smart grid technologies. His research interest and initiatives also extend to broadening participation of underrepresented minorities in STEM education.Mrs. Jennifer Dashiell-Shoffner, NCATSU Jennifer is a part-time faculty member in the Psychology department at NCA&TSU in Greensboro, NC. She is also a doctoral candidate in the Rehabilitation Counseling and Rehabilitation Counselor Education program. She is well versed in interdisciplinary work and is utilizing her knowledge of human behavior to provide integral insights in this study. She is expected to complete her PhD studies in May 2020.Hyung Nam Kim, North
the University of Pittsburgh, a center charged with creating a national network for STEM precollege programs and a local network of undergraduate STEM programs designed to broaden participation. Dr. Allen has a Bachelor of Science degree in physics education from Lincoln University of Pennsylvania, a Master of Education degree in policy, planning and evaluation and a Doctor of Education degree, both from the University of Pittsburgh. .Dr. Jennifer Iriti, University of Pittsburgh Jennifer Iriti, Research Scientist and Director of the Evaluation for Learning Group at the University of Pittsburgh, designs and manages mixed-methods evaluations of education initiatives in PK-20 settings to support educational
sharetheir personal stories of identity and educational development withfirst-year engineering students, faculty, and staff. Theseundergraduate storytellers - called Student Trainers - are placed inthe position of teachers and storytelling is presented as part of anengineering educational experience. By teaching others about theirexperiences, students examine their own learning journeys, engagein the critical process of metacognition, and become strongerlearners. This program is designed to show students that theirvoices matter and that students have the power to initiate change.And we pursued these goals because research shows that theseoutcomes are linked to fostering students’ feelings of well-beingand rootedness in the school community.USC’s
Paper ID #28384Increasing the Enrollment, Retention, and Graduation of UndergraduateWomen Majoring in ComputingDr. Leisa D. Thompson, University of Virginia Dr. Leisa Thompson is a Research Scientist in Science, Technology, and Society at the University of Virginia. She also works for the National Center for Women & Information Technology (NCWIT) as the Director of Research and Consulting for the NCWIT Extension Services for Undergraduate Programs. Dr. Thompson conducts research on systemic reform that focus on recruitment, retention, and advancement of women in undergraduate computing and engineering programs. Dr
Paper ID #32193Lab-kits and the Self-Beliefs and STEM Beliefs of Students at a BlackMajority High SchoolMs. Casey Lynn Haney, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Casey Lynn Haney is a Ph.D. student in engineering education at Purdue University and a research assis- tant in Dr. Jennifer DeBoer’s Lab. She completed her undergraduate degree in Engineering/Technology Teacher Education. Her interests include STEM self-efficacy for diverse students and data analysis within educational datasets.Dr. Claudio Freitas, Purdue University Dr. Claudio Freitas is a Postdoctoral Research Associate in the School of Engineering
described smartness, despite our initial suspicion that there would be based onour own positionalities and experiences.5. Findings and Discussion5.1. Research Question 1: What do high school science and engineering students believe about smartness?During our initial thematic analysis, it was difficult to identify common themes across all, oreven the majority, of the participants. This was due to the considerable variation in the students’responses. The participants used phrases like “good grades,” “hard work,” “natural ability,”“confidence,” and many others to describe their smartest peers. They also frequently contradictedthemselves and each other in their responses. For example, some participants described thesmartest student as the one
Paper ID #32155Working to achieve equitable access to engineering by redefiningdisciplinary standards for the use and dissemination of demographics inquantitative studiesMr. Justin Charles Major, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Justin C. Major is a fourth-year Ph.D Candidate and National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fel- low in the Purdue University Engineering Education Program. As an undergraduate student at the Univer- sity of Nevada, Reno (UNR), Justin completed Bachelor’s degrees in both Mechanical Engineering and Secondary Mathematics Education with an informal emphasis in engineering education
of the Engineering Council, director of the NASA CUIP Program, and director of the SAMPEX flight experiment. During a leave of absence from the University (2003-2006), Pines served as Program Manager for the Tactical Technology Office and Defense Sciences Office of DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency). While at DARPA, Pines initiated five new programs primarily related to the development of aerospace technologies, for which he received a Distinguished Service Medal. He also held positions at the Lawrence Livermore Na- tional Laboratory (LLNL), Chevron Corporation, and Space Tethers Inc. At LLNL, Pines worked on the Clementine Spacecraft program, which discovered water near the south pole of the moon
Paper ID #32181Social Cognitive and Educational Environment Trends in UndergraduateEngineering: Results from Three Consecutive Cross-Sectional StudiesDr. Mary E Fitzpatrick, University of Wisconsin - Madison Mary Fitzpatrick, Ph.D. is an educational psychology researcher and former engineer. She directs the student programs and initiatives offered by the Diversity Affairs Office, evaluates program outcomes for diversity initiatives and conducts original research in the area of underrepresented individuals and orga- nizational climate in engineering education and the workplace. Dr. Fitzpatrick holds an undergraduate degree
the United States.Cynthia Hampton, Virginia Tech Cynthia Hampton is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. While at Virginia Tech, Cynthia has directed summer bridge programs, led peer support initiatives for un- derrepresented groups, and served on various commissions, committees, and research groups focused on student support, organizational change, graduate student policy, and culturally responsive evaluation. Her research interests include organizational behavior and change as it pertains to engineering education and broadening participation, faculty change agents, and complex system dynamics. Her research investigates narrative inquiry of faculty who use their agency
(HSI) while Cal Poly is considered for this study a Predominately White Institution (PWI).This current study was initiated by Cal State LA where the faculty researchers have been working to support theirminoritized students for decades. In particular the college has developed outreach, bridge, and supplemental programs tosupport persistence and degree completion (Menezes, 2017, 2019). They have also worked across campus to develop facultyprofessional development activities (Galvan 2020) to support evidence based teaching practices including active learning,flipped classroom, asset-based (Yosso, 2005) and equity minded classroom practices such as mastery grading. One of thesuccessful student based programs, FYrE which is supported with an NSF
, mechanical, and chemical engineering. On the first day ofcamp, we introduce the staff to the students requesting they briefly describe their disciplinaryexpertise. We believe by highlighting the disciplinary knowledge of the staff, students can askquestions to individuals with specific disciplinary knowledge to advance their design and askquestions about disciplines of interests.To support the camp initiatives, we provide the staff a series of training materials that includesreadings, reflections, and discussions with returning staff members. We divide the trainingmaterials into two categories: instructional and research support. The training materials designedto support instruction includes overviews of the engineering design process, strategies
Design at Shanghai Jiao- tong University. Fellow and Past President of the International Communication Association (ICA), she served as President of the Council of Communication Associations and the Organization for the Study of Communication, Language and Gender. She is a Distinguished Scholar of the National Communica- tion Association. Her research focuses on career, work-life policy, resilience, gender, and engineering design. She received ICA’s Mentorship Award and the Provost Outstanding Mentor Award at Purdue, where she was University Distinguished Professor and Endowed Chair and Director of the Susan Bulke- ley Butler Center for Leadership Excellence. She has worked with Purdue-ADVANCE initiatives for
Initiatives (5 minutes) 1. Mentoring Program – Best Practices (Amy), Mines Program (Annette) 2. Vanguard Scholars – Best Practices (Amy), Mines Program (Annette) 5. Questions/Close (5 minutes) WISEM.MINES.EDU #womenatminesWISEM.MINES.EDUMines snapshot• Degrees • 18 undergraduate majors • 34 Graduate Programs• Characteristics • 6268 undergraduate, graduate and non-degree students • 31 average ACT score • $65.89 million in research awards in FY2018 • 30.7% women students, 33% new freshmen women• Points of Pride • Ranked #4 in Lumosity's Brainiest
school rankings. Pines has been director of the Sloan Scholars Program since 1996 and director of the GEM Program from 1999- 2011, and served as chair of the Engineering Council, director of the American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #28257NASA CUIP Program, and director of the SAMPEX flight experiment. During a leave of absence fromthe University (2003-2006), Pines served as Program Manager for the Tactical Technology Office andDefense Sciences Office of DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency). While at DARPA,Pines initiated five new programs primarily
Education a year later. Her research interests currently focus on engineering doctoral students in underserved populations such as women and international students.Dr. Jennifer M Bekki, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Jennifer M. Bekki is an Associate Professor in The Polytechnic School within the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her research interests include topics related to engineering stu- dent persistence, STEM graduate students (particularly women), online learning, educational data mining, and the modeling and analysis of manufacturing systems. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Bioengineering and graduate degrees in Industrial Engineering, all from Arizona State
their undergraduate careers. In addition toanswering the research question, however, we also seek to increase awareness across theengineering education community regarding students’ experiences with non-apparent disabilitiesand further bolster scholarly initiatives that more intentionally include individuals withdisabilities in higher education.Sensitizing FrameworksTo help frame our exploration, we draw from three existing constructs in Disability Studies: 1)the medical model of disability, 2) the social model of disability, and 3) the social-relationalmodel of disability. First, medical models of disability position physical, cognitive, anddevelopmental difference as a “sickness” or “condition” that must be “treated” [20], [21]. Fromthis
striking differences between strategies used to cope with genderstereotype or bias when examined by the participants’ engineering major.DiscussionThis research provides information on female engineering students’ responses toward genderstereotype or bias experiences. Understanding a problem is key to creating behavioral change [17].A deeper understanding of how female engineering students react could positively impact the designand implementation of interventions related to gender stereotype or bias. Superficial application ofgender-related initiatives may lead to a failure to create relevant change [25]. It is fundamental tocreate critical consciousness to systematically change normalized oppression narratives [26].It is noteworthy that in our