Paper ID #33048Gaining Industry Experience Exposure During a PandemicDr. Wm. Michael Butler, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Wm. Michael Butler is an Associate Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is a 23 year aerospace industry design professional with B.S. and M.S. in Aerospace Engineering from Virginia Tech and a PhD. in Engineering Education also from Virginia Tech. His engineering education research is focused on the use of design tools and live simulation in engineering design education as a means to better prepare students for industry. He is a
member to receive the national Campus Compact Thomas Ehrlich Faculty Award for Service-Learning. He was a co-recipient of the National Academy of Engineering’s Bernard Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education and the recipient of the National Society of Professional Engineers’ Educational Excellence Award and the ASEE Chester Carlson Award. He is a fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education and the National Society of Professional Engineers.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all
typical of aerospace use. Students are often surprised by the significant strength difference between these alloys and this experiment helps reinforce the importance of material selection. (a) dimensions (b) prior to instrumentation (c) following instrumentation Figure 2: Dimensions of stress concentration specimens used to evaluate the stress distribution near a concentration. Specimen is ¼ inch thick.Part 2: Stress Concentrations under Quasistatic LoadingThe second part of the experiment investigates stress concentration factors under quasistaticloading. • A large specimen containing a circular hole (Figure 2) is loaded in axial tension. Loads are kept low enough so that yielding does
administration of the persistence in engineering survey. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 371-395. 7. Lichtenstein, G., Loshbaugh, H. G., Claar, B., Chen, H. L., Jackson, K., & Sheppard, S. D. (2009). An engineering major does not (necessarily) an engineer make: Career decision making among undergraduate engineering majors. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 227-234. 8. Committee on the National Aerospace Initiative, Air Force Science and Technology Board Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences. (2004). Evaluation of the National Aerospace Initiative. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 9. Weigel, A. (2010). “Survey of aerospace student attitudes.” Retrieved February 20, 2011
/. [Accessed 2020].[6] Facultad de Ingenieria de la Universidad Nacional de Asunción, FIUNA, "Estudiantes y docentes de la FIUNA realizan «Taller de Diseño de Pequeños Satélites CANSAT» a Docentes en marco del Proyecto JEKUPYTY," 16 Dec 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.ing.una.py/?p=40844. [Accessed 2021].[7] Facultad de Ingenieria de la Universidad Nacional de Asunción, FIUNA, "Culminó con éxito el Taller de Diseño de Pequeños Satélites Educativos CANSAT," 28 Oct 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.ing.una.py/?p=39996. [Accessed 2021].[8] D. Ortiz, J. Moreira, L. Moreira, D. Stalder, B. Vega and J. Kurita, "CanSat Pico-satellite building workshop as an effective tool for STEAM education, a case study.," in ASEE: Proceedings
the game would benefit from collaborationwith educators who can provide insights to a young student’s mind. Moving forward, the authors areworking with more teachers, especially those who do not have a background in aerospace, to obtainfeedback. Hopefully, approvals will be granted soon to allow students playing the game to be surveyed toobtain a richer set of feedback.AcknowledgementsSupport for this project was graciously provided by NSF project REvolutionizing Diversity OfEngineering (REDO-E) (project 1730693).References[1] Data USA: Aerospace Engineers. 2018.[2] Elam, M. E., Donham, B. L., & Soloman, S. R. (2012). An engineering summer program forunderrepresented students from rural school districts. Journal of STEM Education
configuration of a helicopter for a given mission. 12. The student shall plan for flight test of total performance of a helicopter. 13. The student shall measure performance of a helicopter in a flight test. Page 26.840.10 B. Tool - Mapping the Learning Objectives to Bloom’s TaxonomyThe front cover of the revised Bloom’s Taxonomy provides a table in which to map the learningobjectives of a course so as to assist in crafting appropriate teaching and assessment strategies.The numbers in Section III.A and the abbreviations EU, IMP, and FAM to represent EnduringUnderstanding, Important-to-Know, and Good-to-be-Familiar-With concepts
study. The data sources arethe winning design competition packages published on the competition website. For the years2015-2020, the annual ACRP design competition invited proposals in four categories: A. Airport Environmental Interactions, B. Runway Safety/ Runway Incursion/Runway Excursions, C. Airport Operations and Maintenance, and D. Airport Management and Planning.The winning student design submittals are announced around mid-summer every year andpublished on the ACRP website accessible to the public. Each design proposal has a 40-pagelimit excluding required appendices to address innovative solutions related to airport issues.Students may show “evidence of effective interaction with airport operators and
, observation b) Significantly more positive self-efficacy when faced with a STEM-related problem. i) Pre/post attitudinal survey; key interviews, observation c) Significantly improved intentions to take STEM-related courses after the program. i) Pre/post attitudinal survey; key interviews, observation d) Significantly improved self-efficacy in regard to 21st century skills 62) SystemsGo’s participants will finish the program with significantly improved 21st century skills, including teamwork and collaboration, communication, leadership, and problem solving. (reaching some pre-determined criterion) a) Exhibit significantly more positive
/ [Accessed: March 14, 2019].[17] K. Brouwer, T. Cottam, C. LiVolsi and S Pratt, “Eye in the Sky – Drone Detection & Tracking System”, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://vsgc.odu.edu/acrpdesigncompetition/wp- content/uploads/sites/3/2018/11/Runway_First-Place_URI_Nassersharif_Bahram.pdf [Accessed: January 14, 2019].[18] B. Blumberg, A. Johnson, A. Norberg and E. Roads, “Twice Repurposed Crumb Rubber as a Jet Fuel Solidifier”, 2014. [Online]. Available http://vsgc.odu.edu/ACRPDesignCompetition/competitionwinners/2014/Environment%20-%20Firs t%20Place.pdf [Accessed: January 14, 2019].[19] S. Gildersleeve, S. Norris, B. Tortorici
. Three separate andindependent groups of students are recruited for the study. Group distribution is shown as a Venndiagram in Figure 1. Group A is presented with written literature to review before the flight. Theliterature defines the functions of the flight simulator, flight controls, aircraft principles,instruments and the required mission details. They are then asked to fly the mission with minimalassistance during the flight portion. They are free to ask questions during the flight. Group B is notpresented with any literature for review before the flight. A short presentation is given to them thatdescribes the flight controls, basic instruments and the mission. Their first real exposure to theflight is when they get on the simulator and
the number of STEM graduates and increasing underrepresented populationsearning a STEM degree for two reasons: (a) State will experience the largest headcount growth ofhigh school graduates in the next ten years; over 87,000 more graduates by 2025 [8] and (b) in2011, US Census Bureau[9] reported Texas was one of five majority minority states. While theAERO program traditionally has over 90% of the undergraduate students entering from highschools in Texas, the current ethnic and gender diversity of the student population does not reflectthe ethnic makeup of the state.A recent initiative by Texas A&M University seeks to diversify the aerospace departmentorganically through an “aerospace skills” based approach to design in an effort to
3 © American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 2019 ASEE 126th National Conferencethought processes on the white board, working out problems, using “Jeopardy” style games forreviewing the concepts, etc. The post-class work included graded homework problems tostrengthen the concepts.The Motivation Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) [55] was administered to thestudents of the intervention and control groups to measure the five dimensions (a) Self efficacy,(b) Intrinsic value, (c) Test anxiety, (d) Cognitive strategy use, and (e) Self-regulation. Students’perceptions of the flipped classroom were determined with a Flipped Classroom survey. Theseinstruments had a 5-point
System (LMS) such as Canvas. In step b), the utilization of open resourcesis encouraged including Solutions Manual, Internet search engines, and group problem solvingsessions, along with the availability in step c) of content tutoring within the EPC. Regardless ofonline or flipped delivery, the formative and summative assessment are conducted in-person asoverseen, in step d), supervised by test proctors in a secure computer-based testing facility. Instep e), referred to as score clarification, students are afforded a two-week interval to clarifytheir scores based on handwritten work via scanned-in scratch sheets, either with the contenttutors or faculty who may, in step f), refine assessment scores or adjust assessment results viadiscrimination
majors (engineering, mathematics, chemistry, biology, computerscience, political science and English). The responding students included incoming freshmen,sophomores, juniors and seniors.Two assessment instruments will be used to establish the intellectual development mental modelsof the students. The first one (B-D scale) is a 16-item scale developed by Bateman and Donald[36]. Their instrument is a questionnaire that measures the stages of development in four broadercategories (dualism, multiplicity, relativism, and commitment) with four items for each stage. Thesecond instrument is the Learning Environment Preference (LEP) Instrument developed by Moore[37] to measure the development positions 2-5 (Intellectual Development). Positions 6-9
. 213-224, Feb. 2008.[2] P. Kunz, U. Frischknecht – Tobler, B. Bollmann – Zuberbuehler, and S. Groesser, “Factors influencing the adoption of systems thinking in primary and secondary schools in Switzerland,” Systems Research and Behavioral Science, vol. 34, pp. 78-93. Jan. 2017.[3] H. Shaked, C. Schechter, “Definitions and development of systems thinking,” in Systems Thinking for School Leaders, Cham: Springer, 2017, pp 9-22.[4] R.D. Arnold and J.P. Wade, “A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 44, pp. 669-678, 2015.[5] J.W. Forrester, Industrial Dynamics. Portland: Productivity Press, 1961.[6] B. Richmond, “Systems thinking/system dynamics: let’s just get on with it,” System
)they are interested, and 5) they feel cared about by the instructor and/or other students” [13].Marzano, Pickering and Heflebowen [14] noted that a pedagogical environment that elicits positiveresponses to questions: “a) How do I feel? b) Am I interested? c) Is it important? and d) Can I dothis?” may indicate an engaged student. Such an environment leads to self-efficacy which has beendefined by Bandura [15] as "how well one can execute courses of action required to deal withprospective situations". Academic achievement and self-efficacy have been empirically shown tobe related [16]-[20]. Successful learning enhances an individual’s self-efficacy [21]-[23].The objective of this work is to assess an innovative active learning environment. In
Paper ID #25717Open-Ended Modeling Problems in a Sophomore-Level Aerospace Mechan-ics of Materials CoursesDr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson is a postdoctoral research fellow at the University of Michigan. He received his Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2014, after which he served as a postdoctoral research fellow at the Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. Aaron also obtained a master’s degree from MIT in 2010 and a bachelor’s degree from the University of Michigan in 2008, both in aerospace engineering.Dr. Jessica E
incorporation of the flight simulator activities. (a) Ratios and Proportion (b) Slope and Rate of Change (c) Kinetic and Potential Energy (d) Newton’s LawsDuring the one-week PD and the summer camp for the middle school students, only the Ratio andProportion, and Kinetic Energy and Potential Energy lesson modules were covered. Details of eachlesson modules are included in the project website (www.flyhightu.weebly.com).The content knowledge instrument for student participants of the summer camp consisted of 20questions (10 questions from math content and the other 10 questions from science content). Thequestions on the pretest and post-test instruments were not the same, though similar. The STEMattitudes assessment instrument - a
rather thanlearning a programming language. The project team had previously piloted the use of theseprogrammable quadcopters and robots during two half-day sessions at the local middle schools aspart of ‘UAS Road Shows’.(a) Ozobot (b) Ozoblockly (c) Mamba Drone (d)TynkerFigure 1: Hardware and Programming EnvironmentsProcedureThere were several presentations and hands-on activities during the 5-day camp. The participantswere given a presentation on physics of flight and on aircraft controls. This was followed by hands- © American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 2018 ASEE National Conferenceon practice on a large screen flight
is the test phase, wherestudents evaluate the structural integrity of their designs with a drop test from a height of sixstories.ResultsBefore the activity was introduced, students were asked to evaluate their perceptions of aerospaceengineering and gage their interest level. Students were asked some basic demographics questions(reported in Camp Background), if they plan to major in engineering, the problem they were most(a) Students interested in majoring in engineer-ing (b) Students interested in aerospace specifically Figure 1: Results of survey for students interested in engineering and aerospace engineering.interested in solving, and then to rank on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is not
provide an overview of the anatomy of satellites and facilitate theparticipants to seek answers to the following questions:1. What are the constituents of a PNMSat?2. What is the role of the following subsystems of a PNMSat? a. Command & Data Handling System b. Electrical Power System c. Telemetry, Telecommand and Communication d. Attitude Determination and Control e. Orbit Design, Control and Ground Tracking System f. Structural and Thermal System g. Payload System3. How do these subsystems integrate and form a PNMSat system?4. How do I make sure my PNMSat will achieve its goal in space?5. How do I launch my satellite if I put in the effort to build one?6. What do I do once the satellite is launched and executed its intended
Comparison. Figure 2. Math 108 Performance ComparisonFigure 3. Math 110 Performance Comparison Figure 4. Math 207 Performance ComparisonThe smallest difference between the traditional delivery and the flipped delivery was observed forMath 110. This could be because the students of the traditional delivery class were provided accessto some of the learning videos that were being developed for the planned flipped delivery of theclass. However, a large increase in the passing rate with A, B, and C letter grades (33% in atraditional Fall 2017, 44% in a flipped Fall 2018, and 57% in flipped Spring 2019) was observedin Math 107. And in Math 108 course even a larger increase in the passing rate (30% in a traditionalFall 2018, 60% in a flipped Fall
skills wasmeasured by the rubrics (see Appendix B) basedon Ref. [13-16]. Even though this research teamdoes not have empirical data, from anecdotal Figure 7 Students' resistanceaccounts and observations, student had improvedtheir writing skills. The rubric was developed bythe instructor and it was pilot tested with a group of students. For 2018 class, the project-basedlearning was not implemented. Figure 8 Writing and Communication skill5. ConclusionThis work was motivated by the need to improve the students’ learning experience in Flightdynamics and control class by implementing inductive learning and teaching. The outcomemeasurements were performed by
Paper ID #17795Mobile Aerospace Education Lab (m-AEL): A NASA Supported K-12 ”Roadshow-In-A-Box” Initiative to Advance Aviation/Aerospace Education in UnderservedCountiesDr. Kuldeep S. Rawat, Elizabeth City State University KULDEEP S. RAWAT is currently the Chair of Department of Technology and Director of Aviation Sci- ence program at Elizabeth City State University (ECSU).He has earned an M.S. in Computer Science, 2001, an M.S. in Computer Engineering, 2003; and, a Ph.D. in Computer Engineering, 2005, from the Center for Advanced Computer Studies (CACS) at University of Louisiana-Lafayette. He serves as the Site Director
to a differential equation (ODEs, PDEs, etc.). (b) Solution to an algebraic equation (c) Solution to a geometric equation4. Simulate and analyze the solution in real-time to obtain a static/dynamic graphical representation (graphs, plot, distribution, mechanical/electrical designs).5. Interpret the mathematical solution and simulation results in a real world.6. Prototype the solution and demonstrate functioning. For several years now, the author has offered courses in aerospace engineering and twoof them are core theory-based courses, which need to be taken by every student in the program.At large, the material presented in these courses is foundational and has very limited variations.To facilitate the students to review the
questions, three map to the environment. Gendered effects of performance in CS areinfluenced by the social environment, whereas programming experience in high school or undergraduateeducation beyond introductory CS is reflective of the opportunity that students have in their pre-collegeenvironment. We also take students’ grades in the linear algebra course to be reflective of theirenvironment, rather than their ability, because the programming assignment we study involved forming anAx = b matrix from a set of equations. Based on students’ difficulty with this concept in class, wehypothesized that having prior knowledge of linear algebra would be helpful on this programmingassignment. And therefore, students who had the opportunity to take advanced
baccalaureate program at Purdue University inAeronautical Engineering Technology. The program is part of the School of Aviation andTransportation Technology in the Polytechnic Institute located on the main campus in WestLafayette, Indiana. On the approved plans of study for students, this junior-level course isrequired for a bachelor’s degree program in aeronautical engineering technology. Twoprerequisite courses build the foundational knowledge that is used in this course. The firstprerequisite course is an introduction to reciprocating engines and the second is basic aircraftelectricity.The undergraduate course is currently mapped to two student outcomes for Criterion 3: (b) anability to apply a knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering, and
leadership which are being highlyvalued by every organization.At Aeronautical Engineering Technology within the School of Aviation and TransportationTechnology, my colleague and I are currently teaching three courses whose learning objectives arebriefly summarized as below: 1. AT 205 Statics for Aero Structures a. Construct free body diagram and identify forces on a body about a reference point b. Utilize geometry and trigonometry for evaluating forces acting on a body c. Analyze stresses and strains acting on systems and structures d. Distinguish between external and internal forces e. Demonstrate structural analysis on systems in equilibrium 2. AT 272 Introduction to Composite
: Classroom-based practicies. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1):87–101, January 2005.[14] Kenneth A. Bruffee. Collaborative Learning, Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.[15] Karl Rohnke and Steve Butler. Quicksilver. Project Adventure, Inc. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co., Dubuque, Iowa, 1st edition, 1995.[16] Brian M. Slator and Harold C. Chaput. Learning by learning roles: A virtual role-playing environment for tutoring. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pages 668–676, 1996.[17] B. M. Slator, J. Clark, P. McClean, B. Saini-Eidukat, and A. R. White. Research on role-based learning technologies. In Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning