parameter extraction from photo-plethysmographic signals, light/tissue interactionmodeling, and the use of photo-plethysmograms in applications such as biometric authentication.These new devices have been employed in (a) a Fall 2006 lecture/laboratory pair within abiomedical instrumentation course sequence taken by undergraduate and graduate students, (b)undergraduate honors research experiences, and (c) graduate signal processing research.I. IntroductionBlood oxygen saturation, often referred to as the sixth vital sign, can be obtained via a wellknown, empirically discovered technique referred to as pulse oximetry.1, 2 In recent decades,pulse oximeters have become a staple in clinical environments and are therefore an expectedelement of any
) Bioinformatics in the post-sequence era. Nat Genet 33 Suppl:305-10. 4. Our cultural commonwealth: The Report of the ACLS Commission on Cyberinfrastructure for the Humanities and Social Sciences, July 18, 2006 5. Buetow, K (2005) Cyberinfrastructure: empowering a “third way” in biomedical research. Science 308(5723): 821-824. 6. Greene, K. and S., Donovan. (2005) Ramping Up to the Biology Workbench: A Multi-Stage Approach to Bioinformatics Education. Bioscene 31(1): 3-11. 7. Rainey, D., Faulkner, S., Craddock, L., Cammer, S., Tretola, B., Sobral, B.W., and O., Crasta. 2007. A project-centric approach to cyberinfrastructure education. TeraGrid 2007. 8. He, Y., R. R. Vines, A. R. Wattam, G
Chair of the 2007 Bioengineering Quiz Bowl. She is also liasion of the UCSD Student Chapter of the Biomedical Engineering Society to the Bioengineering Undergraduate Studies Committee.Michele Temple, University of California-San Diego Michele M Temple, PhD, is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Bioengineering at UCSD. Her educational research interests include teaching evaluation, assessments, and course and curriculum improvement. Her teaching interests include physiology, tissue engineering, and introductory biomechanics.Edward Chuong, University of California-San Diego Edward B Chuong is currently a senior in the Bioengineering: Bioinformatics major of the Department of
gauges.Corresponding lectures focused on creating and reducing block diagrams and theconcepts of feedforward and feedback.Briefly, the lab protocol required the following steps:• Measure the pressure drop (∆P) between two points in the system (A and B) for a flow rate of 500mL/min• Constrict the tubing (using a variable clamp) between point A and B to increase ∆P.• Change something in the system (not the clamp) to return the original ∆P. Most students discover that decreasing the flow rate produces the desired reponse.• Explain in detail the algorithm they used to find the right flow rate.• How many adjustments did it take to get the right flow rate?• Repeat the above to create a plot of constriction level versus flow rate
the dataflow representation of the same. int func_add_multiply(a,b) { //program to add and multiple int c=0; c=a+b; c=c*25; return c; } (a) Textual Representation (b)Equivalent Dataflow Representation Figure 1. Comparison Between Textual and Dataflow ParadigmsSeveral key points are worth noting in the two representations. First, textual representation needsa lot of attention to syntax and variables. In the example in figure 1, the variable c needs to beproperly declared and identified (int c=0). Secondly, the textual approach uses a proceduralapproach with one function following the other with no apparent “flow” of data making itdifficult to comprehend the objective of a program, whereas the
to assess the effects of innovations: (1) relative effects; (2) differential gain;and (3) achievement in the innovation group that exceeds a pre-specified threshold forsuccess. Page 12.13.4 3 These three criteria are embedded in the basic experimental design and can be seen inFigure 1. Because of randomization to conditions, prior to the delivery of the innovation(pre-test), the average performance across groups is expected to be equivalent (see A inFigure 1). Moreover, the gain observed between pretest and post-test for the innovationgroup (GainTx = B-A in Figure 1) can be judged against what
Ultrasound and Image Processing: To gain anintroduction into BME imaging, the students perform B-mode ultrasound imaging with a singletransducer. The transducer moves along a motorized stage over a phantom, and the motor andthe transducer data (collected via an oscilloscope) are coordinated using LabVIEW.Additionally, transducers having different focal depths are used to collect data so that thestudents can learn the effect of focal depth on the final reconstructed image. This lab not onlyteaches the principles of ultrasound imaging, but also a simple control system in LabVIEW. Thestudents are given a non-functioning version of a LabVIEW interface, and they must add thecomponents necessary for the system to operate correctly. The data are then
: jmajdans@.edu Or Professor Hazelwood Page 12.7.12APPENDIX B: INFO SESSIONRe: Sports Medicine Research Launch!Hey Gang,Welcome back to Stevens! We hope you had a great holiday break and that you are ready for avery exciting and rewarding semester.Thanks for volunteering to be a subject in the "Biomed Shred" fitness project. Your participationputs you into the elite class of charter membership on the Sports Medicine Research Team. Moreimportantly, your help in this project should enable us to develop some very importantinformation that could potentially improve the health and welfare of hundreds of thousands ofpeople in the future. We sincerely
AC 2007-2611: A REAL INTRODUCTION TO ENGINEERING ANDBIOTECHNOLOGYRachael Schmedlen, University of MichiganMimi Adam, University of MichiganRobert Sulewski, University of MichiganMatthew O'Donnell, University of Washington Page 12.103.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 A Real Introduction to Engineering and BiotechnologyAbstractWe have developed a unique section of the required Freshman Introduction to Engineeringcourse for the College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor: Biotechnology andHuman Values. Our course is predicated on the assumptions that a meaningful introduction toBiomedical Engineering and biotechnology includes 1. solving
. Page 12.3.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007“What Works” in Engineering Education? A Meta-analysis of VaNTH/ERC Biomedical Engineering ModulesAbstract The Vanderbilt-Northwestern-Texas-Harvard/MIT Engineering Research Center(VaNTH/ERC) for Bioengineering Educational Technologies has undertaken a series ofstudies to examine the effects of instructional innovation on learning outcomes. In thispaper we summarize the nature, scope and results of these assessments. In the spirit ofidentifying evidence-based practices in education, we present estimates of the overall andconditional effects from 28 studies and sub-studies reported in 19 evaluation studies. Theresults suggest that VaNTH-sponsored innovations
AC 2007-1121: A FOUR-YEAR PROGRESSION OF OPEN-ENDED PROJECTS INAN UNDERGRADUATE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUMDaniel Cavanagh, Bucknell UniversityJoseph Tranquillo, Bucknell UniversityDonna Ebenstein, Bucknell University Page 12.40.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 A Four Year Progression of Open-Ended Projects in an Undergraduate Biomedical Engineering CurriculumAbstractOne of the important instructional goals of our Biomedical Engineering Program is to providestudents with the opportunity to develop strong, independent project skills in both the classroomand the laboratory. To accomplish this goal, the Program has developed a
AC 2007-1990: CARDIOVASCULAR ENGINEERING: CURRENT STATUS,FUTURE TRENDS, AND ITS EMERGENCE AS A DISCIPLINEMichael VanAuker, University of South Florida Dr. VanAuker is presently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of South Florida. His research focuses on cardiovascular engineering and targeted drug deliver.Joel Strom, University of South Florida Dr. Strom is a cardiologist who is presently a faculty member of the cardiovascular engineering group at the University of South Florida.William Lee, University of South Florida Dr. Lee is presently the Director of the University of South Florida Biomedical Engineering Program
information to different audiences in separate works or communicateinformation to a varied audience in one work. In BMEG 472, students were required toprepared four written works all centered around a particular topic in neuroscience. Thefirst three short works were targeted to a layperson, clinical scientists and engineerrespectively. These works included children’s books, science fictions stories, medicalpamphlets, and video tutorials. The fourth work was a reflective written statementcomparing and contrasting the approaches used to convey the same material to threedifferent audiences. In BMEG 401 weekly memos were addressed to fellow teammembers, the faculty advisor and external clinical mentors (Appendix B). For oralpresentations, the role of the
considerations given that: CA = concentration of trimeric receptors CB = concentration of dimeric receptors CC = concentration of monomeric receptors CL = concentration of the ligand CD = concentration of all receptor-bound ligands CD A - 3L D K eq ,1 ? C AC L3 CD B - 2L D K eq , 2 ? (2) C B C L2 CD
AC 2007-1674: IMPROVING INTERDISCIPLINARY CAPSTONE DESIGNPROJECTS WITH COOPERATIVE LEARNING IN THE MEDI-FRIDGEPROJECTDavid McStravick, Rice University DAVID MCSTRAVICK received his B. S. and Ph. D. degrees in mechanical engineering from Rice University. He worked in industry for many years in various engineering research positions. He joined Rice University in 1996 and is currently a Professor in the Practice of Mechanical Engineering in the MEMS Department. He teaches in the area of engineering design and his current research interests are in medical product design and in engineering education.Marcia O'Mallley, Rice University MARCIA O’MALLEY received the B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from
these projects, as well as Dr. Caren Sax for her assistance in designing the survey,A.J. de Ruyter for his efforts to help advise some of the student teams, and Michael Rondelli forhis guidance through the technology transfer process.Bibliography1. Marin, J. A., Armstrong Jr., J. E., and Kays, J. L., "Elements of an optimal capstone designexperience," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 19-22, 1999.2. Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P., Sorensen, C. D., Swan, B. R., and Anthony, D. K., "A survey ofcapstone engineering courses in North America," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 84, no. Page 12.1269.54, pp. 165-174, 1995.3
. Teaching Design Skills in the Freshman Engineering Curriculum, Proceedings of the 1996 Annual ASEE Conference, June 1996, Washington, DC.3. S. Chattopadhyay. Freshman Design Course at IPFW, Proceedings of the 2004 Annual ASEE Conference, June 2004, Salt Lake City, UT.4. R. E. Musiak, E. W. Haffner, S. Schreiner, A. K. Karplus, M. B. Vollaro, and R. A. Grabiec. Forging New Links: Integrating the Freshman Engineering Curriculum, Proceedings of the 2001 Annual ASEE Conference, June 2001, Albuquerque, NM.5. L. S. Baczkowski, J. D. Enderle, D. J. Krause, and J. L. Rawson. NDSU Undergraduate Design Projects for the Disabled, Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation, volume 26, pp. 95-99, 1990.6. S. M. Blanchard and R. P. Rohrbach
askfor input from the program faculty. A visual chart or “map” helps considerably in this processand may be completed initially for each course then for the entire curriculum. An example ispresented in Figure 3 for the course presented in Figure 1. The Program Outcomes a-k closelymatch the prescribed a-k in the ABET requirements with minor variations that make them more Page 12.1483.3specific to the Biomedical Engineering Program. It may be noted that this course only maps toProgram Outcomes a, b, c, f, and k. It is obvious that not every course will address or assessevery Program Outcome. The “Measured Score” column reflects the information
& FeasibilityDiscuss the feasibility of your design or research. What are the unknown factors? What maycause your design to fail? What are its strengths? What are its weaknesses? Are animal orhuman experiments required? Are governmental and university regulations involved? Budget?Maximum 2 pages.Assignment No. 6Final ReportPrepare a final report based on all you have written up to this point. Use the following format forthe cover page: a) At top: Final report on BENG1, Introduction to Bioenginering, Instructors’ names. b) At center: Title of your project. c) The names of all the authors in alphabetical order with corresponding signatures. d) At bottom: Date submitted.Beginning on page 2, writ Sections in the
additional information. At this stage of the project, this role was fairly easy since we’re really moving forward on our design. Everyone came to the meetings with a pretty clear idea of what we needed to do and the motivation to work on it making my job fairly easy. The only blotch on my record was failing to call when I was quite sick and couldn’t come to the meeting. Our attendance policy states that we need to notify the group, and I just forgot. I would grade myself a B- on my role as not quite a solid “good,” but more like a “not half bad.” Person 2: This portion of the semester I had the role of leader. I feel I did a good job for the most part. I am comfortable taking
Technology Education Teachers”. Journal ofTechnology Education, vol. 17(2), 2006.9. Danielson, S. “Knowledge Assessment in Statics: Concepts versus Skills”. In: Proceedings of the AnnualConference and Exposition of the American Society for Engineering Education, Session 1168, Salt Lake City, UT,June 2004.10. Streveler, R. A., B. M. Olds, R. L. Miller, and M. A. Nelson. “Using a Delphi study to identify the most difficultconcepts for students to master in thermal and transport science (conference paper)”. In: Proceedings of the AnnualConference and Exposition of the American Society for Engineering Education, Session 2430, Nashville, TN, June2003, pp. 1-8.11. Edgren, G. “Developing a competence-based core curriculum in biomedical laboratory science
/Educating-Engineering-Students-in- Page 12.407.7 Entrepreneurship.pdf3. Ochs, John B., Watkins, Todd A., Boothe, Berrisford W., Creating a Truly Multidisciplinary Entrepreneurial Educational Environment, Journal of Engineering Education, October 2001, pp578- 83.4. Lewin David I., Teaching Techies to Become Entrepreneurs, Computing In Science & Engineering, May/June 2000, pp6-9.5. Criteria For Accrediting Engineering Programs, Effective for Evaluations During the 2006-2007 Accreditation Cycle, Engineering Accreditation Commission, ABET, Inc., www.abet.org6. Nunally, P. O., Saad, S. M., “Technical and
AC 2007-2296: BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING PROJECTS: INTEGRATING THEUNDERGRADUATE INTO THE FACULTY LABORATORYDavid Barnett, Saint Louis UniversityRebecca Willits, Saint Louis University Page 12.313.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Biomedical Engineering Projects: Integrating the Undergraduate into the Faculty LaboratoryAbstractOpportunities for undergraduate students to become involved in faculty research and designprojects can vary widely by institution. We have developed a senior projects sequence thatenables students to complete a yearlong faculty sponsored project that immerses the student inthe laboratory. While a majority of
WSOE Curriculum Committee, 11/1/06. POs: Graduates of the program will attain: a. an ability to apply knowledge of advanced mathematics (including differential equations and statistics), science (including biology and physiology), and engineering to solve problems, especially those at the interface of engineering and biology; b. an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to make measurements on and to analyze and interpret data from living systems, addressing the problems associated with the interaction between living and non-living materials and systems; c. an ability to design a system, component, or processes to meet desired bioengineering needs within realistic
engineeringcurriculum at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. This sequence of courses provide a platformfor students to develop and improve their oral and written communication skills. After taking afreshman engineering design course, each student admitted to biomedical engineering in thesophomore year does a team design project each semester for six sequential semesters. Theteams work on progressively more challenging real-world projects submitted by clients fromaround the university and from industry. While advancing their technical and problem-solvingskills through successive projects, the students also learn interpersonal and publiccommunication skills through this experience.IntroductionBeginning in 1998, we started teaching a sequence of design courses
AC 2007-1425: DEMONSTRATING NEURAL FUNCTION THROUGH BOTHHANDS-ON AND COMPUTER-SIMULATED LABORATORY MODULESJennifer Kang Derwent, Illinois Institute of Technology Page 12.445.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Demonstrating Neural Function through Both Hands-on and Computer Simulated Laboratory ModulesAbstractThe Department of Biomedical Engineering (BME) at Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT)focuses on three areas of study: Cell and Tissue Engineering, Neural Engineering and MedicalImaging. Within the Neural Engineering curriculum, students take a core class called “BME 445Quantitative Neural Function”. The major objective of this class
AC 2007-861: MEDITEC: AN INDUSTRY/ACADEMIC PARTNERSHIP TOENABLE MULTIDISCIPLINARY, PROJECT-BASED LEARNING INBIOMEDICAL ENGINEERINGRobert Crockett, California Polytechnic State University Robert Crockett received his Ph.D. from University of Arizona in Materials Science and Engineering. He holds an M.B.A. from Pepperdine University and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of California, Berkeley. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. Dr. Crockett is a specialist in technology development and commercialization of advanced materials and manufacturing processes. Prior to joining Cal Poly, he was founder
AC 2007-998: FACULTY-FRIENDLY ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS FORBIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAMSSteven Schreiner, Western New England CollegeJudy Cezeaux, Western New England CollegeDiane Testa, Western New England College Page 12.731.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Faculty-Friendly Assessment System for Biomedical Engineering ProgramsAbstractMany engineering programs have limited resources to create and operate an assessment system.Paramount to the success of a system is the system’s ability to engage faculty without being anundue burden so that the faculty remains compliant and the system yields useful information.The assessment
AC 2007-160: CURRENT TOPICS IN REHABILITATION ENGINEERINGPaul King, Vanderbilt University Paul King is a long time member of the engineering faculty at Vanderbilt University. He has an appointment in both Biomedical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, with past joint appointments in Anesthesiology and Orthopedics and Rehabilitation. His primary area of endeavor is the teaching of design.Mark Richter, MaxMobility Mark Richter is the director of MAX mobility, an assistive technology R&D company, and an Adjunct Assistant Professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Vanderbilt University. Dr. Richter’s research interests include: wheelchair design, propulsion technique
AC 2007-482: SENIOR DESIGN PROJECT IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERINGEDUCATIONVladimir Genis, Drexel University Dr. Vladimir Genis, Associate Professor and Program Director of Applied Engineering Technology in the Goodwin College, Drexel University, taught and developed graduate and undergraduate courses in physics, electronics, biomedical engineering, and acoustics. His research interests include ultrasound wave propagation and scattering, ultrasound imaging, electronic instrumentation, piezoelectric transducers, and engineering education. He serves as a member of the Drexel’s Faculty Senate