1 − dσ1 / 3 − eσ τ = ]1.06η − 1.03(1 - η)_ 4 in g/cm3 3.1975 − aσ − bσ − cσ 1/ 3 where σ = 647.27 – T a = -0.3151548, b = -1.2003374 x 10-3, c = 7.48908 x 10-13 d = 0.1342463, e = -3.946263 x 10-3 Temperature (T) in KelvinsSpecific Volume 1 in m3/kg v? τSpecific Heat cP = 0.0571 + (3.7234)η + (1-1.02η)(.93)(a+bT+cT2+dT3+eT4) inkJ
Project Based Introduction, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2009. Page 14.370.93. Middendorf, W. and R. Engelemann. Design of Devices and Systems, 3rd ed.NewYork: Marcel Dekker, Inc.,1998.4. King, P. and R. Fries. Design of Biomedical Devices and Systems, 2nd ed. Boco Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2009.5. Karsnitz, J., S. O’Brien, and J. Hutchinson. Engineering Design An Introduction, 1st ed. New York: Delmar, 2009.6. Eggert, B. “Achieving Team Work in design Projects: Development and Results of a SpreadSheet Tool.” 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburg, PA, June 2008.7. Zoltowski, C., W. Oakes, B. Myers. “Multi
-class time to write a memo in whichthey must: 1) Compare how their solution compares to the: a. Objectives identified in Assignment 1 b. Functions identified in Assignment 2 c. Specifications identified in Assignment 3 2) Summarize project progress and team performance. Items to address are: a. Is the team on schedule? Why or why not? b. What are the main challenges in completing the project?In addition, a third point must be addressed by each individual on each team. 3) Reflect on your own individual role in the project.Assignment five is not accompanied by formal lectures, but rather is meant to induce individualand group meta-analysis of the design process. The aim is that by identifying
-health-care-is-digital-panelists- say.aspx4. http://www.intel.com/healthcare/5. http://www-03.ibm.com/industries/healthcare/us/index.html6. http://www.microsoft.com/industry/healthcare/default.mspx7. S. Patel, K. Lorincz, R. Hughes, N. Huggins, J. Growdon, M. Welsh, and P. Bonato, “Analysis of Feature Space for Monitoring Persons with Parkinson's Disease With Application to a Wireless Wearable Sensor System,” 29th IEEE EMBS Annual International Conference, August, 2007.8. O.A. Blanson Henkemans, K.E. Caine, W.A. Rogers, A.D. Fisk, M.A. Neerincx, and B. de Ruter, “Medical Monitoring for Independent Living: User-centered design of smart home technologies for older adults,” Proceedings of the Med-e-Tel
the grading has a large weight on weekly assignments and the final project,including reports. Finally, as we employ some active learning techniques, we give points forparticipation and team work by using an online collaboration tool called Ubiquitous Presenterfrom UCSD11.Module List1. Introduction. Basic outline of course. Relationship between human body functions, signals and communications. a. Course policies and outline b. Modern Biomedical environment. c. Chain Human --> Signals --> Sensors --> Acquisition --> Preprocessing --> Communications --> Storage and Processing. d. Principles of networking2. Systems 1: Principles of operating systems, installation and VMware. a. Allocation
distance learning courses. Traditional classroom interaction, the dialogue between teachers and students, is considered fundamental to the learning process and we were not surprised that our faculty and students hadFigure 1. Students A and B are “local concerned about DL interactions. Therefore the focus oflearners;” they are at the same physical this study was on reported interactions among students andlocation as the instructor. Students C andD are “distance learners;” they are not at between students and faculty in the distance learningthe same physical location as the environment.instructor
work was correctly done), and “learning” was anoverarching score that took into account the students’ ability to synthesize their knowledge andthe techniques they applied in the module to truly understand not only what they did, but why itwas important. All 9 students did well on these oral midterms and demonstrated solidunderstanding of the labs, techniques, and underlying concepts (grades ranging from B to A+).Final Written Examination: At the end of the semester, enrolled students took a three-hourwritten examination which not only covered all three modules, but also asked the students tointegrate modeling approaches from among the three scales to demonstrate their appreciation forthe challenges and possibilities associated with multi-scale
the case of Experimentation, solutions basedupon the concepts of "work it out", "estimate or guess" and "be prepared for serendipity"are used to as guidelines in brainstorming to develop an idea.The ProcessEffectively developing treatments for heart disease requires that directions for research bedefined and that they then be investigated. Toward the goal of defining research aims, asystematic approach that can be applied is the 8D Methodology. This methodologyconsists of finding ideas that meet defined solution patterns (dimensions). Eight maindimensions are broken up into sub-dimensions to facilitate in the categorization andgeneration of ideas. These sub-dimensions are fully listed in the left column of thesolutions in Part A and B of the
include movement biomechanics, rehabilitation, and engineering education.James Sweeney, Florida Gulf Coast University James D. Sweeney is Professor and Chair of the Department of Bioengineering at Florida Gulf Coast University. He received his Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in Biomedical Engineering from Case Western Reserve University in 1988 and 1983, respectively, and his Sc.B. Engineering degree (Biomedical Engineering) from Brown University in 1979. He is a Senior Member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and a Fellow of the American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering
effectively across disciplines1. The students work on a variety of interesting and challenging projects. Some examples of Page 14.1083.2the projects are:1. A combined thermistor, pressure, and CO2 device for use in the sleep laboratory: Develop adesign for a single device that can be used on infants and that can measure all three signals ofinterest which are a) temperature difference between inhaled and exhaled air, b) pressure sensorsthat show a flattening pressure profile during upper airway narrowing, and c) carbon dioxidesampling tubes to detect the exhaled CO2 waveform.2. Design for a self-contained, maneuverable, endoscopic, video camera
. Page 14.200.61. Introduction a. Syllabus and course outline b. Lab reports c. Lab notebooks2. Good Laboratory Practices a. Health and safety b. Recording data c. Data handling d. Analyzing data (including MATLAB)3. Cellular and Molecular Biotechnology a. Introduction to the Biological Lab i. Pipetting exercise ii. Sterile technique b. GFP Transformation into Bacteria (E. coli)4. Bioinstrumentation a. Data acquisition basics b. Measure and analyze EKG (Electrocardiography) signals5. Bioimaging a. Collection of biological images b. Techniques for image analysis c. Biomedical and clinical applications6. Biomaterials a. Use photopolymerizable monomers
.; Houghtalen, R.; Hanson, J., Engineering REU Sites: Designing for Appropriate and Valuable Summer Educational Experiences. In American Society for Engineering Education, 2005.2. Martin, C.; Bratton, B.; Dillard, D.; Ellis, M.; Bump, M., Incorporating a Learning Community Approach to Enhance a Fuel Cell Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU). In American Society for Engineering Education, 2008. Page 14.343.83. Hancock, M. P. a. R., Susan H., Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) in the Directorate for Engineering (ENG):2003-2006 Participant Survey 2008.4. Russell, S. H.; Hancock, M. P.; McCullough, J
bioengineering educationcommunity with a methodology for analyzing team effectiveness and accomplishments.6.0 AcknowledgementThis research is funded by NSF CBET-0602592 Collaborative Research: The BME-IDEACompetition, Assessing Innovative Design in Biomedical Engineering Education with additionalsupport for the BME-Idea competition provided by The Lemelson Foundation.References1. Novak, Joseph D. and Gowin, Dixie B. (1984). Learning How to Learn. United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press.2. Besterfield-Sacre, M., J. Gerchak, M. Lyons, L.J. Shuman, and H. Wolfe, “Scoring Concept Maps: Development of an Integrated Rubric for Assessing Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, 93(2), April 2004, pp. 105 – 116.3. Golish, B
AC 2009-1085: DESIGNING GLOBAL EXPERIENCES FOR ENGINEERINGSTUDENTSSonya Seif-Naraghi, University of California, San Diego Page 14.431.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Designing Global Experiences for Engineering StudentsAbstractParticipation in a foreign study program can teach students valuable skills outside theirtechnical skill set. It has been recognized in academia and industry alike that engineersrequire an ever-broadening skill set in order to function competitively. Considering theincreasingly globalized nature of the industry, an understanding of other cultures andstrong cross-cultural communication skills will prove invaluable. Understandably
, G., Liu, S. Q., Smith, H. D., & Hirsch, P. (2006). Educational Modules in Tissue Engineering Based on the “How People Learn” Framework. BEE-j , 7.4. Birol, G., McKenna, A. F., Smith, H. D., Giorgio, T. D., & Brophy, S. P. (2002). Integration of the "How People Learn" Framework into Educational Module Development and Implementation in Biotechnology. Second Joint EMBS/BMES Conference (pp. 2640-2641). Houston: IEEE.5. Barr, R, Pandy, M, Petrosino, A, Austin, B and Goldberg, E. (2004). Classroom Testing of VaNTH Biomechanics Learning Modules. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Session 1109: 20 pages (2004).6. Greenberg, J.E., Smith, N.T. and Newman, J.H. Instructional Module
AC 2009-1366: CONSIDERING THE MATHEMATICAL APPROACH ANDCOURSE-CONTENT STRUCTURE WHEN TEACHING PHYSIOLOGY TOBIOMEDICAL ENGINEERSRegina Nelson, University of Wisconsin, Madison Regina Nelson is a doctoral student in Biomedical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She received an M.Ed. in Special Education from the University of Pittsburgh and an M.S. in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Her research focuses on teaching methods and assessment of learning outcomes related to the physiology sub-curriculum in biomedical engineering education.Naomi Chesler, University of Wisconsin, Madison Naomi Chesler is an Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering at
programs are struggling to keep their curriculum current and meet thechanging needs of today’s technically based society. Every engineering program needs toproduce technically savvy engineers prepared for the workforce (or graduate school) whileteaching them professional skills such as teamwork, leadership, and communication. BecauseBiomedical Engineering (BME) programs must include the ability “to solve the problems at theinterface of engineering and biology” and “the ability to make measurements on and interpretdata from living systems” [1] BME programs often have more difficulties including the requisiteengineering topics necessary to meet ABET criteria. A good biomedical engineer must have atleast a basic understanding of mechanical
AC 2009-504: INTRODUCING BIONANOTECHNOLOGY INTOUNDERGRADUATE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERINGAura Gimm, Duke University J. Aura Gimm is Assistant Professor of the Practice and Associated Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Duke University. She teaches courses in biomaterials, thermodynamics/kinetics, engineering design, and a new course in bionanotechnology. Dr. Gimm received her S.B. in Chemical Engineering and Biology from MIT, and her Ph.D. in Bioengineering from UC-Berkeley. Page 14.802.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Introducing