) AnnualConference Proceedings, 10-13 June, 2012, San Antonio, TX, USA.9 Chronicle Staff. (2015). “Benefits of study abroad are not universal, paper says,” The Chronicle of HigherEducation. January.10 Nussbaum, M. (2004). “Liberal education and global community.” Liberal Education, 90(4), 42-48.11 Hovland, K. (2006). “Shared futures: Global learning and liberal education.” Diversity Digest, 8(3), Association ofAmerican Colleges and Universities, Washington D.C., pp. 1, 16-17.12 Marcus, R.R., Hayter, D., Koivula, M., and Garcia, A. (2013). Global Learning Inventory 2012-2013. CaliforniaState University, Long Beach.13 Olson, C., Green, M., and Hill, B. (2006). A handbook for advancing comprehensive internationalization: Whatinstitutions can do and what
seven 100 pointproblems to get back to a B average. Using the 4 point scale, a zero on the first problem can beredeemed to a B by only three additional problems with perfect scores; a condition which stillrequired effort but is more achievable.Evaluation by the PrinciplesThe basic principle of the flipped classroom is that instruction is moved out of class and practiceand assessment are moved into class. This is clearly achieved in both courses where half of thelessons in Statics and almost all lessons in Solid Mechanics are ‘flipped’. The learningenvironment remains structured through the course notebook and in in class practice problemswhich are designed to build the student’s understanding of each topic. Student engagement isfurther
the fieldis better served by refining the original research question and conducting two reviews, each ofwhich can be synthesized in a self-contained article. The single initial research question wasrevised into the following three questions3: 1. What instructional practices have transportation engineering educators employed to improve student learning at the undergraduate and graduate levels? 2. What techniques have been used to measure student learning in transportation engineering education? 3. How have transportation engineering curricula changed over time? a. Where does transportation engineering fit within engineering programs? b. How does transportation engineering fit within
.References1. National Academy of Engineering. (2011). "Grand Challenges for Engineering." Retrieved January 9, 2012, 2011, from http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/cms/8996.aspx.2. Lavelle, J. P. and L. J. Bottomley (2011). NAE Grand Challenges and Academic Culture in Engineering Education at NC State. American Society for Engineering Education Southeast Section, 2011.3. Allen, D., C. Murphy, B. Allenby and C. Davidson (2006). "Sustainable engineering: a model for engineering education in the twenty-first century?" Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 8(2): 70-71.4. National Academy of Sciences (2008). Changing the Conversation, Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering
AC 2007-1894: A SURVEY OF FACULTY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES IN CIVILENGINEERINGWilfrid Nixon, University of Iowa Wilfrid Nixon is a Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Iowa and a research engineer at IIHR - Hydroscience and Engineering. Dr. Nixon, a Professional Engineer in the State of Iowa, received a B. A. in Engineering from Cambridge University, England in 1981, and a Ph. D. in Engineering from Cambridge University in 1985. Page 12.138.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 A Survey of Faculty Development Activities in Civil EngineeringAbstractRecent
consolidated all project-based communications into an easily accessible and dedicated archive. In addition,students were required to log all team communications, specifically those that did notinvolve email. Furthermore, a Facebook page was established for the class in an attemptto enhance group interactions. The Facebook page was used for posting the localgeotechnical photographs of the second icebreaker activity.Assessment of project activities has been conducted using a) peer evaluation of studentwork, b) the Felder-Silverman Learning Styles Index,4 c) student surveys, d) focus groupvideo conferences between students and an external assessment consultant, and e) gradedanalysis of student work products.Assessment of ActivitiesStudent PerformanceThe
, only minor logistical modifications were made from the CIT-Ematerials.5.2.2 Infrastructure-Themed Group ProjectsThe learning outcomes of the project included that the students would be able to: (a) describe civilengineering practice and a typical project, (b) define the typical engineering project structure, (c)discuss how societal needs are incorporated into a project, (d) describe the need for and howinnovation manifests itself, and (e) describe what makes a civil engineering project successful (ornot). Note the overlap with holistic definition of the civil infrastructure perspective provided byNSF CIS, the inherent connection to ASCE’s BOK. The student groups of 3 to 6 students Page 6 of 16
earned by each design team andoverall are shaded differently for scores below and above 70% and above 80%.This allows a quick determination of areas where students do not achieve an acceptablestandard on an outcome, and areas where students are excelling in achieving outcomes.Note, the format changed in Table 4 from 2007-2008 to 2008-2009 because of theprogram’s assessment of the assessment process and how the data should be displayed. Page 15.213.12 11Table 4 Assessment matrix: (a) 2007-2008; (b) 2008-2009(a) BS NU
Paper ID #25200Monitoring and Controlling a Construction Project in the ClassroomCol. Brad Wambeke P.E., United States Military Academy Colonel Brad Wambeke is the Civil Engineering Division Director at the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, NY. He received his B.S. from South Dakota State University; M.S. from the University of Min- nesota; and Ph.D. from North Carolina State University. He is a member of ASEE and is a registered Professional Engineer in Missouri. His primary research interests include construction engineering, lean construction, and engineering education.Major Todd Mainwaring, United States Military
]. Accredited programs must have documented student outcomes that preparegraduates to attain the program educational objectives. The student outcomes are outcomes (a)through (k) plus any additional outcomes that may be articulated by the program. Table 4: Mapping ABET outcomes with 21st-century skills 21st Century ABET Outcomes Skills for Success (a) an ability to apply knowledge of 2. Numeracy mathematics, science, and engineering 3. Scientific Literacy (b) an ability to design and conduct 7. Critical Thinking/Problem Solving
engineeringstudents based on fundamental-principles. Advances in Engineering Education. 3 [1], p 9-44. Page 23.281.11[5] Bransford JD, Schwartz DL. Rethinking transfer: a simple proposal with multiple implications. Rev Res Educ.1999; 24:61–100.[6] Barry, B. E., Brophy, S. P., Oakes, W. C., Banks, K. M., & Sharvelle, S. E. (2008). Developing professionalcompetencies through challenge to project experiences. International Journal of Engineering Education, 24(6),1148-1162[7] Schwartz, D. L., Brophy, S., Lin, X., & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Software for managing complex learning:Examples from an educational psychology course. Educational
Paper ID #7406A Structural Engineering Master’s Program – the Trials and TribulationsDr. Cole C McDaniel, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Cole McDaniel is an associate professor in the Architectural Engineering Department at the California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo.Dr. Allen C Estes, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Allen C. Estes is a professor in and head of the Architectural Engineering Department at Califor- nia Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo. Until January 2007, Dr. Estes was the director of the Civil Engineering Program at the United States Military Academy
, 192 of 469 programs were cited as havingCriterion 2 weaknesses. After the due process period, the number was reduced to 92, but Page 15.203.2Criterion 2 shortcomings were still more common than shortcomings in any of the other eightEAC-ABET criterion. This has been a trend for several years.In a published report card on the status of institutional and program assessment, the developmentof PEOs was given a grade of B+, but assessment of PEOs was given a grade of D.3 Clearly,institutions are doing a better job of defining their PEOs than they are assessing them. The EAC-ABET Criterion 2 includes requirements for developing PEOs and an assessment
AC 2012-5031: A FINANCIAL STUDY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING PRO-FESSION AND PARAPROFESSIONSKing To Hung, Brigham Young University King To Hung obtained a B.E.S. in civil engineering from Brigham Young University in 2009 and is currently a M.S. student in Civil Engineering at Brigham Young University. He has served as a Team Captain in a steel bridge competition and is interested in engineering management.Dr. Fernando Fonseca, Brigham Young University Page 25.43.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The authors appreciate the reviewers’ comments and suggestions; each was seriously
PBLimproves student experience and outcomes in a hybrid or virtual environment resulting fromCOVID, it does not assess actual student performance. Further research can still be done toassess student performance in the hybrid or virtual environment that has resulted from theCOVID pandemic, particularly comparing performance of students in traditional-style onlinecourses and PBL-oriented courses using exam or course grades.References[1] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2020 – 2021.” ABET. Accessed February 1, 2021. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2020-2021/.[2] S. Deep, B. M. Salleh, and H. Othman. “Improving the Soft Skills of Engineering
] Borrego, M., Foster, M.J. and Froyd, J.E. 2014. Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing interdisciplinary fields. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), pp.45-76.[16] Penzenstadler, B., Bauer, V., Calero, C. and Franch, X. 2012. Sustainability in software engineering: A systematic literature review. In 16th International Conference on Evaluation & Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2012), pp. 32-41.[17] Barrella, E., Watson, M. K., Cowan, C. 2017. Expert Evaluation of a Sustainable Design Rubric. Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Zone II Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
when thestudent, under stress, was asked to complete a similar problem in an exam environment.A typical process of assigning homework is shown in Figure 1a. The steps are straight-forward;the instructor assigns a set of homework problems and the student is given a set amount of timeto complete these problems before submitting to the instructor to grade. The instructor reviewsthe homework set and then returns to the student with a score based on the correctness of thesolutions provided.Figure 1: a) homework grading process (typical); b) homework self-grading process (by student)By comparison, the implementation of student self-grading (see Figure 1b) for this studyrequired several additional steps. The rationale for these steps will be
," Concrete Products, pp. 28-31, 3 December 2013.[17] B. M. Shahrooz, R. A. Miller, K. A. Harries and H. G. Russell, "NCHRP Report 679 : Design of Concrete Structures Using High-Strength Steel Reinforcement," National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2011.[18] Y. F. Houst, R. J. Flatt, P. Bowen, H. Hofmann, J. Widmer, U. Sulser, U. Maeder and T. A. Bürge, "Influence of superplasticizer adsorption on the rheology of cement paste," in The Role of Chemical Admixtures in High Performance Concrete, Monterrey, Mexico, 1999.[19] Z. Wu, W. Choi, A. Mirmiran, S. Rizkalla and P. Zai, "Flexural Behavior and Design of High-Strength Concrete Members," in Seventh International Symposium on the Utilization of High Strength/High- Performance
a class that I had at the academy. The expectations of this course were unreasonable. It is my feeling that the capstone course is not designed to emphasize learning a new (software) program, that is as difficult as Microstation, and be able to produce a quality product.” “The instructors need to know the software packages much better before trying to teach them.” “Why do I have a D in this course when I spend more time on it than any other course I am taking at the moment? I spent 25 hours on the 65% IPR only to get a B- and the fact that I have to take a TEE now because I didn’t learn a CADD program that didn’t work all semester and didn’t apply to my job as project manager is complete BS. This class is ridiculous. I
to handle engineering-type data more proficiently.iv) Reshuffling design topics in prerequisites - In the process of designing various structuralmembers for buildings, the teaching staff have noted two discrepancies in design prerequisites: a)the subjects need to be realigned i.e., to have the topics properly sequenced; and, b) the need tointroduce the students to local/regional design practices, making use of local codes. A strongargument has emerged with regard to the timing of the capstone experience. Many have arguedthat capstone courses occur much too late in an engineering student education.v) The infusion of design concepts in a first-year introductory course - A first year engineeringcourse titled “Introduction to Engineering
thecurriculum as a whole and for individual courses (including its place in the ABET continuousimprovement criterion), the specific lessons learned after the first 3 years of implementation, thechanges to be made for the next 3 year cycle, and conclusions on how these experiences may betransferred to other programs. A mixed-methods approach is used to evaluate this first cycle ofimplementation and assessment, include comparing expected vs. actual/measured: (a) coursesevaluated in a given semester; (b) student artifacts; and (c) program learning outcomes.Introduction and BackgroundDuring the period 2013-14 and 2014-15 academic years, Texas A&M University’s civilengineering department undertook a curriculum transformation project base its program
. Page 22.651.2The students complete reading assignments and respond to the pre-class assignment the eveningbefore class via the web. A few hours before the class, the instructor is able review the studentsresponses, determine level of understanding of the particular learning objectives for theupcoming lesson, and adjust the classroom activities to respond to the students’ current state ofunderstanding. Student responses are easily incorporated into active learning components of theclass. JiTT can complement and enhance interactive classroom learning strategies and providesfeedback and support to both weak and strong students1. Figure a) below shows a footing carrying a structural load, F. Figure b) below shows an embankment covering a large
: An Overview, Theory Into Practice, 41:4, 212-218,4) Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S., & Masia, B.B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook II: The affective domain. New York: David McKay.5) Fink, L.D. (2013). Creating significant learning experiences: an integrated approach to designing college courses. 2nd Edition. Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.6) Randolph, G. B. “Collaborative Learning in the Classroom: A Writing Across the Curriculum Approach.” Journal of Engineering Education. ASEE. Vol. 89, No. 2. April 2000. pp. 119-122.7) Felder, R. M. and Silverman, L. K. “Learning and Teaching Styles In Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering
AC 2012-3497: INTERDISCIPLINARY CAPSTONE DESIGN: ARCHITECTS,STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGERSMr. James B Guthrie P.E., California Polytechnic State University Jim Guthrie is an Assistant Professor for the Architectural Engineering Department at California Poly- technic State University at San Luis Obispo. Professor Guthrie came to Cal Poly with over 30 years of structural engineering experience and is a registered Professional and Structural Engineer in the state of California. Jim Guthrie received a B.S. degree in Structural Engineering from the University of Califor- nia at Davis in 1972 and an M.S. degree in Structural Engineering from the University of California at Berkeley in 1973.Dr. Allen
Paper ID #22126Revising the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (BOK): The Applicationof the Cognitive Domain of Bloom’s TaxonomyDr. Decker B. Hains, Western Michigan University Dr. Decker B. Hains is a Master Faculty Specialist in the Department of Civil and Construction Engi- neering at Western Michigan University. He is a retired US Army Officer serving 22 years on active duty with the US Army Corps of Engineers and taught at the United States Military Academy at West Point (USMA). He earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from USMA in 1994, Master of Science degrees from the University of Alaska
with the eastern time zone (e.g., Canvas Time (ET)and Canvas Date (ET)) to ensure the analytic data matched the course's activity timestamps. Dueto Canvas collecting each student interaction using a combination of facts and dimensions, everyinteraction required various filters in an Excel pivot table to match student actions on Canvas. Todetermine the proper filters, the researchers compared the analytic data to the Canvas courseinformation. For example, we ensured the time and date of the discussion entries for a student onthe analytics matched the course's time and date. Figure A2 in Appendix B goes through thesteps of developing the correct pivot table filters when determining the number of discussionentries and replies by the hour. As
Board (TRB) and other engineering journals and conferences across the United States.Ayodeji B. Wemida Ayodeji Wemida is a Master’s student at Morgan State University. He received his Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering with a focus on cybersecurity in 2018. As part of his commitment to learning and excellence, he has served as a tutor both on and off Morgan State’s campus and has also led class sessions as a Teaching Assistant in the school of engineering. He is currently working towards completing his Masters of Engineering degree while developing his analog and digital design skills.Dr. Steve Efe, Morgan State University Dr. Steve Efe is an Assistant Professor and the Assistant Director of the Center for
) Leadership Award in 2010. At the University of Alabama, Fridley has led efforts to establish several new programs including new undergraduate degree programs in construction engineering, architectural engineering and environmental engineering, a departmental Scholars program allowing highly qualified students an accelerated program to earn their MSCE in addition to their BS degree, the interdisciplinary ”Cube” promoting innovation in engineering, and the cross-disciplinary MSCE/MBA and MSCE/JD dual-degree programs.Dr. Decker B. Hains, Western Michigan University Dr. Decker B. Hains is a Master Faculty Specialist in the Department of Civil and Construction Engi- neering at Western Michigan University. He is a retired US
://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2018/09/why-is-college-so- expensive-in-america/569884/. [Accessed 9 January 2019].[5] K. Hopkins, "New Three-Year Degree Programs Trim College Costs," 29 February 2012. [Online]. Available: www.usnews.com/education. [Accessed 22 November 2018].[6] A. R. Kukreti, T. C. Keener, P. L. Bishop and S. T. Kowel, "The Accelerated Engineering Degrees (ACCEND) Program in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Cincinnati," in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2003.[7] K. R. Leitch and E. B. Butler, "Creating a New Civil Engineering Program in the 21st Century," in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2015.[8] N. M. Safai and L. Reaveley, "Universal Model - A Partnership for
years, otherspecial cases included two students who had transferred from other four yearinstitutions and one student who transferred from an institution outside the UnitedStates. All grades earned, irrespective of their institution where they were earned,were treated equally. Letter grades were converted to a grade point average(GPA) as follows: A = 4; A- = 3.7; B+ = 3.3; B = 3.0; B- = 2.7; C+ = 2.3; C = 2.0;C- = 1.7; D+ = 1.3; D = 1.0; D- = 0.7.Overall Performance in the Comprehensive ExaminationA summary of overall student performance in the comprehensive examination inthe past four years and in the various mechanics based courses are presented inTable 2. The results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. It is worthrestating that